Develop Reference

Why in Google App Engine Always 11 secs of Latency coming only for the first requests?

I am deploying my Nodejs sample app to Google App Engine Flexible env and when I am using google app engine URL which is in the form appspot.com to hit my API, it is taking around 11 secs to send response from my mobile data, but other APIs are sending response in milisecs.
Also, the time delay is only happening when I am opening my android app and sending request to the server after that all requests are taking normal time, and again delay is coming when I again open the app and send request to the server.
Edit - I found that
This can be a caused when your application is still booting up or warming up instances to serve the request and can be called as loading latency. To avoid such scenarios you can implement health check handler like readiness check so that your application will only receive traffic when its ready
That's why I checked in my Logs that readiness check is performed sometimes around 1 sec
and sometimes around 200 ms
Can anyone please tell me is there anything wrong in warming up my instances because I don't think cold boot time is causing this problem.
Edit 2
I have also tried to set min_num_instances: 2 so that once loaded atleast my 2 instances will again not get boot up, but the thing is delay is again same.
Edit 3
runtime: nodejs
#vm: true
env: flex
automatic_scaling:
min_num_instances: 2
max_num_instances: 3
Edit 4
I am noticing a strange behaviour that when I am using this app Packet Capture to capture traffic, then all https requests (if I am not enabling SSL Proxying) and all Http requests are executing in milisecs whereas without using this app all Http/Https requests are taking 11-16 secs of delay.
I don't know how but is there any certificate kind of issue here?
Edit 5
Below I have attached Network Profiler where delay is coming 15 secs
Please Help

Depends on which App Engine you are using and how you setup the scaling, there's always a loading time if you don't have a ready instance to serve a request. But if you have readiness check to ensure your instance is ready (and not cold started for the request), then there shouldn't be a problem.
Can you find a loading request or any corresponding slow request in your logs? If not, then it's likely an issue with the app. If possible, instead of calling this API on your app, do it from two apps (one is already open, one is not). So you make calls from both apps and if you notice that the one that's already open is getting a response faster than the other one, that means that's a problem with the app itself. App Engine can't determine whether or not your app is pre-opened so any difference would be client side.
=== Additional information ===
In the your logs, there's no delay at all. The request enter Google and was processed within a few milliseconds. I am sure there's something application-side. Maybe your app is constructing the request URL (first request) from some other source that results in the delay? App Engine has no knowledge of whether or not your app is opened or not or whether it's sending a first request after being opened, it cannot act differently based on it. As long as your App Engine instance is ready and available, it will treat your request the same way regardless of whether or not it's your first request after the app is opened.

The issue is resolved now, it was happening because of network service provider which is Bharti Airtel, their DNS lookup was taking the time to resolve the hostname. After explicitly using alternative DNS like Google 8.8.8.8 the issue got completely resolved. Maybe it's a compatibility issue of Airtel with Google Cloud.

Last time I checked I remember having to put a warmup request handler so that Google would know that the instance is up and running and can be used to answer calls. Keep in mind that code has to be EXACTLY under the endpoint you specify in the handler under the yaml file. (Wouldn't be the first time someone forgets that)
Here are the docs https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/python/configuring-warmup-requests this is python specific, but you can also check other languages like Go, Java, and such in the docs.
If the problem is client dependant (each time a new clients spawns and makes a call it gets the latency) then it is most likely, either a problem with the client app itself or with initialization, registration or DNS resolution.
You could also try to reproduce the requests with CURL or similar, and see if also with those you see the mentioned delay.

Codename One - ToastBar when "No connectivity detected"

What is a correct approach to deal with Internet connection unavailability (that is common on mobile devices)?
Maybe it's a big question (or maybe not), however I didn't find any Codename One tutorial / article / video or API to deal with an unstable Internet connection (that is the normality on mobile) without errors or unexpected behaviors. I've found an app (Protonmail) that has a functionality that I would like to replicate in my apps. Please look at the following two screenshot: the first one is taken when the Internet connection is available, the second one when it's not available.
I noted that the ToastBar appears not only when Internet is explicitly disabled, but every time that the server is not reachable. When the "No connectivity detected" message is shown, the app pauses the Internet activity, so no errors are generated (and the messages written by the user are not lost). When the app server returns to be reachable, the ToastBar disappears automatically (without pressing the "RETRY" button).
What is a correct way to implement a similar functionality in Codename One, in a way that is as most as possible independent from the specific app? Is it possible to suspend the Internet activity of a Codename One app and then restore it?
I'm imagining something like this:
the app tries to do a simple request (like a ping) to a server every few seconds, implementing the performBackgroundFetch method;
if there is no response in a fixed time (i.e. three seconds), the Internet activity is suspended and the ToastBar is shown;
if there is response, the Internet activity is restored, the paused or failed downloads are restarted and the ToastBar disappears;
ideally all of this should works also with a BrowserComponent.

You can detect a networking error in the NetworkManager class by using:
NetworkManager.getInstance().addErrorListener(e -> {
// prevents the error from propagating into the ConnectionRequest class
e.consume();
ToastBar.showMessage("Connectivity error, retry?", FontImage.MATERIAL_ERROR,
ee -> ee.getConnectionRequest().retry());
});
As explained here: https://www.codenameone.com/manual/files-storage-networking.html
The toast bar code just prompts in a similar way and offers a retry on the connection request. Notice that this is the generic global approach.
This will not work for things like browser component which connects on its own without "us". In there you will need to handle errors in the JavaScript side.

Flex mobile app crashes/hangs while waiting for web service response

I have having problems with a WSDL/SOAP service call in an app I have built in flash builder for mobile. I have connected to the service using flash builders built in data/services functionality.
For the most part, the service call works perfectly but once in a while it will cause the app to crash - on my android device it completely locks up (spinning animation stops) and then Android informs me that the app is not responding and asks if I want to close it.
The crash appears to occur quite frequently but not with any pattern. One time it happened on my third attempt, another time it took approximately 30, a couple of times I could not get it to happen and most times it occurs somewhere in between.
It appears that the crash happens after a service call is made but before any response is received. Neither the success or the fault listeners are ever fired. I am very confident that I am sending exactly the same variables to the service every time.
I have used web service calls in other apps without trouble so I have to assume there is something in this particular build that is causing problems but I can't seem to find anything.
Any thoughts on possible causes, things to test or even a solution would be hugely appreciated.
Thank you,
Jamie

Your question lacks essential details, so now I can suggest you to setup Charles proxy and monitor you requests trough it.
If you send too many requests simultaneously, you shall not be confident in fault/result events as air runtime has limitations (in any case, it is a good practice to handle request timeout).

What is the good practice on android app development integrated with web services?

I have developed android apps, and have a web server application which serves REST style JSON, to the apps.
My apps are strongly dependent on that web services but as traffic gets higher, users' complaint started, as force close problems. I am not sure but maybe my server (AWS small instance) may not answer all requests correctly or in time.
I am planning to retry the web request when a problem on getting json response arise instead giving the error/net-connection alert.
I guess there are many developers who integrates apps with web services, so what is the good practice on handling network problems?
Or is the frequency of such network problems acceptable?
I take about 10-20 problem per day.
I have about 200.000+ web requests per day, for a AWS small instance (1.7 RAM), dedicated to server Tomcat. I analyze the logs there is no clue, no error log. Also the errors are spreaded.

You need to start with analyzing the problem, and determine the root cause or root causes of your issues. You always need to take into account that
a network connection might drop
a users switches from 3G / WiFi
the android devices "thinks" it's connected while in fact it's not
Also, be very sceptical when using the Android ConnectivityManager / NetworkInfo. Only trust it when it states that it is not connected. If it is connected, check it yourself (as sometimes, user is on a hotspot and the only connectivity he has is with a login page).
The application needs to handle all these scenarios properly. The way it's presented to the user depends on the use-case (do you want the user to be informed of the error, do you silently ignore it and just retry, ....)
In terms of retrying webservice connections, there are several ways to implement this :
exponential backoff
periodic rescheduling
event-driven triggering
retry-after moratorium intervals
You need to start by putting sufficient logging both on the client (Android) and on the server (AWS) so that you can analyze the issues and draw the proper conclusions.

I think the answer to your problem lies in the design of your android app.
You need to take into consideration the worst case scenario and redesign your application to take that into account and recover. Dealing with the chaos monkey - jeff atwood.
Personally I never allow an android app to be in a state where it needs to force close. For any or all network connection I assume that the connection is down, lossy, not all data can be retreived and (finally) up and working correctly.
That way my app will degenerate gracefully. If it needs web access it'll make an attempt in a background thread allowing the user to continue using the app, it will cache previous requests and will retry until it gets a connection or gives a nice toast to the end user.

Android Force Close Uncatchable Unreportable

I've released my second game project on the Android Market this week, and immediately had multiple 1-star reports due to force closes. I tested it on many handsets and many emulators with zero issues. I'm completely at a loss for how to proceed and looking for advice.
I use Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler to intercept and report uncaught exceptions, then close gracefully. The people reporting force closes aren't getting to any of that, even though it is the first thing set in the application's main task constructor, and everything is wrapped in try/catches throughout. They are also reporting that there is no "Send Report" option in the force close popup (providing the Developer Console error reports), so I have absolutely no way of knowing what the problem is.
Uses Android 2.0, with android:minSdkVersion="5". Only Permission required is INTERNET.
(on Android market as 'Fortunes of War FREE' if you want to test)

I'm a bit surprised about the missing "Send report" button. What API level did you build the game with? I usually build the level with your minimum API level to make sure you're not using any API calls beyond that, but then switch back to the highest API level so you can use functionality like "install to SD".
I'm sure there's at least one user who wrote you a mail. Can you ask them to install LogCollector and mail you the log?
Btw, in general, I wouldn't use Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler so there IS the option to send a report. (It's ominously missing in your case, but normally, it should be there.)
Btw btw, the exception handler applies to the current thread. If you have an OpenGL app, maybe the crash happens in the GL thread?

I'm not sure if I understood you correctly, but as far as I know Android only shows that report dialog if you use its default UncaughtExceptionHandler.
Try this:
In your UncaughtExceptionHander's constructor, call Thread.getDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler and save the returned object in a variable (let's call it defaultHandler). In your Handler's uncaughtException() do the things you want to do, and then call defaultHandler.uncaughtException() afterwards.
Maybe something you should know:
In my experience, your Context isn't functional anymore at uncaughtException(). So, you can't send broadcasts, etc anymore.
By the way, if you really wrapped everything in try/catch, that could be the reason why error reporting doesn't work as expected? :P
Good luck
Tom

Perhaps the force closes are caused by stalls, rather than exceptions. Users may not notice the difference. This kind of problem can occur more often if users have CPU hogging services running at the same time as your application, which explains why you're not seeing the issue in your testing.

Permission Internet sounds a lot like you try to transfer data from the net, which is very fast in your local LAN, but all of a sudden becomes slow (and time consuming) when people try this over their GSM connections.
If you then do the data transfer in the UI thread, this one is blocked and the system detects the block - but then this should end up in a "Did not respond" -- but then I've seen one user report an error with in the market on my app that was such a slow down cause.