This is the scenario:
User has a main activity used for UI.
Program needs to communicate with peers and keep connection and wait for messages
When a message comes it is shown in the main activity.
So the question is should I use a service for the communication and what type of service?
And also should I use AsyncTask in the service in order to keep my UI responcive and why?
The important thing here is that any CPU intensive work or blocking I/O (including waiting for incoming network connections) occurs in a thread separate from your main UI thread.
If you just need network communication to stay running while your activity is alive, then use a second thread within your activity. If you need to maintain network communication even after your activity has been killed, you'll need to use a service.
Keep in mind that default behavior is for a service to share the same process and thread as anything else in the same application (including the activity that provides your UI). For this reason, even if you use a service, you'll still need to spawn a new thread to get the desired effect.
AsyncTask is used to perform a task in a separate thread that will eventually terminate and return a result. If this sounds like your application, then feel free to use it. But if you're keeping a port open across several requests (meaning you don't have a single return value), using this class would just be a burden.
Related
I was going through Bound Service in Android Developer website. I thought I understood the service enough but I just found another way of connecting service through Using a Messenger class especially for local service. There I got confused. Maybe I got the concept wrong.
Here is my understanding of Android Service. You create a service when
You want to do separate jobs in the background.
You want to make it a separate process.
You want to make it run in a lifecycle that's independent of the component that started it.
Confusion is the first item in the list, the definition of the background. Isn't the background a thread or process? I never thought that it can run on the main thread.
Here is the caution of service in the dev pages about.
Caution: A service runs in the main thread of its hosting process—the service does not create its own thread and does not run in a separate process (unless you specify otherwise). This means that, if your service is going to do any CPU intensive work or blocking operations (such as MP3 playback or networking), you should create a new thread within the service to do that work. By using a separate thread, you will reduce the risk of Application Not Responding (ANR) errors and the application's main thread can remain dedicated to user interaction with your activities.
Questions
Why does one choose to use service if the service function will anyway run on the main thread?
Do we have to write a service only to block ANR even if the time-consuming job is done in the main thread? Assume the service is only for my application.
Are there any practical cases or reasons to use a service as private and running in the same thread?
Application main thread is not always the UI thread. For example, when Activity is stopped, the onStop() is invoked, hence the UI thread is taken away from that Activity and moved to another Activity within the same or a different application. However it doesn't mean the application is no longer active, it can continue working in the background until it is closed either by OS or by user. Then who keeps it running in the background? It is the main thread and not the UI thread.
What are services
In Android, a Service is an application component that can perform
long-running operations in the background on the UI thread. By
background, it means that it doesn’t have a user interface. A Service
runs on the main thread of the calling Component’s process by default
(and hence can degrade responsiveness and cause ANRs), hence you
should create a new Thread to perform long running operations. A
Service can also be made to run in a completely different process.
Unlike Activity components, Services do not have any graphical
interfaces. Also Broadcast Receivers are for receiving broadcast
messages (broadcast, multicast, unicast) and perform short tasks
whereas Services are meant to do lengthy processing like streaming
music, network transactions, file I/O, interact with databases, etc.
When a Service is started by an application component like an Activity
it runs in the background and keeps running even if the user switches
to another application or the starting component is itself destroyed
Why use service
Services are given higher priority than other Background processes and
hence it’s less likely that Android will terminate it. Although it can
be configured to restart once there is ample resources available
again. You should go through the different processes and their
priority/important level in the documentation on processes and
threads. Assigning them the same priority as foreground activities is
definitely possible in which case it’ll need to have a visible
notification active (generally used for Services playing music).
Use IntentService if you don't want to fiddle with managing threads on your own. Otherwise, use AsyncTasks.
Please read this excellent article to understand more in detail and also read this answer.
Service basically runs in UI thread or main thread.But,if we are going to perform long running operations in service,we need to create a background thread and perform that task.
But why we have to use service?
Now let's think of Music Application.We need songs to be played continuously even if we leave music app.If we use activities,we can't achieve above requirement.So,service helps in these kind of scenarios.Even if the app is not in foreground, service keeps on running and we are able to listen to songs.This is why we use service even though it runs on main thread.
In short, Services runs on the background of the UI thread.
You can perform tasks like client-server authentication or write to a database where the tasks are done in the background with no graphical interface.
But if you're doing a really long processing tasks that could freeze the interface, you use a service on a separate thread.
eg of a Service on a separate thread is IntentService
I am looking for what service should be used in android applicaton.
Docs says
A Service is an application component that can perform long-running operations in the background and does not provide a user interface.
I have read this thread Application threads vs Service threads that saying same services are for running operation in background.
But here this can be done using Thread also. Any difference between them and where you should use them
UPDATE based on latest documentation:
Android has included in its documentation on when you should use Service vs Thread. Here is what it says:
If you need to perform work outside your main thread, but only while
the user is interacting with your application, then you should
probably instead create a new thread and not a service. For example,
if you want to play some music, but only while your activity is
running, you might create a thread in onCreate(), start running it in
onStart(), then stop it in onStop(). Also consider using AsyncTask or
HandlerThread, instead of the traditional Thread class. See the
Processes and Threading document for more information about threads.
Remember that if you do use a service, it still runs in your
application's main thread by default, so you should still create a new
thread within the service if it performs intensive or blocking
operations.
Another notable difference between these two approaches is that Thread will sleep if your device sleeps. Whereas, Service can perform operation even if the device goes to sleep. Let's take for example playing music using both approaches.
Thread Approach: the music will only play if your app is active or screen display is on.
Service Approach: the music can still play even if you minimized your app or screen is off.
Note: Starting API Level 23, you should Test your app with Doze.
Android Documentation - Services
A Service is meant to run your task independently of the Activity, it allows you to run any task in background. This run on the main UI thread so when you want to perform any network or heavy load operation then you have to use the Thread there.
Example : Suppose you want to take backup of your instant messages daily in the background then here you would use the Service.
Threads is for run your task in its own thread instead of main UI thread. You would use when you want to do some heavy network operation like sending bytes to the server continuously, and it is associated with the Android components. When your component destroy who started this then you should have stop it also.
Example : You are using the Thread in the Activity for some purpose, it is good practice to stop it when your activity destroy.
This is the principle i largely follow
Use a Thread when
app is required to be visible when the operation occurs.
background operation is relatively short running (less than a minute or two)
the activity/screen/app is highly coupled with the background operation, the user usually 'waits' for this operation to finish before doing anything else in the app.
Using a thread in these cases leads to cleaner, more readable & maintainable code. That being said its possible to use a Service( or IntentService).
Use a Service when
app could be invisible when the operation occurs (Features like Foreground service could help with operations being interrupted)
User is not required to 'wait' for the operation to finish to do other things in the app.
app is visible and the operation is independent of the app/screen context.
Reference from https://developer.android.com/guide/components/services.html
A service is simply a component that can run in the background even when the user is not interacting with your application. Thus, you should create a service only if that is what you need.
If you need to perform work outside your main thread, but only while the user is interacting with your application, then you should probably instead create a new thread and not a service.
For example, if you want to play some music, but only while your activity is running, you might create a thread in onCreate(), start running it in onStart(), then stop it in onStop().
Remember that if you do use a service, it still runs in your application's main thread by default, so you should still create a new thread within the service if it performs intensive or blocking operations.
My Approach for explanation is simple:
Create a thread when you are in the activity and want to do some background operation with frequent communication with the main thread.
Alert- Don't create too many threads as 1 thread is equal to 1 processor thread. If you want to do parallel processing with threads(multiple) try your hands on Executors
Now you want long running operations with less interaction with UI then go for Service. Keep in mind service runs on UI thread. But now you want the processing should be done in background thread, then go for Intent Service.Intent service maintains their Thread Pools and do not create new threads and runs your tasks serially.
I was wondering why would one use a bound service? I get the it provides a "rich client interface" however, since it executes on the UI thread, I suppose one could not run a CPU/IO intensive operation on it, right?
Let me clarify, say I have a bound service StatService that exposes a method - getStats(). This method may perform some network IO. Now once the service is bound to my Activity, I could directly call getStats() however the whole activity would pause as the service is performing a network IO call.
Is the right way to use the bound service, is to launch a Thread within the service and have it perform the network IO while getStats() simply returns a data structure that is asynchronously populated by the Thread?
If your service executes in same process as activity, then, yes, you have to create worker threads to do IO/Network tasks. But if you move service in separate process then you won't have to do it.
Separating service has own pros and cons. For example if your activity is crashed, your service will continue working. But cross-processing transfer is more expensive than directly access in same process.
I have doubts when it comes to Services.
I know the service runs in the background, but I thought you necessarily needed to create a thread within the service, otherwise it would block the main thread and you would get an ANR error.
I thought I got it! But then I read this in the Android Developer guide:
…if your service performs intensive or blocking operations while the user interacts with an activity from the same application, the service will slow down activity performance. To avoid impacting application performance, you should start a new thread inside the service.>
The paragraph mentions "intensive or blocking operations", but doesn’t mention an ANR error, it mentions performance. So how a service works?
Supposing an Activity starts a Service. Does the Service run by default in the background of the main thread? Meaning that you can still use your activity while the service is running, but since your Activity and the Service are sharing the main thread’s resources, it would slow down the performance of your activity, and if Service is doing CPU intensive work, it could leave no resources for the activity to use, and eventually you would get an ANR error.
The best practice (but not necessarily, if the service is doing light work) would be to start a new Thread within the Service, now the Activity and the Service are using their own thread’s resources. Then you could close your activity, but Android keeps the service thread alive.
Is that it? Thanks =)
I thought you necessarily needed to create a thread within the service, otherwise it would block the main thread and you would get an ANR error.
Correct.
The paragraph mentions "intensive or blocking operations", but doesn’t mention an ANR error, it mentions performance.
Feel free to file a bug report at http://b.android.com to get them to improve this portion of the documentation. :-)
Does the Service run by default in the background of the main thread?
The lifecycle methods of a Service, such as onCreate() and onStartCommand(), are called on the main application thread. Some services, like IntentService, will provide you with a background thread (e.g., for onHandleIntent()), but that is specific to that particular subclass of Service.
and eventually you would get an ANR error.
Yes.
The best practice (but not necessarily, if the service is doing light work) would be to start a new Thread within the Service, now the Activity and the Service are using their own thread’s resources. Then you could close your activity, but Android keeps the service thread alive.
Basically, yes. Here, "light work" should be less than a millisecond or so. Also, some things that you might do are naturally asynchronous (e.g., playing a song via MediaPlayer), so it may be that the Service itself does not need its own thread, because something else that it is using is doing the threading.
Why do I read in the answer to most questions here a lot about AsyncTask and Loaders but nothing about Services? Are Services just not known very well or are they deprecated or have some bad attributes or something? What are the differences?
(By the way, I know that there are other threads about it, but none really states clear differences that help a developer to easily decide if he is better off using the one or the other for an actual problem.)
In some cases it is possible to accomplish the same task with either an AsyncTask or a Service however usually one is better suited to a task than the other.
AsyncTasks are designed for once-off time-consuming tasks that cannot be run of the UI thread. A common example is fetching/processing data when a button is pressed.
Services are designed to be continually running in the background. In the example above of fetching data when a button is pressed, you could start a service, let it fetch the data, and then stop it, but this is inefficient. It is far faster to use an AsyncTask that will run once, return the data, and be done.
If you need to be continually doing something in the background, though, a Service is your best bet. Examples of this include playing music, continually checking for new data, etc.
Also, as Sherif already said, services do not necessarily run off of the UI thread.
For the most part, Services are for when you want to run code even when your application's Activity isn't open. AsyncTasks are designed to make executing code off of the UI thread incredibly simple.
Services are completely different: Services are not threads!
Your Activity binds to a service and the service contains some functions that when called, blocks the calling thread. Your service might be used to change temperature from Celsius to Degrees. Any activity that binds can get this service.
However AsyncTask is a Thread that does some work in the background and at the same time has the ability to report results back to the calling thread.
Just a thought: A service may have a AsyncTask object!
Service is one of the components of the Android framework, which does not require UI to execute, which mean even when the app is not actively used by the user, you can perform some operation with service. That doesn't mean service will run in a separate thread, but it runs in main thread and operation can be performed in a separate thread when needed.
Examples usages are playing music in background, syncing data with server in backgroud without user interaction etc
AsyncTask on other hand is used for UI blocking tasks to be performed on a separate thread. It is same like creating a new thread and doing the task when all the tasks of creating and maintaining the threads and send back result to main thread are taken care by the AsyncTask
Example usage are fetching data from server, CRUD operations on content resolver etc
Service and asynctasks are almost doing the same thing,almost.using service or a asynctask depends on what is your requirement is.
as a example if you want to load data to a listview from a server after hitting some button or changing screen you better go with a asynctask.it runs parallel with main ui thread (runs in background).for run asynctack activity or your app should on main UI thread.after exit from the app there is no asynctask.
But services are not like that, once you start a service it can run after you exit from the app, unless you are stop the service.like i said it depends on your requirement.if you want to keep checking data receiving or check network state continuously you better go with service.
happy coding.
In few cases, you can achieve same functionality using both. Unlike Async Task, service has it's own life cycle and inherits Context (Service is more robust than an Async Task). Service can run even if you have exited the app. If you want to do something even after app closing and also need the context variable, you will go for Service.
Example: If you want to play a music and you don't want to pause if user leaves the app, you will definitely go for Service.
Comparison of a local, in-process, base class Service✱ to an AsyncTask:
✱ (This answer does not address exported services, or any service that runs in a process different from that of the client, since the expected use cases differ substantially from those of an AsyncTask. Also, in the interest of brevity, the nature of certain specialized Service subclasses (e.g., IntentService, JobService) will be ignored here.)
Process Lifetime
A Service represents, to the OS, "an application's desire to perform a longer-running operation while not interacting with the user" [ref].
While you have a Service running, Android understands that you don't want your process to be killed. This is also true whenever you have an Activity onscreen, and it is especially true when you are running a foreground service. (When all your application components go away, Android thinks, "Oh, now is a good time to kill this app, so I can free up resources".)
Also, depending on the last return value from Service.onCreate(), Android can attempt to "revive" apps/services that were killed due to resource pressure [ref].
AsyncTasks don't do any of that. It doesn't matter how many background threads you have running, or how hard they are working: Android will not keep your app alive just because your app is using the CPU. It has to have some way of knowing that your app still has work to do; that's why Services are registered with the OS, and AsyncTasks aren't.
Multithreading
AsyncTasks are all about creating a background thread on which to do work, and then presenting the result of that work to the UI thread in a threadsafe manner.
Each new AsyncTask execution generally results in more concurrency (more threads), subject to the limitations of the AsyncTasks's thread-pool [ref].
Service methods, on the other hand, are always invoked on the UI thread [ref]. This applies to onCreate(), onStartCommand(), onDestroy(), onServiceConnected(), etc. So, in some sense, Services don't "run" in the background. Once they start up (onCreate()), they just kinda "sit" there -- until it's time to clean up, execute an onStartCommand(), etc.
In other words, adding additional Services does not result in more concurrency. Service methods are not a good place to do large amounts of work, because they run on the UI thread.
Of course, you can extend Service, add your own methods, and call them from any thread you want. But if you do that, the responsibility for thread safety lies with you -- not the framework.
If you want to add a background thread (or some other sort of worker) to your Service, you are free to do so. You could start a background thread/AsyncTask in Service.onCreate(), for example. But not all use cases require this. For example:
You may wish to keep a Service running so you can continue getting location updates in the "background" (meaning, without necessarily having any Activities onscreen).
Or, you may want to keep your app alive just so you can keep an "implicit" BroadcastReceiver registered on a long-term basis (after API 26, you can't always do this via the manifest, so you have to register at runtime instead [ref]).
Neither of these use cases require a great deal of CPU activity; they just require that the app not be killed.
As Workers
Services are not task-oriented. They are not set up to "perform a task" and "deliver a result", like AsyncTasks are. Services do not solve any thread-safety problems (notwithstanding the fact that all methods execute on a single thread). AsyncTasks, on the other hand, handle that complexity for you.
Note that AsyncTask is slated for deprecation. But that doesn't mean your should replace your AsyncTasks with Services! (If you have learned anything from this answer, that much should be clear.)
TL;DR
Services are mostly there to "exist". They are like an off-screen Activity, providing a reason for the app to stay alive, while other components take care of doing the "work". AsyncTasks do "work", but they will not, in and of themselves, keep a process alive.