I am trying to handle problems that occur in my application when the phone is plugged into certain types of chargers and put into "Car Mode" or "Driving Mode".
In the running application, onDestroy() is called and immediately followed by onCreate(), and the application starts again normally. However, subsequent calls to update UI elements (in the newly created main Activity) now have no effect, and it looks like I've lost scope on my layout.
RelativeLayout splash = (RelativeLayout) findViewById(R.id.splash);
splash.setVisibility(View.VISIBLE);
What could be ocurring onDestroy() that I'm not accounting for? I don't do much cleanup onDestroy because I didn't think I needed to.
The Activity has been detached from the UI by the time onDestroy() is called so having UI calls to it doesn't make any sense. If you need the splash to be shown, set it to View.VISIBLE in onCreate(), onResume(), or maybe onPause(). I'm not entirely sure if onPause() would act any different.
When the phone rotates the activity is destroyed and recreated. Plugging into a car charger usually forces the phone to landscape mode, thus rotating it (from portrait, most likely) and calling onDestroy. There is a way to prevent this behavior with some activity flags -- but Google advises against it.
We need to see some more code for this Activity to figure out what's going on.
Also, as DeeV points out, the activity is long gone by the time onDestroy gets called, so it might not be the right place to be doing whatever it is that you're doing -- but we need more code to be sure.
As a sidenote, sliding the keyboard up (on phone's that have slideout keyboards) will produce the same effect.
Related
I have a stock Nexus 5 running 4.4.2 (using ART if it matters) and I've found an interesting scenario. I have this as my onDestroy():
#Override
protected void onDestroy() {
super.onDestroy();
t.setText("onDestroy");
t.show();
}
It's a GPS oriented app so I'm up and walking around. I am using the technique mentioned in this question to show a lot of debug toast messages.
Anyway, when I rotate my app, the toast appears. I understand that the activity is destroyed and recreated for the new orientation, but how can I know what's really going on? How can I tell when my app is REALLY getting destroyed and not just being rotated? Similar to this question, I want to log out when a particular activity is destroyed.
Since Honeycomb, the isChangingConfigurations() method can be queried to check whether the Activity is being recreated due to configuration changes. Alternatively, the isFinishing() method can be queried on any API level to check whether the Activity is actually being finished, or is only being destroyed temporarily by the system.
As far as I can determine, the two methods should always return mutually consistent results in practice. The only point where they might have diverged is when the system kills the process to clear memory, but there are no callbacks or interaction with the app at that point.
The documentation of the onDestroy() method mentions the use of the isFinishing() method:
Perform any final cleanup before an activity is destroyed. This can happen either because the activity is finishing (someone called finish() on it, or because the system is temporarily destroying this instance of the activity to save space. You can distinguish between these two scenarios with the isFinishing() method.
You can put it in a fragment with setRetainInstanceState(true) set. Place your code in the onDestroy() method of the fragment. Then, the fragment will not be destroyed on orientation changes.
First of all, you should not use onDestroy() to do anything because its not guaranteed to be called. I would put things on the onPause() method; I wouldn't even put things in onStop().
Also, Im not sure why you want to log out a user when they navigate away from the app. I would rather implement some kind of timer on the app or server to log out after x time.
Now, the answer lies in the documentation: http://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/Activity.html#ConfigurationChanges
You might want to override onConfigurationChanged so that your activity is not restarted.
I found a couple of solutions which are really just patterns to detect when the screen rotates. Alternatively, you can determine that the device was actually destroyed by checking some static data member to see if it was initialized or not.
Configuration changed solutions:
The first one involves handling all of the configuration changes in the onConfigurationChanged callback.
"Note that this will only be called if you have selected
configurations you would like to handle with the configChanges
attribute in your manifest."
The second involves listening for Display.getRotation() which returns a Surface.ROTATION_* object. Which is the new orientation of your screen relative to the natural state of the device orientation.
Again, you can use the configuration changes along with the static member.
Add ConfigChanges.UiMode flag to the ConfigurationChanges attribute for your MainActivity class, and this solves the problem.
More details: Android Launcher "OnDestroy" gets called twice
I've got an app that is complete, apart from the lifecycle that, guiltily, I left as last.
Things seem to work good in all cases, but one:
When I pause the app by pressing the power button, it correctly pauses and restarts when resuming.
When I rotate the screen it correctly resizes.
When I pause AND THEN rotate the screen, its behaviour is different and the app resets.
Now, obviously it's a problem of my internal code, but to help me in the debugging, I would like to understand what's the difference between the three lifecycles. Or better, if the THIRD example is some how different from the first two.
With debugging I saw that all of three do this (I resemble by mind, I hope to be right):
onSaveInstanceState()
onPause()
onStop()
onStart()
onResume()
Is it right? Or do I miss some lifecycle steps in the third example, above?
Thank you.
Please specify what you mean by the app resets.
When you press the power button, most likely your app stops. That's why you see onStart() being called after stopping (not: pausing) your app.
Given that, is it really the case that the third scenario you describe is a combination of the first two? In other words, how do you pause your app in the third scenario?
Update Regarding your comment: There is a difference between your Activity being stopped and your Activity being destroyed.
Rotation is a configuration change. In this scenario, your Activity is going to be destroyed and re-created. You can handle this case separately if you must (it depends) through the onRetainNonConfigurationInstance() callback and the getLastNonConfigurationInstance() method. Android will call onPause(), onStop(), onRetainNonConfigurationInstance() and onDestroy() in this order, and then continue with onCreate() etc and it will not handle any events in the meantime so that they won't get lost.
Most likely, some of your code is located in the wrong callback, such that in the third scenario, something does not get initialized/attached/... This is really hard to tell without the code and the exception (if it is an exception).
I suggest you proceed as follows.
Complete your understanding of the lifecycle and be precise (creation, start, restart, resume, pause, stop, destroy)
Complete your code to override the other lifecycle callbacks as well with log messages (don't forget to call the super class' callback) and analyze pause, stop, rotation and combinations
Identify the point of the crash
Analyze the life cycle of the objects involvedd in the crash in conjunction with the Activity lifecycle
Or you can post some code and the exception here, of course.
Update 2 I have made a test on an AVD. I have observed the following:
When the AVD is in landscape orientation, and I press the power button, my app receives a configuration change to portrait orientation (presumably because the portrait-orientation-only lock screen takes over). Pressing power again and unlocking the AVD, the app receives a configuration change again back to landscape orientation.
While not solving your issue, it goes to show that code must be carefully placed in the respective callbacks, because in the case above, while being re-created, the Activity will still not be shown.
Drop me a comment if you update your question.
Hi you can check the documentation regarding Managing the Activity life cycles in android .
When orientation changes Activity is re-created.
Add android:configChanges="keyboardHidden|orientation" to your activity in the manifest.
When using the onPause method in the Android SDK, that code is run whenever the Activity was re-drawn (Such as rotating the device). Is there a way to detect whether the Activity was actually paused (Such as a new window popping up) or if the Activity was actually just re-drawn?
Actually if you look at the life cycle of an activity, when the device is rotated, the activity is restarted, so after onPause(), the activity goes through the complete restart cycle (onStop() and onRestart() are also called), so in this case you can set some value depending on what functions were called, or check the device's orientation.
Also when the activity goes into background, onPause() is called, and when the activity is no longer visible to the user, onStop() is called, which are due to specific reasons, the application can check that by setting some variable. For complete understanding, study the activity life cycle (Alternate Link)
But why do you need to know what happened to the activity? By overriding appropriate functions and providing proper layout resources, you do not need to know what happened in most cases.
For orientation, you can also get the orientation using getRotation method.
The Activity Lifecycle is giving me headaches.
The documentation at http://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/Activity.html is so darn ambiguous when it describes the concept of visibility, that I can't figure out when onStop() is called vs onPause().
Compare the following two statements from the documentation:
(taken from right beneath the lifecycle diagram)
The onStart() and onStop() methods can be called multiple times, as
the activity becomes visible and hidden to the user.
vs
(further down in the blue table with the "killable" columns)
onPause() Called when the system is about to start resuming a previous activity.
What I'd understand from the first quote, is that onStop() is called on activity A when A is "hidden". "Hidden" I'd guess is referring to when another activity B has been resumed and is completely covering actvity A.
But the second quote then states that onPause() is called when another activity is about to start resuming. Wouldn't that completely hide activity A as well? Both cases seem to imply that that activity A becomes "hidden", no? According to my likely faulty interpretation, onPause() and onStop() are called in identical situations.
The documentation also seems to differ between being hidden (onStop() gets called) and being partial visibility (onPause() gets called). But when is an activity still partially visible? Do they mean literally? Or can an activity still be deemed "partially visible" when it has started up a new activity (activity calls startActivityForResult and starts a date picker activity) that covers the entire screen? Surely the activity is not going get onStop invoked? Its supposed to receive a result any moment!
So I'm trying to figure out what I'm not getting.
I understand that a call to onPause is guaranteed. That would be when activity A loses focus (device enters sleep mode, screenlock, etc), a different activity B takes the foreground (where activity B may or may not have been initiated by activity A).
But at which point is the onStop() invoked on activity A?
Is it matter of how many activities have been piled ontop of activity A on the activity stack? Are there two different definitions of "visiblity" at play?
Sorry about the wall of text, but I'm really frustrated :S
So the question stands: Precisely in which situations is an activity deemed "hidden" such that onStop() is called on it?
EDIT:
I inserted Toast notifications in each onX method, and discovered some additional weirdness:
Pressing the Home button will always call onStop(). But starting up the application won't call onRestart(). Instead it calls onCreate(). This seems strange to me, but ok...
When the "USB Mass Storage" activity is started on top of the main activity, onStop() is called. And when exiting the usb storage activity, returning to the main activity, onRestart() is called, instead of onCreate().
When the device goes into Sleep mode and is waken up, the activity only goes through the onPause() and onResume() cycle.
The last point was expected (although I can't get it to fit in the lifecycle diagram). But whats up with 1. and 2. ?
In the first point, I was expecting a call to onRestart() when starting the activity again. Why did it deallocate the activity and call onCreate() instead?
And take a look at point nr 2:
According to the documentation: when "another activity comes in front of the activity", onPaused() should be called. Isn't that what happened when the USB Storage activity came up? It didn't call onPause(), it went through the onStop() - OnRestart() cycle! Obviously, the documentation doesn't consider that a case where "another activity comes in front of the activity". So what really happened?
Ok, I think I've got this now.
1.
The key to the first point was this link:
http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=2373
Its a bug. Theres some code in the link that has completely solved the problem with new root activity instances being created, instead of just restarting the last active activity (before the home button was pressed).
I put the code at the top of the onCreate method, just below the super.onCreate call:
if (!isTaskRoot()) {
final Intent intent = getIntent();
final String intentAction = intent.getAction();
if (intent.hasCategory(Intent.CATEGORY_LAUNCHER) &&
intentAction != null && intentAction.equals(Intent.ACTION_MAIN)) {
finish(); return;
}
}
Note that I added the return statement after finish so the rest of the onCreate method doesn't run in the case that the bug is detected.
2.& 3.
The key to the second and third points was these two links:
http://answers.oreilly.com/topic/2692-android-programming-understanding-the-activity-life-cycle/
How to make Activity, not covering full screen
It turns out that "visibility" really is literally! So when the documentation says "another activity comes in front of the activity", the activity behind the bumped activity is still partially visible. This means that the Android Activity manager must check whether the bumped Activity is a full-screen activity or not: If it is, onStop() is called on the previous activity. If not, then onPaused() is called on the previous activity instead.
This trivially explains why the USB Storage manager caused the onStop() to be called.
This also means that when device goes into sleep mode, the Activity Manager considers it a non-fullscreen activity, even though technically the main activity is completely hidden behind it.
(See the second link on how to make non-fullscreen activities )
Interestingly, the pull-down window (with the notifications) doesn't call onPause() (nor does it call onStop()), even though it would have made sense as a non-fullscreen activity. This must be some kind of exception that I'll be investigating on my own.
This also means that the onStop()-onRestart() cycle is probably more common than the onPause()-onResume() cycle (although both must still be accounted for), since activities probably more often than not are full-screen activities (personally, I thought the documentation indicated the opposite: that onPause-onResume was more commmon, but maybe thats just me).
Additionally, this must mean that when the main activity starts a new fullscreen activity for a result, the main activity will be first stopped and later restarted when the result-retrieveing activity is done.
So the only question now is how to best deal with a paused activity (meaning, it is covered by a non-fullscreen activity) that gets deallocated (although this case would be rare). What challenges may there be?
But thats outside the scope of this question.
Finally tracked this down: you can detect the status bar pulldown using onWindowFocusChanged()
how to use OnWindowFocusChanged method
I am logging each onCreate() and onDestroy() calls. I found out that once I click power button on my Android (and on the emulator too!) the phone calls in my activity
> onDestroy();
> onCreate();
Which kills my game and then immediately reopen it from the beginning. Of course once user unlock the screen the game is presented in main menu with all progress killed.
Is it possible to override or disable this behavior?
When you press the power button, the screen lock usually kicks in. This may trigger a configuration change on the activity currently in the foreground (the screen lock is usually in portrait mode), causing it to be destroyed and recreated.
Declaring android:configChanges="keyboardHidden|orientation" for such activities in AndroidManifest.xml prevents them to be destroyed and recreated but also implies that you will handle the configuration changes by yourself (if necessary) by overriding onConfigurationChanged
You can't override when the onCreate() and onDestroy() methods get called (at least not without experiencing extraordinary amounts of pain). The best thing for you to do is to figure out how to work within the confines of when they get called. Save your state in onDestroy(). Make it so that your app can tolerate this call sequence because quite frankly, it supposed/has to. That's just how android works.