I'm in the process of developing an android game within a group of people. Our knowledge is very limited. As a part of the game it will be essential for us to have the continuous possibility for updates. To give some context; this will be a pirate based game where by people can go around and dig for treasure on a map. Friends have to be updated when treasure is retrieved and when new treasure is buried.
Rather than setting a time period to send out a request for any changes on the server, we thought it might be good if the server could just push out changes if they occur.
Does this a) Sound like a good idea for what we'll be updating? and if yes, b) What would be the simplest way of implementing this? / If it is not simple should we stick with the first idea of just sending requests every so often?
What I know about implementing a server push is faking the server push. There are two ways of doing this. One is continuous polling to the server asking for any updates. But when the polling rate is high it will take much network traffic and also will make your application slow. Other way of doing it is to block the client call from the server. When ever a client makes a call to the server, if there is nothing to return server just block that request ( inside a while loop). When ever server has something to return, loop will break and reply the update. But if your network connection is bad you cant do this easily.
Related
Though as a beginner, I am trying to develop an android app which is story based, i will like to know the best way to serve content to the user, i mean like a continuous update of content, just like updating news by the hour. As users will install just once, how will they get the latest content of my news or story based app.
I have access to domain names and hosting if it requires uploading such content through a domain.
from your experience, what is the best method to achieve this? I humbly await a response, thanks
So given the clarification in the comments this is the answer:
The best way is PUSHING the content to the user's device.
Generally speaking, the two ways for a new content to reach an app are :
1.polling your server (or any third-party server) for new data every,say, 20 minutes. The disadvantage of this method is that it drains the battery. Every time that the phone connects to the internet, the radio in that phone stays on (or in a standby mode) for something like 2 minutes. Those modes (on and standby) drain the battery. Another problem is that it does use data needlessly and in some countries cellular data is expensive (Canada for example).
This could be a solution if the data changes very very frequently (for example a stock's price can change many many times a day). But generally speaking method 2 is the preferred method..
2.Pushing the content to the user's phone.
Your server will send a message to the device once new data that you want to send is there (and you could also put that data in the payload of the message if it's not too much).
This means that the phone will connect only when some new data is available.
Saves battery life,and gets the information as soon as it is available!
I recommend using GCM (Google Cloud Messaging) for this purpose which is free, and simple to use. If you have no idea how to do that in Android (which is likely since you said that you are a beginner), it is explained really well in Udacity's
Advanced Android App Development. It is a free course by Udacity and Google, but the section about GCM is only about 15 minutes long.
If you know how to implement a server but don't know how to use GCM in your server (and you don't find Google's documentation helpful) do let me know..
If you don't know how to implement a server...well then it's something you will have to learn in order to get your content to your users as that's the best way.
I hope this helps! :)
I have an application with list of data that I get from server with http request. Now I want to make a notification when new data is available and I assume that it can be achieved with service.
Is that a good practice? Is there any limitations for number of requests made from service?
What I want to achieve is something like gmail application. When I get a new email, notification is shown.
I want my app to be as up to date with data as possible, but I understand that making requests every 5 seconds might be too much.
I am open to all alternatives and various ideas how to do that.
Not sure if you really need to pull data every 5 seconds. Of course, it is too much. You have two options:
Use GCM as #duynt suggested in comment. Follow Try cloud messaging for Android if you've never used it. This way you don't need to worry managing your service locally but whenever there is a latest data available, you will get notification so you can place request to get that and update in notification.
GCM needs An application server that you must implement in your environment. This application server sends data to a client app via the chosen GCM connection server, using the appropriate XMPP or HTTP protocol. Take a quick look About GCM connection server.
For any reason if you would like to pull data from your local Android Service component, you can still do that. But 5 seconds frequency is really high. As majority of the times the device is in sleep mode, you have to wake up the device then send request to pull data. Waking up device every 5 seconds means a battery drain along with consuming data.
If you still want to proceed with local service option by increasing the frequency, make sure you follow How to use http in sleep mode and implement it that way otherwise it wont work in deep sleep mode.
You have to make a decision now.
I am writing the app that can chat with other. I saw some project : Parse, GCM,... It is exactly good. But I need to know how it work. Because want to use my own.
In my case, I saw when other send his chat, then it's almost display on my screen after 1-2 seconds. Then I think what happened:
My friend post his chat to server, and server send request to app with ID ( unique).
In my app, there have a service, which send request to this server each 1 second to get new chat, or notification. If found, display in my device.
Is my above ideal true? I am going to write about chat with client-server.
Give me reason why down vote.
Thanks :)
In my app, there have a service, which send request to this server each 1 second to get new chat, or notification. If found, display in my device.
Implement as you say lead to energy(own app services use)/IO(every net request each 1 second)/server(large amount request from clients, and most of request is useless because nobody chat in 24h) waste, and message may lost or can't get notification in time if the service is killed by system(or don't start).
However, your method will work if you find a way to keep your service always alive, and make well design for servers to support large amount requests from large multi clients.
For the better, you can use dynamic look-up algorithm that keep a long interval if there is no notification recently.
For one of the screens in my android application, I need to listen to server indeterminately - ie; I have few fields in the screen whose values change continuously so long the screen is kept open. The values to be updated will be provided by the server continuously. I understand that normal http connection would not be a solution here. Also, I do not wish to make continuous http requests owing to performance reasons. What is the best way out in order to accomplish this.Is GCM Cloud Connection Server a good solution for my requirement. Or are there better solutions? Please advise.
Any help is much appreciated.
I think there are a two options. If you don't own the server yourself I would start a service to run in the background and bind to it. The service would poll the server at some time interval depending upon how often you want the values to update. The activity would then receive periodic updates and update the views. Given that the information that you're updating is really not all that large, updates every 30s to a minute wouldn't take a toll on performance at all since all of the work would be done in an asynchronous task.
Using an AlarmManager to accomplish this.
If you own the server then you could implement the GCM model, and only send updates when data changes. This is assuming that every user of the app would get the same set of updates of course.
Introduction to GCM
Keeping screen on could be battery consuming. If you own the server the changes can be pushed to the app using the GCM service.
As far as I understand, GCM bundles push messages from several server trying to push the messages together and hence is an optimised way to communicate.
Alternatively, you can bring up a server which can keep polling the original server and push the changes to the app through GCM.
Recently google introduced push-to-device service, but it's only available 2.2 and up.
I need a similar system in my app, and I'm trying to get around limitations.
The issue is battery life. Since the user must be notified immediately about the changes on the server, I thought to implement a service that would live in the background (standard Android service) and query the server for updates.
Of course, querying the server, even each second, will cost a lot of bandwidth, as well as battery, so my question is this: does it make a difference if the server is holding the response for some period of time? (the idea behind Comet type ajax request)
Works like this:
Device sends request for data update
Server gets the request and goes in the loop for one minute, checking if there are updates on each iteration
If there are updates, server sends response back with updates
If not, service goes on to the next iteration.
After a minute, it finally sends the response that no data is yet available
After response (no matter whether empty or with data) Android fires another such request.
It will definitely cost less bandwidth, but will it consume less (or even more) battery?
Holding a TCP socket (and consequently waiting for an HTTP response) as you suggest is probably going to be your best option. What you've described is actually already implemented via HTTP continuation requests. Have a look at the Bayeux protocol for HTTP push notifications. Also, check out the Android implementation here. For what it's worth, that's definitely what I would use. I haven't done any sort of analysis of it, but this allows you to minimize the amount of data transmitted over the line (which is directly proportional to the power consumption) by allowing the connection to hang for as long as possible.
In short, the way Bayeux works is very similar to what you've suggested. The client opens a request and the server waits on it. If it has something to send, it sends it otherwise it simply waits. Eventually, the request will timeout. At that point, the client makes another request. What you attain is near instantaneous push to the client from the server without constant polling and duplication of information like HTTP headers, etc.
When the phone is actively using the networks, it's battery is used more. That is to say when it sends the request and when it receives the response. It will also be using battery just by listening for a response. However, will the phone download data, checking to see if there's a response? Or will the phone just be open to receiving it and the server will push the response out to the phone? That is mainly what it depends on. If the phone is just open to receiving the response but does not actually use the network while trying to download some response the whole time it's waiting, it should use less battery.
Additionally, the phone sending a query every minute instead of every second definitely uses less battery, as far as using the networks goes. However it depends on how you make the phone hold, if you tie it up with very complex logic to make it wait it may not help battery life. That's probably not the case, however, and I would say that in all likelihood this would work out for you.
In closing, it should help the battery but there are ways you could make it in which it would not. It wouldn't hurt to write the program and then just change some type of variable (for example WAIT_TIME to 1 second instead of 1 minute) and test battery usage though, would it?