I am looking for a tool that would allow me to:
Define code templates with replaceable strings. Example - <NAMESPACE> would be replaceable:
jclass pJNIActivityClass = pJNIEnv->FindClass("<NAMESPACE>");
Automate code snippet insertion based on a regex. Example - new code would be inserted at //##:
public void onCreate ( Bundle savedInstanceState ){
super.onCreate ( savedInstanceState ) ;
//##
The existing tools I've found are language specific. I don't really need the tool to understand a specific language, although it would make life easier if it could parse XML.
For some background. I'm working in an environment where a closed-source application exports an eclipse or visual studio project (android or windows). This exported code is always identical with exception to the project namespace.
The idea here is to be able to run a tool on these stock exported projects to automate the implementation of common extra functionality.
For a FOSS solution you should take a look at Acceleo from the Eclipse Foundation. It uses languages like UML as input and allows you to generate output for any text based language. It may be a bit heavy in terms of size and features and it requires an installation of Eclipse but it's very good at code generation. It also handles large and complex template source very well and provides the type of functionality you expect to have in an IDE. I have only used older versions but my experience with it was good.
If you are unable to find a FOSS solution and a commercial solution is acceptable I recommend EntiPro. It has been a while since I used it but my experience with it was very positive. It's powerful and flexible and seems to meet the requirements you outlined in your question. It's also inexpensive at $40 for a single seat developer license.
In the event that you are unable to find a FOSS solution or don't want to drop the $40 on EntiPro you may be left to implementing a solution yourself. If that turns out to be the case I highly recommend using the String Template Engine by Terrance Parr.
Telosys is an Open Source code generator that you should try : http://www.telosys.org/
It uses a template engine based on Velocity, so it suits well for the requirement "code templates with replaceable strings"
Related
Are there any advancements in this area? I want to be able to write purely functional code on Android in Haskell or similar languages. I've tried some examples with Scala but it seems to be a pain to get started. Are there any other functional JVM languages which I can use to write Android applications?
Edit: functional languages that write native android applications. My mistake about the JVM.
I doubt that you can find anything mature for writing Haskell-like code for Android. You do need to implement Java abstractions which are required by Android API (implement activity, etc.).
But if you really want to write for Android in a purely functional style you can try to implement your business logic in a pure functional language that compiles to JVM and call it from your Java classes. That approach would be much simpler than trying to implement it entirely in pure functional style.
As your language choice, you can try
Frege, it even has a library for android - froid
Eta lang, it is very new and probably nobody has tried to use it for Android yet
I you want a painless solution in terms of Gradle builds etc., you have only two options: Java and Kotlin, of which of course you should choose Kotlin ;)
Kotlin has most of the things you need to write in functional style:
functions as first class citizen
higher-order functions
immutable collections
var and val like in Scala
if-else as a statement
elements of pattern matching (where statement)
tail recursion
and more...
If you also include funKTionale and kotlinx.collections.immutable, you'll have all the functional goodies like: Option, Try, currying, memoization, persistent data structures and so on...
To start with Kotlin just install the latest Android Studio 3 Preview, which already has built-in Kotlin support.
BTW, don't be so polarized into "pure" functional ;) After all, being 100% "pure" means no side-effects, which means your app can't interact with the user ;)
Hope this helps :)
I've never tried it personally, but you can do F# programming using Xamarin.Android (and, I believe, with Xamarin Forms too). You can see the guide here. (It also includes sample code).
As some background, F# is the .NET Framework's functional language. It is derived from ML; in fact, many ML scripts can be compiled almost "directly" as F# (with the caveat that you may have to do some renaming because F# has some additional keywords that ML doesn't have in order to support several .NET-specific extensions).
Xamarin allows for native development for Android, iOS, and Windows phone. Xamarin Forms allows for a single code-base for all three platforms (it's a competitor to Ionic).
One more quick point: Android does not use the JVM, even if you're writing apps in Java. (In fact, Android does not even support all Java 8 features yet). Through Android 4.4 it used Dalvik; after that, it started using Android Runtime.
You could also try using a JVM language like Scala to create a JAR file and create a bindings library for it.
Please also note that you'll end up using at least somewhat of a mixed paradigm - for example, things like Activities are objects, and the XML files used to define an Android screen is, for all practical purposes, declarative. Edit: This last point is slightly debatable - see the comments.
One final possibility: I haven't checked this out too closely, but try also this link for a site claiming you can do Scala in Android.
Between Pure functional and Java, there is a way which is IMO Pragmatic functional. For instance Redux achieves that in the React arena.
My goal is to write an app (Activity) having an immutable state that advanced as a result of interactions is functional.
In the browser you can see that done with elm (Haskel like language which is also web platform)
Since we want an Android app, I opened the Android Studio used the wizard to create and app with Navigaton Drawer Action bar (with Drawer, FloatingActionBar),
Then converted it to use Elm concepts of immutable model functional approach into a working POC based on a small ElmBase class and idioms.
The code is written in Kotlin (JetBrains tool of choice for the JVM).
You can find the app at my GitHub https://github.com/saffih/ElmDroid The sweet spot of that approach is that it leverages Kotlin being strongly typed and the editor does code completions very well,
making lot's of the code completed for me in a way I have never seen before - amazing experience (But it require using idioms like the sealed class and when properly).
I'm writing a Android app for encrypting texts, and I wonder if I can use a extension language to write additional algorithms outside the app instead of writing them inside the app and recompile the source. After doing some researches, Lisp seems to be a good language to use, and I've come up with a few choices:
Write my own lisp. This seems to be viable, but I always have trouble with writing a new program, and debugging is very time-consuming. It won't be my first choice.
Use lisp written by others. I've been searching Java-lisp repos on Github, and I found some small projects that may be useful, but lack some important features I want to include. I can add more to others' projects and use, but because of the reason above, this is not a good choice either.
Use Clojure. This seems to be a good choice, because Clojure is a well maintained and supported language. The only problem left is how to integrate it into my app.
Number 3 is my preferred choice now, but I want to ask you to help me choose. Other solutions are also welcome. Thanks!
Does anyone have experience with NativeScript and can compare it to developing native apps, especially for Android?
I have read all these articles:
FIRST THOUGHTS ON NATIVESCRIPT
SECOND THOUGHTS ON NATIVESCRIPT
Introduction to Native Script – Is It Worth Your Time?
My Experience Developing with Telerik NativeScript
I know especially three of them may be outdated. But I want to ask all of you developers:
How is your experience with NativeScript?
Are there any Android-Components you cannot use? Which are these ones?
Is styling really so limited?
Do apps really look so different at runtime as in the mockup as in the pictures of the first article referenced above?
Does loading of native Android objects into JavaScript Code always work correctly?
Does NativeScript generate Java-Code for Android-Platform out of the NativeScript code I write?
Is it possible to modifiy this code if I want to use some native-only features? What if I want to make UI changes then? Do I have to regenerate the code and do I miss my native extensions then?
Very glad to see that you are evaluating NativeScript to eventually use it in present and future projects.
I'll try to condense answers to a few of the questions into one, as they really are mostly related.
Skipped.*
That depends on what has already been exposed through a custom view/plugin or module. The core-modules that every NativeScript app comes with contains the most basic of wrappers for both Android and iOS under a common API. There are plugins (nativescript npm modules) that provide additional wrappers on native android views (nativescript-telerik-ui for one, nativescript-carousel), most of which are created by the NS community.
As RexSplode mentioned before me - it's mostly the platform that imposes certain limitations. NS uses CSS to declare style, but you can also access the native components and manage their style and appearance programatically if what you need isn't readily available out of the box.
First I'd like to note that the first 3 articles you've linked are over a year old now, and trust me, NativeScript has evolved a lot since then. With all the available components (remember the npm modules I mentioned earlier?) there's a good chance that you will get a close to 1:1 similarity to a well-styled native Android mockup.
At build time metadata is generated for the Android/Java public API used in the project. When the JavaScript Engine (V8) fires up, that metadata is loaded into memory, prototype chains are constructed, and callbacks are attached, so that when you call new android.widget.Button(); in your JavaScript code, the proper virtual machine instructions will be called, and a native button will be created. Static methods are accessed similarly, check out the official docs to get a better understanding of how it all works.https://docs.nativescript.org/runtimes/android/advanced-topics/execution-flow
and 7., and a cont. of 2. Java code, or rather compiled Java code is generated whenever you wish to extend a native Android class that isn't available already in a module or in the native Framework. Extending classes is very similar to how you would do it in Java - you extend a class, and create new implementations of interfaces. That means that you won't have to open Android Studio to create a new class, build it into a native plugin and then add it to your project, since you can do it all in your NativeScript code using JavaScript/TypeScript. https://docs.nativescript.org/runtimes/android/generator/extend-class-interface
Disclaimer: I am on the NativeScript Engineering team
I investigated the Native Script a little and my colleague at work writes an app with it, so I can offer you a bit of information that I have.
1. skipped
There are limited amount of components you can use with native script out of the box. However, if you have a native-java developer who can write a wrapper for you - you can use everything.
It is limited to the platform you are using. Android itself has a lot of style limitations which cannot be easily overwhelmed.
don't know
It works a little different. Your JS object, or rather widgets are translated to java code. So with the items from the box - yes, they are okey. If you write a wrapper for your custom component, then all is up to you.
Yes it does.
No, the code is generated, how are you going to modify it? Changes will be undone on the next build. However, you can write a native module for your application and use any features you want. It is like defining an interface, which you can use in JS code afterwards.
I am currently working on an android application that evaluate images in different aspects, and I found that there are lots great open source algorithms can be used.
Problem 1: Most of the algorithms are designed on c/c++/matlab languages that cannot be applied directly.
I've search that NDK is a tool that allows us develop android application by other languages, but the setup procedures are quite complicated that I stuck for days. So before I go further on it, I would like to first ask whether I can include other's c/c++ source code directly like calling java library?
Problem 2: For example, I would like to use Point Matching algorithm's source code in my application, but there are lots files inside as it's just source code but not library/plugin. What are the steps to apply the require functions in my android application?
(the most desired way is to blindly input some images to the alogrithm, and it returns the results like calling functions, which I dont have to understand the working principle of it.)
You can't directly use other C++ libraries, you have to build them for Android first using NDK. If there is a version of the library built for Android, then, of course you can use it directly by linking to it using NDK.
You have two options here. First, you create a regular Java application for Android, write a C++ wrapper for handling calls to native side and build the necessary source files using NDK. Your java application will make calls to wrapper using JNI and the wrapper will call your actual C++ functions as in Java->JNI wrapper on C++->Your actual C++ source.
Second option is going fully native, which will leave out Java, JNI calls and the wrapper. You can access your source files directly as if you were writing a desktop C++ application. In the end you will have to build using NDK but this step is required in any case.
As a suggestion, you can also take a look at OpenCV for image processing purposes. It has libraries built for Android, all you will have to do is to link them.
Short version.
Download opencv4android library. Import it in eclipse and see if everything is fine (compile errors, output, etc.).
Secondly, try to import face detection application and try to understand how it works.
It has a java part and a native part.
In order to understand how it works you must understand how java interacts with C++, more or less how NDK works.
One important aspect is to learn how to create your interfaces in C++, based on the native ones defined in java. When you got there then you can try creating your own application.
After that you can come here and ask specific questions.
I've been searching solutions for my enterprise apps, at least 3 platforms need to be supported, which are iOS, Android and Window Phone. After a whole day's search, I finally set my eyes on 2 promising cross platform solutions, one is monocross and the other phonegap.
monocross seems to use c# and .net at all, is it possible to access native libraries and languages? I read somewhere it's compiled directly into binaries that can execute on target platforms.
And about phonegap, it uses webviews on each platform to provide the capabilities of presenting user interfaces to final users. As it's implemented via interpreted language and high level apis, the performance may not meet our needs.
Finally, we(my team) decide to give it a try with mono, the architecture is illustrated as bellow:
+++++++++++++++++++++representation layer++++++++++++++++++++++++++
[monotouch,monodroid,silverlight]or [native gui calls] or [html5/js/css]
+++++++++++++representation controller/business logic layer+++++++++++++++
[ mono/c# ]
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++server side+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
[ the cloud ]
I want to use mono/c# to write some common purpose business logic and data structures, and when it comes to some common platform features, like storage service, notifications, I'd like to wrap them up on each platform and expose uniform apis for c#(business logic layer) to use. As to the representation layer, we decide to choose from the 3 optional solutions listed above.
To make this happening, first I have to figure out if it is possible to call native frameworks.
So, my questions are:
1, How does mono work, I mean, are the c# codes compiled into binaries that can be executed directly on iOS, Android and Windows Phone?
2, Is there a mechanism to make native invocations? Like in cocos2d-x, I can call java methods via JNI, and in iOS, c++ can call oc directly. Can I call cocoa touch stuffs in mono with c#?
3, Is it possible to manage all these stuffs in one single project, and how to build them?
4, Are there any better solutions?
Any suggestions will be appreciated, thanks for your patience!
I wonder why Xamarin does not land on the first page of your search result,
http://xamarin.com/features
But that's what the Mono guys created for the C# developers that want to target mobile platforms. MonoTouch and Mono for Android are there each featuring a common library base with Microsoft .NET, and also platform specific bindings.
Your non-UI code should be able to be used in portable libraries and share among them. Microsoft's portable library is Windows specific, and right now I am not sure how much Mono guys can embrace that, but even if PCL fails, you can create multiple platform specific projects based on the same copy of source files (which I did in #SNMP). The remaining task is to develop platform specific UI for Windows Phone, iOS, and Android.
There are tons of articles showing the features,
http://docs.xamarin.com/
and also many successful apps
http://xamarin.com/apps
The best way to learn a product is to try it out (for free in Xamarin's case). This also applies to MonoCross (which is a framework built upon Mono).
I am not familiar with PhoneGap, so you need someone's advice on that.
Disclaimer: this is not a complete answer - but I do hope it answers at least part of your question
I encountered a similar problem when I started cross-platform dev using the Mono products 18 months ago.
The approach I've built since is called MvvmCross - it forked off of MonoCross a long time ago - now shares no code with it (but maybe we'll team up again one day!).
The approach uses PCLs to share code. This is not entirely painless, but is easy after you've done a few setup steps - http://slodge.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/cross-platform-winrt-monodroid.html
You can learn more about this approach on this video: http://slodge.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/mvvmcross-video-presentation-xaminar.html