Unable to instantiate Fragment - android

Unable to instantiate fragment make sure class name exists, is public,
and has an empty constructor that is public
Is it because my Fragment is not a static class?
Is it because my Fragment is an inner class?
If I make my Fragment a static class, all my references to findViewById fail, which means a LOT of refactoring.
How can I solve this without turning my inner Fragment into a static class?


is it because my Fragment is an inner class
If your fragment is an inner class, it must be a static inner class. Ideally, it's a standalone public Java class.
if I make my Fragment a static class, all my references to findViewById fail, which means a LOT of refactoring
You needed to do that refactoring anyway. Widgets are now owned by the fragment, not the activity. Fragments should know as little as possible about what activity contains them, so they can be shuffled between different activities as needed to support phones, tablets, TV, etc.
How can I solve this without turning my inner Fragment into a static class??
You make it a standalone public Java class.


Your Fragment shouldn't have constructors (see this documentation and its examples).
You should have a newInstance() static method defined and pass any parameters via arguments (bundle)
For example:
public static final MyFragment newInstance(int title, String message)
{
MyFragment fragment = new MyFragment();
Bundle bundle = new Bundle(2);
bundle.putInt(EXTRA_TITLE, title);
bundle.putString(EXTRA_MESSAGE, message);
fragment.setArguments(bundle);
return fragment ;
}
And read these arguments at onCreate:
#Override
public Dialog onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState)
{
title = getArguments().getInt(EXTRA_TITLE);
message = getArguments().getString(EXTRA_MESSAGE);
//...
//etc
//...
}
This way if detached and re-attached the object state can be stored through the arguments, much like bundles attached to Intents.


As CommonsWare said make it static or standalone, additionally don't know why you need a shedload of refactoring for getting findViewById to work. Suggestions:
Using the view inflated in onCreateView,
inflatedView.findViewById(.....)
or calling it in onActivityCreated(.....)
getActivity().findViewById(......)
But even if you still need a load of refactoring then that might just be the way it is, converting an app to use fragments doesn't come for free having just finished a project doing so.


I had this problem as well - turns out it was getting confused because my custom Fragment had a constructor.
I renamed the constructor method and called the new method instead upon instantiation, and it worked!


public static class MyDialogFragment extends DialogFragment {
public MyDialogFragment(){
}
public Dialog onCreateDialog(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
LinearLayout main = new LinearLayout(getActivity());
main.setOrientation(LinearLayout.VERTICAL);
return (new AlertDialog.Builder(getActivity()).setTitle(
getText("Title")).setView(main).create());
}
}


In my case, I was missing the constructor, the post from #eoghanm above helped me
public static class MyDialogFragment extends DialogFragment {
public MyDialogFragment(){
}
...
}


Using setRetainInstance(true) worked for us. Our inner classes now look like this:
public class SectionsPagerAdapter extends FragmentPagerAdapter {
public SectionsPagerAdapter(FragmentManager fm) {
super(fm);
}
#Override
public Fragment getItem(int position) {
// getItem is called to instantiate the fragment for the given page.
Fragment fragment = new MySectionFragment();
Bundle args = new Bundle();
args.putInt(MySectionFragment.ARG_SECTION_NUMBER, position + 1);
fragment.setArguments(args);
fragment.setRetainInstance(true);
return fragment;
}
// ...
}
public class MySectionFragment extends Fragment {
public static final String ARG_SECTION_NUMBER = "section_number";
#SuppressLint("ValidFragment")
public MySectionFragment() {
}
#Override
public View onCreateView(LayoutInflater inflater, ViewGroup container, Bundle savedInstanceState) {
//...
}
// ...
}
PS. Here's an interesting one about setRetainInstance(boolean): Understanding Fragment's setRetainInstance(boolean)


if you don't want to make the inner class static, try to override the method onPause of the dialog fragment like this:
public void onPause()
{
super.onPause();
dismiss();
}
so the fragment should be destroyed when the app goes on pause and there is no exception. i tried it and works.


Hahah my hilarious issue was I had a call to getString() as a member level variable in my fragment which is a big no no because it's too early I guess. I wish the error was more descriptive!


Make sure the Fragment isn't abstract. Copy&paste makes this kind of things happen :(


The inner class constructor must be pass in an instance of the outer class. so it is said the compiler cannot find the constructor which has no parameter. so it should be put into static of other java file.


i have meet this problem
you need use full class name :
eg:
Fragment.instantiate(MainActivity.this, com.XX.yourFragmentName);
must full class name


It is also worth trying to check that your default Fragment constructor is public, not package-private, which Android Studio might propose. This was the cause in my case.

Related

Is this the right way to get string resources from within a Fragment?

Which method is generally better / safer for reading string resources while in a Fragment?
Here I read getResources().getString() directly:
public class SomeFragment extends Fragment {
public static SomeFragment newInstance() {
Bundle args = new Bundle();
SomeFragment fragment = new SomeFragment();
fragment.setArguments(args);
return fragment;
}
#Override
public void onCreate(#Nullable Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
String someString = getResources().getString(R.string.my_string_id);
}
}
Or is it better to do it this way, by setting a Context field first and then reading the resources from that:
public class SomeFragment extends Fragment {
private Context context;
public static SomeFragment newInstance() {
Bundle args = new Bundle();
SomeFragment fragment = new SomeFragment();
fragment.setArguments(args);
return fragment;
}
#Override
public void onAttach(Context context) {
super.onAttach(context);
this.context = context;
}
#Override
public void onCreate(#Nullable Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
String someString = context.getResources().getString(R.string.my_string_id);
}
}
Any tradeoffs/drawbacks to either of these methods?
The reason I ask is because sometimes I've run into nullpointer issues with the first approach that were resolved by using the second approach; so I wasn't sure if it was problematic to use the first one.

The second approach is more complicated and adds no value over the first approach. Use the first approach.

Both the approaches are better. No issues in this. You faced the null pointer exception because.
When a fragment transaction happens the lifecycle of the fragment starts and only when it gets attached to the activity and when reaches the onstart it will be ready.
Some times if we try to access the public methods of the fragment immediately after the fragmentManager's commit. Then you will run into null pointer exception while accessing the context object. As it is not still completed the process.
So its developers logic to write the code understanding the life cycle to avoid those.

When Fragments is onCreate() method, it already has the Activity's context, so it is not necessary set the context previously. Unless you need to do an specific (and inusual) implementation of Context, like parsing variables/values from portrait screen mode to landscape mode I guess...
However you're getting an string resource from last context, wich is already set up, so well the parsed variables/values indeed.

Android Fragment and Dependency Injection

as the title says, I'm trying to figure out which one is the best way to inject a dependency in a Fragment.
I want to be independent from external frameworks like RoboGuice etc.
Now, in the simplest way possible, I have an interface that abstracts some kind of logic, and, from an Activity, I want to inject an implementation of this interface. I know that I have to provide a default constructor for my fragment, since the system might need to recreate the fragment at some point, and that the usual way to create a new instance of the fragment is to provide static method that handles the creation like this:
public static Fragment newInstance() {
final Bundle bundle = new Bundle();
...
final Fragment fragment = new MyFragment();
fragment.setArguments(bundle);
return fragment;
}
How can I pass my dependency to the fragment? Should I make it implement the Parcelable or Serializable interfaces and then pack it in the Bundle? Is there some other way to achieve the result?

A simple solution is to declare an interface which is declaring the Dependencies required for the Fragment. Then let the Context of the Fragment implement this interface, and poll the dependencies when needed from the Context.
Contract:
public interface MyDependencies {
MyDep getDep();
}
Activity:
public MyActivity extends Activity implements MyDependencies {
#Override
public MyDep getDep(){
return createMyDependencyOrGetItFromASingletonOrGetItFromApplication()
}
}
Fragment:
public void onActivityCreated(Bundle b){
super.onActivityCreated(b)
if (getActivity() instanceOf MyDependencies) {
MyDep dep = ((MyDependencies) getActivity).getDep();
} else {
throw new RuntimeException("Context does not support the Fragment, implement MyDependencies")
}
}
So, in fact, there is no unnecessary coupling to the Activity because the contract is defined by an interface.

Why don't you grab the dependency from your activity?
public void onActivityCreated( Bundle b){
super.onActivityCreated(b)
DependencyClass c = ((MyActivity)getActivity()).getDependency();
}

If you can't pass in the dependency via the constructor (if you need a default constructor), and you don't want to use a dependency injection lib like Dagger or RoboGuice, the other classic way is to a setter to "inject" the dependency.
Fragment MyFragment {
Depend mDepend;
....
public void setDepend(Depend depend) {
mDepend = depend;
}
}
Then in your activity you can inject the dependency in the onCreate method.
so something like this in your activity:
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_map);
MapFragment wrapperFragment = new WrapperFragment();
if (savedInstanceState == null) {
getFragmentManager().beginTransaction()
.add(R.id.map_container, wrapperFragment).commit();
// find the fragment
// call the setter
}
}

ViewPager + Fragment + saveInstanceState

I have a simple Activity containing a ViewPager, which displays Fragments.
My Activity should display information about a football league, and each fragment displays information like livescroes/matchdays, tables, etc.
The Intent with which I start the Activity, contains the league id.
And each Fragment needs this league id to load the correct data.
So my FragmentPagerAdapter looks like this
public class LeaguePagerAdapter extends FragmentPagerAdapter {
private String leagueId;
public LeaguePagerAdapter(FragmentManager fm, String leagueId) {
super(fm);
this.leagueId = leagueId;
}
#Override
public Fragment getItem(int pos) {
if (pos == 0){
return TableFragment.newInstance(leagueId);
} else {
return MatchdayFragment.newInstance(leagueId);
}
}
}
The TableFragment looks like this ( the matchday fragment looks similar):
public class TableFragment extends PullToRefreshListViewAdFragment {
private String leagueId;
public static TableFragment newInstance(String leagueId) {
TableFragment t = new TableFragment();
t.leagueId = leagueId;
return t;
}
#Override
public View onCreateView(LayoutInflater inflater, ViewGroup container,
Bundle savedInstanceState) {
// Setup UI and load data
}
}
Sometimes the leagueId is null. I see the exceptions in the crash logs (crittercism). But Im asking my self why. It seems to me, that the problem is when the activity has been destroyed in the background and reconstructed if (for instance) the user uses the multitasking button to switch to my app.
So as far as I know, the original Intent will be stored internally by Android itself if the Activity has been destoryed. Therefore I have not implemented any onSaveInstanceState() in my activity nor in the fragment. In my activity I read the Intent Extra to retrieve the leagueId. This works fine, also on restoring the activity. I have assumed that by recreating the activity, a new LeaguePagerAdapter will be created and all fragments will also be new created.
Is that correct? Or does the "old" fragment instance will be restored and hence the leagueId is null (because the fragment has not stored the leagueId in Fragments onSaveInstanceState method?).
Is there a way to test such lifecycle things

The reason it is null is because the system restores the Fragment with the default constructor. Here's what the documents say:
Every fragment must have an empty constructor, so it can be instantiated when restoring its activity's state. It is strongly recommended that subclasses do not have other constructors with parameters, since these constructors will not be called when the fragment is re-instantiated; instead, arguments can be supplied by the caller with setArguments(Bundle) and later retrieved by the Fragment with getArguments().
edit: also, take a look at this: Fragment's onSaveInstanceState() is never called
edit: To further add on, you are creating your Fragment with your newInstance(String) method. If your Fragment is killed by Android, it uses the default constructor and so your leagueId variable won't be set. Try using setArguments/getArguments to pass the value into your Fragment instead.

The life cycle of Fragment in Android

I asked a question about Fragment's initialization and post my code( Delay initialization when using Fragment in Android ). The question is solved. But my problem still exists. When I call onLoad() to get the variables, it throws NullPointerException. I initialize these variables in onCreateView(). So I guess the life cycle is end. I loged the info in A.java in these function: onDestroy, onDestroyView, onStop. the onDestroyView and onStop is called while the onDestroy is not when fragment A is changed to another one. Strange:
There is a EditText in fragment A. I input a string abc. 1、If the life cycle is end, then when I change fragment from A to another then change back to A, the input should be empty. But it's NOT. 2、if the life cycle is not end, why can't I get the variable?
So is there anything to save the abc somewhere? What's it? Where?
It seems that I can't delay the initialization in Fragment. I can't get the non-static variables.
Code:
/** super class of Fragment */
public class BaseFragment extends Fragment {
public void onLoad(Context context){
}
}
/** */
public class AFragment extends BaseFragment{
TextView name;
#Override
public View onCreateVew(...){
name = new TextView(..);
}
#Override
public void onLoad(Context context){
// here will throw NullPointerException
name.setText("=========");
}
}
public class TabsAdapter extends FragmentPagerAdapter implements TabHost.OnTabChangeListener,ViewPager.OnPageChangeListener {
....
#Override
public Fragment getItem(int position) {
TabInfo info = mTabs.get(position);
return Fragment.instantiate(mContext, info.mClss.getName(), info.mArgs);
}
#Override
public void onPageSelected(int position) {
TabWidget widget = mTabHost.getTabWidget();
int oldFocusability = widget.getDescendantFocusability();
widget.setDescendantFocusability(ViewGroup.FOCUS_BLOCK_DESCENDANTS);
mTabHost.setCurrentTab(position);
widget.setDescendantFocusability(oldFocusability);
BaseFragment f = (BaseFragment) getItem(position);
f.onLoad(mContext);
}
}

But my problem still exists. When I call onLoad() to get the
variables, it throws NullPointerException. I initialize these
variables in onCreateView().
The problem is in the way you work with those fragments. More exactly, in the onPageSelected method you call the FragmentPagerAdapter's getItem() method to find the fragment for that position(or this is what I'm thinking you're trying to do). But calling this method simply instantiate a new fragment each time you call it, it doesn't give you a reference to the ViewPager's fragment for that position. This newly instantiated fragment isn't attached to an Activity and it's onCreateView method hasn't be called so it doesn't have any views created. Attempting to use your onLoad method to access one of this views is wrong and it will throw that NullPointerException. You should try to use my code from the previous answer, as that code will try to find the fragments that the ViewPager instantiated and it's using as its pages through the FragmentManager.

Send data from activity to fragment in Android

I have two classes. First is activity, second is a fragment where I have some EditText. In activity I have a subclass with async-task and in method doInBackground I get some result, which I save to variable. How can I send this variable from subclass "my activity" to this fragment?

From Activity you send data with intent as:
Bundle bundle = new Bundle();
bundle.putString("edttext", "From Activity");
// set Fragmentclass Arguments
Fragmentclass fragobj = new Fragmentclass();
fragobj.setArguments(bundle);
and in Fragment onCreateView method:
#Override
public View onCreateView(LayoutInflater inflater, ViewGroup container,
Bundle savedInstanceState) {
String strtext = getArguments().getString("edttext");
return inflater.inflate(R.layout.fragment, container, false);
}

Also You can access activity data from fragment:
Activity:
public class MyActivity extends Activity {
private String myString = "hello";
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_my);
...
}
public String getMyData() {
return myString;
}
}
Fragment:
public class MyFragment extends Fragment {
#Override
public View onCreateView(LayoutInflater inflater, ViewGroup container, Bundle savedInstanceState) {
MyActivity activity = (MyActivity) getActivity();
String myDataFromActivity = activity.getMyData();
return view;
}
}

I´ve found a lot of answers here # stackoverflow.com but definitely this is the correct answer of:
"Sending data from activity to fragment in android".
Activity:
Bundle bundle = new Bundle();
String myMessage = "Stackoverflow is cool!";
bundle.putString("message", myMessage );
FragmentClass fragInfo = new FragmentClass();
fragInfo.setArguments(bundle);
transaction.replace(R.id.fragment_single, fragInfo);
transaction.commit();
Fragment:
Reading the value in the fragment
#Override
public View onCreateView(LayoutInflater inflater, ViewGroup container, Bundle savedInstanceState) {
Bundle bundle = this.getArguments();
String myValue = bundle.getString("message");
...
...
...
}
or just
#Override
public View onCreateView(LayoutInflater inflater, ViewGroup container, Bundle savedInstanceState) {
String myValue = this.getArguments().getString("message");
...
...
...
}

This answer may be too late. but it will be useful for future readers.
I have some criteria. I have coded for pick the file from intent. and selected file to be passed to particular fragment for further process. i have many fragments having the functionality of File picking. at the time , every time checking the condition and get the fragment and pass the value is quite disgusting. so , i have decided to pass the value using interface.
Step 1: Create the interface on Main Activity.
public interface SelectedBundle {
void onBundleSelect(Bundle bundle);
}
Step 2: Create the SelectedBundle reference on the Same Activity
SelectedBundle selectedBundle;
Step 3: create the Method in the Same Activity
public void setOnBundleSelected(SelectedBundle selectedBundle) {
this.selectedBundle = selectedBundle;
}
Step 4: Need to initialise the SelectedBundle reference which are all fragment need filepicker functionality.You place this code on your fragment onCreateView(..) method
((MainActivity)getActivity()).setOnBundleSelected(new MainActivity.SelectedBundle() {
#Override
public void onBundleSelect(Bundle bundle) {
updateList(bundle);
}
});
Step 5: My case, i need to pass the image Uri from HomeActivity to fragment. So, i used this functionality on onActivityResult method.
onActivityResult from the MainActivity, pass the values to the fragments using interface.
Note: Your case may be different. you can call it from any where from your HomeActivity.
#Override
protected void onActivityResult(int requestCode, int resultCode, Intent data) {
selectedBundle.onBundleSelect(bundle);
}
Thats all. Implement every fragment you needed on the FragmentClass. You are great. you have done. WOW...

The best and convenient approach is calling fragment instance and send data at that time.
every fragment by default have instance method
For example :
if your fragment name is MyFragment
so you will call your fragment from activity like this :
getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction().add(R.id.container, MyFragment.newInstance("data1","data2"),"MyFragment").commit();
*R.id.container is a id of my FrameLayout
so in MyFragment.newInstance("data1","data2") you can send data to fragment and in your fragment you get this data in MyFragment newInstance(String param1, String param2)
public static MyFragment newInstance(String param1, String param2) {
MyFragment fragment = new MyFragment();
Bundle args = new Bundle();
args.putString(ARG_PARAM1, param1);
args.putString(ARG_PARAM2, param2);
fragment.setArguments(args);
return fragment;
}
and then in onCreate method of fragment you'll get the data:
#Override
public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
if (getArguments() != null) {
mParam1 = getArguments().getString(ARG_PARAM1);
mParam2 = getArguments().getString(ARG_PARAM2);
}
}
so now mParam1 have data1 and mParam2 have data2
now you can use this mParam1 and mParam2 in your fragment.

Basic Idea of using Fragments (F) is to create reusable self sustaining UI components in android applications. These Fragments are contained in activities and there are common(best) way of creating communication path ways from A -> F and F-A, It is a must to Communicate between F-F through a Activity because then only the Fragments become decoupled and self sustaining.
So passing data from A -> F is going to be the same as explained by ρяσѕρєя K. In addition to that answer, After creation of the Fragments inside an Activity, we can also pass data to the fragments calling methods in Fragments.
For example:
ArticleFragment articleFrag = (ArticleFragment)
getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentById(R.id.article_fragment);
articleFrag.updateArticleView(position);

I would like to add for the beginners that the difference between the 2 most upvoted answers here is given by the different use of a fragment.
If you use the fragment within the java class where you have the data you want to pass, you can apply the first answer to pass data:
Bundle bundle = new Bundle();
bundle.putString("edttext", "From Activity");
Fragmentclass fragobj = new Fragmentclass();
fragobj.setArguments(bundle);
If however you use for example the default code given by Android Studio for tabbed fragments, this code will not work.
It will not work even if you replace the default PlaceholderFragment with your FragmentClasses, and even if you correct the FragmentPagerAdapter to the new situation adding a switch for getItem() and another switch for getPageTitle() (as shown here)
Warning: the clip mentioned above has code errors, which I explain later here, but is useful to see how you go from default code to editable code for tabbed fragments)! The rest of my answer makes much more sense if you consider the java classes and xml files from that clip (representative for a first use of tabbed fragments by a beginner scenario).
The main reason the most upvoted answer from this page will not work is that in that default code for tabbed fragments, the fragments are used in another java class: FragmentPagerAdapter!
So, in order to send the data, you are tempted to create a bundle in the MotherActivity and pass it in the FragmentPagerAdapter, using answer no.2.
Only that is wrong again. (Probably you could do it like that, but it is just a complication which is not really needed).
The correct/easier way to do it, I think, is to pass the data directly to the fragment in question, using answer no.2.
Yes, there will be tight coupling between the Activity and the Fragment, BUT, for tabbed fragments, that is kind of expected. I would even advice you to create the tabbed fragments inside the MotherActivity java class (as subclasses, as they will never be used outside the MotherActivity) - it is easy, just add inside the MotherActivity java class as many Fragments as you need like this:
public static class Tab1 extends Fragment {
public Tab1() {
}
#Override
public View onCreateView(LayoutInflater inflater, ViewGroup container,
Bundle savedInstanceState) {
View rootView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.your_layout_name_for_fragment_1, container, false);
return rootView;
}
}.
So, to pass data from the MotherActivity to such a Fragment you will need to create private Strings/Bundles above the onCreate of your Mother activity - which you can fill with the data you want to pass to the fragments, and pass them on via a method created after the onCreate (here called getMyData()).
public class MotherActivity extends Activity {
private String out;
private Bundle results;
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_mother_activity);
// for example get a value from the previous activity
Intent intent = getIntent();
out = intent.getExtras().getString("Key");
}
public Bundle getMyData() {
Bundle hm = new Bundle();
hm.putString("val1",out);
return hm;
}
}
And then in the fragment class, you use getMyData:
public static class Tab1 extends Fragment {
/**
* The fragment argument representing the section number for this
* fragment.
*/
public Tab1() {
}
#Override
public View onCreateView(LayoutInflater inflater, ViewGroup container,
Bundle savedInstanceState) {
View rootView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.your_layout_name_for_fragment_1, container, false);
TextView output = (TextView)rootView.findViewById(R.id.your_id_for_a_text_view_within_the_layout);
MotherActivity activity = (MotherActivity)getActivity();
Bundle results = activity.getMyData();
String value1 = results.getString("val1");
output.setText(value1);
return rootView;
}
}
If you have database queries I advice you to do them in the MotherActivity (and pass their results as Strings/Integers attached to keys inside a bundle as shown above), as inside the tabbed fragments, your syntax will become more complex (this becomes getActivity() for example, and getIntent becomes getActivity().getIntent), but you have also the option to do as you wish.
My advice for beginners is to focus on small steps. First, get your intent to open a very simple tabbed activity, without passing ANY data. Does it work? Does it open the tabs you expect? If not, why?
Start from that, and by applying solutions such as those presented in this clip, see what is missing. For that particular clip, the mainactivity.xml is never shown. That will surely confuse you. But if you pay attention, you will see that for example the context (tools:context) is wrong in the xml fragment files. Each fragment XML needs to point to the correct fragment class (or subclass using the separator $).
You will also see that in the main activity java class you need to add tabLayout.setupWithViewPager(mViewPager) - right after the line TabLayout tabLayout = (TabLayout) findViewById(R.id.tabs); without this line, your view is actually not linked to the XML files of the fragments, but it shows ONLY the xml file of the main activity.
In addition to the line in the main activity java class, in the main activity XML file you need to change the tabs to fit your situation (e.g. add or remove TabItems). If you do not have tabs in the main activity XML, then possibly you did not choose the correct activity type when you created it in the first place (new activity - tabbed activity).
Please note that in the last 3 paragraphs I talk about the video! So when I say main activity XML, it is the main activity XML in the video, which in your situation is the MotherActivity XML file.

If you pass a reference to the (concrete subclass of) fragment into the async task, you can then access the fragment directly.
Some ways of passing the fragment reference into the async task:
If your async task is a fully fledged class (class FooTask extends AsyncTask), then pass your fragment into the constructor.
If your async task is an inner class, just declare a final Fragment variable in the scope the async task is defined, or as a field of the outer class. You'll be able to access that from the inner class.

From Activity you send data with Bundle as:
Bundle bundle = new Bundle();
bundle.putString("data", "Data you want to send");
// Your fragment
MyFragment obj = new MyFragment();
obj.setArguments(bundle);
And in Fragment onCreateView method get the data:
#Override
public View onCreateView(LayoutInflater inflater, ViewGroup container, Bundle savedInstanceState)
{
String data = getArguments().getString("data");// data which sent from activity
return inflater.inflate(R.layout.myfragment, container, false);
}

Sometimes you can receive Intent in your activity and you need to pass the info to your working fragment.
Given answers are OK if you need to start the fragment but if it's still working, setArguments() is not very useful.
Another problem occurs if the passed information will cause to interact with your UI. In that case you cannot call something like myfragment.passData() because android will quickly tells that only the thread which created the view can interact with.
So my proposal is to use a receiver. That way, you can send data from anywhere, including the activity, but the job will be done within the fragment's context.
In you fragment's onCreate():
protected DataReceiver dataReceiver;
public static final String REC_DATA = "REC_DATA";
#Override
public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
data Receiver = new DataReceiver();
intentFilter = new IntentFilter(REC_DATA);
getActivity().registerReceiver(dataReceiver, intentFilter);
}
private class DataReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver {
#Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
int data= intent.getIntExtra("data", -1);
// Do anything including interact with your UI
}
}
In you activity:
// somewhere
Intent retIntent = new Intent(RE_DATA);
retIntent.putExtra("data", myData);
sendBroadcast(retIntent);

Very old post, still I dare to add a little explanation that would had been helpful for me.
Technically you can directly set members of any type in a fragment from activity.
So why Bundle?
The reason is very simple - Bundle provides uniform way to handle:-- creating/opening fragment
-- reconfiguration (screen rotation) - just add initial/updated bundle to outState in onSaveInstanceState()
-- app restoration after being garbage collected in background (as with reconfiguration).
You can (if you like experiments) create a workaround in simple situations but Bundle-approach just doesn't see difference between one fragment and one thousand on a backstack - it stays simple and straightforward. That's why the answer by #Elenasys is the most elegant and universal solution. And that's why the answer given by #Martin has pitfalls

If an activity needs to make a fragment perform an action after initialization, the easiest way is by having the activity invoke a method on the fragment instance. In the fragment, add a method:
public class DemoFragment extends Fragment {
public void doSomething(String param) {
// do something in fragment
}
}
and then in the activity, get access to the fragment using the fragment manager and call the method:
public class MainActivity extends FragmentActivity {
#Override
public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
DemoFragment fragmentDemo = (DemoFragment)
getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentById(R.id.fragmentDemo);
fragmentDemo.doSomething("some param");
}
}
and then the activity can communicate directly with the fragment by invoking this method.

the better approach for sending data from activity class to fragment is passing via setter methods. Like
FragmentClass fragmentClass = new FragmentClass();
fragmentClass.setMyList(mylist);
fragmentClass.setMyString(myString);
fragmentClass.setMyMap(myMap);
and get these data from the class easily.

Use following interface to communicate between activity and fragment
public interface BundleListener {
void update(Bundle bundle);
Bundle getBundle();
}
Or use following this generic listener for two way communication using interface
/**
* Created by Qamar4P on 10/11/2017.
*/
public interface GenericConnector<T,E> {
T getData();
void updateData(E data);
void connect(GenericConnector<T,E> connector);
}
fragment show method
public static void show(AppCompatActivity activity) {
CustomValueDialogFragment dialog = new CustomValueDialogFragment();
dialog.connector = (GenericConnector) activity;
dialog.show(activity.getSupportFragmentManager(),"CustomValueDialogFragment");
}
you can cast your context to GenericConnector in onAttach(Context) too
in your activity
CustomValueDialogFragment.show(this);
in your fragment
...
#Override
public void onCreate(#Nullable Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
connector.connect(new GenericConnector() {
#Override
public Object getData() {
return null;
}
#Override
public void updateData(Object data) {
}
#Override
public void connect(GenericConnector connector) {
}
});
}
...
public static void show(AppCompatActivity activity, GenericConnector connector) {
CustomValueDialogFragment dialog = new CustomValueDialogFragment();
dialog.connector = connector;
dialog.show(activity.getSupportFragmentManager(),"CustomValueDialogFragment");
}
Note: Never use it like "".toString().toString().toString(); way.

just stumbled across this question, while most of the methods above will work.
I just want to add that you can use the Event Bus Library, especially in scenarios where the component (Activity or Fragment) has not been created, its good for all sizes of android projects and many use cases. I have personally used it in several projects i have on playstore.

You can create public static method in fragment where you will get static reference of that fragment and then pass data to that function and set that data to argument in same method and get data via getArgument on oncreate method of fragment, and set that data to local variables.

I ran into a similar issue while using the latest Navigation architecture component. Tried out all the above-mentioned code with passing a bundle from my calling activity to Fragment.
The best solution, following the latest development trends in Android, is by using View Model (part of Android Jetpack).
Create and Initialize a ViewModel class in the parent Activity, Please note that this ViewModel has to be shared between the activity and fragment.
Now, Inside the onViewCreated() of the fragment, Initialize the Same ViewModel and setup Observers to listen to the ViewModel fields.
Here is a helpful, in-depth tutorial if you need.
https://medium.com/mindorks/how-to-communicate-between-fragments-and-activity-using-viewmodel-ca733233a51c

Kotlin version:
In Activity:
val bundle = Bundle()
bundle.putBoolean("YourKey1", true)
bundle.putString("YourKey2", "YourString")
val fragment = YourFragment()
fragment.arguments = bundle
val fragmentTransaction = parentFragmentManager.beginTransaction()
fragmentTransaction.replace(R.id.your_container, fragment, fragment.toString())
fragmentTransaction.commit()
In the Fragment onCreate():
var value1 = arguments?.getBoolean("YourKey1", default true/false)
var value2 = arguments?.getString("YourKey2", "Default String")

Smartest tried and tested way of passing data between fragments and activity is to create a variables,example:
class StorageUtil {
public static ArrayList<Employee> employees;
}
Then to pass data from fragment to activity, we do so in the onActivityCreated method:
//a field created in the sending fragment
ArrayList<Employee> employees;
#Override
public void onActivityCreated(#Nullable Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onActivityCreated(savedInstanceState);
employees=new ArrayList();
//java 7 and above syntax for arraylist else use employees=new ArrayList<Employee>() for java 6 and below
//Adding first employee
Employee employee=new Employee("1","Andrew","Sam","1984-04-10","Male","Ghanaian");
employees.add(employee);
//Adding second employee
Employee employee=new Employee("1","Akuah","Morrison","1984-02-04","Female","Ghanaian");
employees.add(employee);
StorageUtil.employees=employees;
}
Now you can get the value of StorageUtil.employees from everywhere.
Goodluck!

My solution is to write a static method inside the fragment:
public TheFragment setData(TheData data) {
TheFragment tf = new TheFragment();
tf.data = data;
return tf;
}
This way I am sure that all the data I need is inside the Fragment before any other possible operation which could need to work with it.
Also it looks cleaner in my opinion.

You can make a setter method in the fragment. Then in the Activity, when you reference to the fragment, you call the setter method and pass it the data from you Activity

In your activity declare static variable
public static HashMap<String,ContactsModal> contactItems=new HashMap<String, ContactsModal>();
Then in your fragment do like follow
ActivityName.contactItems.put(Number,contactsModal);

Categories

Resources