I am trying to create multiple database tables in android where each table will represent an account. I am struggling to get more then one table per database
Would anyone have any sample code they could show me? Or any suggestions?
Thanks
I don't know anything about your app, but the way you're designing your database schema sounds a little questionable. Does creating a table for every account (whatever an "account" might be) really make the most sense?
Regardless, creating tables in SQLite is pretty straightforward. In your SQLiteOpenHelper class, you can call db.execSQL(CREATE_TABLE_STATEMENT) to create a table, where CREATE_TABLE_STATEMENT is your SQL statement for a particular table. You can call this for every table you need created. This is typically going to be called in your SqliteOpenHelper's onCreate method when the database is initialized, but you can call it outside of the helper as well.
If you are going to use a fair amount of tables and data, including a prepopulated database in your assets folder is another way to go.
When I started to use databases on android I found this very helful.
http://developer.android.com/resources/tutorials/notepad/index.html
ps now that you mentioned that there are only 2-3 accounts, creating one table/account sounds much more reasonable than first expected.
But it really depends on what you are planning to do with the data and where your performance requirements are. One could even use one single table or as well multiple tables for each (fixed) type of transaction - if the data for transaction types have very different structure.
Creating database table in Android is pretty straghtforward:
db.execSQL(CREATE_TABLE_STATEMENT);
where db is SQLiteDatabase object and CREATE_TABLE_STATEMENT is your create table sql statement
As in your question you did not explain clearly the requirement of your app, but I can see a few cons in your approach of creating one table for each user
If there are many users created, u will have many tables in ur database
If later on you have some information, settings that would be shared across some users or all user, you will have to replicate them in every user single table.
My recommendation would be you have one table for users, and another table for transactions with one column is user_id to link back to the user table. It would be easier to expand or maintain your database later.
Hope it helps :)
Related
I am currently developing a health app on android.
There would be a need to store personal data like gender, height and settings for app.
I plan to create a table with different columns.
My question is about creating the table with default values and editing the database.
My first thought is to create table and add a row with default values in onCreate().
But it seems to be wrong usage of onCreate() as i see multiple examples that only db.execSQL(SQL_CREATE_ENTRIES) is onCreate().
Second thought is to make use of DEFAULT in SQL but still i have to find somewhere to run add row.
What's the good practice to do so?
About editing those data, i put multiple public get and set function in sqliteopenhelper class.
Is it right to do so?
As multiple tables are created, the sqliteopenhelper class seems to be a bit messy since there are a lot of functions.
Welcome to any suggestions and criticism.
Thanks all.
Does your data really need an entire SQL Database? From your question I understand that you store data (gender, height) for a single user. If it so, you can use Android's SharedPreferences. SharedPreferences are a simple Key-Value store system where you have functions for both setting and getting you values based on a key (similar to a single SQL Table with two columns, key and value).
Assume that I want to update dirty flags of some contacts linked to a group.
To do this,
From 'data' table, records having the group ID should be queried.
Should update using contact ID in the fetched records.
But if I can use SQL, it can be done with one SQL statement.
Is it possible?
Thanks in advance.
No, I don't think so.
See, Android API doesn't let you access the SQLite database behind the contacts (although it is there) but rather abstracts data access by means of ContentProviders (And there's a good reason for that: giving developers access to the SQLite db would be way too insecure -- any app with proper permissions could e.g. drop the contact tables and thus cause major malfunctions of other apps)
It's not much more complex to run update statements on those though (well, apart from the fact that SQL statements are kind of broken down into methods and parameters), the ContentProvider class has .update() method for just that, the tricky part is the WHERE part of the call, you'll have to take a good look at the ContactsContract class.
I am writing an app which logs the GPS data in a database. Each time the user starts logging, I'd like to create a new table and save the data in that table. When the user stops logging, the table is closed. So the next time the user starts the app a new table should be created in the current database. How can I add tables dynamically to the current database?
In several different places I have read it is not a good idea to add tables or columns dynamically to a database. But why? and what is the solution?
Changing the schema dynamically makes data migrations you might want to perform on app update much harder. You'll also have to keep track of the created table names, which is doable, but probably completely unnecessary.
I'd say that what you really need is something like a session_id column in the GPS data table.
When using a content provider for SQLite database access
Is it better practice to have a content provider for each table or to use one for all tables?
How to handle one-to-many relationships when creating new records?
A ContentProvider is not a database
A ContentProvider is a way to publicly (or semi-publicly) access data as content. This may be done in a number of ways, via file access, SQLite or even web access. A ContentProvider in and of itself is not a database, but you can program a database for it. You may also have multiple ContentProviders accessing the same database, but distributing different levels of access, or the same content in different ways according to the requestor.
What you are really asking is not a ContentProvider question, but a database question "How to handle relationships in an SQLite database" because the ContentProvider doesn't use any database code unless you tell it to via an SQLiteOpenHelper and other similar classes. So, you simply have to program your database access correctly and your SQLite database will work as desired.
A database is a database
In the old days, databases were simply flat files where each table was often its own entity to allow for growth. Now, with DBMS, there is very little reason to ever do that. SQLite is just like any other database platform in this regard and can house as many tables as you have space to hold them.
SQLite
There are certain features that SQLite handles well, some that it handles - but not well, and some that it does not handle at all. Relationships are one of those things that were left out of some versions of Android's SQLite, because it shipped without foreign key support. This was a highly requested feature and it was added in SQLite 3.6.22 which didn't ship until Android 2.2. There are still many reported bugs with it, however, in its earliest incarnations.
Android pre 2.2
Thankfully being SQL compliant and a simple DBMS (not RDBMS at this time), there are some easy ways to work around this, after all, a foreign key is just a field in another table.
You can enforce database INSERT and UPDATE statements by creating CONSTRAINTs when you use your CREATE TABLE statement.
You can query the other table for the appropriate _id to get your foreign key.
You can query your source table with any appropriate SELECT statement using an INNER JOIN, thus enforcing a pseudo-relationship.
Since Android's version of SQLite does not enforce relationships directly, if you wanted to CASCADE ON DELETE you would have to do it manually. But this can be done via another simple SQL statement. I have essentially written my own library to enforce these kinds of relationships, as it all must be done manually. I must say, however, the efficiency of SQLite and SQL as a whole makes this very quick and easy.
In essence, the process for any enforced relationship goes as follows:
In a query that requires a foreign key, use a JOIN.
In an INSERT use a CONSTRAINT on the foreign key field of NOT NULL
In an UPDATE on the primary key field that is a foreign key in another TABLE, run a second UPDATE on the related TABLE that has the foreign key. (CASCADE UPDATE)
For a DELETE with the same parameters, do another DELETE with the where being foreign_key = _id (make sure you get the _id before you DELETE the row, first).
Android 2.2+
Foreign keys is supported, but is off by default. First you have to turn them on:
db.execSQL("PRAGMA foreign_keys=ON;");
Next you have to create the relationship TRIGGER. This is done when you create the TABLE, rather than a separate TRIGGER statement. See below:
// Added at the end of CREATE TABLE statement in the MANY table
FOREIGN KEY(foreign_key_name) REFERENCES one_table_name(primary_key_name)
For further information on SQLite and its capabilities, check out SQLite official site. This is important as you don't have all of the JOINs that you do in other RDBMS. For specific information on the SQLite classes in Android, read the documentation.
As for first question: you don't need to create content provider for every table. You can use in with multiple tables, but the complexity of provider increased with each table.
A Content Provider is roughly equivalent to the concept of a database. You'd have multiple tables in a database, so having multiple tables in your content provider makes perfect sense.
One to many relationships can be handled just like in any other database. Use references and foreign keys like you would with any other database. You can use things like CASCADE ON DELETE to make sure records are deleted when the records they reference in other tables are also deleted.
I need to store an retrieve a vector of an unknown number of objects in an android sqlite database.
Essentially, the setup is this: I am developing a task management app, where the user can add as many notes as they like to their tasks. My current setup uses one database, with one row per task. This presents a problem when I need to associate multiple notes and their associated information with one task. I can see two approaches: try to store an array of notes or a vector or something as a BLOB in the task's row, or have another notes database in which each row contains a note and it's info, as well the id of the task which the note belongs to. This seems a little easier to implement, as all I would have to do to retrieve the data would be to get a cursor of all notes matching a particular id and then iterate through that to display them to the user. However, it seems a little inefficient to have a whole new database just for notes, and it makes syncing and deleting notes a little more difficult as well.
What do you think? Is it worth it to have a separate notes database? Should I use a BLOB or go for the separate database? If a BLOB, are there any good tutorials out there for storing and retrieving objects as BLOBs?
It sounds like you need another table in your database (not another database). You already have a table for Tasks. Now make one for Notes. Make a column be a foreign key into the Tasks table. That is, Notes.Task_ID would hold the ID of the Task that the Note is for. Then when you want to get all of the notes for a task, query the Notes table.
I think the answer to this question really lies in how you're going to go about updating things should they change. For now, the BLOB route probably seems like a really good idea, but what happens if you want to add some new functionality and you want to store some new property of notes (think of things like starred or importance). What would you need to do in order to update the notes object to add this new field? If it's just a database table, it's quite easy to change the layout of the table and even add a default value. If it's a BLOB, you're going to need to go through each entry, de-serialize the BLOB object, fix it, and re-serialize. That could get tricky.
Also, and this probably isn't as important to a small application using an embedded database, but it's easier to modify the database outside of the application if the object isn't a BLOB. Not to mention the queries you'll be able to write with the separate table. For example, how might someone calculate the number of notes that are attached to a task? If it's separated out in the database, it's a simple query.
Just my two cents.