Some days ago I have published my application in Android Marketplace and a question came into my mind during designing and developing application. This question is about limitation or unlimitation of number of activities.
For example, my application includes 37 activities. Is it so much? I want to know for a game such as "Angry Birds" which has more than 200 levels, it has 200 activities?!!
My next question is, assume that I am designing an application which includes 100 activities. User starts application and gos into last activity (such as reading a book). If user wants to close the application what should he do? 100 times press back key on his devise?!
If I want to put close button(to help user) in options menu, do I have to repeat it for each activity? because as far as I know each activity has its own menu.
If i put close button in last activity and user clicks on it, program will close. What will happen to other 99 activities? are they still exist in stack? or When I close an application, all activities related to that package will delete from stack.
I have read activities page published by Android but I couldn't find my answers.
Sorry if above questions are stupid questions :)
Thank you
In the case of Anry Bairds, I doubt they have 100s of activities, I think they just have one (or possibly a couple) for levels and another for the welcome screen - different levels are probably loaded depending on some parameter that was passed to the activity.
As for how to handle 100s of loaded activities, first of all, it is very likely that the system will recycle the old ones at the bottom of the stack before you get to the 100th activity. If not, then yes, your user will have to click back through a 100 activities.
If you want to change the behaviour of what the back button, you can override onKeyDown().
Or if you want to change the default behaviour of how activities are launched, then take a look at activities launch mode.
Please read Tasks and Back Stack and Activity and Task Design Guidelines
Well, first, regarding angrybirds, I guess it is written nearly entirely in OpenGL ES, so it consists of only a few activities.
And second, if you're really having 200 activities, you should probably think of an activity which can be reused multiple times. e.g. why would you need one activity for every page of a book, if every page should have the same look and functions? Just fire an intent with extra data and it should work. And, to close the app, you can simply press the home button :-)
An application like Angry Birds probably has one activity with an OpenGL ES view, with all of the interfacing done with a RelativeLayout
that being said, you could have an unlimited number of activities, the only concern is how much space your app will take, why any user would want to navigate through such a robust program on their mobile device, and how much RAM you are using and are you managing your activities efficiently
Related
I need general advice.
I'm building an app that can be started via the icon (normal way) but also with an intent triggered by a click in the notification area (the app places an icon in the notification area). The is awaken when a time event / alarm occurs.
The app has 5 to 10 views. Is it better to open a new activity for each view? How can I be sure not to have mutliple tasks open? Say if my app is Activity-A, Activity-B, Activity-C and can be started from Activity-A and Activity-B (depending on if it's opened via the icon or the notification area) ... how do I clean everything upon app close?
Or is it better to have one activity and just switch views (xml layouts)?
I'll start of with what you should watch and read. It should be clear that navigation in Android is very easy to do wrong. Google has a history of doing differently from app to app, but they are getting better. This said, if you are to do an app you should know how it is intended to work, and the best way to do that is to read the docs. As mentioned, there was an excellent talk at IO'12. There is also a very good section on the design site, and finally there is a good section in the API Guides.
To summarize: a full screen is an activity (which in turn can be constructed of fragments). The activities should in virtually all cases be structured as a tree with the root being the activity that are launched from home. For every activity you should have an "up" activity that takes you up in the hierarchy. Note that this is different from back which should take you to the last full screen state you were in. Also note that full screen means that for example tabs should not be recorded in the "back history", since they provide navigation within a screen.
When it comes to tapping a notification it should be equivalent to: pressing home, remove the task from the recents view (clearing the task), opening the task, and finally take the shortest path to get to the activity presenting the info that the notification told you about. Complicated, yes indeed... But at least there is a helper class in JB and in the support library called TaskStackBuilder.
The key to all this is a UI design that follow the Android design guidelines. Take your time to make the design for your app, and make sure to separate up (static) and back (temporal).
It might be as simple as using a different launchmode, which you can define in the manifest or I think in the inent you are using. It takes some experimenting but SingleTask or SingleInstance may be the right choices for you,
Your activity should support onNewIntent in this case, to reuse existing Activities if that is the desired effect.
In this case I better use one activity or use fragments.
Does anyone know of a way to show another class without creating a new instance?
It seems a bit crazy from a memory management point of view that each time you want to display a different form / page you need to use StartActivity which then creates a new instances of the class instead of reusing instances previously created.
Thanks in advance
I guess from what has been said - there is no real way to do it which won't hinder the "Back" functionality of the OS?
I'm building an app which is linear except on each screen it has a home button which then makes it possible to countermand this functionality and end in a loop - is there anyway you know of to destroy all over views and reset back to the main class? (IE prevent a memory leak from becoming a problem but also not damaging OS functionality)
Consider it a "clear history" without restarting the app
Not sure if this would work for Android (coming from a MS/C# background), but conceptually one option is to iterate through open forms looking for one with a specific handle. Then, once you find it, simply call the method to show that form. This would depend on there being a Java equivalent to the Application.OpenForms property in .NET.
It seems a bit crazy from a memory management point of view that each time you want to display a different form / page you need to use StartActivity which then creates a new instances of the class instead of reusing instances previously created.
Tactically, you are welcome to add FLAG_REORDER_TO_FRONT to bring an existing activity back to the foreground, so long as you understand the ramifications from a navigation standpoint.
However, your question is rather curious. How are you accessing StackOverflow?
Clearly it's not via a Web browser. Web browsers use the exact mechanism that you feel is "crazy", rendering Web pages even if that Web page had been viewed previously. They have been doing so for over 15 years, and we've been doing OK by it.
The Android navigation model is designed to approximately mirror that of the Web:
Users click on things to move forward
Users click on a BACK button to move to the previous thing they were looking at
Users click on a HOME button when they want to switch to some other major thing to go look at
By "reusing instances previously created", you're circumventing that navigational model. For example, let's suppose your activity stack were A-B-C-D, and you call startActivity() with an Intent for B and FLAG_REORDER_TO_FRONT. Now, the activity stack is A-C-D-B. When the user presses BACK times, they no longer are on the B they were looking at originally, but are back at A. In a browser, this would be rather strange behavior.
There are other flags on Intent, or attributes on <activity> in the manifest, that offer "reusing instances previously created". However, they are not there "from a memory management point of view". They are there where the traditional Web BACK-heavy navigation pattern does not fit your needs.
Assuming you aren't screwing up anywhere, Android will destroy under-utilized activities, garbage collect that memory, and even return that memory to the OS.
OK sorry this is a bit of a "stupid" question.
Currently I am developing an application with a number of views and XML files. If I click certain buttons the view changes etc.
BUT, I want it like stack. So if you go to Page 2, pressing the back button goes back to Page 1. Currently the back button destroys the activity and the application closes.
The only thing I can think of is to have states, so if the back button is pressed, set the view to State X, but I am not sure if this is the "correct programming technique" for Android.
Another thought was to have multiple Activities, so when a button is pressed, a new Activity is created on top of the old one. But this seems inefficient and stupid.
TIA
Yes, you want multiple Activities.
Activities and Intents have a lot of built-in knowledge about the back stack and make it easy to do just what you're describing while providing the user with a coherent experience.
Perhaps you could describe a bit more why you think this would be efficient for your application? Are you creating hundreds of Activities programmatically?
Edit - if you're coming from another mobile platform, where application parts are more tightly bound together, you might try thinking of Android apps as being more like web pages. The most common way to share information is via the query string (Intent) and the back button works because your are arriving at a new page (Activity) for each navigation.
The Widget Sample code, 'Wiktionary' on the android sdk site has some sample code for this in the LookupActivity.java file.
I seem to be missing something obvious here, why would I want more than one activity per application in Android? Does somebody have some solid examples?
Suppose you are creating a game. You need to have at least two activities - a welcome screen, and the actual game screen. The third activity in this example might be a settings page of the game.
Another example.
Suppose you are developing an application and you need to pop up a dialog, i.e. asking user to set username and password (Standard login screen). You might choose to create and activity and apply a dialog theme to it.
Think about it as the form of desktop application. you don't put everything on one form do you? :)
Sorantis' answer is spot on. Here are other thoughts as well:
Most Web applications, even AJAX-y ones, don't try to have everything in one single page. Some do, and those tend to be the ones that are slow as molasses to load (Evernote, I'm looking at you), have code that looks like a heaping mound of spaghetti, etc. Android is no different.
Also, state management for a super-complex Activity will be nasty, causing you problems with screen rotations and supporting being kicked out of RAM because you screw up onSaveInstanceState(). Memory management in Android assumes lots of cheap activities, not fewer massive ones. Intelligently handling the BACK button requires gobs of your own logic. If you want multiple entry points (e.g., Launcher icon and a MIME type handler and something some other app can call with startActivityForResult() and a search results handler), doing that in one activity will be a nightmare. And so on.
One very basic thing that makes having multiple activities in your program desirable is the use of the back button. I have a form in app after the user clicks search he is presented with another activity showing the results of the search. If he wants to change the search parameters he just can press back and without me doing anything particular he gets back to the search form. Doing this with one activity would be a lot of work for you.
The next thing is the memory management. Android will trigger the garbage collection automaticaly after changing activities that means my whole search form leaves the memory and doesn't take any resources away from the user.
I have developed some apps for Android, and this questions stays always:
How should I structure my UI? Should I launch activity after activity and leave the phone to make the "back" button, or should I choose more optimized, but more complex to implement, way with switching manually Views and then manually doing the "Back" button functionality?
What do you think (or know) is the better practice?
I would say that multiple Activities almost always makes more sense. I just don't think Android is designed for constantly switching its own views - you miss out on so much. You have to implement Back yourself, you don't get any inter-Activity transitions, you have to implement a lot of internal logic to resume an application in the correct state. If you don't partition your app into Activities, it makes it a lot more difficult later on to change the flow of your application. It also results in one mega-Activity that can be a lot harder to handle than a lot of smaller pieces of code.
I have trouble imagining that speed is really an issue; if it is then there's something wrong with the way you're initializing each Activity. For example, I used try to pass Serializable objects between Activities, and that proved to be incredibly slow; when I switched to a faster method of passing objects, the speed of launching Activities increased immensely.
Also, I think it's telling that the Android guidelines for Activity and Task Design don't mention switching Views at all; it's centered around an Activity-as-View design.
I'd like to point out some instances when a single activity might be better design for an Android application that has more than one full screen View:
If the application screens are tightly coupled and share a common Object that they are all operating on. In this case passing around the Object may require a Bundle and can be error prone since there will be copies of it. A good example might be a wizard. Yes you could use static's to access the common Object but static can be dangerous in Android (think configuration changes!)
If you want some really cool animations in between screens. Maybe you want a bird to take off in one screen and land in another screen. Try doing that when each screen is an activity!
On the other hand if one of your screens is designed to be shown by any number of other applications then that screen should be its own Activity.
UPDATE March 2014:
At this point the question should now include the choice of Fragments. I think that Views are probably the least likely choice of the 3: Activity, Fragment, View. If you want to implement screens that make use of the back button then it should be either Activties or Fragments because both handle the back button natively. Fragments will need to be added to the FragmentManager back stack for the back button to work. Managing fragments, dialogs and the back stack can be a bit of an annoyance though!
UPDATE Sept 2018:
Some devs at Google are recommending single activity apps using the new navigation architecture component.
Also keep in mind that implementing your app with multiple Activities will give the user a more coherent experience with the platform as a whole. Part of the experience will be shaped by using the built-in Google apps, so users will probably have an easier time using your application if it behaves similarly to the ones that are already installed on the phone.
Different from others I use a mixture of both, for example,
1. There is a main menu when the application starts
2. You click on search, takes you to search activity
3. Then there's a filter button, which just switches view and shows you filter options
4. There are two buttons at the end of the filter view, You hit "Search" or "Cancel" and you are back to the Search View again (without switching activity)
5. Now if the user hits the phone back button he's taken back to the main menu instead of the search filter options. Which I guess is the correct behavior.
Use it the way user will feel natural. And keeping everything in one activity will make it complex.
It all depends on application, what are you trying to achieve better performance, smoother UI. IMHO I prefer the second approach of controlling the Activities manually even that it is more complex as you have stated. This is a approach I have used in my android tabs project, also you might want to take a look at a class called ActivityGroup (not sure the package) it allows you to have multiple activities that you can switch between, good thing about this class is that your activities are not unloaded when you switch but a bad thing is it takes longer to load your main app.
Just my opinion.
The problem with switching views, that I stumbled upon, is also caused by garbage collector. Seems that GC is triggered when you leave activity and not the view. So, changing tabs with a fairly complex children views, for instance, will almost inevitably lead to stack overflow exception..
I've experienced so many problems with multiple activity layout that I strongly discourage it, unless there's good reason to pick it.
Disadvantage of multiple activities
Using multiple activities it is much hard to refactor code to return data from activity.
If you call a 'sub'-activity then the main activity may be killed. But you never experience that while debugging on a decent device, hence you need to handle always saving state and correctly recovering state. That is a pain. Imagine calling a method on a library (ie. another activity), and you would have to be ensure that when that method returns your app must be able to recreate its state completely with all fields on all objects in the VM (ie. activity.restoreIntance). Its insane.
Also the other way round, when you open a subactivity the VM might have been killed since the subactivity was first spawned, such as when app is minimized while subactivity is displayed.
Its so much cleaner to just have one place to store the relevant app-state, and in my case, most often if VM is killed, I want to return user to main-screen, and let them do their stuff again, because I don't spend 30-50 hours coding save/resume functionality that 0.1% of users will ever experience.
Alternative
Fragments or just manage you activity views yourself. Managing views manually, requires coding some view-switching alternative to activities/fragments with transitions if desired.
And no it does not mean one mega-activity, as suggested in the accepted answer, in any other way than its one mega-app. It just requires a bit more design of the codebase into fitting pieces, because there's slightly more work managing views, though much less work managing activity-state and other weirdness.
Possibly relevant: Reddit: It's official : Google officially recommends single activity app architecture