Android framework. What is it? [closed] - android

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I've few questions on Android Framework. Can someone please answer
them
What does an Android Framework
do? What is it's job?
What are these managers -
Activity Manager, Location Manager
etc? Are they APIs or libraries?
I heard that the definition of
a framework is - a set of libraries
that say “Don’t call us, we’ll call
you.” So can I say that Activity
Manager, Location Manager etc are
such libraries? Or is it that they
are not libraries but APIs (used to
access underlying c/c++ libraries)
and the actual libraries that do
"Don't call us, we'll call you."
are hidden from us?

The android framework is the set of API's that allow developers to quickly and easily write apps for android phones. It consists of tools for designing UIs like buttons, text fields, image panes, and system tools like intents (for starting other apps/activities or opening files), phone controls, media players, ect. Essentially an android app consists of Activities (programs that the user interacts with), services (programs that run in the background or provide some function to other apps), and broadcast receivers (programs that catch information important to your app). The best way to learn this system will be to go through the Google Tutorials found here
AcitivityManager and LocationManager are examples of classes found in the android sdk (the framework). I do not know of any use for these classes, as I believe they are part of the system. I have never used them, but if you wanted to learn more about them i would look at the Android API
I believe your question is a bit 3 dimensional:
A library is a code source that a developer and add to their application. It is not source code, thus the inner details are hidden to the developer. You can only access the visible (public) parts.
An API is the documentation that accompanies a library to explain how to use the library (an example of this is the Android API listed above)
So to answer your question, ActivityManager and LocationManager are neither libraries nor APIs. Rather, they are classes within the Android SDK (which is a library) that are used by either the system, or the developer (if he can find any use for them). Also, everything in android is Java, so you wont find any C/C++ libraries for android
I hope that this answer was helpful for you.

The Android Framework is the entire stack of stuff that makes up the OS. This is the underlying Native libraries that are not directly accessible, the layer above that that you actually interact with and the code that developers write to run on the system. Yo are confused about Libraries vs APIs. Libraries are just chunks of useful code, APIs are the interface to those libraries. API actually stands for Application Programming Interface. The Managers do exactly what it says on the tin! The Activity Manager is the class that manages Activities, the Location Manager manages your current location.

Android framework is a set of those classes and methods whose fuctionalities can be selectively overridden by the user like examples content providers,activity managers,Location manager,Telephony manager etc.
Activity manager or Location manager are the classes whose methods can be override to use it as per the need of the output of the programme.

Android framework has APIs which are provided for android application development. Using these APIs, apps can access android functionalities like Wifi, BT, NFC etc.

Related

Best way to share code between iOS and Android [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I develop an app for both iOS and Android, and I'm loon'ing for the best way to share code between this two platforms.
What I would like to do is creating all the View (UI part) in native but share the code for the logic (controller + model).
With all I found, 3 things seems to be quite good :
1) C++ --> Build library file Using c++ For the logic so I'll be able To use the .dll files in the 2 platforms
2) Azure mobile apps services. Is it possible to habe all the logic in a webservice? The issue is that if I dont have acces to internet, my app will be unaivalable, right?
3) I hear a lot about React native used by Facebook, but it seems to be used to create the UI, but I prever create it in native. Can I use react only for logic?
It seems like you have three options:
1. C++
You can't just have a compiled .dll and expect it to work for iOS and Android. They both have to be compiled in different architectures and it has to be a static library on iOS.
Dropbox's done it this way, and they've put up a lot of notes and example code, and code you can use so you can take a look.
Pros
• Pretty straightforward after you manage to set it up
• No additional layer of dependencies, bugs, etc (like in case of Xamarin/React Native)
Cons
• Setting it up and using it needs a lot of extra work: you need to setup additional compile steps and write wrappers for both platforms.
• Some other challenges you're surely going to meet when trying to compile the same code for two different architectures
Here's a SO post on how to do it in detail...
2. Xamarin
This option seems to extreme to use in this case. You're forced to use C# and introduce another layer of dependencies and bugs. You said you don't want to use another language for UI so I wouldn't recommend it.
3. React Native
Now this is a viable option. You can write scripts in JS and use them in native code in both Android and iOS.
Here's an article on how to share code with code examples...
Unfortunately it uses React Native for UI, but you can easily call React Native functions from native code.
There are a lot of downfalls to using this, including the fact that the calls are asynchronous as they're executed on another thread, so you would have to implement some kind of callback system for functions that return something.
Pros
• Seems to be easy to set up and write
Cons
• You'd have to implement a native callback for every function that returns something
• Using it has a lot of downfalls that the document describes:
• As events can be sent from anywhere, they can introduce
spaghetti-style dependencies into your project.
• Events share namespace, which means that you may encounter some name
collisions. Collisions will not be detected statically, what makes
them hard to debug.
• If you use several instances of the same React Native component and
you want to distinguish them from the perspective of your event,
you'll likely need to introduce some kind of identifiers and pass them
along with events (you can use the native view's reactTag as an
identifier).
Conclusion
I think I'd go with C++, mainly because a big company (Dropbox) tried it and succeeded and actually uses it in production. You could try React Native as an experiment, it would make a great study case!
I'd say that putting the "core" logic into a separate library is a sensible approach.
You are not the first who wants to do this, and I highly recommend looking at Djinni. It's a tool to accomplish just that. You can define common interfaces and datatypes and fill in the native parts. Communication is possible in both ways.
It's not as easy as writing the whole thing natively at once, but it supports clean design which you might benefit from anyway.

Why do iOS and Android force you to write the UI in the native App Programming language? [closed]

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
:) When you write a iOS App, in order to use the UI like buttons. you have to write it in Objective-C. (Java on Android). I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on the technical reasoning behind this. Why they might of done this. As you can write apps in C++ on iOS so I've never fully worked out why they didn't expose a way of making the UI in that. (Ignoring the fact that this is how they did it on the Mac).
Note: I know you can write apps in c++ for Android but the question is more why is the main UI i.e buttons etc forced to be written in a dynamic language for these platforms, why not expose access to it thorough C++ without having to write a crude wrapper or binding layer yourself.
I'm guessing that when the original framework engineers were working on their respective operating systems, cross-platform desires like UI support in a different language like C++ was at the bottom of their concerns. You'll have to realize that when deadlines loom, all of the features are prioritized only what is considered most important is made to work. Everything else is a consequence of that.
In the case of iOS, Objective-C is the language of choice for the OS that Apple uses. All of the MacOS app developers were writing in Objective-C so their developer based was in familiar territory.
In the case of Android, Java was already a popular language, with existing open source tooling and libraries (Eclipse IDE, Apache Harmony), so presumably they decided to use Java as the first class language for app development with apps running in a VM as a consequence. Alternatively the decision may have been VM first for the sandboxing of apps and Java was picked as the language for app developers. Or some other reason.
In either case any attempt to add in additional languages now that both are in the hands of customers means design decisions and trade offs along with a host of other questions like: how to add it in without breaking existing APIs, how to support it along with new features, how to test, etc. etc.
As you see more and more software, you'll realize that lots of stuff is just arbitrary or made sense at the moment of when it was designed.
iOS does expose a C API for drawing UI components; it's called Core Graphics.
Because the view itself is written in Objective-C, or Java, respectively. When in Rome, do as the Romans do.

Android library engineering [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Intro: I have a native library (C++) with Java (JNI) wrapper. The library engine is cpu intensive, we don't want more than one app linking this lib to be running at the same time, and complex objects should be returned by the lib engine.
The question: What is the best way to engineer such an Android library?
So far, I could find just find 2 valuable examples: OpenCV manager and Connectbot ssh-agent.
I can think of a few solutions:
Solution 1: Make a (bound or AIDL) service that wraps the library functionality. (should the service run in its own space? or in the space of the application that links to it? how can the native lib be loaded if it's in a different app space(System.load("/data/data/com.company.myLib/lib.so")). How to return complex objects in AIDL?). This should be the Connectbot way.
Solution 2: Divide the lib into 2 components:
A standalone package which keeps the native libs + a manager service
An android lib-project which only contains Java wrappers which users can use to build their apps.
This should be the OpenCV manager way. I don't know exactly the details, but this way one does not need a service to interface with and can just import com.company.myLib.LibWrapper. On the other side the LibWrapper class should perform System.load("/data/data/com.company.myLib/lib.so"). Correct?
I would personally go for solution 2. Unfortunately Android is a new land and there are not many models yet on how to develop a library. Is there any other/better solutions? Is there other considerations to make?
Consider the following scheme: you build an "empty" app that contains no activities, no settings - only the manifest, the icon for "manage apps" list and the native lib that is installed by the system in /data/data/package/lib directory.
This native library may, but doesn't have to expose JNI functions. In a typical situation, this lib will be a straightforward port of an opensource LGPL library - e.g. libdmtx.so.
The "client" apps will call loadLibrary() for the "external" lib, and after that it will call the usual load() for its JNI wrapper. This lib has the only purpose to translate Java methods to the public C APIs of the external lib.
The JNI wrapper and the corresponding Java class may be distributed as a .jar or as sources, they are not bound by LGPL license of the external lib.
Such scheme is, IMHO, the only way to ensure LGPL compliance on Android: anybody can recompile the "external" lib from the open source, package it as an "empty" app and install it on their device.
Regarding your concern about concurrent access to the lib, I actually doubt that it is so important: the high end devices have four cores more powerful each than one core on cheaper devices. OTOH, it's easy to use Linux synchronisation methods, e.g. named pipes, to keep track of active instances.

Plugins architecture for an Android app? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
THIS QUESTION HAS MOVED TO https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/27841/plugins-architecture-for-an-android-app
I want to implement a plugin system for an Open Source app, because it has become really large, with many features that only a few users need. Releasing different apps is not a good solution, because userA wants feature7 and feature24 whilst userB wants feature39 and feature24.
Where can I find a good example of a plugin architecture?
Here is what I would like a plugin to be able to do:
Redefine the layout of a particular screen (load deflated XML?)
Redefine a method of a class (load dex class?, AOP?)
For instance, one of the plugins must add a button on a particular screen, and clicking this button increments a value in the app's database. This is not doable with Content Providers and Intents, as far as I know.
I want to avoid making the core app's code complex with tons of hooks everywhere.
The form of the plugin could be a file on the SD card, an app, or anything else.
I have done a framework that works like Robo-guice with some of its primary IoC functions. (Cut down on boilerplate codes that load views/service etc...)
But the core of which, I believe is the solution to your problem, is the ability to load separate APK "plugin" files, that includes "res" as well as <layouts>.xml files. The <layouts>.xml file can be independently inflated by the classes within that APK. That is, you can load a CustomView (that inflates its own <layout>.xml) into an originating/parent App. All this is done without the Parent App APK knowing how the UI was inflated in the plugin APK.
Example of what I mean:
I have a Mapping App, the framework will dynamically scan installed APK that matches the "contract" for a "add-on function" plugin, and loads the UI specific to it onto the App's View as a floating panel.
I would say a plugin framework for Android is do-able, as Android has most if not all of the necessary built in APIs to accomplish this.
These are your friends in this area of plugin development for Android:
PackageManager (Scan install packages, aka Plugins)
DexClassLoader (ClassNotFoundException will be a pain if you don't use the correct ClassLoader btw)
Java Reflection
Where can I find a good example of a plugin architecture?
Roman Nurik from Google has implemented a nice plugins framework in his open source app dash clock. The plugins themselves are Services that extend the DashClockExtension class in the API and are installed as completely independent APK files with their own resources. It's quite a lot of work defining the communication protocol via the AIDL, but it's nice and clean and works very well.
one of the plugins must add a button on a particular screen, and clicking this button increments a value in the app's database.
The parts of the main Layout which can be modified by the plugin will need to be pre-defined by the core app, and exposed via the communication protocol. It should be possible for the plugin to inflate an arbitrary layout, and send it to the main app, which could put that inside a pre-allocated area of it's own Layout.
If you are just going for an increase in modularity, I would recommend using a dependency injection container such as PicoContainer, Guice or Spring.
If you want a light-weight plug-in architecture, then go for Java Plugin Framework (JPF).
It allows you to define extension points, which can be implemented by your modules. The primary job of the plug-in framework is to provide a way that you can bundle these modules (as jars), which are dynamically found by the core application and given as implementations of the extension point.

Android SDK - Other ways?

If I needed to build an android SDK that other developers can integrate into their android apps, is jarring my SDK the only way to go about it? As far as I have learnt, jarring has the following considerations:
If your app uses a layout, then you have to create it programmatically. Since jar files cant carry any resources.
The jar will needs to be placed in the lib/assets folder and added to the build path (in Eclipse) -- Learnt here: Android - Invoke activity from within jar
The main app will have to create an Intent object and specify the package and class name in the jar to start the activity.
Any one have other ideas of going about any of the above steps?
Thanks
George
Creating a JAR is, in my opinion, a very bad decision. Android has specific features just for the kind of thing you're looking for. If your JAR:
provides some sort of (structured) data to be used in other applications, use a ContentProvider;
does some backround processing and makes that processing's results available to other applications, use a Service;
provides an Activity that gets some input from the user (or shows some information about something), eventually processes it and returns it to the calling Activity, just create that Activity and any application will be able to start your Activity as long as it's installed on the phone.
If you use one of the three solutions above, third party apps will be able to probe for whether your application is installed and, if not, prompt the user to install it. Only if your application does not fall into one of the three bullet points mentioned above should you use a JAR. Otherwise, using a ContentProvider, Service or Activity provides:
More standardized interaction between components
Better maintainability -- if you update your SDK you won't have to call everyone who uses it and tell them to upgrade.
No duplication -- if you were to provide a JAR and multiple applications that use it would be installed on a device, multiple copies of the JAR would be present on that device, thus using more memory than it has to. If you provide one of the three components mentioned above, one copy will satisfy all applications that need to use it.
Again, these components are specifically designed and provided by the Android OS for creating such SDKs. Please, only use a JAR if you really, really have to. Otherwise, provide a standardized ContentProvider, Service or Activity and document the way it's supposed to be used (i.e. how to use/query/integrate it).

Categories

Resources