Handler postDelay() new Runnables create garbage? - android

I've been thinking about implementing postDelay() in my game animation to make it more smooth. What I am worried about is that postDelay() creates a new Runnable everytime it is executed. Since my game needs postDelay() to be executed very often, will this create a lot of garbage since it is creating a new Runnable every time? Or even if it does not, does the creation of a new Runnable slow down performance?
So in this case, is it appropriate to use postDelay() in a situation where it is going to be executed very often for a long time?

You can use single Runnable instance for all postDelayed calls.
But I think that a loop is better for games, it's a standard pattern, like in this post: How to appear and disappear an object on screen using game loop for every five second

There's no need to create a new runnanable each time postDely() is executed
private static int LOOP_TIME = 5000;
private Handler handlerWork;
private Runnable runnableWork = new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
//do some work
handlerWork.postDelayed(runnableWork, LOOP_TIME);
}
}
#Override
protected void onResume() {
super.onResume();
if (handlerWork == null)
handlerWork = new Handler();
handlerWork.postDelayed(runnableWork, LOOP_TIME);
}
#Override
protected void onPause() {
super.onPause();
if (handlerWork != null)
handlerWork.removeCallbacks(runnableWork);
}

Related

runOnUiThread() no executing when using Thread.sleep()

I'm using code that looks like this :
_thread = new Thread(){
#Override
public void run() {
try {
while (true) {
operate();
Thread.sleep(DELAY);
}
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// Doesn't matters...
}
}
};
operate function looks like this :
// does things....
activity.runOnUiThread(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// adds an ImageView to the screen
}
});
// does other things...
At the bottom line, what i wanted to achieve is an operation that happens once in a while, without interrupting the main thread and the UI, something like a game-loop.
In the first 2 times that operate() runs, it adds the ImageView and everything is alright, but after 2 or 3 times it stops adding the ImageViews, but the UI is still running as usual. When i debugged the problem, i found out that after 3 times the run() method of the Runnable isn't called anymore, even thought the operate function was called.
The wired thing (for me) was that when i removed the Thread.sleep, everything worked fine (much faster of course...). I tried to replace it with a very long for loop (just for checking) and it worked, but of course it is not an appropriate solution to the problem.
I read about the problem, most of the people that asked this question did a thread.sleep or an infinite loop on the main thread, but, as i see it, i didn't do such thing. Many people wrote that you should replace the Thread.sleep with Handler.postDelayed. I tried to do it but it didn't work, maybe I did it wrong. I even tried replacing the runOnUiThread with other options I found on the internet, but all of them gave me the same exact results. I tried to replace the method that I'm adding the view to the activity, but all of them, again, gave the same result.
The waiting is crucial for this application. I got to find a way to wait sometime and then execute a function on the UI thread, cause this pattern returns at least a couple of times in my application.
It sounds like you want a post delay so that you can do the code on the UI thread after some delay. Handler Post Delay.
private static final int DELAY = 500;
private Handler mHandler;
private Runnable mRunnable;
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState)
{
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
start();
}
private void start()
{
mHandler = new Handler();
mRunnable = new MyRunnable(this);
mHandler.postDelayed(mRunnable, DELAY);
}
private void stop()
{
mHandler.removeCallbacks(mRunnable);
}
private void doSomething()
{
// Do your stuff here.
// Reschedule.
mHandler.postDelayed(mRunnable, DELAY);
}
Recommended way of creating a Runnable.
private static class MyRunnable implements Runnable
{
private WeakReference<MainActivity> mRef;
// In here you can pass any object that you need.
MyRunnable(MainActivity activity)
{
mRef = new WeakReference<MainActivity>(activity);
}
#Override
public void run()
{
// Safety check to avoid leaking.
MainActivity activity = mRef.get();
if(activity == null)
{
return;
}
// Do something here.
activity.doSomething();
}
}
There could be several reasons why the UI Runnable isn't being executed. Probably the activity variable has something messed up with it or it's referencing the context incorrectly, or as you said the Thread.sleep() could be causing an issue. At this point more parts of the code needs to viewed to better solve the problem.
A better way of implementing your logic is to use a scheduled Timer instead of using an infinite loop with a Thread.sleep() in it. It will execute the code within a background thread. And then use a Handler to update the UI instead of activity.runOnUiThread(). Here's an example:
// Global variable within the activity
private Handler handler;
// Activity's onCreate()
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
handler = new Handler(getMainLooper());
Timer timer = new Timer("ScheduledTask");
// Timer must be started on the Main UI thread as such.
timer.scheduleAtFixedRate(new TimerTask() {
#Override
public void run() {
operate();
}
}, 0L, DELAY);
}
private void operate() {
// does things in background....
handler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// adds an ImageView to the screen from within the Main UI thread
}
});
// does other things in the background...
}

Create timer(Handler) when view appears and stop it when view disappears

I have been developing iOS apps for quite a time and now i have switched to android. I have a requirement in which I have to start timer(In think in Android, I need to use handler) when view appears(onResume) and invalidate timer(stop handler) when view disappears(onPause). I am able to create runnable Handler but not able to stop it.
My code is:
protected void AutoRefresh() {
try{
handler.postDelayed(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
new LongOperation().execute("");
}
AutoRefresh();
}, 60000);
}
catch(Exception ex){
}
}
Now, how can I stop this this handler thread when view disappears. Please also comment, if its not the right way to do timer implementation in android.
when view appears(onResume) and invalidate timer(stop handler) when
view disappears(onPause). I am able to create runnable Handler but not
able to stop it.
Keep a reference to the Runnable you use:
private Runnable mRefresh = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
new LongOperation().execute("");
}
AutoRefresh();
}
//...
protected void AutoRefresh() {
handler.postDelayed(mRefresh, 60000);
}
and in onPause remove it like this:
handler.removeCallbacks(mRefresh);
Keep in mind that this will not remove the currently Runnable that is being executed(if any) so in the LongOperation's onPostExecute method you might want to check if the Activity is still available before refreshing the UI or doing any other interaction with the Activity.
Please also comment, if its not the right way to do timer
implementation in android.
You seem to need to do an action at a certain interval of time and using a Handler is the way to do it, I don't think a timer is what you need.

Android Inception (A thread within a thread)

I have one function which queries a network server with a few "ping pongs" back and forth, and have written a custom handler to handle the message communication between my main UI thread and the communication thread (I was using AsyncTask for this, but as the program got more complex, I have decided to remove the communication code to its own class outside of the main activity).
Triggering a single instance of this thread communication from onCreate works perfectly, no problem.
I want this query to run on a regular timed basis -- in the background -- for the entire time the app is in use, so I've set up another thread called pollTimer, which I'm trying to use to call the OTHER thread at a regularly scheduled basis.
Obviously, it's crashing, or I wouldn't be posting this.
Is there a way to get a thread within a thread? Or put differently, trigger a thread from another thread?
Timer pollTimer = new Timer();
private void startPollTimer(){
pollTimer.scheduleAtFixedRate(new TimerTask(){
public void run(){
Log.d(TAG,"timer dinged");
//if the following is commented out, this "dings" every 6 seconds.
//if its not commented out, it crashes
threadedPoll();
}
}, 3120, 6000);
}
private void threadedPoll() {
testThread(asciiQueries,WorkerThreadRunnable.typeLogin);
}
edit: it would probably help to include the "testThread" function, which works by itself when called from onCreate, but does not make it when called from the Timer.
"WorkerThreadRunnable" is the massive chunk of code in its own class that has replaced the mess of having AsyncTask handle it inside the main activity.
private Handler runStatHandler = null;
Thread workerThread = null;
private void testThread(String[] threadCommands, int commandType){
if(runStatHandler == null){
runStatHandler = new ReportStatusHandler(this);
if(commandType == WorkerThreadRunnable.typeLogin){
workerThread = new Thread(new WorkerThreadRunnable(runStatHandler,threadCommands, WorkerThreadRunnable.typeLogin));
}
workerThread.start();
return;
}
//thread is already there
if(workerThread.getState() != Thread.State.TERMINATED){
Log.d(TAG,"thread is new or alive, but not terminated");
}else{
Log.d(TAG, "thread is likely deaad, starting now");
//there's no way to resurrect a dead thread
workerThread = new Thread(new WorkerThreadRunnable(runStatHandler));
workerThread.start();
}
}
You seem to be well on the way already - the nice thing about handlers, though, is that they aren't limited to the UI thread - so if you have a Handler declared by one thread, you can set it up to take asynchronous instructions from another thread
mWorkerThread = new WorkerThread()
private class WorkerThread extends Thread {
private Handler mHandler;
#Override
public void run() {
mHandler = new Handler(); // we do this here to ensure that
// the handler runs on this thread
}
public void doStuff() {
mHandler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// do stuff asynchronously
}
}
}
}
Hopefully that helps... if I'm totally off base on your problem let me know
Wots wrong with a sleep() loop? Why do you have pagefuls of complex, dodgy code when you could just loop in one thread?

Android unit tests with multiple threads

I have a problem with unit tests in Android.
My object MyObject has a method start() like this :
public void start() {
final Handler onStartHandler = new Handler();
new Thread() {
#Override
public void run() {
super.run();
onStartHandler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
mIsRunning = true;
onStart();
}
});
}
}.start();
}
And I want to test that onStart() is called.
So I tried something like that :
public void testOnStartIsCalled() {
assertFalse("onStart() should not be called", mMyObject.isRunning());
mMyObject.start();
assertTrue("onStart() should be called", mMyObject.isRunning());
mMyObject.stop();
assertFalse("onStop() should be called", mMyObject.isRunning());
}
But it doesn't work, I guess it's because it's in a Handler and a new Thread.
My test class extends AndroidTestCase.
What should I do ? What is the best practice for this case ?
Regards.
When I deal with testing some multi-threaded code I try to let the program take as much of its natural flow as possible. Additionally, I avoid the use of sleep statements since you don't get any guarantees that the sleep interval you've chosen is enough to allow the subject of your test to finish what it's doing; you often end up having to choose sleep intervals that are too large and it forces a much slower execution of your test cases.
I would recommend that you try to add some code into the class you're testing, in this case MyObject, which call a listener whenever something happens. It seems that you already have callback methods for onStart() and onStop()(if those are events/callbacks), so those should be getting invoked and you should use them to control the flow of your test. When you get an onStart() event, you should then call stop() and wait for an onStop() event.
Update
First and foremost, you have redundant code:
public void start() {
final Handler onStartHandler = new Handler();
new Thread() {
#Override
public void run() {
super.run();
onStartHandler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
mIsRunning = true;
onStart();
}
});
}
}.start();
}
Either start a new thread to call onStart() or schedule the runnable on the Handler's thread queue.
Version 1- remove the handler and just let the code be executed in a new thread:
public void start() {
new Thread() {
#Override
public void run() {
super.run();
mIsRunning = true;
onStart();
}
}.start();
}
Version 2- only use the handler to asynchronously execute the callback:
public void start() {
final Handler onStartHandler = new Handler();
onStartHandler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
mIsRunning = true;
onStart();
}
});
}
And second: I noticed is that if you don't have a Looper, then whatever you post with the Handler will be ignored (thus it will never be called). For more information on the Looper-Handler pattern see the article: Android Guts: Intro to Loopers and Handlers. The Looper and the Handler are supposed to be attached to the same thread (usually the main thread). Additionally, if you're creating the Handler on a separate thread as your Looper, then you'll run into the same problem: anything you post with the Handler will be ignored.
Here are a few more good questions and articles on loopers and handlers:
Just do IT: looper and handler in android
Handler-Looper implementation in Android
The relationships between Looper, Handler and MessageQueue is shown below:
The problem here is that you are calling onStart() which invokes a new thread, and then immediately ask if it is started. There is startup time for the new thread and while that is happening, your test is asking if it is started -- it's not YET.
I bet if you waited by using Thread.sleep(), or a loop, you'd find it is started "eventually".
What is it you're actually trying to test?
If you need the new thread, you might want to read up on threads, synchronize, etc.
http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/fundamentals/processes-and-threads.html

Android Async, Handler or Timer?

Every 5 seconds, I want to call my webservice and get text (not images), then display it in my ImageAdapter. What would be the best way to accomplish this?
final Handler handler = new Handler();
final Runnable r = new Runnable()
{
public void run()
{
callWebservice();
}
};
handler.postDelayed(r, 5000);
It depends if you want to use a different thread or not. Do you want the user to be able to interact with the application on the UI Thread while the images are downloading? If so, then I would definitely use an AsyncTask with a small ProgressBar (style="#android:style/Widget.ProgressBar.Small")
If you don't care about threading then what #inazaruk said.
Edit: the truth is most modern apps that retrieve data from a web service will use an AsyncTask with a discreet little loader in the corner just to let the user know it's updating.
Edit 2: here's an example of using a TimerTask to run something every 5 seconds. The key is the runOnUiThread(). There may be better ways to tie all the elements together but this accurately portrays all the pieces.
myTimer = new Timer();
myTimer.schedule(new TimerTask() {
#Override
public void run() {
CallWebService();
}
}, 0, 1000);
}
private void CallWebService()
{
this.runOnUiThread(fetchData);
}
private Runnable fetchData = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
asyncTask.execute();
}
};
You should call asynctask inside the application main thread. Asynctask can't be called in a background thread.

Categories

Resources