How can you localize drawable-nodpi? - android

The documentation seems to imply you can't do localization AND resolution targetting.
Can anyone tell me how you can go about localizing drawable-nodpi?
Eclipse returns an invalid resource directory name error.
I'm targeting Android 2.2 only so if there are more recent ways to solve this, would be great to hear about them.

So the answer is, rather than pathing with drawable-nodpi-de-rDE you put drawable-de-rDE-nodpi.
Format:
{resource}-{language}-r{region}-{resolution}
Documentation is particularly lacking in examples.

At First, Run Time Executing drawable folder's(like drawable-ldpi,drawable-nodpi,values-long,etc) are supports in Android 1.6 or later version only. if you want support your app which has developed using Android 1.5. you have to note -v which is in the Strategies for Legacy Applications topic

Related

Updated Software for Python APKs

For the past several days, I have been trying to get the following to work in regards to building an APK from a Python application: 1. Briefcase, 2. P4A, 3. Buildozer, 4. Chaquopy.
Yet with hardly any luck, I've only gotten as far on all of them to tell me I've installed Java incorrectly. I've tried installation in a variety of different ways and to no avail.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to what to use to package my Python code into an APK? All the tools I've used so far are obsolete or have limited and varying documentation.
The tools you list are the best ones currently available, and none of them are obsolete. If you need help using one of them, you should ask a question giving details of exactly what happened, either here on StackOverflow, or on the project's issue tracker.

INSTALL_FAILED_DEXOPT when using GreenDao

Background
I wanted to simplify the usage of DB in an Android app.
For this, I've compared some third party libraries that create a DAO layer.
I've come up with a nice library called "GreenDao" (presentation about it here) . The website shows that it's faster than other competitors (like ORMLite) and is optimized for Android.
The problem
For some reason, on some device (usually old devices, with GB) , I get the next console error when trying to install the app:
Installation error: INSTALL_FAILED_DEXOPT
Please check logcat output for more details.
Launch canceled!
I've searched for the reason of this error, but couldn't find out how to solve it. Many complain about this error, but I can't find out why it occurs, and what can be done.
The error is quite common and known, but it's never mentioned as the result of using this library, yet when I remove the usage of this library, everything works fine...
Also note that on newer devices (like nexus 4) it installs and works just fine, and that the sample itself also works fine no matter which device I test it on.
The question
Why does it occur?
Is it possible that the structure of the classes is just too much for old devices to load, since we use other libraries ?
Could it be that I've reached the limit of code that is supported by android apps?
The jar file itself takes just 87KB ...
How can I solve this?
Ok, I've found the problem and the solution:
It has nothing to do with GreenDao.
It's because the app uses too many jars, so maybe Android has a limitation of code.
The solution is to either delete un-needed jar files or delete a lot of code.

Running apps containing large amount of code

Background
It seems some old Android OSs (and maybe even the newest ones) have a limitation on the amount of code each app can hold.
As I've found, the limitation is on a buffer called "LinearAlloc" .
On 2.2 or 2.3 it's about 5-8 MB , and I think it's 16 or more on others.
The problem
If you have a too large code (and apps can reach this state), you won't be able to install the app at all on older devices, getting the next error (also reported here) :
Installation error: INSTALL_FAILED_DEXOPT
Please check logcat output for more details.
Launch canceled!
What I've found
One solution is to just remove as much code and libraries as possible, but on some huge projects such a thing is very hard to do.
I've found the next links talking about how Facebook solved this, by somehow increasing the limit:
http://www.slashgear.com/how-facebook-fixed-its-gingerbread-dalvik-problem-04272478/
http://arstechnica.com/business/2013/03/how-facebook-dug-deep-within-android-to-fix-its-mobile-app/
https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-engineering/under-the-hood-dalvik-patch-for-facebook-for-android/10151345597798920
Also, Google has posted how to solve it by loading code dynamically :
http://android-developers.blogspot.co.il/2011/07/custom-class-loading-in-dalvik.html
The question
How did Facebook do it?
Is it possible to overcome this in other ways too?
Is there any free library that increases/removes the limitation of this buffer?
What is the limitation on newer Android versions, if there is any?
How do other huge apps (and games) handle this issue? Do they put their code into C/C++?
Would loading the dex files dynamically solve this?
The limit is the total number of method references:
https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=7147#c6
https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=20814#c6
A middle ground between doing nothing and the multi-dex approach described in the FB/Google articles is to use a tool like ProGuard to remove references to unused code at the Java level. See:
http://proguard.sourceforge.net/
http://developer.android.com/tools/help/proguard.html
There is a new solution, made by Google:
https://plus.google.com/+IanLake/posts/JW9x4pcB1rj?utm_source=Android%20Weekly&utm_campaign=59f1f4bf4d-Android_Weekly_125&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_4eb677ad19-59f1f4bf4d-337848877
http://developer.android.com/reference/android/support/multidex/MultiDexApplication.html
It seems all you have to do is any of the next things:
- extend from "MultiDexApplication" instead of from "Application"
- call MultiDex.install(context) in your application's attachBaseContext
But now I wonder:
Is that really it?
Does it have any issues ? Does it affect performance?
How does it work?
What should be done with ContentProvider, as it's getting called before Application gets initialized?
The post says "gives you MultiDex support on all API 4+ devices (well, until v21, where you get this natively)" . Does it mean that from v21 it will be the default behavior, or just that the class will be built in and you won't need to use the support library's class ?
Will this solution work on Eclipse too?

Testing Android support on older versions

I am making application with target SDK set to 17 and min to 8.
So for some features I have to use Support library v4
Question is how can I test it works on older devices?
I am testing on my phone - which has 4.2.2; and I don't have others with older ones
Will creating emulator with 2.3.3 be true test?
tnx
Update
Just for example: I use Fragment in my code (from android.app, not from support library) - even if my minSDK is 4 - I don't see any warnings...should I?
Yes. It is an emulator (not a simulator) so it is very similar to running your code on the corresponding phone.
Another good practice is to run the Lint tests from times to times, they can detect many common mistakes in your code (including compatibility).
Your ide (both Eclipse & Android Studio plugins do this) will also display warning for obvious calls to functions that don't exist at your chosen min API level.
Most of the time emulator behave same if we consider layout view and
other stuff like look and feel performance , but that can be
difference in case of speed performance and sound quality
.
I found one online tool which are providing that service please go through that link , https://appthwack.com
apache lint (from tools) is the answer - shows all problems

Incorporating both Contacts and ContactsContract into an Android application

Greetings all,
I realize this issue has been posed before in other forms, and believe me, I have been searching the net for days trying to find the answer. However, I'm fairly new to Android and Java, and I need a little guidance please.
I presently have two version of my app, one for Android 1.5 and 1.6, and another for 2.0 and beyond. As you probably guessed, it's because the Contacts API is different.
I recently became aware that it was possible to combine both methods into a single app, by using dynamically loadable classes. Very cool! After days of attempts, I still haven't been able to do it successfully... or at least, it won't run.
I have come across 3 examples of how to do this - one by Google, called "Business Card", another that had something to do with Spinners, and a 3rd was something someone here created. My problem is that each one seems to me to have a showstopper.
I'm using Eclipse on Windows 7. My app was first created for A1.5, so that's the one I'm upgrading. What's happening is that my ContactsAccessorNewApi class needs to import the ContactContracts, and according to Eclipse, that won't work because my project was originally built without support for it. Hence, it won't run. I've tried adding the android.jar for SDK level 5 into the project, but that creates a whole mess of other problems.
My code for this pat of my app is exactly like the Google example "Business Card" - so if someone could help me cross this hurdle, I'd be very grateful. I'll be happy to post any code that you need to answer my question.
Thank you!
another that had something to do with Spinners
If you mean this sample project, that's mine.
I'm using Eclipse on Windows 7. My app was first created for A1.5, so that's the one I'm upgrading. What's happening is that my ContactsAccessorNewApi class needs to import the ContactContracts, and according to Eclipse, that won't work because my project was originally built without support for it.
You need to set your build target (Project Properties > Android) to be high enough that ContactsContract exists (android-5 or higher).
So long as your android:minSdkVersion in your manifest is set to support earlier versions of Android (e.g., 3 for Android 1.5), your app will still install on older emulator AVDs and devices.
I've tried adding the android.jar for SDK level 5 into the project, but that creates a whole mess of other problems.
Yeah, don't do that.

Categories

Resources