Empty View to add any Content on it - android

I'm creating an application and it's has a button to switch perspective view of the itens (coverflow, grid and list). My question was, how do I keep an space in my activity to swap these views?
I have a header, and a footer, the middle I want to place an empty View in that to switch my perspectives on it.
Someone has a better idea?

You should use something like ViewFlipper if I understand you right. Even better you can define your children Views as includes or stubs

I didn't really understand your question.
Are you looking for a ViewStub?
http://developer.android.com/reference/android/view/ViewStub.html
You can inflate layouts to a ViewStub. But you can do it to any "ViewGroup" like LinearLayout etc.
The advantage is that a "ViewStub is an invisible, zero-sized View that can be used to lazily inflate layout resources at runtime". It's really there for it.
Inflating "normal" layouts may have additional costs.

Related

Android - Is a ViewStub worth it?

I have a ListView where each row of the listview contains about 10 ImageButtons. Most of these buttons have visibility = Gone and only show up in very rare scenarios. I am wondering if it's worth it to replace these ImageButtons with ViewStubs to avoid loading them (and the images they contain) all the time for all the rows of the listview. Then again their visibility is set to "Gone", so I am not sure what impact loading them has. Do their images actually get loaded or not?
Note that I am talking about replacing e.g. the 8 ImageButtons with 8 ViewStubs, not with 1
Cheers
A ViewStub is a dumb and lightweight view. It has no dimension, it does not draw anything and does not participate in the layout in any way. This means a ViewStub is very cheap to inflate and very cheap to keep in a view hierarchy. A ViewStub can be best described as a lazy include. The layout referenced by a ViewStub is inflated and added to the user interface only when you decide so.
Sometimes your layout might require complex views that are rarely used. Whether they are item details, progress indicators, or undo messages, you can reduce memory usage and speed up rendering by loading the views only when they are needed.
Simply a ViewStub is used to increase efficiency of rendering layout. By using ViewStub, manually views can be created but not added to view hierarchy. At the runtime, can be easily inflated, while ViewStub is inflated, the content of the viewstub will be replaced the defined layout in the viewstub.
The ViewStub will be loaded only when you actually use it/need it, i.e., when you set its visibility to VISIBLE (actually visible) or INVISIBLE (still not visible, but its size isn't 0 any more). ViewStub a nice optimization because you could have a complex layout with tons of small views or headers anywhere, and still have your Activity load up really fast. Once you use one of those views, it'll be loaded.
You must add ViewStub in Layout at first, after you can inflate it to another View.
Note: One drawback of ViewStub is that it doesn’t currently support the <merge/> tag in the layouts to be inflated. Alos ViewStub can’t be used more than once. Also keeping long-lived reference to a ViewStub is unnecessary, if it is required, it's good practice to null it after inflating, so GC can eat it.
Let's suppose your ViewStub ID is view_stub. You need to do the following in the activity:
ViewStub viewStub = (ViewStub) findViewById(R.id.view_stub);
View inflatedView = viewStub.inflate();
ImageButton button = (ImageButton) inflatedView.findViewById(R.id.button);
Now you can do whatever you want with the button :) That is, the inflate method returns the stub layout which contains the actual elements from the XML file.
Of course, you can always have the onClick XML attribute or can be dynamically called.
Is a ViewStub worth it?
->For the scenarios that you are specifying, I think `ViewStub` will be worth-shot.
See below urls about ViewStub
http://android-developers.blogspot.in/2009/03/android-layout-tricks-3-optimize-with.html
http://developer.android.com/reference/android/view/ViewStub.html
http://developer.android.com/training/improving-layouts/loading-ondemand.html
Instead of ViewStub you can try <\include> tag. The <include/> will just include the xml contents in your base xml file as if the whole thing was just a single big file. It's a nice way to share layout parts between different layouts.
Difference between <include> and <ViewStub> in android
Edit: just noticed that Endzeit commented regarding a similar direction before me.
I would start by doing some benchmarking around the inflating code with and without the views - just comment out the adapter code so it doesn't try to access the non existing views.
If the removal of the Views from the layout does gives you an improvement that you think is necessary and since you say the views are present only in rare scenarios which you are anyway checking for in your adapter,
then instead of inflating those views or even using view stubs, create them in code and add/remove them as needed (using the viewholder to reference them).
You could even go further and do a lazy creation of these views, similar to lazy loading of images, but I would only do that after running some benchmarking again.
I would use ViewStubs for loading complex layouts not simple ImageButtons.
Edit 2:
Looking into ViewStub inflate command, which is what it does when it needs to be visible you can see it infaltes the layout given and then adds it to the parent layout - since you are adding a simple ImageButton you can gain performance by not having a ViewStub and just adding the ImageButton in your code.
http://grepcode.com/file/repository.grepcode.com/java/ext/com.google.android/android/5.1.1_r1/android/view/ViewStub.java#ViewStub.inflate%28%29
According to Google's official documentation here.
ViewStub is a lightweight view with no dimension that doesn’t draw anything or participate in the layout. As such, it's cheap to inflate and cheap to leave in a view hierarchy. Each ViewStub simply needs to include the android:layout attribute to specify the layout to inflate.
To experiment this, I created a sample project and added a ViewStub to the layout hierarchy. On running layout inspector I can see that all the layout attributes for ViewStub are zero.
Let's compare it to having a layout which has 10 buttons hidden. What this actually means is, the layout hierarchy has 10 buttons hidden, which is sitting in the layout hierarchy and taking up some amount of memory. It's cheap to leave a ViewStub in hierarchy since it doesn't take up much memory, at the same time it's cheap to inflate.
My final verdict would be, use ViewStub extensively when you've complicated views which are inflated rarely as it definitely helps in saving memory and improving View inflating time.
Using the Android monitor's Memory tab in Android Studio (button for the Android monitor should be at the bottom bar), you could check it yourself:
Take a look at the memory usage when running the app with invisible buttons
Take a look at the memory usage when running the app with visible buttons
If there is any difference, then you can conclude not everything is preloaded when the views are Gone. Of course, you could also compare this to a ViewStub implementation to check whether that will help to decrease memory usage.
In short, using custom view instead of viewstub.
We are having a similar situation now, and we have also tried viewstub before, listview works a little faster. But when it comes to 8 viewstubs, i don't think its a good idea to use viewstub to avoid inflate too many widgets.
Since u (and also us) have a logic to control whether 10 buttons to show or not , why not just define a custom view, and draw different buttons according to different state machine? It's much fast, and need no inflation at all, and it's logic is much better controlled. We are using this method to accelerate listview now and it works good.
when you set a view visibility to gone this means that This view is invisible, and it doesn't take any space for layout but its data are loaded into it.
Now the ListViews they remove the unseen or lets say the views that are out of the screen bounds for performance reasons .
A ViewStub is an invisible, zero-sized View that can be used to lazily inflate layout resources at runtime.
So i think if you want from my opinion I prefer the Views with GONE Visibility rather than using much logic with ViewStub and Creating and inflating ... etc .
But on the other hand
The rendering performance comes into picture when you are inflating
the views.
My guess is that its much cheaper to inflate a ViewStub than to
inflate a View, either from XML or by changing visibility. ViewStub is
especially used when you need to add/remove (indefinite) views (eg.
add phone numbers to a given contact). Hope this is what you were
looking for.
reference : ViewStub vs. View.GONE
some good Brief presentation of DDMS here :
http://magicmicky.github.io/android_development/benchmark-using-traceview/
Use ViewStub instead ImageButton.
This is because
. ViewStub is zero sized view by default while image button not
. View Stub is naturally an invisible view . its performance is better than image button because it load runtime only when its state become visible.

Need suggestions for dynamically creating views in android

I am going to start one app where my activity page will contain "n" grouped views. Grouped view means "collections of views (i.e. One group can have TextView+Button+ImageView)". So the page will have "n" number of such grouped views.
I need suggestions like what would be the best practice to implement this. I could think of below ones:
1) Should a ScrollView be used (Then I will have to create groups in runtime and place one under another)?
2) Or a ListView be used (Then how can I accommodate the height of each row as grouped views height may differ from each other?)
Or is there any other way I can go along with?
Appreciate the suggestions and any sample examples if have. Advance Thanks.
Both options would work, it really depends on your use case.
Place a vertical LinearLayout inside of a ScrollView and add your grouped-views to the LinearLayout. I would recommend this if you have a relatively small number of such views (not necessarily a fixed number, but small enough that you wouldn't have to scroll many "pages" to see them all). Make sure the ScrollView has android:layout_height="match_parent" and the LinearLayout has android:layout_height="wrap_content".
If the number of grouped-views is not small, you could use a ListView and make an Adapter for it. This lets you take advantage of ListView's automatic view recycling when items get scrolled off screen.
For either case, make an XML file for just the grouped-views. In code, you would get a LayoutInflater object (usually by calling Activity.getLayoutInflater()) and call inflate(R.layout.your_grouped_views, null). If using the LinearLayout, you would add it in code with one of the LinearLayout.addView(..) methods; if using the ListView, your adapter would return the whole thing from getView(...).
create one xml layout containing the constant elements of your group view.
in you main xml layout which will be the contentView of your application, put a ScrollView and a single LinearLayout.
then in the program inflate as many views of your group view as you want.
For your answer i want to give you referance of this website, on this website you can learn create dynamic view in android...

Android - how to draw in a multiple view layout

i have to draw a ball inside a view (or anything else that is good for this task).
I have followed some tutorial about the matter, but every tutorial that i have found
uses only one view (that is shown on the screen without the use of a layout).
But in my Activity i use a layout, that is composed by many views, and i want to draw
only on one of them.
here a little mockup!
Anybody knows a way to do it?
Is the view the wrong container to do it?
Thanks is advance!
Bye
...
You should extend a view that inherits from ViewGroup. this kind of view lets you handle a view that contains other views. with that, you can control the drawing, measures and layout of each of it's children separately
Your mockup can be made with a LinearLayout, which will contain some TextView's and you own View (the one which is containing the ball).
I'm surprised by this question, because there are many examples over the net explaining how to build a layout containing multiple views.

Graphical Layout shows first view of ViewFlipper, how to see others?

I am using Eclipse and a ViewFlipper. In Graphical Layout, I want to see the second, third, and forth layouts of my views - right now, I can only see the first view. Any suggestions?
If I'm understanding you correctly, you want to see each view in the 'Graphical layout' tool? The way I do this, is instead of having all the layout work done in one xml (where your viewflipper is) I make each view a new layout xml. And then have each view (xml file) included into the view flipper by using this....
<include
layout="#layout/layout_media"
android:id="#+id/flipper_media" />
Hope this helps.
just put each layout in relative layout or linear what ever you are working with then with each layout you will work with the first one in the order and etc.. then at the end put each layout in the order you want later
I had to subclass the ViewSwitcher class to display an indeterminate ProgressBar until data is ready to display in the second view. I used isInEditMode() to determine whether I was actually running the app or just previewing in AS.
You should be able to add a custom attribute to choose which child to display. This might look a bit overkill, but if you happen to already have to subclass your ViewSwitcher or ViewFlipper, i think it is not a big deal.
I will try to put an example later.

Difference between <include> and <ViewStub> in android

What are the differences between <\include> tag and <\ViewStub> tag and which one is preferrable while designing the layout.
The < include /> will just include the xml contents in your base xml file as if the whole thing was just a single big file. It's a nice way to share layout parts between different layouts.
The < ViewStub /> is a bit different because it is not directly included, and will be loaded only when you actually use it/need it, ie, when you set its visibility to VISIBLE (actually visible) or INVISIBLE (still not visible, but its size isn't 0 anymore). This a nice optimization because you could have a complex layout with tons of small views or headers anywhere, and still have your Activity load up really fast. Once you use one of those views, it'll be loaded.
include
It is used to reuse layout resource
ViewStub
It is used to lazily inflate layout resource
Sharing and reusing layouts is very easy with Android thanks to the tag, sometimes even too easy and you might end up with user interfaces that contain a large number of views, some of which are rarely used. Thankfully, Android offers a very special widget called ViewStub, which brings you all the benefits of the without polluting your user interface with rarely used views.
A ViewStub is a dumb and lightweight view. It has no dimension, it does not draw anything and does not participate in the layout in any way. This means a ViewStub is very cheap to inflate and very cheap to keep in a view hierarchy. A ViewStub can be best described as a lazy include. The layout referenced by a ViewStub is inflated and added to the user interface only when you decide so.
Another important difference is related to layout inflating. with it is not possible to change the layout already static inflated in XML, it is necessary to replace the view and set programmatically al the layout parameters.
With it is possible to define (for e.g.) height, width, etc... and inflate different layout at runtime time

Categories

Resources