I ran into an issue where my Android app cannot make outgoing connections using the TcpClient class (question located here). While debugging and conducting further research, I found that my Android device (API level 22) is receiving a subnet mask of 0.0.0.0 when it connects to my WiFi network. My DHCP server is configured to use 255.255.255.0, so I believe this discrepancy could be the root of my other problem. This is my code:
//Connect to the WiFi network
int id = WiFiManager.AddNetwork(new WifiConfiguration()
{
Ssid = $"\"{ssid}\"",
PreSharedKey = $"\"{password}\""
});
WiFiManager.EnableNetwork(id, true);
WiFiManager.Reconnect();
//Retrieve subnet mask (for debugging)
int subnet_mask = WiFiManager.DhcpInfo.Netmask;
subnet_mask returns 0, and the formatted version of the DhcpInfo class shows:
{ipaddr 10.0.0.15 gateway 10.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 dns1 10.0.0.0 dns2 0.0.0.0 DHCP server
10.0.0.0 lease 43200 seconds}
With this being the situation, is there any way I can manually change the subnet mask (or "netmask") within the Android API? I have tried using a static IP configuration as shown here, but use of those settings was deprecated in API level 17. I have also tried setting the DhcpInfo.Netmask property manually, but it takes an int. I calculated one based on this answer, but it was too large and became a uint. Lastly, I looked through a variety of classes, including Android.Net.Wifi.WifiManager, to see if there was a way to change the netmask. I didn't find anything, but I might have just been looking in the wrong places.
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Update:
For security reasons, it seems like this is not possible with the standard Android API. However, is the Android NDK able to change the subnet mask? I understand it provides lower-level access to the device, and I do not need to put this app on the app store (it is for my use only).
For security reasons, Android OS may not allow you to do this.
I know as a user I would not want an app to change my network configuration.
It seems this may have been able to be done in the past: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7142316/2913599
but that API is obsolete/deprecated in API level 17: https://developer.android.com/reference/android/provider/Settings.System.html#WIFI_STATIC_DNS1
Docs say to use WifiManager instead, but that API does not allow changing the ip, dns, gateway, again for security reasons.
If you need to get these settings changed, perhaps you can provide an instruction page for the user so they can change them themselves.
I am new to android studios and I have the task to develop an app which transfers data from an app (Acceleration sensor data - i have created this app already which shows the data) to matlab (on the pc).
I don't really know how I should do this. I've experimented a bit with bluetooth apps, but I don't have a clue how to connect to Matlab.
I would be greatful for your help.
Thanks in advance,
Annika
Unfortunately I can not speak to the android side of things, but MatLab can connect to generic devices with the UART interface, which is fairly low level.
The process with some microprocessors that I am using is to connect the device to the PC, and then note the Outgoing com port.
(In windows 10, these can be found in Bluetooth settings -> More Bluetooth options)
Then you can use
s = serial('COM<what you found in settings>');
s.Baudrate=115200;
s.InputBufferSize = 100;
fopen(s{i});
serials = instrfindall;
to open an connection. The critical command is serial, the other parameters depend on your device/ configuration. Sometimes there can be issues, in which case one options is to build a loop that tries again until it works.
You then collect the data sent via UART via
flushinput(serials);
temp = fscanf(serials,'%s');
and then split the string. If data is sent continuously, you wrap this into a while loop.
After you are done, you can clean up via
fclose(s{i});
delete(instrfind)
instrreset
It should be noted, that establishing a connection takes longer, the more enabled COM ports there are. So it might be worth disabling all those you don't need.
For more specific things matlab can do, check out What Is the MATLAB Serial Port Interface
I need to connect 20+ android devices in a client-server network. Each client Android device will be communicating with the server Android device and vice versa. The client devices do not need to communicate with each other.
The server device would need access to internet for a brief period while connected to the clients.
My question is, can Wi-Fi P2P support that many connections reliably? And if yes, how do I go about implementing them?
Or will I have to ensure that all devices are on the same WLAN?
From experience, in a real-world deployment of an Android Wi-Fi Direct application, 20 devices should not be an issue.
Theoretically, the maximum number of devices in a Wi-Fi P2P group, where the GO is an Android device, is 254. The group owner is assigned the IP, 192.168.49.1. Clients are assigned an IP from the range, 192.168.49.2 to 192.168.49.254.
The group owner address is defined by the following in WifiP2pServiceImpl.java:
/* Is chosen as a unique address to avoid conflict with
the ranges defined in Tethering.java */
private static final String SERVER_ADDRESS = "192.168.49.1";
Determining the range for the clients is done as follows:
In WifiP2pServiceImpl.java, the startDhcpServer(String intf) method will start the DHCP server for a given interface - not a surprise. This method is called when the group has started and the device is the group owner.
Taking a closer look at this code, we can see that on the InterfaceConfiguration object, the link address is set to 192.168.49.1 and the prefix length is 24 (prefix length is the number of bits set in a subnet mask, here equivalent to 255.255.255.0) - this implies the answer, but we can dig a little further.
ifcg = mNwService.getInterfaceConfig(intf);
ifcg.setLinkAddress(new LinkAddress(NetworkUtils.numericToInetAddress(
SERVER_ADDRESS), 24));
ifcg.setInterfaceUp();
mNwService.setInterfaceConfig(intf, ifcg);
Next, the following commands will restart tethering with the DHCP range specified by the String[], tetheringDhcpRanges. The calls of mNwService (Network Management Service) methods will execute the appropriate netd commands.
ConnectivityManager cm = (ConnectivityManager) mContext.getSystemService(
Context.CONNECTIVITY_SERVICE);
String[] tetheringDhcpRanges = cm.getTetheredDhcpRanges();
if (mNwService.isTetheringStarted()) {
if (DBG) logd("Stop existing tethering and restart it");
mNwService.stopTethering();
}
mNwService.tetherInterface(intf);
mNwService.startTethering(tetheringDhcpRanges);
And cm.getTetheredDhcpRanges() is ultimately a reference to the following (ConnectivityManager.getTetheredDhcpRanges() -> ConnectivityService.getTetheredDhcpRanges() -> Tethering.getTetheredDhcpRanges()):
// USB is 192.168.42.1 and 255.255.255.0
// Wifi is 192.168.43.1 and 255.255.255.0
// BT is limited to max default of 5 connections. 192.168.44.1 to 192.168.48.1
// with 255.255.255.0
// P2P is 192.168.49.1 and 255.255.255.0
private String[] mDhcpRange;
private static final String[] DHCP_DEFAULT_RANGE = {
"192.168.42.2", "192.168.42.254", "192.168.43.2", "192.168.43.254",
"192.168.44.2", "192.168.44.254", "192.168.45.2", "192.168.45.254",
"192.168.46.2", "192.168.46.254", "192.168.47.2", "192.168.47.254",
"192.168.48.2", "192.168.48.254", "192.168.49.2", "192.168.49.254",
}
and:
mDhcpRange = context.getResources().getStringArray(
com.android.internal.R.array.config_tether_dhcp_range);
if ((mDhcpRange.length == 0) || (mDhcpRange.length % 2 ==1)) {
mDhcpRange = DHCP_DEFAULT_RANGE;
}
in com.android.server.connectivity.Tethering.
Of course, it is possible for the device manufacturer to change this code, so this is also worth considering.
For those planning to deploy applications where there will be many users, a mechanism to allow a more than one device to be GO is required. If data needs to be synchronised between devices, it is simple to simulate "churn" and have GOs only be a GO for a time period before becoming a client to another GO and synchronising any data.
The max number as far as I know is not specified, so you would need to test that out to be certain. Also there could be differences between hardware.
Anyway, the basic implementation would be rather simple. The server would call GreateGroup, so it would be the Groupowner in all cases. And then start locals service advertising. Clients then would simply look for the advertisement and once they see it, they would start connection process to the server. One the server connection is made over Wifi direct you would simply start socket communications from the client to the server (server would have listening socket on all times).
Note that connection would require user to click on the dialog showed when client tries to connect to the group owner. And if you want to get rid of this. Then you could actually use the Accesspoint created by GreateGroup, and add the access point name as well as the password to the advertising. Then your clients could actually use the accesspoint to connect (like to any Wlan accesspoint)
Note though that the Wifi Direct way, would not interfere with Wifi connections, not would it require it. But the accesspoint way would mean that any existing Wifi connection from the client would be disconnected, and the device thinks that the connection made to the server would provide normal internet connectivity.
Remember that devices don't need to be connected to a network to connect to each other. Wi-Fi Direct allows them to connect directly.
Here is a list of Wi-Fi Direct resources that you may find useful: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/wi-fi-direct/uWpuOzHY6y0
I'd recommend following Android's Service Discovery Demo and try implementing it yourself. And here is the source code for the demo.
Need to discover or search for Bluetooth devices of certain "vendor-specific" devices.
"vendor-specific" means all devices will have similar starting bits in their "MAC" address
For example, I want to search only for devices whose MAC address starts with 12:34:56:
It should search only for specific series of MAC addresses and list them.
Perform a full discovery, then filter using BluetoothDevice.getAddress()
// Define Vendor ID Prefix
public static final String VENDOR_ID = "12:34:56:"
// First, do a full discovery...
BluetoothAdapter.getDefaultAdapter().startDiscovery()
//...
// Then, for each device returned from discovery...
if ( device.getAddress().startsWith(VENDOR_ID) ) {
// Do Something
}
My Explanation will be based on the BluetoothChat example from the Android SDK, hopefully this is ok, otherwise I would need to write a lot more. If you haven't seen the BluetoothChat example, go take a look, it's really nice!
If you want to use a device where you don't know the complete adress, you'll have to do a complete discovery with BluetoothAdapter.startDiscovery() and search the received addresses for the ones you want to.
If you know the complete address of the device you want to connect to you can directly connect to this device with BluetoothDevice device = mBluetoothAdapter.getRemoteDevice(address)
I want to be able to discover Android devices on my network and possibly retrieve some device information about them. This is very easy with Apple devices since they run Bonjour services. However, I can't seem to find any similar service running on Android.
This must work without modifying the Android device, installing some service, or opening some port. It's meant to work with vanilla Android devices in the way that Bonjour helps you find vanilla Apple devices. Even being able to just verify that the device is running Android would be sufficient.
Chosen Answer: Although it's not the top rated answer (yet), please take a look at the response by Luis. As he mentions, you can use a DNS lookup (using your local DNS server) to discover Android devices. I have found this to have a 100% success rate, as Android forces devices to use a hostname of android-_____. This is apparently difficult to change on the phone, even if it is rooted. So I think this is a pretty accurate method. Thanks, Luis!
Example:
$ nslookup 192.168.1.104 192.168.1.1
Server: 192.168.1.1
Address: 192.168.1.1#53
104.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa name = android-711c129e251f14cf.\001.
Sample Code: If you wanted to implement this in Java (e.g., to run on Android), you can't easily use getHostName() because it uses the external DNS servers. You want to use the local DNS server on your router, for example. Luis mentions below that you could modify the DNS servers of the Wifi connection, but that could possibly break other things. Instead, I've found the dnsjava library to be extremely helpful to send targeted DNS requests. Here is some sample code using the library:
String ipAddress = "104.1.168.192";
String dnsblDomain = "in-addr.arpa";
Record[] records;
Lookup lookup = new Lookup(ipAddress + "." + dnsblDomain, Type.PTR);
SimpleResolver resolver = new SimpleResolver();
resolver.setAddress(InetAddress.getByName("192.168.1.1"));
lookup.setResolver(resolver);
records = lookup.run();
if(lookup.getResult() == Lookup.SUCCESSFUL) {
for (int i = 0; i < records.length; i++) {
if(records[i] instanceof PTRRecord) {
PTRRecord ptr = (PTRRecord) records[i];
System.out.println("DNS Record: " + records[0].rdataToString());
}
}
} else {
System.out.println("Failed lookup");
}
} catch(Exception e) {
System.out.println("Exception: " + e);
}
This gives me the output:
DNS Record: android-711c129e251f14cf.\001.
Bingo.
There is an very simple approach that gave me positive results in few different devices.
When a device connects to your router it receives an IP (i.e. DHCP) and registers a name in DNS. The name that is registered seems to be always in the form android_nnnnnnnn.
Of course, you can name any computer with the same approach and trick the check, resulting in false positives ...
Also, I can't ensure that all device suppliers are following the same approach, but I've found it to work correctly in a few devices from different brands (including different SDK levels) that I've tested.
--EDITED--
How to do it
It depends on where you would be running the code to discover the Android devices. Assuming that you would be running the code in an Android device:
First discover devices responding to ping in your network. You can use the code in my answer to this post: execComd() to run a ping command.
Get the name of responding devices using the code:
InetAddress inetAddress = InetAddress.getByName(string_with_ip_addr);
String name = inetAddress.getCanonicalHostName();
--EDIT 2--
Proof of concept
The method below is just a proof of concept for what I've wrote above.
I'm using isReachable() method to generate the ICMP request, which is said to only work with rooted devices in many posts, which is the case for the device used for testing it. However, I didn't give root permissions for the application running this code, so I believe it couldn't set the SIUD bit, which is the reason why some claim that this method fails. I would like to do it here from the perspective of someone testing it on a non-rooted device.
To call use:
ArrayList<String> hosts = scanSubNet("192.168.1.");
It returns in hosts, a list of names for devices responding to ping request.
private ArrayList<String> scanSubNet(String subnet){
ArrayList<String> hosts = new ArrayList<String>();
InetAddress inetAddress = null;
for(int i=1; i<10; i++){
Log.d(TAG, "Trying: " + subnet + String.valueOf(i));
try {
inetAddress = InetAddress.getByName(subnet + String.valueOf(i));
if(inetAddress.isReachable(1000)){
hosts.add(inetAddress.getHostName());
Log.d(TAG, inetAddress.getHostName());
}
} catch (UnknownHostException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
return hosts;
}
Regards.
Android is not going to be as easy as iOS. There is no Bonjour equivalent.
Android 4.0, Ice Cream Sandwich, introduced Wi-Fi Direct Peer to Peer networking. At first I hoped it might be able to be scanned in the the way your thinking, but it helps Android devices communicate without an access point, so they're not really "on your network". Besides, ICS runs on only a fraction of Android devices.
Rather than an active netscan approach, you're left with a passive monitoring approach. If your network is secure, sniffing the encrypted packet is possible, but inconvenient. You'll have to
put your network interface into monitor mode
capture the 4-way handshake
decrypt it using the network's pre-shared key
this will give you the key you need to decrypt traffic
If you want to see this in action, Wireshark supports WPA decryption.
Once you're able to view the Wi-Fi traffic, you will notice Android devices tend to communicate with certain Google servers and their HTTP connections have User Agent strings that can be identified.
This is the basis for a workable passive solution.
Tenable Network Security offer products that seem to take this type of approach.
Another Idea
#Michelle Cannon mentioned Libelium's Meshlium Xtreme whose approach will not get you all the way there (not without good up to date MAC address range tables). But it could be part of reaching a lesser goal.
You can:
Detect all wireless devices
Eliminate Apple devices using the MAC's Organizationally Unique Identifier (OUI)
Tell it's a mobile device by by monitoring signal strength to determine it's moving (and mobile devices will tend to show up and go away)
You may be able to use the MAC OUI as a hint it's Android
You may be able to use the MAC OUI as a hint it's not Android (but a laptop or wireless card, etc.).
This may be workable if your willing to detect devices that are probably Android.
DHCP Fingerprinting
#Michelle Cannon suggested DHCP fingerprinting. I wasn't sure at first but I have to thank him for suggesting what's looking like the best bet for simple passive scanning. As a cautionary tail, I'd like to explain why I was late to the party.
There are things we know, thinks we don't know, and things we think we know but are wrong.
In a lot of ways, it's good that Android uses the Linux kernel. But it's not good if you want to discover Android devices on your network. Android's TCP/IP stack is Linux's therefor Android devices will look like Linux devices or so I thought at first. But then I realized Linux has a lot of build configuration parameters so there could be something distinctive about Android when seen on a network, but what?
DHCP fingerprinting uses a the exact DHCP options requested by the device plus timing. For this to work you generally need an up to date fingerprint database to match against. At first it looked like fingerbank was crowed sourcing this data, but then I noticed their files hadn't been updated for almost a year. With all the different Android device types, I don't think it's practical to keep updated fingerprints for a single project.
But then I looked at the actual DHCP signatures for Android and I noticed this:
Android 1.0: dhcpvendorcode=dhcpcd 4.0.0-beta9
Android 1.5-2.1: dhcpvendorcode=dhcpcd 4.0.1
Android 2.2: dhcpvendorcode=dhcpcd 4.0.15
Android 3.0: dhcpvendorcode=dhcpcd-5.2.10
Linux normally uses dhclient as their DHCP client, but Android is using dhcpcd. Android has a strong preference for using software licensed with the BSD style where possible and dhcpcd uses a BSD license. It would seem dhcpvendorcode could be used as a strong indicator that a mobile device is running Android.
DHCP monitoring
A client uses DHCP to get an IP address when joining a network so it's starting without an IP address. It gets around this problem by using UDP broadcasts for the initial exchange. On Wi-Fi, even with WPA, broadcast traffic is not encrypted. So you can just listen on UDP port 67 for client to server traffic and 68 for the reverse. You don't even need to put your network interface into promiscuous mode. You can easily monitor this traffic using a protocol analyzer like Wireshark.
I preferred to write code to monitor the traffic and decided to use Python. I selected pydhcplib to handle the details of DHCP. My experience with this library was not smooth. I needed to manually download and place IN.py and TYPES.py support files. And their packet to string conversion was leaving the dhcpvendorcode blank. It did parse the DHCP packets correctly, so I just wrote my own print code.
Here's code that monitors DHCP traffic from client to server:
#!/usr/bin/python
from pydhcplib.dhcp_packet import *
from pydhcplib.dhcp_network import *
from pydhcplib.dhcp_constants import *
netopt = {
'client_listen_port':"68",
'server_listen_port':"67",
'listen_address':"0.0.0.0"
}
class Server(DhcpServer):
def __init__(self, options):
DhcpServer.__init__(
self,options["listen_address"],
options["client_listen_port"],
options["server_listen_port"])
def PrintOptions(self, packet, options=['vendor_class', 'host_name', 'chaddr']):
# uncomment next line to print full details
# print packet.str()
for option in options:
# chaddr is not really and option, it's in the fixed header
if option == 'chaddr':
begin = DhcpFields[option][0]
end = begin+6
opdata = packet.packet_data[begin:end]
hex = ['0','1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8','9','a','b','c','d','e','f']
print option+':', ':'.join([(hex[i/16]+hex[i%16]) for i in opdata])
else:
opdata = packet.options_data.get(option)
if opdata:
print option+':', ''.join([chr(i) for i in opdata if i != 0])
print
def HandleDhcpDiscover(self, packet):
print "DHCP DISCOVER"
self.PrintOptions(packet)
def HandleDhcpRequest(self, packet):
print "DHCP REQUEST"
self.PrintOptions(packet)
## def HandleDhcpDecline(self, packet):
## self.PrintOptions(packet)
## def HandleDhcpRelease(self, packet):
## self.PrintOptions(packet)
## def HandleDhcpInform(self, packet):
## self.PrintOptions(packet)
server = Server(netopt)
while True :
server.GetNextDhcpPacket()
This code is based on pydhcplib's server example because it listens for client requests, like a server.
When my Nexus 7 Android 4.2 tablet connects, this interesting information is captured (redacted):
DHCP REQUEST
vendor_class: dhcpcd-5.5.6
host_name: android-5c1b97cdffffffff
chaddr: 10:bf:48:ff:ff:ff
DHCP DISCOVER
vendor_class: dhcpcd-5.5.6
host_name: android-5c1b97cdffffffff
chaddr: 10:bf:48:ff:ff:ff
The host name seems to have a fixed format and is easily parsed. If you need the IP address you can monitor the server to client traffic. Note: only the initial exchange, when an new client first shows up without an IP address, is broadcast. Future lease extensions, etc., are not broadcast.
Reverse DNS Lookup
#Luis posted a great solution that demonstrates how simpler is better. Even after seeing Android's DHCP client was setting host_name to android-5c1b97cdffffffff, I didn't think to ask the router for it's list of names using reverse DNS lookups. The router adds the host_name to it's DNS server so you can still access the device if its IP address changes.
The host_name is expected to remain listed in the DNS for the duration of the DHCP lease. You could check if the device is still present by pinging it.
One drawback to depending on host_name is there are ways this could be changed. It's easy for the device manufacturer or carrier to change the host_name (though after searching, I've been unable to find any evidence they ever have). There are apps to change host name, but they require root so that's, at most, an edge case.
Finally there's an open Android Issue 6111: Allow a hostname to be specified that currently has 629 stars. It would not be surprising to see configurable host_name in Android Settings at some point in the future, maybe soon. So if you start depending on host_name to identify Android devices, realize it could be yanked out from under you.
If you're doing live tracking, another potential problem with Reverse DNS Lookup is you have to decide how frequently to scan. (Of course this is not an issue if you're just taking a one-time snapshot.) Frequent scanning consumes network resources, infrequent leaves you with stale data. Here's how adding DHCP monitoring can help:
On startup use Reverse DNS Lookup to find devices
Ping devices to see if they are still active
Monitor DHCP traffic to detect new devices instantly
Occasionally rerun DNS Lookup to find devices you might have missed
If you need to notice devices leaving, ping devices at desired timing resolution
While it's not easy (nor 100% accurate), there are several techniques that make it possible to discover Android devices on your network.
AFAIK, Android system doesn't provide any zeroconf app/service on it's built-in system app/service stack. To enable the auto-discovery on the actual device attached to local network, you need either install some third-party zeroconf app or develop your own app/service and install it on the actual device, some API options are:
JmDNS (for Apple's bonjour protocol)
Cling (for Microsoft's UPnP protocol)
Android NSD API (introduced since Android 4.1)
I am not quite clear about your requirements, if you want something similar (i.e. auto discover and connect) on vanilla Android devices, you can probably use Wi-Fi direct which is now available on some later device running Android 4.0, however, it requires both devices support Wi-Fi Direct and only create an ad-hoc P2P connection with Wi-Fi turned off, much like a bluetooth connection with a longer range:
For Wi-Fi Direct API support, check out official guide - Connecting Devices Wirelessly.
I am looking at this an thinking
http://www.libelium.com/smartphones_iphone_android_detection
pay special note to this
Do the users need to have an specific app installed or interact somehow to be detected?
No, the scan is performed silently, Meshlium just detects the "beacon frames" originated by the Wifi and Bluetooth radios integrated in the Smartphones. Users just need to have at least one of the two wireless interfaces turned on.
Long time ago I use to use an app called stumbler on my mac to find wifi networks, I think this is similar
Other ideas
Well if I need to determine android phones on a local network how would I do it. Absent of a dns service running I only have a couple possibilities
The SSID if its being broadcast - can't tell me anything The ip address - android lets you have a lot of control over host naming so I guess you could define a specific ip range to your android devices. -not to useful.
Alternately lets say I see an unknown device on the network, if bluetooth is turned on then I am broadcasting a bluetooth device signature SDPP that I can use to deduce my device type.
If I were running a service that supported android and I wanted to discover specific android devices on my network, then I could just register the mac addresses for those devices and watch for them on the network.
Other than that you would need to run either a bonjour (dns-sd) or upnpp dameon on the device.
Updated Response
Sorry, I haven't understood the original question correctly. Only your comment made it really clear to me that you do not want to have to install anything on the target devices but you just want a way of discovering random phones in your network.
I'm not sure if this would really be possible in the way you want it. Without having any network discovery service running on Android you will not find the device in first place. Of course you can use some low-level network protocols but that would only give you an indicator that there's something but not what it is (being an Android device, a PC, a whatever else).
The most promising approach would be to check for preinstalled apps that have network functionality of some kind. E.g. Samsung devices have Kies Air (if the user enables it), Motorola are using UPnP for their Media Server and HTC has something own as well, if I remember correctly. However, there's no app that is installed on all Android devices of all vendors and carriers. So you can't rely on solely one of those but would need to check for various different services using their specific protocols and behaviors in order to get additional information about the device. And, of course, the user would have to enable the functionality in order for you to use it.
Old response
An additional alternative to yorkw's list is AllJoyn by Qualcomm. It's an open source cross-platform discovery and peer-to-peer communication framework I've used in the past myself already.
Though Qualcomm is a big sponsor of AllJoyn this does not mean that you need a Qualcomm chipset in your define. In fact AllJoyn works on any chipset including Intel and nVidia. It doesn't require rooted phones or any other modifications to the Android framework and just works "out of the box" using Wi-Fi and/or Bluetooth as pairing methods.
I am learning a lot from this topic.
there is also something called dhcp fingerprinting, apparently different devices act differently to the kind of network scans we've been discussing such as those using NMAP a linux scanner. Maps of the behavior from these probes are available on the internet.
http://www.enterasys.com/company/literature/device-profiling-sab.pdf
https://media.defcon.org/dc-19/presentations/Bilodeau/DEFCON-19-Bilodeau-FingerBank.pdf
http://community.arubanetworks.com/t5/ArubaOS-and-Mobility-Controllers/COTD-DHCP-Fingerprinting-how-to-ArubaOS-6-0-1-0-and-above/td-p/11164
http://myweb.cableone.net/xnih/
Here's a one liner that pings all of the machines on your network (assuming your network is 192.168.1.x) and does a reverse lookup on their names:
for i in {1..255}; do echo ping -t 4 192.168.1.${i} ; done | parallel -j 0 --no-notice 2> /dev/null | awk '/ttl/ { print $4 }' | sort | uniq | sed 's/://' | xargs -n 1 host
Requires GNU parallel to work. You can install that on OSX using "brew install parallel"
From this you can just look at the devices named android-c40a2b8027d663dd.home. or whatever.
You can then trying running nmap -O on a device to see what else you can figure out:
sudo nmap -O android-297e7f9fccaa5b5f.home.
But it's not really that fruitful.