Develop Reference

Call startSerice() from anywhere in the app code

I would like to automatically insert some crafted code to any possible parts of the target app code. This crafted code includes a "context.startService()" to contact with a remote service from another app. How can I automatically get this context instance so that I can call startService() from anywhere within the app code?
Thanks a lot in advance. Any inputs are highly appreciated.

If I understand correctly, you want to start a service from anywhere within your codebase without passing around context objects. The solution below is a way to do this but look at this post to get a better understanding of why this isn't always the best solution.
Create a class that extends from Application:
import android.app.Application;
public class MyApplication extends Application {
private static Application sInstance;
public MyApplication() {
sInstance = this;
}
public static Application getInstance() {
return sInstance;
}
}
This will give you access to your application's context so you can start a service from anywhere.
Now in some part of your code:
void foo() {
MyApplication.getInstance().startService(new Intent(MY_SERVICE));
}

create a new method, that gets your context, and then calls your service with said context, then call that method instead.
shouldnt change your code much....

Android Context without being in an activity? And other activity-less programming?

I'll try really hard to turn this into one comprehensive question:
I'm writing a method to get a String that contains the name of an Android device's city, as determined by the LocationManager and getLastKnownLocation() and all that.
Then I realized I'd need to do the same thing again in another activity, so why not just make an entirely separate class (LocationFinder) that I could use across my program, instead of writing duplicate code everywhere?
But I've run into problems that confuses me. For instance, if I make this class (LocationFinder), should it extend Activity, even though it is never actually visualized? All this class would do is have a variety of getters like getLastKnownCity() or getCurrentCity() and return strings. I assumed it wouldn't HAVE to extend the Activity class, since it's really not an activity.
But then what Context do I use for:
Geocoder geocoder = new Geocoder(Context context, Locale locale)
?
This made me assume it MUST be an activity. So I extended Activity, and replaced the constructor with
#Override
protected void onCreate(..............
but for some reason, that never ends up getting called, even when I put
String city = new LocationFinder().getLastKnownCity();
My very first line of LocationFinder's onCreate() is
System.out.println("HEY!")
and it never even gets to that. I get a null pointer at android.internal.os.LoggingPrintStream.println() and other stuff.
Plus, there's a bunch of system constants that come from Activity classes. For instance, I need to get at LOCATION_SERVICE, which is a String, which I can't get without extending Activity. Sure, I could cheat and just put in the literal string, but that feels wrong.

EDIT: If possible, use frogmanx's answer. This should only be used when his answer is not possible to use. (ie. singletons that need a context right off the bat.)
Sounds like you should extend Application and not Activity.
Make your Application something like this:
public class MyApplication extends Application {
private static MyApplication instance;
public MyApplication() {
instance = this;
}
public static MyApplication getInstance() {
return instance;
}
Then add this attribute to the application tag of the manifest:
<application android:name=".your.package.MyApplication" ... />
After all that, you can get a Context by calling MyApplication.getInstance() from anywhere.

When constructing your class, you can have a constructor that takes in a Context and assigns it a local Context object within your class.
public class LocationFinder {
private Context myContext;
private Geocoder geocoder;
public LocationFinder(Context context)
{
myContext = context;
geocoder = new Geocoder(myContext);
}
}
And then when you try to access this class, make sure you initialise it like:
public class TestActivity extends Activity {
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState)
{
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.main);
LocationFinder lFinder = new LocationFinder(getApplication());
}
}
Of course, you can't access a context from every class that you will be running. So a reference to a View can suffice.
LocationFinder lFinder = new LocationFinder(anyView.getApplication());

should it extend Activity, even though it is never actually visualized?
No. From the Android docs
An activity is a single, focused thing that the user can do. Almost
all activities interact with the user, so the Activity class takes
care of creating a window for you in which you can place your UI with
setContentView(View)
Think of an Activity as a screen the user sees.
But then what Context do I use for
Geocoder geocoder = new Geocoder(Context context, Locale locale)
The Activity class extends Context, as do a lot of other classes including Application. A context provides access to resources associated with the class which extends the context.
You only need, and should only use, an Activity context when required to interact with resources associated with that Activity and methods implemented by the concrete Activity class. When you do need that access to that context, then you would pass it to the class needing access, typically as an argument to a constructor of that class.
If you ever do pass an Activity context outside of the activity extending it, make sure that the scope and lifecycle of the reference is less than or equal to the extending activity otherwise you will leak large amounts of memory if the activity is destroyed since the garbage collector cannot free the memory since there is a reference to the context.
If you take a look at the constructor for Geocoder you will see that it takes a Context as an argument, as you know. There is a clue as to why the Context is needed in the description:
Geocoder(Context context, Locale locale)
Constructs a Geocoder whose responses will be localized for the given Locale. [1]:
The reason the Context is required is to gain access to system information about the platform locales and the current system locale.
So in your example, you could simply pass the Application context to the constructor, which you can get a reference to with getApplicationContext()
For instance, I need to get at LOCATION_SERVICE, which is a String, which I can't get without extending Activity
You can get it from the application context.

Access context from anywhere? Global context?

I have an application which need to access context in a lot of different classes all the time, for saving and serializing data, showing dialogs etc.
According to an article on the Android developer site, this causes memory leaks:
http://developer.android.com/resources/articles/avoiding-memory-leaks.html
What is the general approach for accessing context? Should a create a singelton class which holds one reference to context as soon as the app is started or what's the best approach?
Right now my methods look like this for instance
public void saveData(TheCassName classObject, Context context){
//do some stuff that involves context
}
And is called from wherever i need it.
Thanks!

Just to clear: There is no memory leak as context which is getting saved, is part of the application which is a process which will only get killed when the application will close.
Extend application in your app and then use the application context by
making static variable in that.
public class MyApp extends Application {
private static Context context;
public void onCreate() {
super.onCreate();
MyApp.context = getApplicationContext();
}
public static Context getAppContext() {
return MyApp.context;
}
}
You need to define application also in your manifest too.
<manifest>
<application android:name="com.abc.MyApp">
</application>
</manifest>

Try using application context instead of activity context. However, there are limitations on app context you should be aware of: When to call activity context OR application context?

Using objects obtained through android Context after the context is invalid

I have been working with android for a little while now and feel pretty comfortable with the platform, but I have gotten a little confused with the Lifecycle of Context Objects. Looking at the hierarchy it is easy to see that Activity and Service both extend Context, and while this is convenient, it is concerning. I have avoided making helper classes that need a shared resource have a static field holding a context (since just about all resources come through some interaction with a Context object) so that way when an activity is destroyed, the GC is free to free it at any time, but I am wondering about resources fetched from a Context.
For example, if I have a static field that holds a File inside of a class. Then make this class's constructor take the current context and assign the File a File resource fetched through the Context passed in, the do nothing else with the Context in my 2ndary class, am I still holding on in some way to the Context?
class testClass{
private static File someFile;
public testClass(Context context){
synchronized(testClass.class){
if(someFile!=null){
//even though I am holding a File, or a SharedPreference Object generated from this context, am I correctly preventing this utility class from holding the Activity object in memory for no reason?
someFile = context.openFileOutput("Some_File.txt", Context.MODE_PRIVATE);
}
}
}
}
I did just read about Context.getApplicationContext() (Sadly not static). It says it returns a context relative to the process and not the activity so if I need to keep a context around, use that one. But the question above still remains.

I remembered I asked this question and thought I would answer it.
Though there may be more kinds of contexts, the primary ones developers use are the Activity Context, and the Application Context (and other things like Service Context). The Activity context is created and destroyed with the activity, so it is not a good idea to use as a constant reference stored between activity creation and destruction. The Application Context doesn't have some of the things an Activity Context has, but everything you would want a static context reference for is there (file IO, preferences...). The application context is also created and destroyed with the application, so you can guarantee that as long as your application code is running, the context is valid.
Because of this, the Application context should be used for things like worker threads that may need a constant access point to a context but not need access to an activity. The best way I have learned to do this is to extend the android Application class. This class is created when the application is created in memory, and as soon as the Application onCreate method is called, the Application Context is valid. This means you can create a static function in your custom application class that gives access to the context.
public class CustomApplication extends Application {
private static Context context;
public void onCreate() {
super.onCreate();
context = getApplicationContext();
}
public Context getAppContext() {
return context;
};
}
The only other thing you need to make this work is a modification to your manifest file so android knows to use your application class instead of the default.
<application
android:icon="#drawable/icon"
android:label="#string/app_name"
android:name=".CustomApplication" >

Needing Context in non-Activity classes

I have some classes within my application that need to call Android functions that require the Context as a parameter.
I don't have it as the class is not a subclass of the Activity class.
What is the correct way to tackle this problem?
Pass it as a parameter on each call?
Pass it at class instantiation and keep it?

It depends on the role of the class. But anyway pass ApplicationContext but not Activity one. If you pass Activity context gc can't remove it from the memory when after you don't need activity anymore. But application context is used while application was not finished by OS.Refer Avoid Memory Leaks

Pass it as a parameter. Or better yet, get the application context to avoid memory leaks.
public class Example {
protected Context context;
public Example(Context context){
this.context = context.getApplicationContext();
}
}

I'm pretty much always going with a constructor parameter approach. I pass it in the instantiation and keep a private reference in the instantiated class.
You have to think about one important thing. If the class you pass the Context will exist longer than the Activity instantiating it then you should use the application context. If that class is doing UI stuff you will need an activity context.
Make sure that the class you are passing an activity context to won't last longer than the Activity or you'll leak the entire activity.
If you don't do UI stuff then go with the application context.

I pass it as a parameter, i think its de best form to do it

Pass it at class instantiation and keep it.
One typical example is when you create a db helper. See this link

I've answered this question here also.
You can do that using ContextWrapper, as described here.
For example:
public class MyContextWrapper extends ContextWrapper {
public MyContextWrapper(Context base) {
super(base);
}
}
and use that class as it were Context

The best way is to follow Bean approach:
public class Example {
protected Context getContext() {
...
}
...
}
Then it depends on possibilities to access context. If class is fully independent then constructor parameter and private field seems best approach.
But that bean property way shields you from further code changes.