I do have a Bluetooth LE remote controlled car. Therefore i need to write periodically to a drive characteristic on the car. My microcontroller (AtmelXMega128A1 # 32Mhz + nRF8001) should be able to handle up to 122 connections per second # 7,5ms connection interval.
My Android App is based on cordova and a bluetooth low energy plugin: https://github.com/randdusing/BluetoothLE
I am running this on a Nexus 5 with Android v4.4.4.
I have a timer which sends values for steering and acceleration to the car each 175ms. I would like to send each 50ms but that does not work. I cannot tell where the problem is but i guess it is the android implementation of GATT (I get the pending command error at some level).
If i write more than it can handle the car executes all commands in a row but time shifted. Some queue hickup obviously and this is not the Microcontroller as it operates much faster.
I am doing a timing change which seems to be successful. I tried turning WiFi off as i hoped it would help but nothing changed.
Is there any experience on periodical writings to a GATT characteristics on Android? Examples would be great.
First of all you should make a robust design. Data should be driven by callback from the Android BT Stack telling when it's ready to accept more data (when the previous transmission is done). Do not use a timer. There will always happen need for retransmissions on the lower stack level so you cannot rely on an exact transfer interval and throughput.
The 7.5ms is the shortest possible connection interval however the default is usually much slower (48.75ms on my Nexus 5 with Android L) So from your peripheral you should try to request a faster connection interval once connected. This will speed up your throughput and responsiveness.
Some Android BT stacks refuse if you try to force a very fast connection interval. You should be handling that intelligently. Like trying with 7.5ms (parameter = 6) and increase it if it failed. iOS design guideline say you must not use a lower value than 20 (*1.25ms) and the upper request value should be at least 20 higher than the lower. You will get a faster connection parameter though if you request values min=10, max=20 and end around 18ms or something.
For android it seems most will accept the 7.5ms (value 6) but again you should not force it because the stack might cancel the connection then.
I made experiments on Android L, requesting connection intervals from the peripheral side when connected. Android rounded off requests so only every 3rd step gave a difference.
6=7.5ms, 9=11.25ms, 12=15.0ms, ..., 39=48.75ms which seems to be the default value on Nexus 5 running Android L.
Bluetooth is a shared resource in the broadcom chipset most are using on the smartphone side. Wifi, BT Classic, BT Low Enegy and sometimes GPS shares bandwidth. You will see hiccups and must be tolerant about them. Make a robust design.
Something else you can try is to renegotiate MTU-SIZE if you need larger data packages than the default. This is by specification an optional BLE feature however Apple broke it completely in iOS7 where they use it as a mandatory thing to boost up throughput. This broke all BLE devices which didn't implement the response handler and so it crashed and could never be used with iOS devices until a SW update was made. Baaaaaad. For android this is not a problem though.
Related
I am evaluating Google Nearby connections2.0 more specifically evaluating the synergy effect of it. For this I am evaluating it against Wifi, Bluetooth and BLE in totally offline scenario, without any router.
Scenario
One device is advertising, all others (8 devices in total) are discovering. On successful connection, I am sending simple Files of 20B, 200B and 33KB sizes for 30 secs straight to each connected device.
I am using android Samsung S6 SM-G920F devices with android version: 6.0.1 and playservices version 12.8.74
I have following issues/questions
Q1: First of all at max 3 to 4 devices could be connected simulatenously more than this results into disconnect event of other devices. Even if only 3 devices are connected, and I am continuously sending message for 30seconds, one of them disconnected ? In simpler words, cannot sustain connectivity with any device for more than 45 secs. usually disconnection occur between 25 - 45 secs
Q2: I cannot send message/file continuously for 30 seconds like we can do with the Wifi like this
While(30sec){
bluetoothSocket.outputStream.write(bytes)
}
Because if I try to do this then I got the exception of too much work.I have to wait for the the callback in onTransferPayLoadUpdate()
Q3: If I try to send the file of 1MB or more to other peers, peer received the file successfully in onPayloadReceived callback but server/sender receive the successful status after too much delay. In my case it's between 1 mins to 5 mins after client callback. And I cannot send new file until I got the success callback on server. If I try to send it before getting the callback, nothing happens. Literally nothing. So In essence I can only send file of 1MB once then I have to resent both the devices to send another file.
This should be broken up into 3 separate questions. It helps future developers search easier. So if you get the time to do that, let me know and I'll split up my answer as well. But anyway, let's get into it!
A1: Nearby Connections has 3 separate strategies. The more limited the strategy, the more types of mediums we can use. So with that in mind, and with no router involved, P2P_CLUSTER will only use Bluetooth. It's the most general strategy, so it has the fewest mediums available.
All Android devices use mobile Bluetooth chips, which are unfortunately weak (but small and power sensitive), and that causes them to have a theoretical 7 device limit but a practical 3~4 device limit. To make things worst, that limit is eaten up by smart watches and paired headphones as well. That's why you're running into problems.
P2P_STAR and P2P_POINT_TO_POINT are both much more limited, because you can't connect in any direction. You need to choose who the host is beforehand and have everyone scan for and connect to that host. But you get the added benefit of WiFi hotspots, which have higher bandwidth and a larger number of simultaneous devices supported. I've seen 7 devices happily connected to a Lollipop device.
If you want to go beyond that, into the 10s and 100s, and a router isn't available, you'll have to build a mesh network. I can link you to examples of how to do that if you're interested. We don't offer support for that within Connections, but others have built meshes on top of us so we can point you in the right direction.
A2: Can you include a stack trace of the error you're seeing? Payload.Type.STREAM was built for continuously sending data. The other payload types should also work too, baring some rare but potential issues like BYTE payloads filling up the phones RAM.
A3: Both devices need to wait for onPayloadTransferUpdate(SUCCESS). onPayloadReceived is only a header, and means that there's an incoming file or stream but that the data hasn't been received yet. For byte payloads, we actually send the full byte payload inside the header so that's the only time data is immediately available.
I am trying to send 10 bytes of data, every 30milisecond,s between 2 android devices using bluetooth low enegry notifications. The goal is to achieve low latency communication and there is no interest in low energy.
You can check the results in the Delay graph(Y field = delta time between packets). The first 10seconds the communication is being perfomed good enough. (The interval between the packets is max 30-40ms). However after the 10th second, the intervals are either extremly high or extremely low.
This is probably happenning due to non strict connection interval parameters. You can check a sample of hci_events that shows clearly the slow down is caused by the hci_events.
I have tried to configure the parameters of the connection, calling from the master the function
requestConnectionPriority
However, it didn't change anything on the result graph. I also check the packets using wireshark and findout that the master didn't even send a request for configuring the connection interval. I also tried another configuration request with
requestMtu
with exactly the same results, no update packets was send from the master.
So, there are 2 questions that show up from this observations.
Has ble a timeout in the 10th second in order to ensure low energy consumption? If so, how can I disable it?
Is some thing wrong calling requestConnectionPriority, from the android 6.0.1 with the role of the central(master)? Can you give me a simple example on how is being called properly?
Note that requestConnectionPriority is called right after the connection being establish in the onConnectionStateChange of the BluetoothGattCallback.
The device that has role of a slave(server) is running (Android 5.1.1) and the master(client) is running (Android 6.0.1).
Thanks a lot!
IMPORTANT UPDATE: It's crucial to mention the way the connection is being initiated between the devices.
The central device calls device.connectGatt, where device is BluetoothDevice device = mBluetoothAdapter.getRemoteDevice(address). Address is a hardcoded string, the peripheral's public mac address. You can check logcat logs and also hci logs.
I have also tried connecting with the legit method (peripheral advertising and connect to scanned random address), but I get an error 'initiate direct connection fail, topology limitation'. You can check logcat logs and also hci logs.
Has ble a timeout in the 10th second in order to ensure low energy consumption? If so, how can I disable it?
No
Is some thing wrong calling requestConnectionPriority, from the android 6.0.1 with the role of the central(master)? Can you give me a simple example on how is being called properly?
I'm not aware of any bugs regarding requestConnectionPriority. But you could try to execute that method after the onServicesDiscovered callback. Android temporarily changes connection interval to 7.5 ms during the GATT service discovery so it might be confused if you don't wait until the service discovery is completed.
Regarding requestMtu, make sure you execute that method while there are no other GATT operations pending (otherwise it won't work).
One additional tip is to use an air sniffer and not only look at the hci logs.
I'm currentily developing an application which uses Bluetooth Low Energy to communicate with a BLE device. The problem is that the project require an high continuous exchange of data for working.
Currently i've developed 4 fragments which share the same BluetoothGatt istance and the same data array. When i connect to the BLE device, i set the connection priority to high, then i start a writing loop which writes the data, usually just 4 bytes, every 50 mls.
At the same time i start reading and i update my interface.
I've noticed that if i stop the writing i receive a packet of data every 50 mls, but if i let the writing loop working the reading time increase from 50mls to 100 or more.
That's not a real big problem but it reduce all the sistem performances.
I looked on the internet for solutions but i didn't find nothing, except the connection priority that already helped me a lot, i'd like to know if someone have never managed such problems and how he did it. thanks
BLE Device that you are using has something which is called "connection interval". It is set in firmware of device. Minimal value for it is 7.5ms, but usually is set to 30ms or more (iOS even will not work with intervals lower than 20-30ms or it will simply miss the packets).
So when BLE device firmware is designed, connection interval is set to some value which is safe and will work with most mobile devices, and also very important to save the battery.
Al this means that you can transfer to, or from device once per connection interval, no mater if it is read, write or notification.
Some devices has configuration settings which allows changing of connection interval, but if you just wanted to know what happens, thats it.
I'm developing a Bluetooth low energy application to connect with a device which will be sending 20 byte long transmissions in notification mode in intervals of 6 milliseconds or more.
So far the application is working fine. It can scan, discover and then subscribe to the characteristic to receive data notifications. The issue is that for the first 2-4 seconds the data will be read nicely in a sequential order but after that the notification data starts to appear in bursts or as in chunks of data but not in consistent intervals between each transmission.
This doesn't happen when i check the data transmission with the Texas Instruments BLE evaluation kit, there my reader shows a perfect transfer with not bursts appearing. Only on android it's become visible.
Could this be an issue that can be configured to fix in android side?
Could this be a problem with the high transmission rate (~milliseconds intervals)?
Thank you..
So it sums up to that optimal throughput can be achieved with the proper configuration of connection parameters for the BLE connection. It is usually done at the peripherals end and may have to differ for the platform connecting to (i.e. IOS , Android may have different connection requirements..)
P.S. : Since i was looking at android found this method documented here https://developer.android.com/reference/android/bluetooth/BluetoothGatt.html#requestConnectionPriority(int) which is calling for a connection priority( CONNECTION_PRIORITY_BALANCED, CONNECTION_PRIORITY_HIGH or CONNECTION_PRIORITY_LOW_POWER) But I didn't test it.
You could try to enable Bluetooth HCI Snoop Log in Developer Options and then view the log file in WireShark. Look for connection update commands, these can be issued by either side of communication. This command change the transmission settings and slow down the transfer. Also look for GAPROLE_PARAM_UPDATE_ENABLE in your TI BLE app.
Yes Michael we use CC2650 and for our requirement BLE is sufficient bur I'm not sure if it really supports bluetooth classic (http://www.ti.com/product/CC2650/description) .
You can try playing around the BLE connection parameters to get the setup tuned, that's what we did other than trying to build the app giving priority to BLE operations.Take a look at this for more information on connection parameters.
https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/question/60/what-is-connection-parameters/
You can't configure the connection parameters on the phone but the peripheral(i.e. SensorTag) even so there's not guarantee that the given parameters will actually be accepted by the central device in case will settle with a set of parameters accepted by the central device. (Android and IOS have different policies in terms of these..)
In our case we are transmitting in intervals of 15ms and seems quite stable. But all these high frequent transfers at the cost of the low power consumption capabilities of BLE which is really what it is intended for. We could go even below that close to 7.5ms which is the minimum connection interval supported by Android. Our initial tests were stable but reliability of such a low latency is questionable.
I'm looking for a way to detect the disconnection of a Bluetooth device immediately after it has happened (2 second max), typically in a "device too far" scenario or Device battery is dead. Currently I can detect it with a BroadcastReceiver by getting a BluetoothDevice.ACTION_ACL_DISCONNECTED, but it takes about 16 to 20 seconds to fire.
Is there any way to get notified in 2 seconds Max.
I used BroadcatReceiver but it is not fast enough to get alert in 2 seconds Max, so is there any other kind of approach available to get notification quickly that bluetooth is disconnected.
I use this createRfcommSocketToServiceRecord(UUID); to connect a paired device and i am bound to use it using UUID.
I have visited a lot of links regarding this issue, but no one matches with my needs.that's why any help would be appreciated.
thanks.
I think the only way you can reliably sense loss of connection quickly (within two seconds) is via your own application protocol that you use over the Bluetooth connection. For example, your application protocol might implement a heartbeat that occurs every 500ms. If you don't see a heartbeat within two seconds then you could trigger your own event.
Bluetooth is a socket-based stream protocol that is designed to work over an unreliable medium (i.e. radio), and as such has to tolerate errors in (or loss of) packets. For this reason it will take significantly more than 2 seconds before your Bluetooth stack declares it has given up and disconnected the device, as you have found.
I have an application on Play which is designed to talk with an automotive ECU via Bluetooth and my strategy for sensing disconnection is exactly as I suggested in my first paragraph.
Update 20th June 14
I see in your bounty comment and also your comment below that you're asking for a code example, but it's kind of difficult for me to provide one without knowing anything about the application protocol that you're running over the socket connection. Or to put it another way, what exactly is it about my first paragraph (i.e. the heartbeat suggestion) that you do not understand or cannot create code for yourself? The concept of using a heartbeat really is quite simple. You would define a certain message type in your application protocol that represents a heartbeat message. One end of the connection sends this heartbeat message periodically, say every one second. The other end of the connection checks that this heartbeat message is received every second or so and drops the connection after a two-second time-out. It is impossible to be any more specific than that, because I can't see your existing code and I don't know what kind of messages you are currently exchanging over the socket.
After nothing work around!
I got two things to get my work done.
I need to check that is my Bluetooth socket is not in use(Sending Receiving) till 2 to 5 sec I disconnect that and when user wants to send data to the receiver device I connect that again.
Or I'll try to connect the socket after 2 to 5 sec so that if it is not ready to connect means it is already connected, else it will be connected and I refresh the previous socket references.
but first option is more valuable to work perfectly in my problem.
This is a problem with old bluetooth and more hardware than software.
If you want to notice that the connection is broken you need to do polling (a heartbeat), something like "are you alive? are you alive?"... This is bad for battery so... the users will finally uninstall your app.
I recommend you to change to BTLE (bluetooth low energy), devices like Nexus 5 has this.
With BTLE you have a proximity profile which can tell you the quality of the signal, so, you can guess the distance (near, far, out of range) and therefore you can also tell if the devices are disconnected.
Another nice point is that if the devices are out of range but one is again in range you could get noticed as well, so this is really nice for apps to open doors by proximity for example.
Check this:
https://developer.bluetooth.org/TechnologyOverview/Pages/PXP.aspx
In the other hand Apple has invented the concept of iBeacons, devices that are distance aware, and the good thing is that there is also an implementation of iBeacons for Android:
http://developer.radiusnetworks.com/ibeacon/android/