Android - Proper way to wait for handler object to be created - android

Folks,
Here is a simplified code for my background thread:
public class MyThread extends Thread {
private Handler _handler;
public void run() {
Looper.prepare();
this._handler = new Handler();
Looper.loop();
}
public void DoSomething() {
if (!this.isAlive()) {
this.start();
}
this._handler.post(blah);
}
}
The problem I have is that the background thread may not have yet created the handler object when post() call is made. Essentially, I need a wait loop for the handler object to be initialized. What is generated accepted method of doing this under Android?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Regards,
Peter

You can set a flag after you initialize the Handler and wait for this flag before calling post.
An easy way to wait for a flag in a concurrent system is with a CountDownLatch. It would start at 1 and decrement after the Handler is initialized. Check out the details here:
http://download.oracle.com/javase/1,5,0/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/CountDownLatch.html

Related

Thread.sleep() vs handler.postDelay() to execute network call in every 30sec

I want perform a network call in every 30sec to push some metrics to Server. Currently I am doing it using thread.sleep(). I found some articles saying thread.sleep() has some drawbacks. I need to know am I doing it right? or Replacing the thread with Handler will improve my code?
public static void startSending(final Context con) {
if (running) return;
running = true;
threadToSendUXMetrics = new Thread(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
do {
try {
Thread.sleep(AugmedixConstants.glassLogsPushInterval);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
mLogger.error(interrupt_exception + e.getMessage());
}
// to do to send each time, should have some sleep code
if (AugmedixConstants.WEBAPP_URL.equals(AugmedixConstants.EMPTY_STRING)||!StatsNetworkChecker.checkIsConnected(con)) {
Utility.populateNetworkStat();
mLogger.error(may_be_provider_not_login_yet);
} else
sendUXMetrics();
} while (running);
if (!uxMetricsQueue.isEmpty()) sendUXMetrics();
}
});
threadToSendUXMetrics.start();
}
If You are using only one thread in the network, then usage of the thread.sleep() is fine. If there are multiple threads in synchronization, then the thread.sleep() command will block all the other threads that are currently running.
As per the details you've provided, there is only one thread present which isn't blocking any other active threads which are running in synchronization, so using thread.sleep() shouldn't be a problem.
Use Handler.postDelayed to schedule tasks if you are working in UI Thread and Thread.sleep if you are working in background thread.
Apparently you are sending some data using network, you must do it in the background thread, hence Thread.sleep is recommended.
Simple is:
Thread.sleep(millisSeconds): With this method, you only can call in background tasks, for example in AsyncTask::doInBackground(), you can call to delay actions after that. RECOMMENDED CALL THIS METHOD IN BACKGROUND THREAD.
Handler().postDelayed({METHOD}, millisSeconds): With this instance, METHOD will trigged after millisSeconds declared.
But, to easy handle life cycle of Handler(), you need to declare a Handler() instance, with a Runnable instance. For example, when your Activity has paused or you just no need call that method again, you can remove callback from Handler(). Below is example:
public class MainActivity extends Activity {
private Handler mHandler = Handler();
public void onStart(...) {
super.onStart(...)
this.mHandler.postDelayed(this.foo, 1000)
}
public void onPaused(...) {
this.mHandler.removeCallback(this.foo)
super.onPaused(...)
}
private Runnable foo = new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// your code will call after 1 second when activity start
// end remove callback when activity paused
// continue call...
mHandler.postDelayed(foo, 1000)
}
}
}
The code above just for reference, I type by hand because don't have IDE to write then copy paste.

handler.postDelayed is not working in onHandleIntent method of IntentService

final Handler handler = new Handler();
LOG.d("delay");
handler.postDelayed(new Runnable() {
#Override public void run() {
LOG.d("notify!");
//calling some methods here
}
}, 2000);
The "delay" does shows in the log, but not others at all. And the method called in the run() is not called at all also. Can anyone help explain why this happens, am I doing anything wrong?
The class that has this code extends IntentService, will this be a problem?
============================
UPDATE:
I put this code in the class that extends IntentService. The only place I found it worked was in the constructor. But I need to put it in the onHandleIntent method. So I checked the documentation for onHandleIntent and it said:
This method is invoked on the worker thread with a request to process.Only one Intent is processed at a time, but the processing happens on a worker thread that runs independently from other application logic. So, if this code takes a long time, it will hold up other requests to the same IntentService, but it will not hold up anything else. When all requests have been handled, the IntentService stops itself, so you should not call stopSelf.
So based on the result I get, I feel like I cannot use postDelayed in "worker thread". But can anyone explain this a bit more, like why this is not working in worker thread? Thanks in advance.
Convert
final Handler handler = new Handler();
to
final Handler handler = new Handler(Looper.getMainLooper());
This worked for me.
You are using looper of the main thread. You must create a new looper and then give it to your handler.
HandlerThread handlerThread = new HandlerThread("background-thread");
handlerThread.start();
final Handler handler = new Handler(handlerThread.getLooper());
handler.postDelayed(new Runnable() {
#Override public void run() {
LOG.d("notify!");
// call some methods here
// make sure to finish the thread to avoid leaking memory
handlerThread.quitSafely();
}
}, 2000);
Or you can use Thread.sleep(long millis).
try {
Thread.sleep(2000);
// call some methods here
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
If you want to stop a sleeping thread, use yourThread.interrupt();
this is how i use handler:
import android.os.Handler;
Handler handler;
//initialize handler
handler = new Handler();
//to start handler
handler.post(runnableName);
private Runnable runnableName= new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
//call function, do something
handler.postDelayed(runnableName, delay);//this is the line that makes a runnable repeat itself
}
};
Handlers and Services will be predictable when the device screen is on.
If the devices goes to sleep for example the Handler will not be a viable solution.
A much more better and reliable solution will be to use:
AlarmManager alarmManager = (AlarmManager) getSystemService(Context.ALARM_SERVICE);
IntentService is not designed for such scenario. You can use a regular Service instead. You can put the handler inside the onStartCommand(). Don't forget to
call stopSelf() on the Service instance to shut it down after the handler.postDelayed(){}
The most simple is to wait before ending onHandleIntent():
SystemClock.sleep(2000);

Android Inception (A thread within a thread)

I have one function which queries a network server with a few "ping pongs" back and forth, and have written a custom handler to handle the message communication between my main UI thread and the communication thread (I was using AsyncTask for this, but as the program got more complex, I have decided to remove the communication code to its own class outside of the main activity).
Triggering a single instance of this thread communication from onCreate works perfectly, no problem.
I want this query to run on a regular timed basis -- in the background -- for the entire time the app is in use, so I've set up another thread called pollTimer, which I'm trying to use to call the OTHER thread at a regularly scheduled basis.
Obviously, it's crashing, or I wouldn't be posting this.
Is there a way to get a thread within a thread? Or put differently, trigger a thread from another thread?
Timer pollTimer = new Timer();
private void startPollTimer(){
pollTimer.scheduleAtFixedRate(new TimerTask(){
public void run(){
Log.d(TAG,"timer dinged");
//if the following is commented out, this "dings" every 6 seconds.
//if its not commented out, it crashes
threadedPoll();
}
}, 3120, 6000);
}
private void threadedPoll() {
testThread(asciiQueries,WorkerThreadRunnable.typeLogin);
}
edit: it would probably help to include the "testThread" function, which works by itself when called from onCreate, but does not make it when called from the Timer.
"WorkerThreadRunnable" is the massive chunk of code in its own class that has replaced the mess of having AsyncTask handle it inside the main activity.
private Handler runStatHandler = null;
Thread workerThread = null;
private void testThread(String[] threadCommands, int commandType){
if(runStatHandler == null){
runStatHandler = new ReportStatusHandler(this);
if(commandType == WorkerThreadRunnable.typeLogin){
workerThread = new Thread(new WorkerThreadRunnable(runStatHandler,threadCommands, WorkerThreadRunnable.typeLogin));
}
workerThread.start();
return;
}
//thread is already there
if(workerThread.getState() != Thread.State.TERMINATED){
Log.d(TAG,"thread is new or alive, but not terminated");
}else{
Log.d(TAG, "thread is likely deaad, starting now");
//there's no way to resurrect a dead thread
workerThread = new Thread(new WorkerThreadRunnable(runStatHandler));
workerThread.start();
}
}
You seem to be well on the way already - the nice thing about handlers, though, is that they aren't limited to the UI thread - so if you have a Handler declared by one thread, you can set it up to take asynchronous instructions from another thread
mWorkerThread = new WorkerThread()
private class WorkerThread extends Thread {
private Handler mHandler;
#Override
public void run() {
mHandler = new Handler(); // we do this here to ensure that
// the handler runs on this thread
}
public void doStuff() {
mHandler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// do stuff asynchronously
}
}
}
}
Hopefully that helps... if I'm totally off base on your problem let me know
Wots wrong with a sleep() loop? Why do you have pagefuls of complex, dodgy code when you could just loop in one thread?

Update textView from thread

In my OnCreate method I have created a thread that listens to incoming message!
In OnCreate() {
//Some code
myThread = new Thread() {
#Override
public void run() {
receiveMyMessages();
}
};
myThread.start();
// Some code related to sending out by pressing button etc.
}
Then, receiveMyMessage() functions…
Public void receiveMyMessage()
{
//Receive the message and put it in String str;
str = receivedAllTheMessage();
// << here I want to be able to update this str to a textView. But, How?
}
I checked this article but it did not work for me, no luck!
Any updates to the UI in an Android application must happen in the UI thread. If you spawn a thread to do work in the background you must marshal the results back to the UI thread before you touch a View. You can use the Handler class to perform the marshaling:
public class TestActivity extends Activity {
// Handler gets created on the UI-thread
private Handler mHandler = new Handler();
// This gets executed in a non-UI thread:
public void receiveMyMessage() {
final String str = receivedAllTheMessage();
mHandler.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// This gets executed on the UI thread so it can safely modify Views
mTextView.setText(str);
}
});
}
The AsyncTask class simplifies a lot of the details for you and is also something you could look into. For example, I believe it provides you with a thread pool to help mitigate some of the cost associated with spawning a new thread each time you want to do background work.
Android supports message-passing concurrency using handlers and sendMessage(msg). (It is also possible to use handlers for shared-memory concurrency.) One tip is to call thread.setDaemon(true) if you wish the thread to die when the app dies. The other tip is to have only one handler and use message.what and a switch statement in the message handler to route messages.
Code and Code

Handler fails to deliver a message or a Runnable to the main thread

I have an app with a two threads - main and data loader. When data loader finishes it posts a Runnable object to the main thread (as described in the DevGuide), but it never gets delivered and run.
Here's the basic code:
class MyApp extends Application
{
public void onCreate()
{
LoaderThread t = new LoaderThread();
t.start();
}
private class LoaderThread extends Thread
{
public void run()
{
SystemClock.sleep(2000);
boolean res = m_handler.post(m_runnable);
if(res)
Log.d(TAG, "Posted Runnable");
}
}
private final Handler m_handler = new Handler();
private final Runnable m_runnable = new Runnable() {
public void run()
{
Log.d(TAG, "Hey, i'm runnable!");
}
}
}
Also it maybe important to note that I ran this code as a unit-test derived from an ApplicationTestCase:
class MyAppTest : public ApplicationTestCase
{
public MyAppTest()
{
super(MyApp.class);
}
public void testLoading()
{
createApplication();
// few asserts follow here...
}
}
So this fails. Runnable never gets run() called, although the log indicates that it has been posted successfully.
I also tried to send simple messages instead of posting runnable (m_handler.sendEmptyMessage(1) for example) - they never get delivered to handler's callback in the main thread.
What do I miss here?
Thanks in advance :)
A Handler requires a Looper in order to work. The Looper provides a message queue required by the Handler.
All instances of Activity have a Looper as one is used to process UI Events, but you can create your instance of Looper elsewhere.
Have a look in your Log output to see if Android is complaining about the absence of a Looper.
If it is, you might be able to fix by add the following to the top of your onCreate() method:
Looper.prepare();
m_handler = new Handler();
Looper.run();
And remove the initialisation of m_handler from later in your code.
Handler only works in an Activity AFAIK. You are attempting to use it in an Application.
An alternative to calling Looper.prepare() is to call new Handler(Looper.getMainLooper()). The problem with calling Looper.prepare() is that it will throw an exception when there is already a looper on your thread. Chances are you are writing code that has to run under different environments and this solution will handle more cases.
See:
AsyncTask and Looper.prepare() error

Categories

Resources