Android SQLite: nullColumnHack parameter in insert/replace methods - android

The Android SDK has some convenience methods for manipulating data with SQLite. However both the insert and replace methods use some nullColumnHack parameter which usage I don't understand.
The documentation explains it with the following, but what if a table has multiple columns that allow NULL? I really don't get it :/
SQL doesn't allow inserting a completely empty row, so if initialValues is empty, this column [/row for replace] will explicitly be assigned a NULL value.

Let's suppose you have a table named foo where all columns either allow NULL values or have defaults.
In some SQL implementations, this would be valid SQL:
INSERT INTO foo;
That's not valid in SQLite. You have to have at least one column specified:
INSERT INTO foo (somecol) VALUES (NULL);
Hence, in the case where you pass an empty ContentValues to insert(), Android and SQLite need some column that is safe to assign NULL to. If you have several such columns to choose from, pick one via the selection mechanism of your choice: roll of the dice, Magic 8-Ball(TM), coin flip, cubicle mate flip, etc.
Personally, I'd've just made it illegal to pass an empty ContentValues to insert(), but they didn't ask me... :-)

Related

How do I copy a column from one table to another in SQLite Android? [duplicate]

What is the exact difference between using rawquery and execSQL ??
While writing a query in android activity, when to use rawquery and when to use execSQL ?
From API documentation:
void execSQL (String sql)
Execute a single SQL statement that is NOT a SELECT or any other SQL statement that returns data.
void execSQL (String sql, Object[] bindArgs)
Execute a single SQL statement that is NOT a SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE.
The documentation is inconsistent but they behave both the same. Documentation of the latter is more in depth.
Cursor rawQuery (String sql, String[] selectionArgs)
Runs the provided SQL and returns a Cursor over the result set.
Uses for rawQuery are:
You want to query the database with a SELECT statement.
=> rawQuery("SELECT ... returns a set of rows and columns in a Cursor.
It's more efficient to use DatabaseUtils.longForQuery(SQLiteDatabase, String, String[]) or DatabaseUtils.stringForQuery(...) in cases there is only a 1x1 query result, like from SELECT count(*) FROM table (which also has it's own dedicated method: DatabaseUtils.queryNumEntries(...)) - this skips creation of a Cursor object & simplifies code since there is also nothing to close, moveToNext, etc.
Special cases like PRAGMA table_info that returns data in rows (see this question)
Note: Do not use rawQuery for INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE or anything else that modifies the database. You'll run into "Why does a delete rawQuery need a moveToFirst in order to actually delete the rows?". Reason being that queries can defer reading the result until needed (= access to the cursor) which means for SQLite delaying execution of the statement.
Uses for execSQL are:
You have "instructions" for the database. Like CREATE TABLE (or any other CREATE statement, e.g. CREATE INDEX), DROP, PRAGMAs that set properties rather than returning them, ...
INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE when you're not interested in the amount of rows modified or the row id of the last insert.
When you need those, either use the update(), insert(), delete() methods or use a second statement to read those: DatabaseUtils.longForQuery with either SELECT last_insert_rowid() or SELECT changes(). Both return only 1 integer value. (see "Get updated rows count from SQLite in Android using a raw query?" and “SELECT last_insert_rowid()” returns always “0”)
Anything else that relies on executing a statement.
if you want to execute something in database without concerning its output (e.g create/alter tables), then use execSQL, but if you are expecting some results in return against your query (e.g. select records) then use rawQuery

android SQLiteDatabase.insert vs executeSQL

I am working on an app which has multiple db insert/update queries and throughout the app i have used
SQLiteDatabase.insert(String table, String nullColumnHack, ContentValues values)
method for inserting any data to any table. What i mean by this is i create a ContentValues object and put all my values as key/value pair inside this object and pass it on to this this method.
contentValues.put("col1", valueCol1);
contentValues.put("col2", valueCol2);
contentValues.put("col3", valueCol3);
So just wanted to check if this way of inserting records to a sqlite table is better or is it better to use executeSQL [ From SQLinjection standpoint]. I do understand as per the documentation here
[http://developer.android.com/reference/android/database/sqlite/SQLiteDatabase.html#execSQL(java.lang.String)][1]
that its recommended to use insert over execSQL. But which is more prone to SQLInjections if at all one is. Any inputs/suggestions.
As suggested in the page that you linked
"Instead, you're encouraged to use insert(String, String,
ContentValues), update(String, ContentValues, String, String[]), et
al, when possible."
you should use insert() when it is possible.
To avoid SQL injection requests, you need to clearly delineate between
the SQL statement and the data it includes. The ContentProvider’s
query(), update(), and delete()methods and Activity’s managedQuery()
method all support parameterization. These methods all take the
“String[] selectionArgs” parameter, a set of values that get
substituted into the query string in place of “?” characters, in the
order the question marks appear. This provides clear separation
between the content of the SQL statement in the “selection” parameter
and the data being included. [Mobile Application Security]
So, insert() method like update() or delete() should be sql-injection free.
You should always use parametrized query methods, supported by Content Provider:
When accessing a content provider, use parameterized query methods
such as query(), update(), and delete() to avoid potential SQL
injection from untrusted sources. Note that using parameterized
methods is not sufficient if the selection argument is built by
concatenating user data prior to submitting it to the method.
reference here

inserting to multiple tables with ContentProvider

I'm implementing a PRIVATE ContentProvider which has few tables with relationships (one to many, many to many). In my current implementation all of the tables are accessible by URIs.
how can I simplify the interface so the inner 'through' tables won't have to be accessed by URIs ?
for example, I have a POSTS table, each POST has many TAGS through the TAGGINGS table.
I want to interact only with the POSTS URI and do the 'private' work inside of the ContentProvider.
for query its simple to return a cursor with joined tables, but how do I do this with insert ? is bulkInsert what I should look into ?
It is a limitation of ContentProvider. If you are not exposing your data to other applications you can use your custom database adapter implementation with methods and queries straight hitting your requirements.
bulkInsert() won't help in this situation as it inserts rows only into one table at once. But take a look at ContentProvider.applyBatch() method and ContentProviderOperation, ContentProviderOperation.Builder classes (you may need withValueBackReference() for one-to-many inserting).
These links should help you understand how to use them:
http://www.grokkingandroid.com/better-performance-with-contentprovideroperation/
http://www.grokkingandroid.com/androids-contentprovideroperation-withbackreference-explained/
What are the semantics of withValueBackReference?
But notice, using ContentProviderOperation is much slower than bulkInsert() if you are inserting many rows at once, as it parses Uri (string comparisions) each time the operation is going to be performed. Doing this way you still have to expose Uri for inserting into child table.
If you decide to use applyBatch(), overwrite it in your provider so it performs all operations in one transaction, so you retain consistency in data and speed up database operations:
#Override
public ContentProviderResult[] applyBatch(ArrayList<ContentProviderOperation> operations)
throws OperationApplicationException {
final SQLiteDatabase db = mOpenHelper.getWritableDatabase();
db.beginTransaction();
try {
ContentProviderResult[] results = super.applyBatch(operations);
db.setTransactionSuccessful();
return results;
} finally {
db.endTransaction();
}
}
You are free to insert to multiply tables as long as the values needed are provided.
For example:
ContentValues v = new ContentValues();
v.put("title","post1");
v.put("tag","tag1");
getProvider().insert(POST_URI,v);
In the implementation of insert, you could check if fields (tag) belongs to other table exists.If it does , it means that you should do extra works - insert tag first if it does not exist, set up correct association between the tag and the post just inserted.
You can check the source code of android contacts for the reference.
UPDATE:
To insert multiply tags, one hack-y way is to insert a comma separated string. THis is not elegant but it works.
Just to get this right: You want to have one URI and insert a post and all its tags with one insert call to the ContentProvider? Correct?
The problem is, that you need to have all values in the ContentValues object. There is a reason for normalization in database. Nevertheless it might be doable. For tags this should be easy. Just use one String for all tags. For example "android, ios, bada, wp7" and parse this string in your insert method.
You could also use a naming plus integer convention. And as long as there is a tag1, tag2,... tagX you would read these values from within your ContentProvider's insert method.
Neither is elegant, but would work.
In this case bulkInsert or applyBatch have no place in your code. They come only into play, if you want to use multiple calls to your ContentProvider at once and within one transaction.
But I think the better solution would indeed be to actually use multiple operations as described by biegleux.
Since you are going to be inserting into multiple tables the normal SQLiteDatabase.insert helper functions will not work. But this is completely doable in a performant and nice way.
You need to look at this from the endpoint of the user who is going to be inserting into you ContentProvider, even if it is only yourself. So first define the names or keys for all of you fields. Since you won't be using SQLiteDatabase.insert you don't actually need to name them the same as the database fields. None of the names should be duplicate. If for example you have fields in two different tables overlap perhaps tag in TableA and in TableB you could define the name for those field as TableA.tag and TableB.tag. Or use semantic naming for more descriptive names that don't collide.
Next you need to create your insert queries using SQLiteStatement per this answer. Make sure the names you use in createInsert are the same ones that the callers of the ContentProvider use as keys in the ContentValues.

Insert method of SQLiteDatabase

The second parameter of insert method of SQLiteDatabase is "nullColumnHack". WHat does this refers. What value should be passed to this parameter.
Thanks
Let's suppose you have a table named foo where all columns either allow NULL values or have defaults.
In some SQL implementations, this would be valid SQL:
`INSERT INTO `foo;
That's not valid in SQLite. You have to have at least one column specified:
INSERT INTO foo (somecol) VALUES (NULL);
Hence, in the case where you pass an empty ContentValues to insert(), Android and SQLite need some column that is safe to assign NULL to. If you have several such columns to choose from, pick one via the selection mechanism of your choice: roll of the dice, Magic 8-Ball(TM), coin flip, cubicle mate flip, etc.
Personally, I'd've just made it illegal to pass an empty ContentValues to insert(), but they didn't ask me... :-)
courtesy commonsware.
nullColumnHack are known and an empty row can't be inserted. If not set to null, the nullColumnHack parameter provides the name of nullable column name to explicitly insert a NULL into in the case where your values is empty.
Brief explanation..
nullColumnHack
optional; may be null. SQL doesn't allow inserting a completely empty row without naming at least one column name. If your provided values is empty, no column names are known and an empty row can't be inserted. If not set to null, the nullColumnHack parameter provides the name of nullable column name to explicitly insert a NULL into in the case where your values is empty.

difference between rawquery and execSQL in android sqlite database

What is the exact difference between using rawquery and execSQL ??
While writing a query in android activity, when to use rawquery and when to use execSQL ?
From API documentation:
void execSQL (String sql)
Execute a single SQL statement that is NOT a SELECT or any other SQL statement that returns data.
void execSQL (String sql, Object[] bindArgs)
Execute a single SQL statement that is NOT a SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE.
The documentation is inconsistent but they behave both the same. Documentation of the latter is more in depth.
Cursor rawQuery (String sql, String[] selectionArgs)
Runs the provided SQL and returns a Cursor over the result set.
Uses for rawQuery are:
You want to query the database with a SELECT statement.
=> rawQuery("SELECT ... returns a set of rows and columns in a Cursor.
It's more efficient to use DatabaseUtils.longForQuery(SQLiteDatabase, String, String[]) or DatabaseUtils.stringForQuery(...) in cases there is only a 1x1 query result, like from SELECT count(*) FROM table (which also has it's own dedicated method: DatabaseUtils.queryNumEntries(...)) - this skips creation of a Cursor object & simplifies code since there is also nothing to close, moveToNext, etc.
Special cases like PRAGMA table_info that returns data in rows (see this question)
Note: Do not use rawQuery for INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE or anything else that modifies the database. You'll run into "Why does a delete rawQuery need a moveToFirst in order to actually delete the rows?". Reason being that queries can defer reading the result until needed (= access to the cursor) which means for SQLite delaying execution of the statement.
Uses for execSQL are:
You have "instructions" for the database. Like CREATE TABLE (or any other CREATE statement, e.g. CREATE INDEX), DROP, PRAGMAs that set properties rather than returning them, ...
INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE when you're not interested in the amount of rows modified or the row id of the last insert.
When you need those, either use the update(), insert(), delete() methods or use a second statement to read those: DatabaseUtils.longForQuery with either SELECT last_insert_rowid() or SELECT changes(). Both return only 1 integer value. (see "Get updated rows count from SQLite in Android using a raw query?" and “SELECT last_insert_rowid()” returns always “0”)
Anything else that relies on executing a statement.
if you want to execute something in database without concerning its output (e.g create/alter tables), then use execSQL, but if you are expecting some results in return against your query (e.g. select records) then use rawQuery

Categories

Resources