I have having problems with a WSDL/SOAP service call in an app I have built in flash builder for mobile. I have connected to the service using flash builders built in data/services functionality.
For the most part, the service call works perfectly but once in a while it will cause the app to crash - on my android device it completely locks up (spinning animation stops) and then Android informs me that the app is not responding and asks if I want to close it.
The crash appears to occur quite frequently but not with any pattern. One time it happened on my third attempt, another time it took approximately 30, a couple of times I could not get it to happen and most times it occurs somewhere in between.
It appears that the crash happens after a service call is made but before any response is received. Neither the success or the fault listeners are ever fired. I am very confident that I am sending exactly the same variables to the service every time.
I have used web service calls in other apps without trouble so I have to assume there is something in this particular build that is causing problems but I can't seem to find anything.
Any thoughts on possible causes, things to test or even a solution would be hugely appreciated.
Thank you,
Jamie
Your question lacks essential details, so now I can suggest you to setup Charles proxy and monitor you requests trough it.
If you send too many requests simultaneously, you shall not be confident in fault/result events as air runtime has limitations (in any case, it is a good practice to handle request timeout).
Related
I'm trying to create an app that manages a BLE connection in the background (receives notifications, reconnects and subscribes to a characteristic when connection is lost and the phone is moved near the BLE device again).
Right now I have the app somewhat built - everything that I need works relatively well but only when the app is open. Although the code isn't up to standard as this is my first app and I don't have any previous experience with Java/Kotlin/Dart (this is also why I'd rather not touch anything outside of flutter).
I need the app to send me local push notifications when tabbed out of the app or when screen lock is on and as far as I understand one could do this with isolates. I've searched a lot but found one guide which is kind of hard to understand as a beginner and also uses Kotlin.
Can I get away with only dart code for background code execution (described above) and is it suitable for a beginner?
Also, let me know if you have any alternative solutions since all I need is to get a notification on my phone whenever it receives a notification from a BLE device (and also auto connecting). I've already tried this with kivy since I'm more familiar with python but with no luck.
Talking about BLE there's this plugin by the way: https://pub.dev/packages/flutter_reactive_ble
As for the isolates, they are not ideal for this even though they do run separately, they'll get killed eventually. There's also a little helper package that makes working with isolates very straightforward if you want to try it: https://pub.dev/packages/computer
And so actually for the task at hand (background execution) I would suggest researching/using this one: https://pub.dev/packages/background_fetch
I would not encourage you to use any timer-based solution that tries to wake up your phone every 15 minutes or so, since that uses unnecessary CPU time.
Now I'm not that much into Flutter, but at least on Android, the "correct" way to have an ongoing connection (auto-connect) is to have a Foreground Service in the process running, so the process does not get killed. Then subscribe to characteristic notifications as usual, and handle the values as they arrive, either in Java or Flutter (by using some Java <-> Dart bridge).
I am deploying my Nodejs sample app to Google App Engine Flexible env and when I am using google app engine URL which is in the form appspot.com to hit my API, it is taking around 11 secs to send response from my mobile data, but other APIs are sending response in milisecs.
Also, the time delay is only happening when I am opening my android app and sending request to the server after that all requests are taking normal time, and again delay is coming when I again open the app and send request to the server.
Edit - I found that
This can be a caused when your application is still booting up or warming up instances to serve the request and can be called as loading latency. To avoid such scenarios you can implement health check handler like readiness check so that your application will only receive traffic when its ready
That's why I checked in my Logs that readiness check is performed sometimes around 1 sec
and sometimes around 200 ms
Can anyone please tell me is there anything wrong in warming up my instances because I don't think cold boot time is causing this problem.
Edit 2
I have also tried to set min_num_instances: 2 so that once loaded atleast my 2 instances will again not get boot up, but the thing is delay is again same.
Edit 3
runtime: nodejs
#vm: true
env: flex
automatic_scaling:
min_num_instances: 2
max_num_instances: 3
Edit 4
I am noticing a strange behaviour that when I am using this app Packet Capture to capture traffic, then all https requests (if I am not enabling SSL Proxying) and all Http requests are executing in milisecs whereas without using this app all Http/Https requests are taking 11-16 secs of delay.
I don't know how but is there any certificate kind of issue here?
Edit 5
Below I have attached Network Profiler where delay is coming 15 secs
Please Help
Depends on which App Engine you are using and how you setup the scaling, there's always a loading time if you don't have a ready instance to serve a request. But if you have readiness check to ensure your instance is ready (and not cold started for the request), then there shouldn't be a problem.
Can you find a loading request or any corresponding slow request in your logs? If not, then it's likely an issue with the app. If possible, instead of calling this API on your app, do it from two apps (one is already open, one is not). So you make calls from both apps and if you notice that the one that's already open is getting a response faster than the other one, that means that's a problem with the app itself. App Engine can't determine whether or not your app is pre-opened so any difference would be client side.
=== Additional information ===
In the your logs, there's no delay at all. The request enter Google and was processed within a few milliseconds. I am sure there's something application-side. Maybe your app is constructing the request URL (first request) from some other source that results in the delay? App Engine has no knowledge of whether or not your app is opened or not or whether it's sending a first request after being opened, it cannot act differently based on it. As long as your App Engine instance is ready and available, it will treat your request the same way regardless of whether or not it's your first request after the app is opened.
The issue is resolved now, it was happening because of network service provider which is Bharti Airtel, their DNS lookup was taking the time to resolve the hostname. After explicitly using alternative DNS like Google 8.8.8.8 the issue got completely resolved. Maybe it's a compatibility issue of Airtel with Google Cloud.
Last time I checked I remember having to put a warmup request handler so that Google would know that the instance is up and running and can be used to answer calls. Keep in mind that code has to be EXACTLY under the endpoint you specify in the handler under the yaml file. (Wouldn't be the first time someone forgets that)
Here are the docs https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/python/configuring-warmup-requests this is python specific, but you can also check other languages like Go, Java, and such in the docs.
If the problem is client dependant (each time a new clients spawns and makes a call it gets the latency) then it is most likely, either a problem with the client app itself or with initialization, registration or DNS resolution.
You could also try to reproduce the requests with CURL or similar, and see if also with those you see the mentioned delay.
I have created a webserivce using C# on .NET and I'm consuming the same in an android application. At times while testing I notice that the web service is annoyingly slow and does not show results for minutes altogether. I don't want to put my user through this behavior of the application.
I am basically looking for a way such that the communication between the application and the web service can become faster.
PS: I am using asynctask function already to provide a separate thread while calling the web service. STILL it takes minutes at times to extract results from it.
Any help is appreciated!:]
I can't tell if you're saying the web service is slow or if it's just slow to be consumed on an Android device.
If the web service is slow on all devices I'd suggest first eliminating the possibility that it's just the speed of the web connection you're testing on. Obviously there isn't much that can be done about that. If the service is simply slow to respond I'd recommend running some profilers to determine where the slowdown is. If it can't be made more efficient perhaps this is a task better suited to be first requested and placed in a queue. When the task is complete alert the device that the data is ready.
If the Android device is slow I'd also recommend some profiling to determine what's eating up the processor.
Sorry if I'm stating the obvious here but these are the only options I can think of.
I have developed android apps, and have a web server application which serves REST style JSON, to the apps.
My apps are strongly dependent on that web services but as traffic gets higher, users' complaint started, as force close problems. I am not sure but maybe my server (AWS small instance) may not answer all requests correctly or in time.
I am planning to retry the web request when a problem on getting json response arise instead giving the error/net-connection alert.
I guess there are many developers who integrates apps with web services, so what is the good practice on handling network problems?
Or is the frequency of such network problems acceptable?
I take about 10-20 problem per day.
I have about 200.000+ web requests per day, for a AWS small instance (1.7 RAM), dedicated to server Tomcat. I analyze the logs there is no clue, no error log. Also the errors are spreaded.
You need to start with analyzing the problem, and determine the root cause or root causes of your issues. You always need to take into account that
a network connection might drop
a users switches from 3G / WiFi
the android devices "thinks" it's connected while in fact it's not
Also, be very sceptical when using the Android ConnectivityManager / NetworkInfo. Only trust it when it states that it is not connected. If it is connected, check it yourself (as sometimes, user is on a hotspot and the only connectivity he has is with a login page).
The application needs to handle all these scenarios properly. The way it's presented to the user depends on the use-case (do you want the user to be informed of the error, do you silently ignore it and just retry, ....)
In terms of retrying webservice connections, there are several ways to implement this :
exponential backoff
periodic rescheduling
event-driven triggering
retry-after moratorium intervals
You need to start by putting sufficient logging both on the client (Android) and on the server (AWS) so that you can analyze the issues and draw the proper conclusions.
I think the answer to your problem lies in the design of your android app.
You need to take into consideration the worst case scenario and redesign your application to take that into account and recover. Dealing with the chaos monkey - jeff atwood.
Personally I never allow an android app to be in a state where it needs to force close. For any or all network connection I assume that the connection is down, lossy, not all data can be retreived and (finally) up and working correctly.
That way my app will degenerate gracefully. If it needs web access it'll make an attempt in a background thread allowing the user to continue using the app, it will cache previous requests and will retry until it gets a connection or gives a nice toast to the end user.
I've released my second game project on the Android Market this week, and immediately had multiple 1-star reports due to force closes. I tested it on many handsets and many emulators with zero issues. I'm completely at a loss for how to proceed and looking for advice.
I use Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler to intercept and report uncaught exceptions, then close gracefully. The people reporting force closes aren't getting to any of that, even though it is the first thing set in the application's main task constructor, and everything is wrapped in try/catches throughout. They are also reporting that there is no "Send Report" option in the force close popup (providing the Developer Console error reports), so I have absolutely no way of knowing what the problem is.
Uses Android 2.0, with android:minSdkVersion="5". Only Permission required is INTERNET.
(on Android market as 'Fortunes of War FREE' if you want to test)
I'm a bit surprised about the missing "Send report" button. What API level did you build the game with? I usually build the level with your minimum API level to make sure you're not using any API calls beyond that, but then switch back to the highest API level so you can use functionality like "install to SD".
I'm sure there's at least one user who wrote you a mail. Can you ask them to install LogCollector and mail you the log?
Btw, in general, I wouldn't use Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler so there IS the option to send a report. (It's ominously missing in your case, but normally, it should be there.)
Btw btw, the exception handler applies to the current thread. If you have an OpenGL app, maybe the crash happens in the GL thread?
I'm not sure if I understood you correctly, but as far as I know Android only shows that report dialog if you use its default UncaughtExceptionHandler.
Try this:
In your UncaughtExceptionHander's constructor, call Thread.getDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler and save the returned object in a variable (let's call it defaultHandler). In your Handler's uncaughtException() do the things you want to do, and then call defaultHandler.uncaughtException() afterwards.
Maybe something you should know:
In my experience, your Context isn't functional anymore at uncaughtException(). So, you can't send broadcasts, etc anymore.
By the way, if you really wrapped everything in try/catch, that could be the reason why error reporting doesn't work as expected? :P
Good luck
Tom
Perhaps the force closes are caused by stalls, rather than exceptions. Users may not notice the difference. This kind of problem can occur more often if users have CPU hogging services running at the same time as your application, which explains why you're not seeing the issue in your testing.
Permission Internet sounds a lot like you try to transfer data from the net, which is very fast in your local LAN, but all of a sudden becomes slow (and time consuming) when people try this over their GSM connections.
If you then do the data transfer in the UI thread, this one is blocked and the system detects the block - but then this should end up in a "Did not respond" -- but then I've seen one user report an error with in the market on my app that was such a slow down cause.