I'm using intel xdk and cordova for an android app that uses geolocation this is the code that i use:
if(navigator.geolocation) {
navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition(geolocalizacion,error,{enableHighAccuracy:true, maximumAge:Infinity, timeout:100000});
} else {
handleNoGeolocation(false);
}
I don't want to use the 'google location service' because, if that option is disabled, some people can get lost trying to find it in settings, so i'm using enableHighAccuracy:true in order to use GPS.
However with that it takes so much time, almost a minute to call the success function 'geolocalizacion' when the app is used indoors. I know that GPS is better in outdoors (in that case it takes 5 or 7 seconds) but i think 1 minute is too much for indoors.
Am i doing something wrong?
Is there a way to make faster the geolocation with GPS?
or a way to activate the 'google location service' without the user doing anything?.
The GPS signals transmitted by GPS satellites are very weak if you are not located outside. Even if you are outside, weather conditions, tall buildings and other large metal structures can hide or degrade the GPS signal. In addition, the GPS receivers inside of your typical phone or tablet are very low grade receivers and antennas, they are not as capable as the more expensive dedicated GPS devices, due to compromises associated price and physical size.
You should really take a two prong approach: get an initial reading using the "coarse" geo reading, with the geo cache enabled. The coarse reading will use the wifi, network, GPS and cached readings and return it's best estimate based on the parameters you specify, usually within a very reasonable time frame.
Then, after you've established an approximate position (which can be very accurate, as #SeahawksRdaBest points out, if based on the current wifi), switch to the "fine" location setting to get an accurate position. This part of your app can run in the background so it doesn't interrupt the responsiveness of your app, and can then update the position information in your app as more accurate position data becomes available.
One thing to keep in mind, many users have the GPS turned off because it severely degrades battery life. If all your app needs is to "find a restaurant nearby" then the coarse location should be good enough, since you're probably more interested in placing the destination on the map. This will be much more battery friendly, and is one of the reasons that the geo settings on the more recent Android devices have changed to make it harder for an app to enable GPS programmatically.
I see you've added the intel-xdk tag, so you might want to checkout this little geolocation test app that I've put together at https://github.com/xmnboy/hello-cordova. It needs a little work but should help you with some experimentation between coarse and fine settings.
I think you can diversify your app a little.
For example if you are indoors and have a WiFi connection why not use that to triangulate your position? WiFi is highly accurate because theoretically it covers a small space so the phone would know exactly where it is and return a position quickly.(if done right in my experience usually <10 secs).
If a Wifi connection is not found(outdoors). You can always drop back to GPS to provide the coordinates. Plus Gps is "fastest" outside anyways.
Checkout these pages: Stackoverflow discussion. Location Manager Android.
If you want to get really fancy you can even use the Geocoder Android library to get Location addresses etc in human readable form.
Related
I am working on gps tracking apps in android. Here is my code architecture:
BackgroundSyncService : A service class that is used for getting location update. Here GoogleApiClient is initialized and implements others Location related methods.
AppRunCheckerReceiver : A BroadcastReceiver class that will check if my BackgroundSyncService is running or not in a time interval. If it stopped then it start.
GpsEnableReceiver : A BroadcastReceiver it will fire if gps status changed. It will check if my BackgroundSyncService is running or not in a time interval. If it stopped then it start.
InternetConnectionStateReceiver : A BroadcastReceiver it will fire when internet status changed. It will check if my BackgroundSyncService is running or not in a time interval. If it is stopped, then it start.
In my BackgroundSyncService service I initialize the GoogleApiClient using this way:
public void setLocationLocationRequest() {
try {
googleApiClient = new GoogleApiClient.Builder(this).addConnectionCallbacks(this)
.addOnConnectionFailedListener(this).addApi(com.google.android.gms.location.LocationServices.API).build();
locationRequest = new LocationRequest();
locationRequest.setInterval(3000);
locationRequest.setFastestInterval(3000);
locationRequest.setPriority(LocationRequest.PRIORITY_HIGH_ACCURACY);
googleApiClient.connect();
} catch (Exception e) {
}
Here accuricy is LocationRequest.PRIORITY_HIGH_ACCURACY and interval is
locationRequest.setInterval(3000)
here is the GoogleApiClient implementation code.
This application GPS info section contains Latitude longitude and Accuracy parameter
My Findings: in onLocationChanged(Location location) method I check the accuracy of Location object in this way : location.getAccuracy(). Here if accuracy is less than 50 meter, then I accept it.
In 85% of the cases it working like a charm. It sending me exact location from GPS. But in 15% cases, it sending me inaccurate location like more >300 meter.
The 15% device are low cost China brand mobile.
My Questions:
How can i make accuracy level near 99%. Is there any problem on my code architecture?
Does GPS accuracy depends on device configuration? if YES then what can I do for low configuration device?
How Uber, Go-JEK etc. ride sharing apps works for all device? Is they have extra coding for GPS only?
My application is for Bangladesh. Here internet is slow. Is it has negative impact on GPS accuracy?
Thanks in advance for this thread. And also sorry for bad english.
How can i make accuracy level near 99%. Is there any problem on my code architecture?
This is real life scenario. You cannot ensure that all the location providers will work as expected. You should ask for best available position.
a) Does GPS accuracy depends on device configuration?
YES. Some devices may have older GPS chipsets which can only track GPS signals (USA) since there are other positioning systems like Galileo (Europe), GLONASS (Russia), QZSS (Japan) and Beidou (China). The more the chipset support for these types the more chance you get to track more satellite hereby position fix. Also TTFF (time to first fix) depends on how many channels do the gps receiver has.
b) If YES then what can i do for low configuration device?
Since this is a hardware issue, you cannot do anything here. But other location sources can compensate the lack of GPS data such as AGPS (aided gps), wifi and cellular positioning. Also there are some paid options which provides a database to locate your device using wifi access points and cellids (they claim that they provide best solution on wifi but i m not sure as I dont use it. you can check it out http://combain.com). Wifi and cellid also depends on how many wifi access point and cell tower available around and how far they are (signal strength). If you need 50m accuracy, cellular positioning has nothing to do but wifi has a chance to get closer to this value.
Some study results from 2009 [3]
3G iPhone w/ A-GPS ~ 8 meters
3G iPhone w/ wifi ~ 74 meters
3G iPhone w/ Cellular positioning ~ 600 meters
How Uber, Go-JEK etc. ride sharing apps works for all device? Is they have extra coding for GPS only?
They may have specific Location strategies but it will based on using other sources during GPS outage.
My application is for Bangladesh. Here internet is slow. Is it has negative impact on GPS accuracy?
Other answers claims that internet is not related to GPS. Yes it is true it is not related to GPS but location. AGPS uses internet to fetch 3 types of data (Satellite signals, almanac and ephemeris) which assist GPS to provide position fix faster. If ephemeris and almanac are outdated or the device moved several hundred km from the previous position fix then it is called cold start and takes around 12-15min without AGPS.
Fused location provider already knows how to provide best solution with these configurations, so you should bless it.
References:
[1] http://gpssystems.net/agps/
[2] http://gpsinformation.net/main/almanac.txt
[3]
https://communityhealthmaps.nlm.nih.gov/2014/07/07/how-accurate-is-the-gps-on-my-smart-phone-part-2/
First, (and second)
How can I make accuracy level near 99%. Is there any problem on my code architecture?
Does GPS accuracy depends on device configuration? If YES then what can I do for low configuration device?
Both - device configuration and code architecture, are important here. If you are already at an 85% success rate, the code architecture is alright I think.
As far as GPS goes, line-of-sight is an important factor when it comes to device configurations and accuracy.
Although a low cost mobile could return an accurate location with a clear line-of-sight. You can try running 2 cycles more/waiting to attain higher accuracy.
In a worst case scenario and for what its worth, you can also try retrieving location using the LocationManager and GPS provider technique which works as a fallback in the 15% just to compare and ensure you are using the most accurate location you can get.
Location Strategies put it as
In most cases, you'll get better battery performance, as well as more
appropriate accuracy, by using the Location Services API.
How Uber, Go-JEK etc. ride sharing apps works for all device? Is they have extra coding for GPS only?
They do work but not always with highest of accuracy for locations received within the app. If there are any location hacks for us developers, we need to find them, maybe a 5th page google search result :) or benefit from the open source environment. For me, best practices and android repo links suffice. You have already followed posts like Receive location updates
My application is for Bangladesh. Here Internet is slow. Is it has negative impact on GPS accuracy?
No relation between Internet and LocationManager + GPS_PROVIDER
I have been using LocationManager for Android to record location data, and the new 'LocationClient' API has come, so I tried it.
The result looked good. It gets location data very quickly, but I found that the Android Fused Location provider(LocationClient) doesn't provide altitude data in almost all cases, even though I tracked quite a long time.
So, the question is, 'Is there any nice way or idea to get altitude data while using LocationClient?', or should I just stay using GPS provider which is not fast enough?
AFAIK, the only provider today in standard Android that can give you altitude is GPS. AFAIK, both WiFi hotspot proximity and cell tower triangulation presume that you are on the surface of the Earth, or at least within a relatively narrow band of the surface, treating the local area as a flat plane.
LocationClient and the "fused" location provider is designed to blend all of those approaches to get you more accurate latitude/longitude more quickly. However, if my AFAIKs are correct, it cannot get altitude any faster than GPS. And, depending on how it handles things internally, it may put more emphasis on the non-GPS providers, and therefore give you altitude less frequently. Since the Play Services stuff is closed-source, we have no good way to know.
or should I just stay using GPS provider which is not fast enough.
The speed of obtaining GPS fixes is tied to environment (e.g., indoors/outdoors) and to device GPS receiver quality.
I'm attempting to get my phone to update the assisted GPS info.
I've followed the instructions outlined in question
Android: How to reset and download A-GPS data?
This seems to tell GPS to remove the "almanac" SO I'll assume the next time my handheld attempts to connect it will also attempt to get the almanac.
This is not really what I'm looking for, because (at least according to wikipedia) GPS take about 12.5 minutes to get the new almanac. It does indeed feel that long, though I've not timed it. Even 5 minutes seems like a long wait when I'm ready to start a run.
When i was skulking about, I came across "GPS Status & Toolbox." This app downloads the data via wifi or 3g. It's lightning fast and perfectly suited to my needs.
Beyond setting clearing the data, I'm wondering if anyone knows how they accomplish the insertion of the data?
You are confusing two different methods to obtain the almanac necessary for GPS to compute user locations:
Receive and decode the almanac directly from the GPS satellite signal, which is broadcast in its navigation message. This is the part that takes 12.5 minutes (i.e. to download the entire almanac from scratch. In practice, this is only needed after a "cold start" of the GPS receiver). In general, a GPS receiver does not require the almanac to obtain a position solution. Instead it performs a so-called sky search to determine which satellite signals are present.
Receive the almanac from an alternative network (e.g. cellular network) that is dedicated to providing such information. This method is also known as Assisted-GPS (A-GPS). This is the method that smartphone-based receivers will typically use, as it is much faster.
The answer you cited concerns the second method, i.e. telling the system to retrieve an updated almanac from a server.
For those who came to this page due to the headline "Is there a way to download the GPS almanac?" and who want to actually see how the almanac data actually looks, you can always download the current almanac data from the US Navigation Center.
First you must distinguish between
almanach
epheremides
preditced ephermides model
The almanach contains the rough satellite curves, valid for "long" time.
Once received the chip does not need to wait for it each time.
The epheremides contains the detailed satellite orbit modell. They are valid a short time.
The predicted ephermides is a ephermides modell that can predict up to two weeks.
It has to be downloaded form a server, this data is not available through GPS communication. And might be proprietary to specific GPS chip manufacturer.
You can set both the almanach and the epheremides to the chip, via (custom) NMEA or usually the GPS chips properietary binary messages.
How this can be done via a hack on android i cannot tell you.
I expect that android OS does this automatcially without need to have a GPS Status Toolbox
I'm working on a app which requires that a device with this app installed will automatically find other users within a maximum radius of 200ft (worst case scenario 300ft, but that's pushing it) and/or a minimum radius of 40ft.
Ive tried the obvious solution of using GPS and a MYSQL query that query's our location table for other users within the 200ft radius, but as you probably would guess this is not incredibly accurate and if the device uploads coordinates that are off by over 200ft the server will return a list of users that are not within proximity. While I would prefer to just get the app to work the way it was meant to I'd rather the server return no users than false positives.
I know there's probably no simple way to do it accurately, but what other options do I have? And how did Color manage to do it? With all the tech in the avg smartphone and all the location based apps this has to be possible to do.
200ft (60m) is no Problem for GPS. Usually GPS is below 10m.
You even have a location.getAccuracy() method which you should evaluate
Just use GPS as your only location source. do not use cell tower location provider, when you want accuracy < 60m.
Of course inside a building, when you are sitting at your desktop GPS will not work, or is off by 60m.
GPS needs a view to open sky not obstructed (by dense materials).
Take a look at this question:
how to get the most accurate location using GPS and AGPS with given time in android?
Basically it depends on the phone's GPS and the current environment. Besides that, there's probably nothing you can do to further boost the location accuracy other than using GPS.
How would I verify/ track device location within a 5' accuracy? I've heard of people using cell towers/ gps combinations.
As far as I know, the only way to get a 5 feet accuracy figure is to use GPS, then it still isn't always that accurate depending on how good a fix of the satellites (clear view to the sky) you have.
Cell tower / Wifi triangulation methods only serve to speed up positioning and will seldom (if ever) be more accurate than satellite positioning methods.
GPS is the way to go. Cell towers won't cut it. In Android (and I believe iOS) the system will provide you with an accuracy reading in addition to the actual location. You could use this value to determine whether the value you've received should be uploaded to your server. Keep in mind using the GPS is very battery intensive and there's no guarantee of how good the accuracy will be. Depending on conditions you may not be able to achieve 5' precision.
As #CommonsWare points out, 5' is really unrealistic anyway although you can get close.
As CommonsWare says you will not get much better that 10 metters accuracy in a consummer-grade device. Even in open sky, the atmosphere characteristcs change minute by minute and thats enough to change the GPS readings.
However, it's teoreticaly possible to increase accuracy if you could get all of the following:
1-There are some stationary GPS receiver stations with fixed known locations which measure the current GPS signals deviation. You would need to have one of those close to you and have access to the data in real time.
2-You would need to have low level access to your phone GPS receiver to read the unprocessed data received from sattelites. This would be different from device to device, and as far as I know, no supplier is providing this access.
3-Finnaly, you would need to do all the calculations required to determine your location applying the deviations got from point 1 above.
good luck.
The only way you can get this type of accuracy is with WAAS. As far as I know, there are no Android handsets that can receive WAAS corrections. If this is for a specific controlled situation, you could use a bluetooth gps receiver with WAAS, and only in WAAS supported locations. However, if this was for a wider deployment, then I think you are out of luck.