Grabbing consecutive frames in android using opencv - android

I am trying to grab consecutive frames from android using opencv VideoCapture class. Actually I want to implement optical flow on android for which i need 2 frames. I implemented optical flow in C first where I grabbed the frames using using cvQueryFrame and every thing work fine. But in android when I call
if(capture.grab())
{
if(capture.retrieve(mRgba))
Log.i(TAG, "first frame retrived");
}
if(capture.grab())
{
if(capture.retrieve(mRgba2))
Log.i(TAG, "2nd frame retrived");
}
and then subtract the matrices using Imgproc.subtract(mRgba,mRgba2,output) and then display the output it give me black image indicating that mRgba and mRgba2 are image frames with same data. Can any one help how to grab two different images. According to opencv documentation mRgba and mRgba2 should be different.

This question is an exact duplicate of
read successive frames OpenCV using cvQueryframe
You have to copy the image to another memory block, because the capture always returns the same pointer.

Related

Opencv findContours in Android seems much slower than findContours in Python. Do you have any suggestion to improve algorithm speed?

it's the first time for me that I ask help here. I will try to be as precise as possible in my question.
I am trying to develop a shape detection app for Android.
I first identified the algorithm which works for my case playing with Python. Basically for each frame I do this:
hsv = cv2.cvtColor(frame, cv2.COLOR_BGR2HSV)
mask = cv2.inRange(hsv, lower_color, upper_color)
contours, _ = cv2.findContours(mask, cv2.RETR_TREE, cv2.CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE)
for cnt in contours:
#here I filter my results
by this algorithm I am able to run the analysis realtime on videos having a frame rate of 120fps.
So I tryied to implement the same algorithm on Android Studio, doing the following for each Frame:
Imgproc.cvtColor(frameInput, tempFrame, Imgproc.COLOR_BGR2HSV);
Core.inRange(tempFrame,lowColorRoi,highColorRoi,tempFrame);
List<MatOfPoint> contours1 = new ArrayList<MatOfPoint>();
Imgproc.findContours(tempFrame /*.clone()*/, contours1, new Mat(), Imgproc.RETR_TREE, Imgproc.CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE);
for(MatOfPoint c : contours1){
//here I filter my results
}
and I see that only the findContour function takes 5-600ms to be performed at each iteration (I noticed that it takes also more using tempFrame.clone()), allowing more or less to run the analysis with only 2fps.
This speed is not acceptable at all of course. Do you have any suggestion about how to improve this speed? 30-40fps would be already a good target for me.
I will really appreciate any help from you all. Many thanks in advance.
I would suggest trying to do your shape analysis on a lower resolution version of the image, if that is acceptable. I often see directly proportional timing with number of pixels of the image and the number of channels of the image - so if you can halve the width and height it could be a 4 times performance improvement. If that works, likely the first thing to do is a resize, then all subsequent calls have a smaller burden.
Next, be careful using OpenCV in Java/Kotlin because there is a definite cost to marshalling over the JNI interface. You could write the majority of your code in native C++, and then make just a single call across JNI to a C++ function that handles all of the shape analysis at once.

Take photo and record video of real-time face detection preview

I have used JavaCv (and opencv too) to implement live face detection preview on Android. I work ok. Now I want to take a picture or record a video from live preview which have face detection (I mean when I take a picture, this picture will have a person and a rectangle around his/her face). I have researched a lot but get no result. Can anyone help me please !!!
What you're looking for is the imwrite() method.
Since your question isn't clear on the use-case, I'll give a generic algorithm, as shown:
imwrite writes a specified Mat object to a file and it accepts 2 arguments - fileName and Mat object, for example - imwrite('output.jpg',img);
Here's the logic you can follow:
Receive input frame (Mat input from video and run face detection using your existing method.
Draw a rectangle on an output image (Mat output).
Use imwrite as - imwrite('face.jpg',output)
In case you want to record all the frames with a face in them, replace 'face.jpg' with a string variable that is updated with each loop iteration and run imwrite in a loop
If you wish to record a video. Have a look at VideoWriter() class

How to improve OpenCV face detection performance in android?

I am working on a project in android in which i am using OpenCV to detect faces from all the images which are in the gallery. The process of getting faces from the images is performing in the service. Service continuously working till all the images are processed. It is storing the detected faces in the internal storage and also showing in the grid view if activity is opened.
My code is:
CascadeClassifier mJavaDetector=null;
public void getFaces()
{
for (int i=0 ; i<size ; i++)
{
File file=new File(urls.get(i));
imagepath=urls.get(i);
defaultBitmap=BitmapFactory.decodeFile(file, bitmapFatoryOptions);
mJavaDetector = new CascadeClassifier(FaceDetector.class.getResource("lbpcascade_frontalface").getPath());
Mat image = new Mat (defaultBitmap.getWidth(), defaultBitmap.getHeight(), CvType.CV_8UC1);
Utils.bitmapToMat(defaultBitmap,image);
MatOfRect faceDetections = new MatOfRect();
try
{
mJavaDetector.detectMultiScale(image,faceDetections,1.1, 10, 0, new Size(20,20), new Size(image.width(), image.height()));
}
catch(Exception e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
if(faceDetections.toArray().length>0)
{
}
}
}
Everything is fine but it is detection faces very slow. The performance is very slow. When i debug the code then i found the line which is taking time is:
mJavaDetector.detectMultiScale(image,faceDetections,1.1, 10, 0, new Size(20,20), new Size(image.width(), image.height()));
I have checked multiple post for this problem but i didn't get any solution.
Please tell me what should i do to solve this problem.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
You should pay attention to the parameters of detectMultiScale():
scaleFactor – Parameter specifying how much the image size is reduced at each image scale. This parameter is used to create a scale pyramid. It is necessary because the model has a fixed size during training. Without pyramid the only size to detect would be this fix one (which can be read from the XML also). However the face detection can be scale-invariant by using multi-scale representation i.e., detecting large and small faces using the same detection window.
scaleFactor depends on the size of your trained detector, but in fact, you need to set it as high as possible while still getting "good" results, so this should be determined empirically.
Your 1.1 value can be a good value for this purpose. It means, a relative small step is used for resizing (reduce size by 10%), you increase the chance of a matching size with the model for detection is found. If your trained detector has the size 10x10 then you can detect faces with size 11x11, 12x12 and so on. But in fact a factor of 1.1 requires roughly double the # of layers in the pyramid (and 2x computation time) than 1.2 does.
minNeighbors – Parameter specifying how many neighbours each candidate rectangle should have to retain it.
Cascade classifier works with a sliding window approach. By applying this approach, you slide a window through over the image than you resize it and search again until you can not resize it further. In every iteration the true outputs (of cascade classifier) are stored but unfortunately it actually detects many false positives. And to eliminate false positives and get the proper face rectangle out of detections, neighbourhood approach is applied. 3-6 is a good value for it. If the value is too high then you can lose true positives too.
minSize – Regarding to the sliding window approach of minNeighbors, this is the smallest window that cascade can detect. Objects smaller than that are ignored. Usually cv::Size(20, 20) are enough for face detections.
maxSize – Maximum possible object size. Objects bigger than that are ignored.
Finally you can try different classifiers based on different features (such as Haar, LBP, HoG). Usually, LBP classifiers are a few times faster than Haar's, but also less accurate.
And it is also strongly recommended to look over these questions:
Recommended values for OpenCV detectMultiScale() parameters
OpenCV detectMultiScale() minNeighbors parameter
Instead reading images as Bitmap and then converting them to Mat via using Utils.bitmapToMat(defaultBitmap,image) you can directly use Mat image = Highgui.imread(imagepath); You can check here for imread() function.
Also, below line takes too much time because the detector is looking for faces with at least having Size(20, 20) which is pretty small. Check this video for visualization of face detection using OpenCV.
mJavaDetector.detectMultiScale(image,faceDetections,1.1, 10, 0, new Size(20,20), new Size(image.width(), image.height()));

How add frame around video

I'm developing app in which I need to create video with frame around it. So, basically i get video throuh standart camera and then I need to add frame around it. On the picture my video needs to be instead of blue area;
I have already read a tons of information about video processing and post-processing, opencv, ffmpeg etc. Does anyone knows how I can achieve this ?
After many hours I found only one solution - to use ffmpeg. You can build it and use through android jni. In my case I used executable ffmpeg file. In OnCreate I'm installing it from raw and then using its functions. (There are many solutions in the internet and on the StackOverflow about ffmpeg commands)
This is very simple.
Try to understand what I have written.
PImage frame, temp;
void setup()
{
/*Display your frame here*/
frame = get(); // this will capture the screen
}
void movieEvent(Movie m)
{
m.read();
frame.copy(m, 0, 0, m.width, m.height, Xbluestart, Ybluestart, Xblueend, Yblueend);
}
void draw()
{
Image(frame, 0, 0);
}
I think this would slove your problem.
P.S. instead of writing Xbluestart or Xblueend; write the co-ordinates of blue rectangle in there.

Parallel image detection and camera preview OpenCV Android

I'm using OpenCV to detect an image. Here is my problem: my function detect_image(mRgba) needs some time to perform operations and give some results. While function is computing camera preview is frozen because it only shows image when code reaches return inputFrame.rgba() I would like to know how to make those operation parallel, function will be computing in a background while camera preview is working with normal speed.
public Mat onCameraFrame(CvCameraViewFrame inputFrame) {
mRgba = inputFrame.rgba();
detect_image(mRgba);
return inputFrame.rgba();
}
To just get a taste at parallelization, the simple approach would be to just use an AsyncTask to process your images:
AsyncTask reference page
A more friendly introduction can be found here:
http://android-developers.blogspot.co.il/2010/07/multithreading-for-performance.html
while this:
http://developer.att.com/developer/forward.jsp?passedItemId=11900176
is a nice all-around introduction to multi-threading on Android.
If you want to just get started, a simple algorithm should work like this:
from within your "onCameraFrame" method check if you have an AsyncThread for processing the image which is already running
if the answer is "yes", just show mRgba in the preview window and return
if the answer is "no" start a new AsyncThread and let it run "detectImage" on mRgba, making sure that the results are saved in the onPostExecute method.
With this algorithm, if your system can detect 4 images per second while taking a preview at 60fps (for example), you will be able to get a smooth video with a new result about each 20-30 frames on a single processor device, under the realistic assumption that detect_image is CPU intensive while the camera preview/display are I/O intensive.
Capture: x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x....
Processing: 1.......1.......1.......1.....1.......1....
time ------------------------------------>
Starting with HoneyComb, a more refined approach would be to account for the number of cores in your CPU (multicore phones/tablets are becoming increasingly common) and start N AsyncTask in parallel (one for each core), feeding a different preview image to each one (maybe using a thread pool...).
If you separate each thread by a fixed delay (about the duration of detectImage/N ), you should get a constant stream of results with a frequency that should be a multiple of the single threaded version.
Capture: x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x....
Processing: 1.2.3.4.1.2.3.4.1.2.3.4.1.2.3.4.1.2.3.4....
time ------------------------------------>
Hope this helps

Categories

Resources