Develop Reference

Does too many views that are View.GONE affect the Android rendering speed?

I have inherited a project where its user input screens are using single layout file. Depending on the type of user input required to show, a group of views are hidden or shown via View.GONE and View.VISIBLE. I don't understand why the old programmers did this. Is there a performance gain in this approach?

Official guideline about Improving Layout Performance
Sometimes your layout might require complex views that are rarely
used. Whether they are item details you can reduce memory usage and
speed up rendering by loading the views only when they are needed.
You can use ViewStub. It is zero sized invisible View that can be used to lazily inflate layout resource at runtime.
Sometimes might need to re-use larger components that require a special layout. To efficiently achieve this, You can try with Re-using Layouts with <include/>. Good way to share layout parts between different layout’s.

It could be a case of performance gain as Views will not be rendered. However, I am not certain why those developers went with this approach. If there are multiple views are not going to be used then rather create two separate layouts and based on the user, inflate one or the another.

Layouting android fragments programmatically

I am new to android development and currently struggling with fragments and layouts (Xamarin.Android for what it's worth).
I am adding fragments to my View programatically in the OnCreate method of my main view. One of the fragments holds the controls for navigation and implements a fly-over Idiom. Now my problem is, that I haven't found a way to make the width of the navigation fragment, say, half of the width of the parent control. In every override I have been able to access the layout has not been performed and hence the width of the fragments and the main view are both 0. Setting the size of the fragments decleratively in the layout files did not work either (neither for the translate properties which I'll nees to access in the same way to hide the fragment initially). Xamarin/VS complains that setting the size or translate properties to a string (i.e. parent_width or the like) was not valid.
Every tutorial on fragments I've read omits this point.

If I am understanding your problem correctly you are having an issue with layout sizing of fragments added dynamically.
It may be helpful if you were able to paste your code outlining how you are adding your fragments and what override methods you attempted to use. However, here is a best attempt to assist without seeing any code.
There are two approaches to sizing dynamically added elements that I have used in the past consistently. One is to use a base container for your layout of LinearLayout and specify weights for your fragments dynamically. This would allow you to specify that your fragments should consume portions of the layout easily. For instance if you have fragment A and B and you wish for fragment A to consume 25% of your layout space - you can set its weight to 1 and Fragment B's weight to 4. You can find support for dynamically setting weight of an element (such as your fragment) here: How to set layout_weight attribute dynamically from code?
Another option would be to use the an OnGlobalLayoutListener that will "fire" when the control is laid out. This will ensure when you try to measure the layout to determine its width/height that it has already laid out and consumed the proper space for measurement and you will not get back 0. There are a number of articles outlining how to write up the code for this listener scattered throughout the web. I It may also be useful to subclass out some of the listener functionality for easy reuse if you find you have a need often to know when the control has laid out. Here is a link to the Android documentation on the subject http://developer.android.com/reference/android/view/ViewTreeObserver.OnGlobalLayoutListener.html.
Hope it helps.

Android - Is a ViewStub worth it?

I have a ListView where each row of the listview contains about 10 ImageButtons. Most of these buttons have visibility = Gone and only show up in very rare scenarios. I am wondering if it's worth it to replace these ImageButtons with ViewStubs to avoid loading them (and the images they contain) all the time for all the rows of the listview. Then again their visibility is set to "Gone", so I am not sure what impact loading them has. Do their images actually get loaded or not?
Note that I am talking about replacing e.g. the 8 ImageButtons with 8 ViewStubs, not with 1
Cheers

A ViewStub is a dumb and lightweight view. It has no dimension, it does not draw anything and does not participate in the layout in any way. This means a ViewStub is very cheap to inflate and very cheap to keep in a view hierarchy. A ViewStub can be best described as a lazy include. The layout referenced by a ViewStub is inflated and added to the user interface only when you decide so.
Sometimes your layout might require complex views that are rarely used. Whether they are item details, progress indicators, or undo messages, you can reduce memory usage and speed up rendering by loading the views only when they are needed.
Simply a ViewStub is used to increase efficiency of rendering layout. By using ViewStub, manually views can be created but not added to view hierarchy. At the runtime, can be easily inflated, while ViewStub is inflated, the content of the viewstub will be replaced the defined layout in the viewstub.
The ViewStub will be loaded only when you actually use it/need it, i.e., when you set its visibility to VISIBLE (actually visible) or INVISIBLE (still not visible, but its size isn't 0 any more). ViewStub a nice optimization because you could have a complex layout with tons of small views or headers anywhere, and still have your Activity load up really fast. Once you use one of those views, it'll be loaded.
You must add ViewStub in Layout at first, after you can inflate it to another View.
Note: One drawback of ViewStub is that it doesn’t currently support the <merge/> tag in the layouts to be inflated. Alos ViewStub can’t be used more than once. Also keeping long-lived reference to a ViewStub is unnecessary, if it is required, it's good practice to null it after inflating, so GC can eat it.
Let's suppose your ViewStub ID is view_stub. You need to do the following in the activity:
ViewStub viewStub = (ViewStub) findViewById(R.id.view_stub);
View inflatedView = viewStub.inflate();
ImageButton button = (ImageButton) inflatedView.findViewById(R.id.button);
Now you can do whatever you want with the button :) That is, the inflate method returns the stub layout which contains the actual elements from the XML file.
Of course, you can always have the onClick XML attribute or can be dynamically called.
Is a ViewStub worth it?
->For the scenarios that you are specifying, I think `ViewStub` will be worth-shot.
See below urls about ViewStub
http://android-developers.blogspot.in/2009/03/android-layout-tricks-3-optimize-with.html
http://developer.android.com/reference/android/view/ViewStub.html
http://developer.android.com/training/improving-layouts/loading-ondemand.html
Instead of ViewStub you can try <\include> tag. The <include/> will just include the xml contents in your base xml file as if the whole thing was just a single big file. It's a nice way to share layout parts between different layouts.
Difference between <include> and <ViewStub> in android

Edit: just noticed that Endzeit commented regarding a similar direction before me.
I would start by doing some benchmarking around the inflating code with and without the views - just comment out the adapter code so it doesn't try to access the non existing views.
If the removal of the Views from the layout does gives you an improvement that you think is necessary and since you say the views are present only in rare scenarios which you are anyway checking for in your adapter,
then instead of inflating those views or even using view stubs, create them in code and add/remove them as needed (using the viewholder to reference them).
You could even go further and do a lazy creation of these views, similar to lazy loading of images, but I would only do that after running some benchmarking again.
I would use ViewStubs for loading complex layouts not simple ImageButtons.
Edit 2:
Looking into ViewStub inflate command, which is what it does when it needs to be visible you can see it infaltes the layout given and then adds it to the parent layout - since you are adding a simple ImageButton you can gain performance by not having a ViewStub and just adding the ImageButton in your code.
http://grepcode.com/file/repository.grepcode.com/java/ext/com.google.android/android/5.1.1_r1/android/view/ViewStub.java#ViewStub.inflate%28%29

According to Google's official documentation here.
ViewStub is a lightweight view with no dimension that doesn’t draw anything or participate in the layout. As such, it's cheap to inflate and cheap to leave in a view hierarchy. Each ViewStub simply needs to include the android:layout attribute to specify the layout to inflate.
To experiment this, I created a sample project and added a ViewStub to the layout hierarchy. On running layout inspector I can see that all the layout attributes for ViewStub are zero.
Let's compare it to having a layout which has 10 buttons hidden. What this actually means is, the layout hierarchy has 10 buttons hidden, which is sitting in the layout hierarchy and taking up some amount of memory. It's cheap to leave a ViewStub in hierarchy since it doesn't take up much memory, at the same time it's cheap to inflate.
My final verdict would be, use ViewStub extensively when you've complicated views which are inflated rarely as it definitely helps in saving memory and improving View inflating time.

Using the Android monitor's Memory tab in Android Studio (button for the Android monitor should be at the bottom bar), you could check it yourself:
Take a look at the memory usage when running the app with invisible buttons
Take a look at the memory usage when running the app with visible buttons
If there is any difference, then you can conclude not everything is preloaded when the views are Gone. Of course, you could also compare this to a ViewStub implementation to check whether that will help to decrease memory usage.

In short, using custom view instead of viewstub.
We are having a similar situation now, and we have also tried viewstub before, listview works a little faster. But when it comes to 8 viewstubs, i don't think its a good idea to use viewstub to avoid inflate too many widgets.
Since u (and also us) have a logic to control whether 10 buttons to show or not , why not just define a custom view, and draw different buttons according to different state machine? It's much fast, and need no inflation at all, and it's logic is much better controlled. We are using this method to accelerate listview now and it works good.

when you set a view visibility to gone this means that This view is invisible, and it doesn't take any space for layout but its data are loaded into it.
Now the ListViews they remove the unseen or lets say the views that are out of the screen bounds for performance reasons .
A ViewStub is an invisible, zero-sized View that can be used to lazily inflate layout resources at runtime.
So i think if you want from my opinion I prefer the Views with GONE Visibility rather than using much logic with ViewStub and Creating and inflating ... etc .
But on the other hand
The rendering performance comes into picture when you are inflating
the views.
My guess is that its much cheaper to inflate a ViewStub than to
inflate a View, either from XML or by changing visibility. ViewStub is
especially used when you need to add/remove (indefinite) views (eg.
add phone numbers to a given contact). Hope this is what you were
looking for.
reference : ViewStub vs. View.GONE
some good Brief presentation of DDMS here :
http://magicmicky.github.io/android_development/benchmark-using-traceview/

Use ViewStub instead ImageButton.
This is because
. ViewStub is zero sized view by default while image button not
. View Stub is naturally an invisible view . its performance is better than image button because it load runtime only when its state become visible.

Difference between <include> and <ViewStub> in android

What are the differences between <\include> tag and <\ViewStub> tag and which one is preferrable while designing the layout.

The < include /> will just include the xml contents in your base xml file as if the whole thing was just a single big file. It's a nice way to share layout parts between different layouts.
The < ViewStub /> is a bit different because it is not directly included, and will be loaded only when you actually use it/need it, ie, when you set its visibility to VISIBLE (actually visible) or INVISIBLE (still not visible, but its size isn't 0 anymore). This a nice optimization because you could have a complex layout with tons of small views or headers anywhere, and still have your Activity load up really fast. Once you use one of those views, it'll be loaded.

include
It is used to reuse layout resource
ViewStub
It is used to lazily inflate layout resource

Sharing and reusing layouts is very easy with Android thanks to the tag, sometimes even too easy and you might end up with user interfaces that contain a large number of views, some of which are rarely used. Thankfully, Android offers a very special widget called ViewStub, which brings you all the benefits of the without polluting your user interface with rarely used views.
A ViewStub is a dumb and lightweight view. It has no dimension, it does not draw anything and does not participate in the layout in any way. This means a ViewStub is very cheap to inflate and very cheap to keep in a view hierarchy. A ViewStub can be best described as a lazy include. The layout referenced by a ViewStub is inflated and added to the user interface only when you decide so.

Another important difference is related to layout inflating. with it is not possible to change the layout already static inflated in XML, it is necessary to replace the view and set programmatically al the layout parameters.
With it is possible to define (for e.g.) height, width, etc... and inflate different layout at runtime time

Effective way to handle redundant UI elements in Android?

I have numerous activites in my Android app., and most should contain the same, relatively complex set of UI widgets on the screen's top area (lets say that its a kind of toolbar that you can find on most screens).
Right now, every screen's layout contains the markup for this toolbar, along with its logic inside every Activity's source, so it's damn redundant. Could you recommend a more efficient / less redunant way to do this?

I would take advantage of the <include> tag in the layout's xml. This will let you reuse that toolbar very easily and effectively. As for the code I would subclass Activity and place the logic in there, then each of you activities can subclass your custom Activity class.
There are 3 very useful articles on the dev site about this topic. Here is the first one link

I would create a custom View object (subclass View) and then include it in all of your layout xml. You can actually pass parameters, etc. just like built in views. Then define XML for that view that will always be used when that view is drawn on the screen. Also, this allows you to change the view and have that change populated across all of your Activities without having to manually modify all of the code.