I have a problem with unit tests in Android.
My object MyObject has a method start() like this :
public void start() {
final Handler onStartHandler = new Handler();
new Thread() {
#Override
public void run() {
super.run();
onStartHandler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
mIsRunning = true;
onStart();
}
});
}
}.start();
}
And I want to test that onStart() is called.
So I tried something like that :
public void testOnStartIsCalled() {
assertFalse("onStart() should not be called", mMyObject.isRunning());
mMyObject.start();
assertTrue("onStart() should be called", mMyObject.isRunning());
mMyObject.stop();
assertFalse("onStop() should be called", mMyObject.isRunning());
}
But it doesn't work, I guess it's because it's in a Handler and a new Thread.
My test class extends AndroidTestCase.
What should I do ? What is the best practice for this case ?
Regards.
When I deal with testing some multi-threaded code I try to let the program take as much of its natural flow as possible. Additionally, I avoid the use of sleep statements since you don't get any guarantees that the sleep interval you've chosen is enough to allow the subject of your test to finish what it's doing; you often end up having to choose sleep intervals that are too large and it forces a much slower execution of your test cases.
I would recommend that you try to add some code into the class you're testing, in this case MyObject, which call a listener whenever something happens. It seems that you already have callback methods for onStart() and onStop()(if those are events/callbacks), so those should be getting invoked and you should use them to control the flow of your test. When you get an onStart() event, you should then call stop() and wait for an onStop() event.
Update
First and foremost, you have redundant code:
public void start() {
final Handler onStartHandler = new Handler();
new Thread() {
#Override
public void run() {
super.run();
onStartHandler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
mIsRunning = true;
onStart();
}
});
}
}.start();
}
Either start a new thread to call onStart() or schedule the runnable on the Handler's thread queue.
Version 1- remove the handler and just let the code be executed in a new thread:
public void start() {
new Thread() {
#Override
public void run() {
super.run();
mIsRunning = true;
onStart();
}
}.start();
}
Version 2- only use the handler to asynchronously execute the callback:
public void start() {
final Handler onStartHandler = new Handler();
onStartHandler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
mIsRunning = true;
onStart();
}
});
}
And second: I noticed is that if you don't have a Looper, then whatever you post with the Handler will be ignored (thus it will never be called). For more information on the Looper-Handler pattern see the article: Android Guts: Intro to Loopers and Handlers. The Looper and the Handler are supposed to be attached to the same thread (usually the main thread). Additionally, if you're creating the Handler on a separate thread as your Looper, then you'll run into the same problem: anything you post with the Handler will be ignored.
Here are a few more good questions and articles on loopers and handlers:
Just do IT: looper and handler in android
Handler-Looper implementation in Android
The relationships between Looper, Handler and MessageQueue is shown below:
The problem here is that you are calling onStart() which invokes a new thread, and then immediately ask if it is started. There is startup time for the new thread and while that is happening, your test is asking if it is started -- it's not YET.
I bet if you waited by using Thread.sleep(), or a loop, you'd find it is started "eventually".
What is it you're actually trying to test?
If you need the new thread, you might want to read up on threads, synchronize, etc.
http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/fundamentals/processes-and-threads.html
Related
I want perform a network call in every 30sec to push some metrics to Server. Currently I am doing it using thread.sleep(). I found some articles saying thread.sleep() has some drawbacks. I need to know am I doing it right? or Replacing the thread with Handler will improve my code?
public static void startSending(final Context con) {
if (running) return;
running = true;
threadToSendUXMetrics = new Thread(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
do {
try {
Thread.sleep(AugmedixConstants.glassLogsPushInterval);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
mLogger.error(interrupt_exception + e.getMessage());
}
// to do to send each time, should have some sleep code
if (AugmedixConstants.WEBAPP_URL.equals(AugmedixConstants.EMPTY_STRING)||!StatsNetworkChecker.checkIsConnected(con)) {
Utility.populateNetworkStat();
mLogger.error(may_be_provider_not_login_yet);
} else
sendUXMetrics();
} while (running);
if (!uxMetricsQueue.isEmpty()) sendUXMetrics();
}
});
threadToSendUXMetrics.start();
}
If You are using only one thread in the network, then usage of the thread.sleep() is fine. If there are multiple threads in synchronization, then the thread.sleep() command will block all the other threads that are currently running.
As per the details you've provided, there is only one thread present which isn't blocking any other active threads which are running in synchronization, so using thread.sleep() shouldn't be a problem.
Use Handler.postDelayed to schedule tasks if you are working in UI Thread and Thread.sleep if you are working in background thread.
Apparently you are sending some data using network, you must do it in the background thread, hence Thread.sleep is recommended.
Simple is:
Thread.sleep(millisSeconds): With this method, you only can call in background tasks, for example in AsyncTask::doInBackground(), you can call to delay actions after that. RECOMMENDED CALL THIS METHOD IN BACKGROUND THREAD.
Handler().postDelayed({METHOD}, millisSeconds): With this instance, METHOD will trigged after millisSeconds declared.
But, to easy handle life cycle of Handler(), you need to declare a Handler() instance, with a Runnable instance. For example, when your Activity has paused or you just no need call that method again, you can remove callback from Handler(). Below is example:
public class MainActivity extends Activity {
private Handler mHandler = Handler();
public void onStart(...) {
super.onStart(...)
this.mHandler.postDelayed(this.foo, 1000)
}
public void onPaused(...) {
this.mHandler.removeCallback(this.foo)
super.onPaused(...)
}
private Runnable foo = new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// your code will call after 1 second when activity start
// end remove callback when activity paused
// continue call...
mHandler.postDelayed(foo, 1000)
}
}
}
The code above just for reference, I type by hand because don't have IDE to write then copy paste.
I'm using code that looks like this :
_thread = new Thread(){
#Override
public void run() {
try {
while (true) {
operate();
Thread.sleep(DELAY);
}
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// Doesn't matters...
}
}
};
operate function looks like this :
// does things....
activity.runOnUiThread(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// adds an ImageView to the screen
}
});
// does other things...
At the bottom line, what i wanted to achieve is an operation that happens once in a while, without interrupting the main thread and the UI, something like a game-loop.
In the first 2 times that operate() runs, it adds the ImageView and everything is alright, but after 2 or 3 times it stops adding the ImageViews, but the UI is still running as usual. When i debugged the problem, i found out that after 3 times the run() method of the Runnable isn't called anymore, even thought the operate function was called.
The wired thing (for me) was that when i removed the Thread.sleep, everything worked fine (much faster of course...). I tried to replace it with a very long for loop (just for checking) and it worked, but of course it is not an appropriate solution to the problem.
I read about the problem, most of the people that asked this question did a thread.sleep or an infinite loop on the main thread, but, as i see it, i didn't do such thing. Many people wrote that you should replace the Thread.sleep with Handler.postDelayed. I tried to do it but it didn't work, maybe I did it wrong. I even tried replacing the runOnUiThread with other options I found on the internet, but all of them gave me the same exact results. I tried to replace the method that I'm adding the view to the activity, but all of them, again, gave the same result.
The waiting is crucial for this application. I got to find a way to wait sometime and then execute a function on the UI thread, cause this pattern returns at least a couple of times in my application.
It sounds like you want a post delay so that you can do the code on the UI thread after some delay. Handler Post Delay.
private static final int DELAY = 500;
private Handler mHandler;
private Runnable mRunnable;
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState)
{
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
start();
}
private void start()
{
mHandler = new Handler();
mRunnable = new MyRunnable(this);
mHandler.postDelayed(mRunnable, DELAY);
}
private void stop()
{
mHandler.removeCallbacks(mRunnable);
}
private void doSomething()
{
// Do your stuff here.
// Reschedule.
mHandler.postDelayed(mRunnable, DELAY);
}
Recommended way of creating a Runnable.
private static class MyRunnable implements Runnable
{
private WeakReference<MainActivity> mRef;
// In here you can pass any object that you need.
MyRunnable(MainActivity activity)
{
mRef = new WeakReference<MainActivity>(activity);
}
#Override
public void run()
{
// Safety check to avoid leaking.
MainActivity activity = mRef.get();
if(activity == null)
{
return;
}
// Do something here.
activity.doSomething();
}
}
There could be several reasons why the UI Runnable isn't being executed. Probably the activity variable has something messed up with it or it's referencing the context incorrectly, or as you said the Thread.sleep() could be causing an issue. At this point more parts of the code needs to viewed to better solve the problem.
A better way of implementing your logic is to use a scheduled Timer instead of using an infinite loop with a Thread.sleep() in it. It will execute the code within a background thread. And then use a Handler to update the UI instead of activity.runOnUiThread(). Here's an example:
// Global variable within the activity
private Handler handler;
// Activity's onCreate()
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
handler = new Handler(getMainLooper());
Timer timer = new Timer("ScheduledTask");
// Timer must be started on the Main UI thread as such.
timer.scheduleAtFixedRate(new TimerTask() {
#Override
public void run() {
operate();
}
}, 0L, DELAY);
}
private void operate() {
// does things in background....
handler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// adds an ImageView to the screen from within the Main UI thread
}
});
// does other things in the background...
}
I would like my code runs all the one minut..
Can anyone explain me how to do it?
private Handler myHandler;
private Runnable myRunnable = new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
//DO WORK
Toast.makeText(getApplicationContext(), " Hello",Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show();
myHandler.postDelayed(this,60000);
}
};
#Override
public void onCreate() {
super.onCreate();
//call function
myHandler = new Handler();
//
myHandler.postDelayed(myRunnable,60000);
Log.d(this.getClass().getName(), "onCreate");
}
watch this http://goo.gl/DRdaUi
BTW 60 second is a very long time for thread to run! If you have something that runs this long consider using android service instead of thread.
Also do you need to use handler? think again, most of the time there is no need for that. AsyncTask is android first option for multithreading and its a lot simpler. unless AsyncTask can not handle what you have in your mind don't use any other method.
A Timer is a valid solution but it will not execute on the UI thread. And your code tells me this is what you want.
The simplest way to do that would be via a handler and a repeating task:
final Handler handler = new Handler(); // ui thread handler
handler.postDelayed(new MyRunnable(handler), INETRVAL);
Where:
class MyRunnable implements Runnable {
#Override
public void run() {
// do periodical action here
// and.. repeat your task <------------
handler.postDelayed(new MyRunnable(handler), INETRVAL);
}
}
I have one function which queries a network server with a few "ping pongs" back and forth, and have written a custom handler to handle the message communication between my main UI thread and the communication thread (I was using AsyncTask for this, but as the program got more complex, I have decided to remove the communication code to its own class outside of the main activity).
Triggering a single instance of this thread communication from onCreate works perfectly, no problem.
I want this query to run on a regular timed basis -- in the background -- for the entire time the app is in use, so I've set up another thread called pollTimer, which I'm trying to use to call the OTHER thread at a regularly scheduled basis.
Obviously, it's crashing, or I wouldn't be posting this.
Is there a way to get a thread within a thread? Or put differently, trigger a thread from another thread?
Timer pollTimer = new Timer();
private void startPollTimer(){
pollTimer.scheduleAtFixedRate(new TimerTask(){
public void run(){
Log.d(TAG,"timer dinged");
//if the following is commented out, this "dings" every 6 seconds.
//if its not commented out, it crashes
threadedPoll();
}
}, 3120, 6000);
}
private void threadedPoll() {
testThread(asciiQueries,WorkerThreadRunnable.typeLogin);
}
edit: it would probably help to include the "testThread" function, which works by itself when called from onCreate, but does not make it when called from the Timer.
"WorkerThreadRunnable" is the massive chunk of code in its own class that has replaced the mess of having AsyncTask handle it inside the main activity.
private Handler runStatHandler = null;
Thread workerThread = null;
private void testThread(String[] threadCommands, int commandType){
if(runStatHandler == null){
runStatHandler = new ReportStatusHandler(this);
if(commandType == WorkerThreadRunnable.typeLogin){
workerThread = new Thread(new WorkerThreadRunnable(runStatHandler,threadCommands, WorkerThreadRunnable.typeLogin));
}
workerThread.start();
return;
}
//thread is already there
if(workerThread.getState() != Thread.State.TERMINATED){
Log.d(TAG,"thread is new or alive, but not terminated");
}else{
Log.d(TAG, "thread is likely deaad, starting now");
//there's no way to resurrect a dead thread
workerThread = new Thread(new WorkerThreadRunnable(runStatHandler));
workerThread.start();
}
}
You seem to be well on the way already - the nice thing about handlers, though, is that they aren't limited to the UI thread - so if you have a Handler declared by one thread, you can set it up to take asynchronous instructions from another thread
mWorkerThread = new WorkerThread()
private class WorkerThread extends Thread {
private Handler mHandler;
#Override
public void run() {
mHandler = new Handler(); // we do this here to ensure that
// the handler runs on this thread
}
public void doStuff() {
mHandler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// do stuff asynchronously
}
}
}
}
Hopefully that helps... if I'm totally off base on your problem let me know
Wots wrong with a sleep() loop? Why do you have pagefuls of complex, dodgy code when you could just loop in one thread?
I am calling from a method:
myHandler.postDelayed(mMyRunnableHide, 6000);
which calls:
public Runnable mMyRunnableHide = new Runnable()
{
public void run()
{
mTextDisplay.setText("");
DisplayX();
}
};
if a button on screen is clicked I want to stop the runnable:
Button next = (Button) findViewById(R.id.Breaction);
next.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
public void onClick(View view) {
myHandler.removeCallbacks(mMyRunnableHide);
mTextDisplay.setText("");
DisplayX();
}
});
}
the removecallbacks is not stopping the runnable. What am I doing wrong? Am I using the correct method? I just want the runnable to "Not Run" when the user clicks the button.
Thanks for any help.
It appears to me that removeCallbacks(..) only stops pending messages (Runnables). If your runnable has already started, then there's no stopping it (at least not this way).
Alternatively, you can extend the Runnable class and give it some kind of kill switch like this:
public class MyRunnable implements Runnable
{
private boolean killMe = false;
private void run()
{
if(killMe)
return;
/* do your work */
}
private void killRunnable()
{
killMe = true;
}
}
This will only prevent it from starting, but you could occasionally check killMe and bail out. If you are looping the runnable (like some kind of background thread) you can say:
while(!killMe) {
/* do work */
}
Hope this helps
EDIT I just wanted to post an update on this. Since this original post, Google has come up with a great class called AsyncTask that handles all of this stuff for you. Anyone reading this really should look into it because it is the correct way of doing things.
You can read about it here
Handler.removeCallback is synchronous and will work nicely provided:
You call postDelayed always in the main thread.
You call removeCallback always in the main thread
You don't call postDelayed again after having removed callbacks.
So in your case removeCallbacks is called from a button handler, which runs in the main thread. But you didn't show in your code the point from where you call postDelayed. If you call it from a background thread thats where your problem is.
If you are sure you don't call any of these methods from background threads, and the order of the calls is correct, then you might be leaving uncancelled tasks unadvertedly alive due to activity recreation on config changes (screen rotation, etc). Always make sure to call removeCallbacks again in the onDestroy method to prevent this kind of problems.
Here is another way to accomplish what mtmurdock is describing. This class will allow editing of instance variables in any class that your Runnable is defined as an anonymous inner class.
package support;
/**
* Runnable that can be stopped from executing
*/
public abstract class KillableRunnable implements Runnable{
private boolean isKilled=false;
/**
* Instead of Overriding run(), override this method to perform a Runnable operation.
* This will allow editing instance variables in the class that this Runnable is defined
*/
public abstract void doWork();
//The handler that posts this Runnable will call this method.
//By default, check if it has been killed. doWork() will now be the method
//override to implement this Runnable
#Override
final public void run(){
if(!isKilled){
doWork();
}
}
final public void kill(){
isKilled=true;
}
}
I don't think that removeCallbacks(..) only stops pending messages (Runnables) ，I think removeCallbacks(..) not working have other cause,but i don‘t know. because postDelayed(..) and removeCallbacks(..) is in the same thread
the following has worked for me. Place it in onResume.
mService= null;
public void onServiceConnected(ComponentName name, IBinder service) {
Log.i(TAG, "OnServiceConnected");
ContadorFG.LocalBinder binder = (ContadorFG.LocalBinder) service;
mService = binder.getService();
connected = true;
synchronized (lock){
lock.notifyAll();
}
}
public void onResume() {
super.onResume();
loopDelayed();
}
private void loopDelayed(){
final Handler handler = new Handler();
handler.postDelayed(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
if (mService != null) {
----
----
----
return;
}else{
//auto call
loopDelayed();
}
}
}, 10);
}