Does anyone know where I can find the list of system call that can be used in Android Mobile phones? I guess that looking to the kernel should work, but I cannot find any *.h or *.c with the declaration of them.
Best regards
You primarily want section 2 of the linux kernel manual pages.
Very little is unique to Android, the few gotchas being in the android docs (no sys-V IPC, AF_INET sockets won't work unless you are in the network group, etc). Most of the android additions are drivers (Binder, etc) and novel usage patterns (for example of user IDs) rather than actual syscalls.
If you actually need the syscall numbers you can find them in bionic/libc/SYSCALLS.TXT within the sources
You may want to check the Bionic sources for the system call list. Since, Bionic is the C-Library, that Android works off.
Try here
It is located in SYSCALLS.TXT file inside of libc directory under certain Android version. Example above is system call on Android 11.
Related
I'm trying an app that require to enable a cloud based file system to my device. For this I've to have FUSE support in my Android device . I'm using Android version 4.4.2 on a Asus tablet. However I searched a lot but couldn't find some satisfactory answer to ensure that whether Android support Fuse. Thus I have few question as below ,
1.According to my search result When I run cat /proc/filesystems on an app (Terminal Emulator for Android) that provides Linux terminal I found the result of cat shows "Fuse" there . Is that mean my system support Fuse interface to allow install an user space file system ?
I also found in some forum either Fuse should come as built inside kernel or it should be as fuse.ko module under /system/lib/module . But my system doesn't contain fuse.ko hence does it mean I don't have fuse ?
In short, my question is how to ensure FUSE on android device ? I'm a beginner in Android programming so any help is much appreciated . Thanks in advance.
Modern versions of Android utilize Fuse internally, for example to implement the emulated External Storage.
However, Android is locked down and so neither 3rd party applications, not in most cases the human user, are allowed to add additional filesystems.
For stock Android the only choice will be to implement file-system-like operations within application code, creating a private API that replicates basic file operations, without actually using any files. Anywhere in the code you are writing or porting and need to access one of the remote "files", you would substitute your API for the actual file one. A good example of this would be Android assets - they look a lot like files and have many similar operations, but at runtime they actually are not files but an Android-unique storage mechanism.
Anything else would require modifying Android away from stock configuration (ie, root hacks, etc).
To check what your version of Android on your device supports, download a terminal emulator, and from the command line, run the following snippet of commands minus the parentheses...
"cat /proc/filesystems"
And scroll through the results looking for fuse. This will be a list of supported filesystems weather it be compiled into the kernel or loadable module.
I am trying to port the android kernel to a vendor SoC which is currently running the 2.6.35 kernel. I have looked for a while, and it seems that the only Google released kernels which are not made specifically for an existing device can be found here:
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+refs
The problem is that the oldest version they have there is 2.6.39. Is this there anywhere I can find older kernel versions which only have android specific material on them, or will I have to use this and settle the extra merging conflicts?
I am currently an intern (so I am new to all this..), and the last person in my position was apparently trying to merge the company kernel with something from ARM called "armdroid" (which has all the kernel versions):
http://linux-arm.org/git?p=armdroid.git;a=commit;h=3baa6a09028e75b210a659bc9b5c7631943edd44
This doesn't make sense though, because it looks like this kernel is designed to work with Realview and Versatile Express platforms, so trying to merge it with the code here would only cause more conflicts. No one here knows anything about android, and I can't get a good explanation as to why he was trying to use it.
For what I am trying to do, do you think that I should use the Google common kernel code, or could it be worth looking for a device specific kernel to merge with? And to repeat my main question, is there a way to get the older android kernel source code?
Thank you!
The 2.6.35 kernel was used by Gingerbread.
If there is no 'common' kernel, you have to use an old Samsung kernel and remove the Samsung-specific stuff.
Please note that 2.6.35 was released in 2010.
If that SoC cannot run a current kernel, you should not use it at all.
I'm going to implement aodv protocol as a linux module for a research project, and I need to implement it on Android later.I wonder if I could compile my codes into the android kernel and have my module work as in Linux (kernel 2.6 up).
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
(P.S. There are already some aodv implementations on Android, such aodv-on-android and UoB JAdhoc, however, those are implemented in Java, not involving kernels)
The tagline goes: Android is Linux, so anything (portable) you do on Linux should be simple to make happen on Android.
This is mostly true, however there are a few things you'll want to keep in mind:
Portability: If you're writing your implementation on x86 and then moving the module to ARM for Android, be careful not to use any capabilities that don't exist on both. However, for something like a network protocol, you probably won't be running into a lot of these. The only one that comes to mind is the NIC.
Dalvik: Generic Linux distributions tend to run fairly close to the OS, meaning they regularly make system calls or libc calls, and the semantics of interactions with the kernel mostly carry over to the application. Android, however, has essentially a Java environment build on top of that, and the majority of applications only interact with that framework. For you, this means you will want to be aware of the possible need to modify the Android framework in order to make changes visible to applications.
The above point depends on your use case, however. If you plan on augmenting routing for existing applications to use aodv, then you'll want to hack around with Dalvik. If you'll be writing one proof of concept application, then you can write the portions that interact with aodv in C using the NDK, and avoid having to modify the application framework.
You probably already know this, but the kernel built system is sophisticated enough that you should be able to get away with writing your module once and compiling it for two architectures or platforms just by changing your configuration.
Hope this helps.
I am trying to build the OpenGL SO lib from android sources (libGLESv2.so) and i would like a little bit more understanding of the internal mechanism of Android OpenGL ES and the flow.
Please correct me where i am wrong:
I know that in windows a developer includes gl.h and static link to OpenGL32(64).lib (which in turn dynamically link to OpenGL32.dll (probably there is a way to dynamic linke to OpenGL32.dll by the developer but that's not important).
The developer is exposed to the declaration of OpenGL API's but the implementation which i assume to be HW dependent.
The same scenario, Android: assuming developer import .opengl.GLES20 and calls the following method: GLES20.glTexEnvf(....
I would like to know what's going on behind the scenes in android (maybe Linux is better for an Android beginner).
the implementation which reside in opengl/java/android/opengl/GLES20.java source calls the native C function glTexEnvf which unlike windows we have it's implementation which reside in opengl/libagl.
Is it true?
In any case what is the GLES2_dbg library in /libs/GLES20_dbg? i can see there some kind of debug implementation with python scripts... are they to compile OpenGL debug version?
What are the .in files and gl2.cpp file in /libs/GLES20?
Where are the HW calls? does each GPU vendor sends his libGLESv2 implementation for HW calls as i saw the libGLESv2_adreno200.so in my xperia arc?
Please help me understand the flow. If you have a link which explain this structure even in Linux it will be great.
In Windows opengl32.dll contains both a software rasterizer fallback and so called trampolines into the OpenGL-ICD shipping with the GPU driver.
The opengl32.lib ist not really a library but a cross reference for the linker to add entries into the executable that make the OS dynamically link the program against the DLL at runtime.
On Linux in the current implementation the libGL.so ships with the graphics driver and contains the vendor specific implementations. The linkers used in *nix systems don't rely on an extra crossreferencing .lib but can take the information directly from the .so
On Android the libGLES you see is only a kind of placeholder to make linking possible. But ultimately the GPU vendor provides the proper library, which drops into the place where the phony libGLES resided.
The .in files are nothing special in particular. They are input files used by configure and build systems to build source files from a template (the .in file) with fields filled in by configuration values.
thanks for the quick answer, i did a little more digging and as i saw here:
Missing OpenGL drivers on Android emulator,
further explanation.
What i understand now is the libagl is pure SW implementation.
In that case the libhgl is actually the GPU vendor implementation.
I also understood that libEGL opens (found it in the code - Loader.cpp) the libGLESv2....
So i will ask 2 more question:
libGLESv2 only dynamically link to the HW lib or the libEGL does that? (found something on EGL - loader.cpp which seems like dynamically link OpenGL API's)
2.So when i call an OpenGL API i goes trough libEGL (since there is the dynamic binding)? and from there to libGLESv2 ?
thanks a lot for your help
it starting to make sense now
Is there a way to trace through function calls at the lowest levels of the Android system? Right now when I debug in Eclipse, it goes through the source files that are located inside the frameworks folder, but is it possible to go even lower? For example show what functions are being called from the libcore folder. I am also interested to find how it communicates with the linux kernel at the bottom of the layers. Is there a way to do this?
Thanks
The lowest level you can go with eclipse debugger if you add all framework source folders is up to JNI calls (the layer that interfaces with native code).
If you want to go lower you need to use gnu gdb debugger, here you will find a guide on how to use it.
http://android.opensourceror.org/2010/01/18/android-source/
Try this :)
In all cases mentioned below, first you need to be root on the mobile phone.
At each process level, you can use "strace" (available from android SDK which u can copy into the phone).
http://tthtlc.wordpress.com/2011/02/06/analysing-the-softkeyboard-in-android/
http://tthtlc.wordpress.com/category/android/page/5/
At the kernel level, depending on the phone's ftrace config flag (but most phone's kernel config followed that of Google ASOP):
http://tthtlc.wordpress.com/2011/12/29/playing-with-ftrace-option-on-my-xperia-arc-s/
I guess the easy way would be compiling your own version of android from https://android.googlesource.com and making it debuggable.