I'd like to have a button in the top left corner of one of my activities that holds the name of the activity under it on the stack. Is this possible? The button will essentially just finish the current activity, I just need to set the text to something like the label for the activity below it on the stack.
I've got a half-working solution where I just pass a string-extra to the activity wherever I start it from, which allows me to set the text to anything that makes sense. This does not work when I'm using notifications.
You could also use a custom Application object as a singleton to store the name of the last known activity (setting that in each activity's onCreate), but if you're launching multiple tasks or tasks with different affinities this won't really work properly.
But question your basic assumptions here: Is what your app is doing so unusual that you need to use up a chunk of screen real estate and introduce a navigational element totally unfamiliar to Android users who expect to just use the physical back button and to see the name of the current app/activity in the title bar (not the previous one)?
Related
A fairly common model for iOS apps seems to have a single UITabBarController, where each tab essentially holds a UINavigationController, i.e. a stack of controllers, and pressing a tab switches to the top of the corresponding stack. Can I get the same behavior on Android without a lot of custom code? (Note: I am using menus instead of tabs on Android).
After reading http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/fundamentals/tasks-and-back-stack.html the closest I can see is to have multiple tasks, each one representing a stack (akin to UINavigationController), and to use FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK to switch to another task/stack. When I switch, is there a way to go straight to the top of the stack, or do I need to keep that piece of state myself?
One problem with keeping that state myself: I've noticed that if my app launches an Intent that starts a new process, sometimes my original app's process is killed (I think), and all of my global state is destroyed.
The only other solution I can imagine is to have a dummy Activity per stack, to push DummyActivityN essentially right before I switch away from the Nth stack, and, when switching to the Mth stack, to start activity DummyActivityM with FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK, and then have DummyActivityM immediately finish() itself.
One last problem: as I navigate to the bottom of one of the stacks, with the back button, I would like to hit the back button once more and NOT go to another stack/task. But this seems easy to overcome by launching an Intent to go to the home screen; is there anything better?
If I understood your problem correctly, if you add this parameter to your Activity declarations in AndroidManifest.xml, the Activities that are launched by your custom menu will be only created once - keeping their state while you move around the tabs.
android:launchMode="singleTask"
I hope this helps,
Best,
-sekran
Sorry, I know that this topic has been covered a bit. I've read the related posts and am still a bit confused. I am working on an app that while the prototype will have 3 main screens, it will eventually have dozens. Each screen will present either dynmically changing status or take user input. To visualize, it is required to be laid out similar to how MS Word or a typical PC is. It has a status bar at the top and a navigation bar at the bottom that is common to all screens (slight tweaks for some screens, like different icons) in the middle is what I would call a view pane that needs to be updated with a applicable layout.
The status, nav bar, and each screen are defined in their own layout xml file. For my first swag at it I just used a ViewFlipper and loaded the 3 screen layouts into it. However that means that currently I have one main Activity which will not be maintainable as I continue to add screens.
It feels right to me that each screen layout should have an associated Activity class that understands how to control that screen. I need to figure out how to load that into the center pane dynamically. However I thought I read in another post that using multiple Activities can be a CPU and RAM drain.
Currently I tried making one of the screens it's own Activity and kick that off from the main Activity by creating an Intent and than calling startActivity. However that causes the new screen Activity to reside on top of the main Activity. The interesting thing is that then pressing the back button dismissed that activity and returns me to the main.
So far I haven't figured out how to setup having a different Activity control what happens in the center pane.
If I continue down the multiple Activity path, should my main Activity be inheriting from ActivityGroup?
Are using View classes more applicable in this case?
I know this has been a long post. I'd appreciate any advice.
Thanks!
CB
As you noticed, Android will implicitly track a stack of started activities in a task, and the 'back' button ends the top one, reactivating the next one down. I would advise you to think about which kinds of things the user might expect the back button to do, and make it so that activities are separated along those lines.
I haven't played with ActivityGroup so I can't advise you there. If you go with completely separate activities, you can have them all use the same "shell" content view with the common nav/status bar. Have a superclass or utility class handle populating and managing that from there. Then use a a LayoutInflater (you can call getLayoutInflater()) to fill in the middle with your Activity-specific view.
If you want one of the activities to have multiple screens, you might still end up with a ViewFlipper in the center slot. Again, you want to have an Activity transition wherever you want the user to be able to go "back"; that also means you may NOT want to have a change of activities in cases where screens are closely related or part of the same logical thing-being-done. (You can override the back button's behavior, but unless you have a good reason to, it's best to just arrange the app so that Android's basic setup helps your app's UI rather than working at cross purposes.)
If you want to use activities in the fashion you talked about, you might look into using a tab activity. It actually works in the way you want, you just need to hide the tab widget and put your navigation bar there instead. Or, you could go a little deeper and make you own similar tab-like ActivityGroup like Walter mentioned if you have more time.
You could use a view pager with fragments to accomplish the flip between the different views but still allow your activity to have full control over it. The activity can control the menus while the fragment controls your viewing area. This way your back button will properly dismiss the activity containing all pages related to the activity instead of walking down the stack.
This question actually has two parts.
The first part:
I've been developing my first app for a couple of weeks now. I have 5 screens and everything seems well. However, I'm considering changing the app's navigation to a TabView.
I haven't delved much into it, but I'm hoping someone can save me a little bit of time. It seems that people don't generally place Activities inside each tab. They simply point the tab content to a View. This is where my major setbacks are. 1) I already have Activity classes full of code and 2) I can't quickly guess how the structure of an app using TabView looks. For example, where do I put the handler code for clicking a button on a View? Does it all just get dumped into the TabView Activity somehow?
What I would like is if you could please give me a quick synopsis of what I'm looking at doing, answers to any questions you think I may have, and point me toward some resources for creating TabView applications. A quick Google search really just shows me how to create a TabView Activity and add a couple tabs to it. The code doesn't go any deeper. For example, say I have a layout xml to show in one of my tab's content pane, where does the code go for clicking a button I have in that layout?
The second part:
I've added a TabActivity to wrap the Activities I currently have in. At the moment I have Activities populating the content of my tabs (though ultimately I'd like to do this in the most efficient fashion, which doesn't seem to be having Activities be tab content). I've noticed something rather annoying. My MAIN Activity is an Activity I wrote for my user to log in to their account. After logging in, they are taken to my Tab Activity. Here is what happens:
When I am on my Tab Activity and I "minimize" the app by clicking the Home button and then launch it again, I don't get taken back to the Tab Activity. I get taken to my log in Activity. Why? I don't have the launchMode of my Tab Activity set to singleInstance... or is it singleInstance by default? How can I make the app re-launch showing the Tab Activity (ideally by setting some parameter, assuming I'm doing something wrong, and not having to save this data off somewhere and reading it and programmatically telling it what to go to)?
Thank you for all your time and help
I don't have a comment on the advisability avoiding the use of sub-activities in TabActivity. As for handlers -- if you aren't going to embed views instead of activities, then all the android:onclick type handler settings in your layout XML will call methods on the TabActivity. This is because they go to methods on the views' Context, which is the generally the nearest containing Activity. If you want to split your code up further without using Activities, I believe you'll have to use findViewById calls on the tab content views after you've set them up, and bind the handlers manually from there in your code.
I was in the midsts of tinkering in android with the goal of trying to make this small exploration game. I actually got pretty far so far: a nice sprite system, a title screen with a main menu that is all in game code (no UI buttons or anything) that launch various activities. An activity that loads this cool map view, that when clicked on will load up another view of a more detailed "zoomed in" action part of a map. It all works pretty well but now I am left wondering how well I am going about this.
(What happens to a view when you instantiate and then move the set the context to a new view? I am guessing as long as the activity is alive all the instantiations of various views that an activity uses are still good? And in an activities onPause is when id have to save the data thats changed in these views to persist the state in the event the user quits the game etc.. ?)
I have three menu options at the start of the game. The main one is:
New Game
The new game, I launch my main map
activity that can launch three views:
First two are a loading screen for
the second, a map screen.
Third view is a more detailed action
orientated part that uses this sprite
engine I developed.
It all works pretty good as in the map view you click on a cell it tells the Calling Activity through a listener to start the detailed action view, and passes in the ID of the cell (so it knows what objects to load in the detailed view based on the cell clicked in second view). (This took me awhile to figure out but someone helped here on another question to get this.) Reference that helped me on this part here. I also used the various information here on ViewSwitcher.
I got even a yes no dialog box in the second view that asks if they really wanna goto that cell when they click on it, a yes tells the calling activity to set the new view. What helped me to get this working was this reference here. I also had to fiddle with the calls to getContext and that, I am still not 100% sure what getResources and getContext do for me.
So is it bad practice to call and load a dialog from a view? If it is, then I don't understand how if I have an event in the view that needs to pop up a dialog how I do that? Call back to the activity and let the activity handle it the dialog response and then call a method on the view for the response?
So far all this works great, I did have a bit to learn about threads too. I spawn a different thread for my MenuView (handles the detection of button clicks and responses), my CellMap view which handles the cool big map that users can click on to see the indepth view which is my SystemView view.
So basically the activity call list is like this:
Home.Activity -> ScrollMap.activity which listens to CellMap wher ethe Yes/No dialog apperas (in the view of CellMap) and if the answer is yes to the question, then the onTouchEvent starts up the SystemView view using
private CellMap.MapClickedListener onTouchEvent=
new CellMap.MapClickedListener() {
#Override
public void onMapClick(int id) {
setContentView(new SolarSystem(theContext,id));
}
};
To help anyone else, that listener had to be defined in my CellMap class. Then in the ScrollMap activity when I am about to start the CellMap I just call a method to CellMap sets the map click listener. So far this is the only way I have been able to get data from a dialog (in this case a it was clicked so set the new view) back to the calling activity. Is this proper practice?
Now my biggest question is, I have a playerObject class I want to initialize on new game event (I know how to detect that push) and that then is available to any view in any activity for the life time of the cycle. So far the game activity has just two (3 if you count the loading progress bar) views. I want to get the players name, is that another activity or view? I cannot find a decent tutorial of just how to make a simple input dialogg box that would return a string.
How do i go about passing this stuff around? After I get the players name from wherever that edit box is to be loaded, I want to set the players name in the class and pass that class instance off to another view or activity so they may get at that data. Everything I have searched on this seemed like overkill or not the right way. Whats the best way to pass this "playerClass" around so that I can access it from other views (to say display the players name in every view).
I also have my Home Activity that waits for an onClick on 3 buttons, it then launches their activity that shows the view. I realize a continue game and new game are the same activity and will just change in data loaded off the drive to restore a save game. When the new game button is clicked I would love to get the players name they want to use and of course set the member of the playerClass to this name so it persists.
Where do I call (an edit dialog is it?) the edit dialog from? (more over how do I build one that can take an okay button and input from keyboard etc). Id also like to make it pretty, maybe I could have a simple view that has one edit box in it and a nice image background (though I haven't figured out how to place the edit boxes to fit nicely matching a background i draw for it. I guess id like an edit dialog I can skin to look how i want it to and fit the look of the game).
I am actually kinda happy what I got so far its looking not to bad, just not sure about some specifics like getting user input for a name of the player. Storing that information and passing it then to other activities and views.
Is it better to have one GameMain activity, and a ton of views:
Map view
Character sheet view
inventory view etc etc?
Or Should there be diff activities in there somewhere as well?
You've written a lot here, so I'm go gonna go ahead and answer the questions I think you're asking.
First, how can one share information between activities and views? If you're just sharing it between views in a single activity, store it in the instance of the Activity subclass.
Sharing between activities requires a little bit more. Instead of using an instance of the default Application class, you can create a subclass of Application and use that instead. Put your data in fields of that subclass. To tell your app to use your subclass, modify the app manifest like so:
<application
....
android:name=".YourAppClassNameHere">
....
</application>
As for getting user input, the simple answer is use the built-in EditText view. since you seem to want to give your game a more "custom" style, though, you may need to go about creating your own editable textbox. That and buttons should allow for most sorts of basic user input.
Now, good practice vis-a-vis activities and views. I'm not aware of a standard for this, but when designing I generally try to think of activities as more conceptually separate elements, whereas views are conceptually interwoven. the line between the two is dependent, in part, on the scope of the app; an app with a narrow focus can afford to break more actions down into different activities than can one with a much broader focus.
Your "GameMain" example is a bit on the fence, but I think you've made the right choice: the activity is "playing the game," as opposed to a menu or high-scores table, and the views present different aspects of the game being played.
I have an NoContentViewActivity which has no Content View (i.e. I did not call setContentView() in the onCreate of my Activity).
My question is how can I keep the content view of the launching activity on the screen? Right now, I am getting a blank screen whenever I launch NoContentViewActivity? I want the content view of the launching activity (the activity which start the NoContentViewActivity) to show on the screen.
Thank you for any help.
Excuse me, people, but my guess is that hap497 wants exactly the thing he wants. There is a bunch of situations where invisible activity would fit while Service will not.
Imaging you want to show a set of dialogs, each next of them is shown after the previous one based on the user choices. And imaging you want to have this (exactly the same) functionality to be available when pressing different buttons on different (lots of them) activities.
To write the same dialog processing logic would be an overkill whether the transparent activity will deal nicely...
Anyway, as stated above, all you need to do is to specify:
android:theme="#android:style/Theme.Translucent"
or
android:theme="#android:style/Theme.Translucent.NoTitleBar"
(if you do not want a titlebar either)
It sounds like you'd be better off using a Service than an Activity. Activities are for code that is to be viewed; Services are for code that runs without a UI, which is what it sounds like you want.
An Activity with no Views assigned is an empty black screen, so it will still obscure the calling Activity. You could make your Activity transparent by assigning it a transparent theme:
android:theme="#style/Theme.Translucent"
Keep in mind though, that your invisible Activity will have focus, so the user won't be able to interact with the Activity underneath.
Why do you want to create a fully transparent Activity? As Daniel suggests, a Service might be a better solution to your problem if you genuinely don't want any user interaction.