Ok, I've stated that fragments are removed without reason. It seems to me, like this, but sureley there is a reason I don't know about. Please help me find it.
I got the FragmentActivity which contains TabHost, with 5 tabs. TabHost has a onTabChangedListener like this (nothing complicated here, just a case with copied code):
new OnTabChangeListener() {
#Override
public void onTabChanged(String arg0) {
LiveTabFragment fragment = null;
int viewHolder = -1;
switch (tabHost.getCurrentTab()) {
case TAB_ABOUT:
fragment = (LiveAboutFragment) getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag(LiveAboutFragment.class.getSimpleName());
if (fragment == null) fragment = new LiveAboutFragment();
viewHolder = R.id.live_tab_about;
break;
case TAB_EVENTS:
fragment = (LiveEventsFragment) getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag(LiveEventsFragment.class.getSimpleName());
if (fragment == null) fragment = new LiveEventsFragment();
viewHolder = R.id.live_tab_events;
break;
case TAB_PLAYERS:
fragment = (LivePlayersFragment) getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag(LivePlayersFragment.class.getSimpleName());
if (fragment == null) fragment = new LivePlayersFragment();
viewHolder = R.id.live_tab_players;
break;
case TAB_LEGEND:
fragment = (LiveLegendFragment) getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag(LiveLegendFragment.class.getSimpleName());
if (fragment == null) fragment = new LiveLegendFragment();
viewHolder = R.id.live_tab_legend;
break;
case TAB_CHAT:
fragment = (LiveChatFragment) getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag(LiveChatFragment.class.getSimpleName());
if (fragment == null) fragment = new LiveChatFragment();
viewHolder = R.id.live_tab_chat;
break;
}
if (fragment != null) injectInnerFragment(fragment, viewHolder, false);
}
}
Here is an injectInnerFragment method:
public void injectInnerFragment(AaFragment fragment, int viewHolderId, boolean addToBackStack) {
FragmentManager manager = getSupportFragmentManager();
FragmentTransaction transaction = manager.beginTransaction();
if (fragment.isAdded()) {
transaction.replace(viewHolderId, fragment, fragment.getClass().getSimpleName());
if (addToBackStack) transaction.addToBackStack(null);
transaction.commit();
} else {
transaction.add(viewHolderId, fragment, fragment.getClass().getSimpleName());
if (addToBackStack) transaction.addToBackStack(null);
transaction.commit();
}
}
Now the problem:
When I click on tab for thr first time fragment is beeing created (onCreate is called) which is normal. In most cases second clicking on already created tab fragment doesn't call fragment'sonCreate which is what I wanted. Thats why I'm trying to find fragment if FragmentManager first.
There are two cases it doesn't work, and previously created fragment is created again, which is not efficient for me. The cases are:
if I click on any tab, then on TAB_ABOUT, then clicking again on any tab causes it's recreating ("any tab fragment" is not found in FragmentManager)
if I click on any tab, then on TAB_CHAT, then clicking again on any tab causes it's recreating ("any tab fragment" is not found in FragmentManager)
What kind of sorcery is this? Is it some automatic memory freeing, dependant on fragment "weight"? Maybe I should store all data I don't want reload each time fragment is created on Activity instead?
Look at your following code :
transaction.replace(viewHolderId, fragment, fragment.getClass().getSimpleName());
try with :
transaction.add(viewHolderId, fragment, fragment.getClass().getSimpleName());
Solved this by modyfing inject method:
public void injectInnerFragment(AaFragment fragment, int viewHolderId, boolean addToBackStack) {
FragmentManager manager = getSupportFragmentManager();
FragmentTransaction transaction = manager.beginTransaction();
if (fragment.isAdded()) {
transaction.attach(fragment);
transaction.commit();
} else {
transaction.add(viewHolderId, fragment, fragment.getClass().getSimpleName());
if (addToBackStack) transaction.addToBackStack(null);
transaction.commit();
}
}
Related
In the following piece of code, what's the point of using detach/attach fragments instead of just replacing them?
private void showFragment(String tag) {
String oldTag = mSelectedTag;
mSelectedTag = tag;
final FragmentManager fm = getSupportFragmentManager();
final FragmentTransaction ft = fm.beginTransaction();
final Fragment oldFragment = fm.findFragmentByTag(oldTag);
final Fragment fragment = fm.findFragmentByTag(tag);
if (oldFragment != null && !tag.equals(oldTag)) {
ft.detach(oldFragment);
}
if (fragment == null) {
ft.replace(R.id.container, getContentFragment(tag), tag);
} else {
if (fragment.isDetached()) {
ft.attach(fragment);
}
}
ft.commit();
}
Why can't I just write something like this?
private void showFragment(String tag) {
final FragmentManager fm = getSupportFragmentManager();
final FragmentTransaction ft = fm.beginTransaction();
ft.replace(R.id.container, getContentFragment(tag), tag);
ft.addToBackStack(null);
ft.commit();
}
getContentFragment method, just in case:
private Fragment getContentFragment(String tag) {
Fragment fragment = null;
if (Frag1.TAG.equals(tag)) {
fragment = new Frag1();
} else if (Frag2.TAG.equals(tag)) {
fragment = new Frag2();
}
return fragment;
}
Here's the documentation for FragmentTransaction.detach() (emphasis added):
Detach the given fragment from the UI. This is the same state as when it is put on the back stack: the fragment is removed from the UI, however its state is still being actively managed by the fragment manager. When going into this state its view hierarchy is destroyed.
So a detached fragment is still "alive" inside the FragmentManager; its view has been destroyed but all of its logical state is preserved. So when you call attach(), you are getting the same fragment back.
FragmentTransaction.replace(), passing a new fragment, however, will cause you to wind up using two different instances of the same fragment class, rather than re-using a single instance.
Personally, I've never had a need to use detach() and attach(), and have always used replace(). But that doesn't mean that there isn't a place and time where they're going to be useful.
I have three fragments :
A is my main fragment, B is a login fragment, successful login will enter C fragment.
When I click on back button, I need to move to Fragment A from Fragment C.
My issue is that, when I click on back button I still move on Fragment B from Fragment A.
How can I fix my issue?
Here is my switch fragment function:
public void switchFragment(Fragment fragment) {
FragmentManager manager = getActivity().getSupportFragmentManager();
FragmentTransaction transaction = manager.beginTransaction();
transaction.replace(R.id.mainFrame, fragment, null);
transaction.addToBackStack(null);
transaction.commit();
}
A fragment(NewHomepage) to B(LoginFragment) fragment:
switchFragment(LogInFragment.newInstance());
This is my B fragment, it has the value logged to decide switch A fragment or not when it come from C fragment.
I think that issue must be here, when go back to A fragment and click back button want to quit the APP, I can see the logcat show 1=> and 2=> .
String logged = memberData.getUD_MBTYPENAME(); //get the value when login succeed
Log.d(TAG,"1=>"+logged);
//If UD_MBTYPENAME is not null，change to A fragment
if (!TextUtils.isEmpty(logged)) {
Log.d(TAG,"2=>"+logged);
((MainActivity) getActivity()).switchFragment(NewHomepage.newInstance());
}
Here is about my MainActivity about onKeyDown and switchFragment:
#Override
public boolean onKeyDown(int keyCode, KeyEvent event) {
if (keyCode == KeyEvent.KEYCODE_BACK) {
if (getSupportFragmentManager().getBackStackEntryCount() == 1) {
quickDialog();//It's a alert dialog
return false;
}
}
return super.onKeyDown(keyCode, event);
}
public void switchFragment(Fragment fragment) {
FragmentManager manager = getSupportFragmentManager();
FragmentTransaction transaction = manager.beginTransaction();
transaction.replace(R.id.mainFrame, fragment, null);
transaction.addToBackStack(null);
transaction.commit();
}
Take a reference change the code like this , if I don't use transaction.addToBackStack(null); , the issue is still there , even though remove transaction.addToBackStack(null);
When I back to A , I have to click twice back to show the alert dialog, I don't know what happened when I click back first time in A fragment.
if (!TextUtils.isEmpty(logged)){
Log.d(TAG,"2=>"+logged);
hideFragment(LogInFragment.newInstance());
switchFragment(NewHomepage.newInstance());
}
public void switchFragment(Fragment fragment) {
FragmentManager manager = getActivity().getSupportFragmentManager();
FragmentTransaction transaction = manager.beginTransaction();
transaction.replace(R.id.mainFrame, fragment, null);
//remove it will fix my issue , but I have to click back twice to show alert dialog , I don't know what happened click it first time in A fragment.
//transaction.addToBackStack(null);
transaction.commit();
}
public void hideFragment(Fragment fragment) {
FragmentManager manager = getActivity().getSupportFragmentManager();
FragmentTransaction transaction = manager.beginTransaction();
transaction.hide(fragment);
transaction.commit();
}
remove hideFragment and use manager.popBackStack(); on switchFragment , the issue will be fixed.
Try
It will show fragment if it is already added.
Use fragmentTransaction.show method to re-use existing fragment i.e. saved instance.
public void switchFragment (Fragment oldFragment, Fragment newFragment, int frameId) {
boolean addFragment = true;
FragmentManager fragmentManager = getFragmentManager ();
String tag = newFragment.getArguments ().getString ("TAG");
Fragment fragment = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag (tag);
// Check if fragment is already added
if (fragment != null && fragment.isAdded ()) {
addFragment = false;
}
// Hide previous fragment
String oldFragmentTag = oldFragment.getArguments ().getString (BaseFragment.TAG);
if (!tag.equals (oldFragmentTag)) {
FragmentTransaction hideTransaction = fragmentManager.beginTransaction ();
Fragment fragment1 = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag (oldFragmentTag);
hideTransaction.hide (fragment1);
hideTransaction.commit ();
}
// Add new fragment and show it
FragmentTransaction addTransaction = fragmentManager.beginTransaction ();
if (addFragment) {
addTransaction.add (frameId, newFragment, tag);
addTransaction.addToBackStack (tag);
}
else {
newFragment = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag (tag);
}
addTransaction.show (newFragment);
addTransaction.commit ();
}
I am pretty new to android development so I am curious how to work properly with Fragments.
My application contains a BottomNavigationActivity which switches between 3 fragments with this code:
FragmentManager fragmentManager = getSupportFragmentManager();
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().replace(R.id.content_montage_order_detail, fragment).commit();
I am storing the Fragments in a List<Fragment> to avoid loosing the current state. But everytime I replace the fragment with another the method onDestroy() is called.
I know, I know I could add and remove the fragment in the fragmentmanager instead of replacing it. I googled alot and most of the tutorials tell me to replace the fragment.
Whats the common way to keep a fragments state without recreating it on every call?
Find the solution
It will not recreate fragment anytime
FragmentManager fragmentManager = getSupportFragmentManager();
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().add(R.id.content_montage_order_detail, fragment).commit();
Use fragment TAG at time of creation of fragment then when you want to get it again use findFragmentByTag. if fragment already created then old one will be find by fragment manager.
Fragment previousFragment = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("TAG");
I suggest you use show,not forreplace
protected void addFragmentStack(Fragment fragment) {
FragmentTransaction ft = getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
if (this.mContent != fragment) {
if (fragment.isAdded()) {
ft.hide(this.mContent).show(fragment);
} else {
ft.hide(this.mContent).add(getFragmentViewId(), fragment);
}
this.mContent = fragment;
}
ft.commit();
}
Try using switchFragment to switch fragment, it will show fragment if it is already added.
Use fragmentTransaction.show method to re-use existing fragment i.e. saved instance.
public void switchFragment (Fragment oldFragment, Fragment newFragment, int frameId) {
boolean addFragment = true;
FragmentManager fragmentManager = getFragmentManager ();
String tag = newFragment.getArguments ().getString (BaseFragment.TAG);
Fragment fragment = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag (tag);
// Check if fragment is already added
if (fragment != null && fragment.isAdded ()) {
addFragment = false;
}
// Hide previous fragment
String oldFragmentTag = oldFragment.getArguments ().getString (BaseFragment.TAG);
if (!tag.equals (oldFragmentTag)) {
FragmentTransaction hideTransaction = fragmentManager.beginTransaction ();
Fragment fragment1 = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag (oldFragmentTag);
hideTransaction.hide (fragment1);
hideTransaction.commit ();
}
// Add new fragment and show it
FragmentTransaction addTransaction = fragmentManager.beginTransaction ();
if (addFragment) {
addTransaction.add (frameId, newFragment, tag);
addTransaction.addToBackStack (tag);
}
else {
newFragment = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag (tag);
}
addTransaction.show (newFragment);
addTransaction.commit ();
}
Ya, you can also manage the state by managing the backstack.
I'm working on an android application, that uses a navigation drawer to switch between two fragments. However, each time I switch, the fragment is completely recreated.
Here is the code from my main activity.
/* The click listener for ListView in the navigation drawer */
private class DrawerItemClickListener implements ListView.OnItemClickListener {
#Override
public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> parent, View view, int position, long id) {
selectItem(position);
}
}
private void selectItem(int position) {
android.support.v4.app.Fragment fragment;
String tag;
android.support.v4.app.FragmentManager; fragmentManager = getSupportFragmentManager();
switch(position) {
case 0:
if(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("one") != null) {
fragment = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("one");
} else {
fragment = new OneFragment();
}
tag = "one";
break;
case 1:
if(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("two") != null) {
fragment = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("two");
} else {
fragment = new TwoFragment();
}
tag = "two";
break;
}
fragment.setRetainInstance(true);
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().replace(R.id.container, fragment, tag).commit();
// update selected item and title, then close the drawer
mDrawerList.setItemChecked(position, true);
setTitle(mNavTitles[position]);
mDrawerLayout.closeDrawer(mDrawerList);
}
I've set up some debug logging, and every time selectItem is called, one fragment is destroyed, while the other is created.
Is there any way to prevent the fragments from being recreated, and just reuse them instead?
After #meredrica pointed out that replace() destroys the fragments, I went back through the FragmentManager documentation. This is the solution I've come up with, that seems to be working.
/* The click listener for ListView in the navigation drawer */
private class DrawerItemClickListener implements ListView.OnItemClickListener {
#Override
public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> parent, View view, int position, long id) {
selectItem(position);
}
}
private void selectItem(int position) {
android.support.v4.app.FragmentManager; fragmentManager = getSupportFragmentManager();
switch(position) {
case 0:
if(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("one") != null) {
//if the fragment exists, show it.
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().show(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("one")).commit();
} else {
//if the fragment does not exist, add it to fragment manager.
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().add(R.id.container, new OneFragment(), "one").commit();
}
if(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("two") != null){
//if the other fragment is visible, hide it.
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().hide(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("two")).commit();
}
break;
case 1:
if(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("two") != null) {
//if the fragment exists, show it.
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().show(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("two")).commit();
} else {
//if the fragment does not exist, add it to fragment manager.
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().add(R.id.container, new TwoFragment(), "two").commit();
}
if(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("one") != null){
//if the other fragment is visible, hide it.
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().hide(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("one")).commit();
}
break;
}
// update selected item and title, then close the drawer
mDrawerList.setItemChecked(position, true);
setTitle(mNavTitles[position]);
mDrawerLayout.closeDrawer(mDrawerList);
}
I also added this bit, but I'm not sure if it's necessary or not.
#Override
public void onDestroy() {
super.onDestroy();
FragmentManager fragmentManager = getSupportFragmentManager();
if(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("one") != null){
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().remove(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("one")).commit();
}
if(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("two") != null){
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().remove(fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag("two")).commit();
}
}
Use the attach/detach method with tags:
Detach will destroy the view hirachy but keeps the state, like if on the backstack; this will let the "not-visible" fragment have a smaller memory footprint. But mind you that you need to correctly implement the fragment lifecycle (which you should do in the first place)
Detach the given fragment from the UI. This is the same state as when it is put on the back stack: the fragment is removed from the UI, however its state is still being actively managed by the fragment manager. When going into this state its view hierarchy is destroyed.
The first time you add the fragment
FragmentTransaction t = getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
t.add(android.R.id.content, new MyFragment(),MyFragment.class.getSimpleName());
t.commit();
then you detach it
FragmentTransaction t = getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
t.detach(MyFragment.class.getSimpleName());
t.commit();
and attach it again if switched back, state will be kept
FragmentTransaction t = getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
t.attach(getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag(MyFragment.class.getSimpleName()));
t.commit();
But you always have to check if the fragment was added yet, if not then add it, else just attach it:
if (getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag(MyFragment.class.getSimpleName()) == null) {
FragmentTransaction t = getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
t.add(android.R.id.content, new MyFragment(), MyFragment.class.getSimpleName());
t.commit();
} else {
FragmentTransaction t = getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction();
t.attach(getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag(MyFragment.class.getSimpleName()));
t.commit();
}
The replace method destroys your fragments. One workaround is to set them to Visibility.GONE, another (less easy) method is to hold them in a variable. If you do that, make sure you don't leak memory left and right.
I did this before like this:
if (mPrevFrag != fragment) {
// Change
FragmentTransaction ft = fragmentManager.beginTransaction();
if (mPrevFrag != null){
ft.hide(mPrevFrag);
}
ft.show(fragment);
ft.commit();
mPrevFrag = fragment;
}
(you will need to track your pervious fragment in this solution)
I guess you can not directly manipulate the lifecycle mechanisms of your Fragments. The very fact that you can findFragmentByTag is not very bad. It means that the Fragment object is not recreated fully, if it is already commited. The existing Fragment just passes all the lifecycle steps each Fragment has - that means that only UI is "recreated".
It is a very convenient and useful memory management strategy - and appropriate, in most cases. Fragment which is gone, has the resources which have to be utilized in order to de-allocate memory.
If you just cease using this strategy, the memory usage of your application could increase badly.
Nonetheless, there are retained fragments, which lifecycle is a bit different and do not correspond to the Activity they are attached to. Typically, they are used to retain some things you want to save, for example, to manage configuration changes
However, the fragment [re]creation strategy depends on the context - that is, what you would like to solve, and what are the trade-offs that you are willing to accept.
Just find the current fragment calling getFragmentById("id of your container") and then hide it and show needed fragment.
private void openFragment(Fragment fragment, String tag) {
FragmentManager fragmentManager = getSupportFragmentManager();
FragmentTransaction fragmentTransaction = fragmentManager.beginTransaction();
Fragment existingFragment = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag(tag);
if (existingFragment != null) {
Fragment currentFragment = fragmentManager.findFragmentById(R.id.container);
fragmentTransaction.hide(currentFragment);
fragmentTransaction.show(existingFragment);
}
else {
fragmentTransaction.add(R.id.container, fragment, tag);
}
fragmentTransaction.commit();
}
Same idea as Tester101 but this is what I ended up using.
FragmentManager fragmentManager = getSupportFragmentManager();
FragmentTransaction fragmentTransaction = fragmentManager.beginTransaction();
Fragment oldFragment = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag( "" + m_lastDrawerSelectPosition );
if ( oldFragment != null )
fragmentTransaction.hide( oldFragment );
Fragment newFragment = fragmentManager.findFragmentByTag( "" + position );
if ( newFragment == null )
{
newFragment = getFragment( position );
fragmentTransaction.add( R.id.home_content_frame, newFragment, "" + position );
}
fragmentTransaction.show( newFragment );
fragmentTransaction.commit();
Hide easily in kotlin using extensions:
fun FragmentManager.present(newFragment: Fragment, lastFragment: Fragment? = null, containerId: Int) {
if (lastFragment == newFragment) return
val transaction = beginTransaction()
if (lastFragment != null && findFragmentByTag(lastFragment.getTagg()) != null) {
transaction.hide(lastFragment)
}
val existingFragment = findFragmentByTag(newFragment.getTagg())
if (existingFragment != null) {
transaction.show(existingFragment).commit()
} else {
transaction.add(containerId, newFragment, newFragment.getTagg()).commit()
}
}
fun Fragment.getTagg(): String = this::class.java.simpleName
Usage
supportFragmentManager.present(fragment, lastFragment, R.id.fragmentPlaceHolder)
lastFragment = fragment
Here's what I'm using for a simple 2 fragment case in Kotlin:
private val advancedHome = HomeAdvancedFragment()
private val basicHome = HomeBasicFragment()
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
...
// Attach both fragments and hide one so we can swap out easily later
supportFragmentManager.commit {
setReorderingAllowed(true)
add(R.id.fragment_container_view, basicHome)
add(R.id.fragment_container_view, advancedHome)
hide(basicHome)
}
binding.displayModeToggle.onStateChanged {
when (it) {
0 -> swapFragments(advancedHome, basicHome)
1 -> swapFragments(basicHome, advancedHome)
}
}
...
}
With this FragmentActivity extension:
fun FragmentActivity.swapFragments(show: Fragment, hide: Fragment) {
supportFragmentManager.commit {
show(show)
hide(hide)
}
}
How about playing with the Visible attribute?
this is a little late response.
if you're using view pager for fragments, set the off screen page limit of the fragment to the number of fragments created.
mViewPager.setOffscreenPageLimit(3); // number of fragments here is 3
I am having trouble figuring out the proper way to navigate through fragments without a pager and i am having problems during Configuration changes for screen orientation. I am using Show/Hide on the fragments to make them visible and functional but i am wondering if i should instead be using Detach/Attach. I am also having problems adding things to the back stack and i think it is also due to the use of show/hide. Is it better to use Attach/detatch or is there a way to override what the back button does to make it show/hide the last/current fragment.
The Behavior:
I have a map fragment and a List fragment along with a few others. everything starts up correctly and works initially with orientation changes. When i navigate to the list view it populates correctly but upon orientation change the list gets redrawn without the Data in it. The map view also gets redrawn and is visible behind my pager title indicator.
If anyone could please point me in right direction for solving this that would be awesome. I am suspecting that is is caused by the way that i am showing and hiding the fragments.
Here is where i create the Fragments and add them to the fragment manager. I have also shown where i show/hide fragments.
#Override
public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_map_frags);
mapViewContainer = LayoutInflater.from(this)
.inflate(R.layout.map, null);
setupFragments();
showFragment(0);
}
public void setListData(String name) {
bName = name;
showFragment(1);
}
private void setupFragments() {
final FragmentManager fm = getSupportFragmentManager();
final FragmentTransaction ft = fm.beginTransaction();
mFragment1 = fm.findFragmentByTag("f1");
if (mFragment1 == null) {
mFragment1 = new MenuFragment();
ft.add(mFragment1, "f1");
ft.hide(mFragment1);
}
mMapFragment = (MapFragment) getSupportFragmentManager()
.findFragmentByTag(MapFragment.TAG);
if (mMapFragment == null) {
mMapFragment = MapFragment.newInstance(0);
ft.add(R.id.fragment_container, mMapFragment, MapFragment.TAG);
}
ft.hide(mMapFragment);
myListFragment = (ListFrag) getSupportFragmentManager()
.findFragmentByTag(ListFrag.TAG);
if (myListFragment == null) {
myListFragment = new ListFrag();
ft.add(R.id.fragment_container, myListFragment, ListFrag.TAG);
}
ft.hide(myListFragment);
frag = (frag) getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag(
frag.TAG);
if (frag == null) {
bacFrag = new frag();
ft.add(R.id.fragment_container, frag, frag.TAG);
}
ft.hide(bacFrag);
ft.commit();
}
public void showFragment(int fragIn) {
final FragmentTransaction ft = getSupportFragmentManager()
.beginTransaction();
ft.setCustomAnimations(android.R.anim.fade_in, android.R.anim.fade_out);
if (mVisible != null) {
if (mVisible == mListFragment) {
ft.remove(mListFragment);
} else {
ft.hide(mVisible);
}
}
switch (fragIn) {
case 0:
ft.show(mMapFragment);
ft.commit();
mVisible = mMapFragment;
break;
case 1:
mListFragment = (ListFragmentDisplay) getSupportFragmentManager()
.findFragmentByTag(ListFragmentDisplay.TAG);
Toast.makeText(this, "startListFrag", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
if (mListFragment == null) {
mListFragment = new ListFragmentDisplay();
ft.add(R.id.fragment_container, mListFragment,
ListFragmentDisplay.TAG);
}
ft.show(mListFragment).commit();
mVisible = mListFragment;
break;
case 2:
ft.show(myfragment).commit();
mVisible = myfragment;
break;
case 3:
ft.show(frag).commit();
mVisible = frag;
break;
}
}
It's not your fault. The problem is that when the orientation changes all the Activity is Destroyed, even all the fragments added. So none of the data within it is retained.
It's not advised to use android:configChanges="orientation|keyboardHidden".
Rather, set for every fragment setRetainInstance(true) and it will work well with your current code.
If you want to have a better persistence (for example when the activity is temporarily destroyed for space issues) also remember to save the state of your fragments with onSaveInstanceState. setRetainInstance will work only when a configuration change is about to come.