I created a simple Android project out of my curiosity. It contains two modules: app and lib. Each module has its own package name. I created one string resource in the lib module and one string resource in the app module. Like this:
<string name="my_str">my_str_from_lib</string>
<string name="my_str">my_str_from_app</string>
Then I set the texts to two TextViews in the app module:
fromLib.text = resources.getString(ru.maksim.sample.lib1.R.string.my_str) // here I expected to see the string from the lib.
fromApp.text = resources.getString(R.string.my_str)
In both cases it was my_str_from_app
I ran Lint and thought it would detect the fact of resource overriding. But it didn't.
Is there a chance to detect this situation? Not necessarily with Lint. Other tools suit me too.
Well you can do a global search in your root folder. Find all instances of my_str and make sure its only the string.xml in your app that uses it as name.
The answer here is a script that parses a resulting XML to which all the string from the main app module and all its libraries are merged and finds all the duplicates.
I have an Android project that I'm trying to make into a library. I get an exception thrown on this code:
_buttonStart = (Button) findViewById(R.id.buttonStart);
The exception I get is:
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: com.xxx.libraryname.R$id.buttonStart
The Android docs seem to explicitly say that the library should be able to access those resources:
"For example, source code in the library project can access its own resources through its R class."
When I look in the library's /gen/com.xxx.libraryname/R.java/R/id/, buttonStart is there. But when I look in the main project's /gen/com.xxx.libraryname/R.java/R/id, it isn't.
I've done a make clean.
Your library project also has same name layout main.xml as your main project.
Android will give priority to host project if both have the same Layout name, in this case "main.xml" Best approach is to use some prefix notation so there are no accidental collisions.
I have an Android library MyLib containing everything I need for my app (targeting Android 2.2). This library has an XML resource:
drawable/main_background.xml
In my Application MyApp project I reference MyLib. Here I want to override specific resources (i.e. branding). So I added a background image in MyApp:
drawable/main_background.png
Eclipse keeps giving me this error:
[com.mycom.mylib.myapp] res\drawable\main_background.xml:0: error: Resource entry main_background is already defined.
[com.mycom.mylib.myapp] res\drawable\main_background.png:0: Originally defined here.
How can I override the resource in the library project?
You cannot simply override resource ID (it's the resource ID you are overriding, not the actual file) with a file with different extension in Android SDK. However, you can do the trick by putting in your project xml file with the same name (main_background.xml) and fill it in a proper way to display your new file (main_background.png), which you need to rename earlier. All syntax you need is descibed here:
http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/resources/drawable-resource.html
, in your case it could be simply (assuming you put this in your non-library project as main_background.xml, and you have your new png as main_background_new.png):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<bitmap
xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:src="#drawable/main_background_new" />
With above solution, you could refer to #drawable/main_background from your project and it should use your file included with that project, instead of a library one.
[com.mycom.mylib.myapp] res\drawable\main_background.xml:0: error: Resource entry main_background is already defined.
[com.mycom.mylib.myapp] res\drawable\main_background.png:0: Originally defined here.
I don't believe you can have the same file name even with different extensions. Try naming the png something else.
Now, i've not used overriding, So this seems odd as you'd expect this to be how you override the asset. However i think you've either got the two assets in your lib named the same. And that in your project it might be ok to have an asset with the same name. I would however check that its ok to have different types. XML is different than png, and if you access the asset from code you could get type errors.
Let me clarify the above point. I understand that a library project can have an item with the same Resource ID as an item in your application.
However the error above suggests that both main_background.png and main_background.xml are in the same project ([com.mycom.mylib.myapp]) which i don't believe is correct.
Further reading
This page describes the various types of project including the library project http://developer.android.com/tools/projects/index.html
Now i don't know where i got the impression from but having looked again it simply doesn't state anywhere that you can override a resource by using the same resource name. God knows why i thought that was a feature.
So no, the same rule applies as far as i can tell, that resources have to be named uniquely even across library projects, otherwise the generated resource ids will conflict. (The error your getting)
What is explained is how resource conflicts are managed.
Resource conflicts Since the tools merge the resources of a library
project with those of a dependent application project, a given
resource ID might be defined in both projects. In this case, the tools
select the resource from the application, or the library with highest
priority, and discard the other resource. As you develop your
applications, be aware that common resource IDs are likely to be
defined in more than one project and will be merged, with the resource
from the application or highest-priority library taking precedence.
The system will use the resource with the highest priority, discarding everything else. Whats odd, is that you would think that a compile error wouldn't occur as the compiler should be discarding the resource. This makes me believe that the original poster had the similarly named assets in the same project, and not across the lib and project.
I haven't read anywhere that this is actually an intended feature. Got any links to say otherwise? (comment them)
So one 'solution' to this problem, which I do not consider to be an answer is the following:
Define an XML document in the library in question (we'll call it bunny.xml), and have it refer to another xml of a similar name (bunny_drawn.xml) with the actual content to be displayed.
Then, in the target project, override bunny.xml with another and use it to refer to an image with a different name instead - bunny_image.png
This does not however solve the problem, firstly because we aren't technically overriding a png with an xml (although the effect is somewhat close to that). Secondly because one of the key features of overriding resources is they are overridden, i.e. they are NOT compiled into the APK:
the tools ensure that the resource declared in the application gets
priority and that the resource in the library project is not compiled
into the application .apk
But the bunny_drawn.xml will still be compiled in! We can sort-of overcome the second point, by not only defining the image to be replaced in the target APP, but also replacing the old target bunny_drawn.xml with a blank xml. (or, as Fenix pointed out, you can have the contents of bunny_drawn.xml inside bunny.xml in the first case - the fact still remains that the resource ID can't be replaced...)
So my final conclusion is that this need to be submitted as a bug in the Developer Tools.
I have a question about inheriting resources from android libraries.
Assume you have an android library project and in that library you put some resources (let's say strings for the moment) under the package name com.libexample
Now in an android project under the package name com.example, I reference the library I created earlier.
If I want to use one of the strings of the library I can get it by using
getString(com.libexample.R.string.test_string);
My question is, is it possible for a string resource in my main project to get assigned the same integer ID as a string in my library? Cause if it is, then the above code statement would in fact be equal to :
getString(R.string.new_string);
assuming that the new_string recourse was assigned the same ID as the test_string resource.
Apparently the compiler adds the resources under the same generated R.java file automatically which prevents any conflicts.
I am trying to separate an application into an app project and a library project (besides moving it from Netbeans to Eclipse). The app will contain resources that are used by the library - for this, I had read on Stackoverflow that we can bundle the resources in the library project and then override them in the app project.
But when I did this, I am getting the error:
...\res\values\attrs.xml:5: error: Attribute "pageBackground" has already been defined
Am I doing something wrong here? Any of my assumptions is faulty?
Thanks,
Rajath
I think I had similar problem when I tried to create a kind of 'configuration file' which was placed in application's resources and was meant to alter behavior of library it used. What I found working was using getIdentifier method from Resources instead of refering directly to R class:
final int resId = getResources().getIdentifier("my_resource", "raw", getPackageName());
You can then use the identifier as normal resource ID, e.g.:
if (resId > 0) {
final InputStream is = getResources().openRawResource(resId);
// ...
}
The idea was to handle both situations: when the file was present in app's resources or when it was not. But I think it should also work in your case of "overriding" the resources from library in application, thanks to getPackageName providing appropriate package name for resources' identifiers' resolving.