Im making a music player/library app in wich I would like a frame/toolbar on top of all other activities as a header. This frame/toolbar will show information about the current playing track and have some controlls like play, next and stop etc. and be a separate selfsufficiennt activity. Is this possible and if so, how?
You can create an ActivityGroup. This is how TabHost is implemented. So your ActivityGroup would fill the whole window and implement the toolbar. Then you could swap out Activities in the bottom part.
Currently I don't think that making a static top bar it's own activity in the life-cycle idea. However, what you can do is have every activity have the top bar and just re-create the bindings needed for each activity. It gives the idea that a section is static.
Now this breaks down if you start doing animations between the screens. Another solution is to just have a single activity and swap out the views. This allows for animations between screens be custom and only the parts that change need to create the connections they need. The trade off there is that you'll lose any kind of state saving and history that you gain by using an activity orientated approach.
I think you can do something like this on Honeycomb tablets as the fragments idea could be implemented like that but I've never explored it much.
Related
I've recently been looking into the navigation system that Android uses with as intention to port my iOS app that uses an UITabBarController containing multiple UINavigationControllers. To replace the tab bar (which is not available on Android) I settled on using the built in DrawerLayout.
From what I've read, navigation in Android is generally done by creating an Intent, providing it with extras and then just replacing the current activity. This automatically makes sure the back button works, and optionally the back button in the top left if enabled.
However, I am not sure how to implement this way of navigation with the navigation drawer. The tutorial tells me to create a DrawerLayout containing a FrameLayout and a ListLayout where the FrameLayout will contain the actual application and the ListLayout will contain the navigation. This would mean that when I use the method described above to "navigate", it would replace the activity and thus removing the drawer.
What would be the best way to implement what I want (basic navigation with back button support while maintaining a global drawer navigation menu)? The possible options I can come up with is always keeping the same activity and dynamically replacing the FrameLayout, but that would mean a lot of boilerplate to render and possibly a hack to support the back button (and there would be no animations :(). The other option would be to just render the drawer on every activity (via subclassing or something), but that would mean that if the user navigates a lot the back button "stack" would become quite large.
I have tried to explain what I need in as much detail as possible, but it is quite hard to explain the concept. Basically, I want something similar to the UINavigationControllers in the UITabBarController.
You can either have one Activity with one NavigationDrawer and present the user with different views by switching Fragments back and forth within that one Activity. You would use the FragmentManager to switch between different Fragments.
Or you can use multiple Activities that all have a NavigationDrawer.
Second option might sound more difficult but it really isn't. You create a base Activity that all your Activities inherit from and all let them have their own NavigationDrawer, no problem.
Sure there's something in between or something completely different, but that's the most straightforward approaches I can think of.
The tutorial you've probably used (the one with the planets) is imho a bit misleading because it assumes a very basic app structure. If you have only little different 'screens' that might work, for a very complex application it's not suitable (again, in my opinion).
I've always opted for the second option because handling the navigation / backstack is just easier with Activities / Intents.
There's loads of different flags that you can set to your Intent to influence their navigation behaviour.
Also see this and that documentation. These documents might have been written when the NavigationDrawer pattern was not all that common but they are still useful.
In an app I am working on, I'd like to have a bar with some controls always present at the bottom of the screen. It should overlay every activity in the app but also be able to disappear and reappear. To do this I've considered some options, such as simply using a linear layout and setting the visibility in every activity or using a fragment somehow. Probably those would work but I feel there must be a better solution. So my question is: what is the best way of doing this?
There are two ways you could do this. You could just use Fragments, and make your overlay be a fragment.
The other way would be to sublcass Activity with an AcitivityWithOverlay, which handles the overlay appearing and disappearing then have all of your activities inherit that. If I did it this way, I'd make my overlay a singleton so I wasn't creating extra versions all over the place that did the same thing.
I have seen a few questions raised on this topic (for e.g.: https://github.com/jfeinstein10/SlidingMenu/issues/5) but I am still unclear. I hope somebody can clarify this.
Context:
See https://github.com/jfeinstein10/SlidingMenu
I have an android app that organizes screens by activities and fragments (i.e.) each screen is an activity containing one or more fragments.
The new requirement is to add a sliding menu (similar to what this library provides).
Issue:
It appears from the examples and discussion that the right model would be to have just 1 MAIN ACTIVITY that will then switch in/out fragments belonging to the different screens. In fact the author mentions in the above thread: "If you were to launch Activities based upon the list selection, then you would not have the behavior where you swap the views that you're talking about. " and also "You can't put an Activity into the above view. That doesn't really make sense when you think about what an Activity is. ".
Why doesn't it make sense? Obviously, I am missing the point here.
Question:
Given that my project already contains multiple activities (one corresponding to each screen), is my only option then to re-organize the project to have JUST 1 MAIN ACTIVITY, in order to use this library? Or alternatively, is there any way to launch a new activity when a list item in the sliding menu is clicked, and still observe the sliding menu behavior, [EDIT- added the last part to be more clear] or in other words, on how exactly to use this library within my existing app design.
Thanks in advance
First, you can't have an Activity inside another and activities are completely different from views as stated in the docs:
An activity is a single, focused thing that the user can do.
Now, to answer your question, it all depends on how you want your app to behave. You could have your activities with the sliding menu implement the onClosedListener and switch to the selected activity from there. This will give you the animation of closing the menu before switching activities. It will also give you a weird effect since every time you select something from your menu you'll see the animation of a new activity coming to the front.
I think the best approach would be to have a "common purpose" between all your sliding menu options. For example, in one of my projects I have to allow the users to select between lists of different types of data. When the user selects anything from the menu, I load a new list fragment into the right corner where he may choose the item he wants to view or edit. That's the app entry point and also the only place were I have a sliding menu in my app. It is pretty much the same for every app that implements this UI design pattern. Look at google+, currents and youtube where the side menu lets you choose which feed or content to show. Once a user makes a selection, just open a new activity for the selected item (a g+ post, a video, a news article, a tweet or whatever it is).
Your app doesn't have to have lists of different data or anything like that to use the sliding menu, but keep in mind that the activity with the sliding menu should have a clear, focused goal with respect to its functionality and purpose. Having a sliding menu because many other apps have one is a bad choice, you should use it with a specific objective. Also keep in mind that applying the sliding menu everywhere would interfere with the platform's navigation pattern and lead to an overall bad user experience since it wouldn't behave as the other apps.
It doesn't make sense to place an Activity into the above view because the Activity is the main controller for the view of each screen. The Activity also shows views and keeps track of Fragments (which in turn are mini controllers, with or without their own views). So placing an Activity in the above view would mean that you would place an Activity in an Activity... Wich is impossible.
From what I can derive from your text I think it would be wise to read through the Android developer guide on Activities and Fragment again (http://developer.android.com/guide/components/activities.html) to get a better understanding of how the concept of Android works.
Now to your question:
I am not clear on what you are trying to achieve but if you want your app, with menu to behave like, say, the Google+ app then one way of doing it is to implement a base class that extends the Activity class (or what ever base Activity used in your project) and let the base set the SlidingMenu. Then you would simple extend your base Activity in each of the Activities that are supposed to have a menu.
You could also do it the way you describe it, but then you would end up with a classic example of a God object (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_object). It's a neat way to practice your Fragment juggling skills and switching between Fragments instead of starting new Activities does have it's use cases, but I still wouldn't recommend it for a project with more then a few views.
Here is the answer that came closest to the issue I had - http://www.verious.com/article/polishing-the-sliding-app-menu/. Scroll down to the bottom of the page to see the last section titled "Using the fly-in app menu between Activities". This is one option if you have a lot of activities in your existing app and want to avoid extensive re-factoring. I haven't tried this out yet but its worth being aware of.
Are there any patterns on how to handle UI Transitions in Android Activities vs Fragments? I am currently looking into a UI that has at most 3 columns in Landscape.
I would like the UI to start with 1 column all the way across the screen and then on selection of something move in the second column and then on clicking on something in the second fade in the 3rd on tablets and phones and fade out the 1st column on phones.
I am wondering when I should do this as an Activity transition and when I should just use Fragments with Views that Appear. As far as I have read fragments can be moved over to other activities so my choice is either implement Activities with static column layouts that then transition taking the fragments with them or have one Activity with all 3 columns and have the Activity manage the Appearing of the Fragments. Both approaches could work but I was interested in pros and cons from as many angles for both solutions.
There are two questions similar to what I am asking but don't quite answer mine
Two panel UI with Fragments vs Separate activities
Android Honeycomb: layout problem - hide/show FrameLayouts
Fragments can seem like more code up front (since you're putting a view in a fragment, and a fragment in an Activity, instead of just a view in an Activity), but they're great at saving you from headaches in just this kind of situation- Definitely go with Fragments. They even handle the transitions for you.
We have some sample code called "Honeycomb Gallery" you can take a look at here, which has a two-column-plus-actionbar layout, and the ability to show/hide the leftmost column. This should give you a good head start in figuring out how to do layout for multiple fragments and show/hide them.
FYI, one important trade-off to using multiple fragments in an Activity instead of multiple Activities, is that fragments don't directly respond to intents - For instance, if you had a note-taking app where "View Note" page was an Activity, and you changed it so that there was a "view note" Fragment inside the main Activity, then you'd have to set it up such that the main Activity received a note ID AND a note action (create, view, edit, whatever) in the Intent, as opposed to just having the "view note" activity receive the note ID in the Intent. The main Activity would then need to set up the fragments on the page accordingly. Not a huge deal, but if external accessibility to various parts of your application via Intent is important, then it might be easier to break your app out into a few Activities, as well as use fragments to represent the individual components.
Based on the page The Android 3.0 Fragments API, an Activity is stand alone while a fragment can be though of as as a mini-Activity, which must be hosted within an actual Activity.
It goes on to say that the introduction of the Fragment API gave the android developers the opportunity to address many of the pain points developers hit with Activities, so in Android 3.0 the utility of Fragment extends far beyond just adjusting for different screens:
I think that using a single activity for an app is not necessarily a wrong decision, just a matter of style. It is a decision that you should make based on what you are trying to accomplish.
However, the introduction of Fragments was seen to solve real world problems. Based on that alone, I would recommend that you writing some "Proof of Concept" code and evaluate the results. At this time, this may be the only real world test that will matter
Use Activities for Full Screen
Use Fragments for Part of or no Screen (but not a service)
In my main application, there is on-screen tabs in a horizontal scroll-view I wanted to persist across multiple sections of the app. Sections include
News,Photos,Videos,Schedule etc. All single-user focusable tasks.
The main Application that houses it all is a application, and the tabs are just a view which call the fragment Manager.
However, I use Activities for complicated user activities deeper in the application. E.g. if someone plays a video, views a item detail page and the photo-gallery/slideshow sections, because they are all full screen components.
There is no need to show/hide fragments when transitioning to full screen because the activity stack handles everything you want to do it quickly and easily, and keep your code minimal and clean.
So I have Activity -> houses fragments -> launch full screen Activities for special commands.
Sorry, I know that this topic has been covered a bit. I've read the related posts and am still a bit confused. I am working on an app that while the prototype will have 3 main screens, it will eventually have dozens. Each screen will present either dynmically changing status or take user input. To visualize, it is required to be laid out similar to how MS Word or a typical PC is. It has a status bar at the top and a navigation bar at the bottom that is common to all screens (slight tweaks for some screens, like different icons) in the middle is what I would call a view pane that needs to be updated with a applicable layout.
The status, nav bar, and each screen are defined in their own layout xml file. For my first swag at it I just used a ViewFlipper and loaded the 3 screen layouts into it. However that means that currently I have one main Activity which will not be maintainable as I continue to add screens.
It feels right to me that each screen layout should have an associated Activity class that understands how to control that screen. I need to figure out how to load that into the center pane dynamically. However I thought I read in another post that using multiple Activities can be a CPU and RAM drain.
Currently I tried making one of the screens it's own Activity and kick that off from the main Activity by creating an Intent and than calling startActivity. However that causes the new screen Activity to reside on top of the main Activity. The interesting thing is that then pressing the back button dismissed that activity and returns me to the main.
So far I haven't figured out how to setup having a different Activity control what happens in the center pane.
If I continue down the multiple Activity path, should my main Activity be inheriting from ActivityGroup?
Are using View classes more applicable in this case?
I know this has been a long post. I'd appreciate any advice.
Thanks!
CB
As you noticed, Android will implicitly track a stack of started activities in a task, and the 'back' button ends the top one, reactivating the next one down. I would advise you to think about which kinds of things the user might expect the back button to do, and make it so that activities are separated along those lines.
I haven't played with ActivityGroup so I can't advise you there. If you go with completely separate activities, you can have them all use the same "shell" content view with the common nav/status bar. Have a superclass or utility class handle populating and managing that from there. Then use a a LayoutInflater (you can call getLayoutInflater()) to fill in the middle with your Activity-specific view.
If you want one of the activities to have multiple screens, you might still end up with a ViewFlipper in the center slot. Again, you want to have an Activity transition wherever you want the user to be able to go "back"; that also means you may NOT want to have a change of activities in cases where screens are closely related or part of the same logical thing-being-done. (You can override the back button's behavior, but unless you have a good reason to, it's best to just arrange the app so that Android's basic setup helps your app's UI rather than working at cross purposes.)
If you want to use activities in the fashion you talked about, you might look into using a tab activity. It actually works in the way you want, you just need to hide the tab widget and put your navigation bar there instead. Or, you could go a little deeper and make you own similar tab-like ActivityGroup like Walter mentioned if you have more time.
You could use a view pager with fragments to accomplish the flip between the different views but still allow your activity to have full control over it. The activity can control the menus while the fragment controls your viewing area. This way your back button will properly dismiss the activity containing all pages related to the activity instead of walking down the stack.