I hope I can show 3 items in a page of viewpager, but now I only could set viewpager's padding value and margin value, so it only show one item in a page of viewpager. How can I set the item width? I think if I can set more little width of item, the viewpager will show more items in a page.
Quick Answer
What you want is overriding getPageWidth in the PagerAdapter implementation you made for that ViewPager.
For example setting it to 0.8f will make a single page cover only 80% of the viewpagers width so that part of the next and/or previous pages are visible.
#Override
public float getPageWidth(final int position) {
return 0.8f;
}
More information at https://developer.android.com/reference/android/support/v4/view/PagerAdapter.html#getPageWidth(int)
Other remarks
Also note that the negative margins will only cause the separate pages to overlap each other. The margin is used to define the space between each page.
If no alternative pageWidth is configured (there is no setter, only the override) it will cover 100% by default making no part of the other pages visible unless dragged.
Code example
A very nice overview of what is possible can be found here https://commonsware.com/blog/2012/08/20/multiple-view-viewpager-options.html
The view pager in your layout
<android.support.v4.view.ViewPager
android:id="#+id/viewpager"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent">
</android.support.v4.view.ViewPager>
Example of an inline configured Adapter implementation, this would go in the onCreate or onViewCreated methods:
// get a reference to the viewpager in your layout
ViewPager mViewPager = (ViewPager) findViewById(R.id.viewpager);
// this margin defines the space between the pages in the viewpager mViewPager.setPageMargin(context.getResources().getDimensionPixelSize(R.dimen.margin_normal));
// setting the adapter on the viewpager, this could/should be a proper Adapter implementation in it's own class file instead
mViewPager.setAdapter(new PagerAdapter() {
// just example data to show, 3 pages
String[] titles = {"Eins", "Zwei", "Drei"};
int[] layouts = {R.layout.layout1, R.layout.layout2, R.layout.layout3};
#Override
public Object instantiateItem(ViewGroup container, int position) {
LayoutInflater inflater = LayoutInflater.from(MainActivity.this);
// here you can inflate your own view and dress up
ViewGroup layout = (ViewGroup) inflater.inflate(layouts[position], container, false);
container.addView(layout);
return layout;
}
#Override
public void destroyItem(ViewGroup container, int position, Object object) {
container.removeView((View)object);
}
#Override
public float getPageWidth(final int position) {
return 0.8f;
}
#Override
public CharSequence getPageTitle(int position) {
return titles[position];
}
#Override
public int getCount() {
return layouts.length;
}
#Override
public boolean isViewFromObject(View view, Object object) {
return view == object;
}
});
Example code based on https://newfivefour.com/android-viewpager-simple-views.html
Have you tried setting the page margins to a negative value, see setPageMargin(int)? If I remember correctly, I read someone realizing something similar to what you're describing that way.
Alternatively, you could have a look at using a Gallery in stead, although I have to admit I'm not a big fan of them as they seem to be less flexible and more buggy.
Related
I have four layouts inside of my viewpager that are supposed to match width/height of its parent (the viewpager). When the activity starts the first page appears to do that, but as soon as you swipe to the next one this weird gap appears. The gap will stay until the activity is restarted. How do I get rid of this gap?
Here's a video of what's happening: https://youtu.be/EA51HZuFruY
XML of one of the layouts (the other three are identical only having different background colors)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<RelativeLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:orientation="vertical" android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent" android:background="#color/blue">
<Button
android:id="#+id/tab1_button"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:layout_centerInParent="true"
android:onClick="tab1Click"/>
</RelativeLayout>
Code for the viewpager's adapter
private class TabPagerAdapter extends PagerAdapter {
private ArrayList<Integer> layouts = new ArrayList<>();
TabPagerAdapter() {
layouts.add(R.layout.tab_menu_1);
layouts.add(R.layout.tab_menu_2);
layouts.add(R.layout.tab_menu_3);
layouts.add(R.layout.tab_menu_4);
}
#Override
public int getCount() {
return layouts.size();
}
#Override
public boolean isViewFromObject(View view, Object object) {
return view == (View) object;
}
#Override
public Object instantiateItem(ViewGroup collection, int position) {
LayoutInflater inflater = getLayoutInflater();
View view = inflater.inflate(layouts.get(position), collection, false);
collection.addView(view);
return view;
}
#Override
public void destroyItem(ViewGroup collection, int position, Object view) {
collection.removeView((View) view);
}
}
EDIT: My layouts inside the viewpager are not matching parent if more than two views are in the viewpager. I can also tell it's not the viewpager not keeping it's constraints that I've given them.
EDIT: After about a month I figured out that changing the offscreen page limit to support the maximum number of screen that could ever be offscreen stops the problem. While I'd be fine with this it's causing slow down in the app, but maybe this might reveal the actually problem.
this question is related with this one that I asked before.
I create a viewpager in MainActivity.java like this:
final ViewPager viewPager = (ViewPager) findViewById(R.id.vp_horizontal_ntb);
viewPager.setAdapter(new PagerAdapter() {
#Override
public int getCount() {
return 5;
}
#Override
public boolean isViewFromObject(final View view, final Object object) {
return view.equals(object);
}
#Override
public void destroyItem(final ViewGroup container, final int position, final Object object) {
((ViewPager) container).removeView((View) object);
}
#Override
public Object instantiateItem(final ViewGroup container, final int position) {
if(position==0) {
// here is important!
} else if(position == 1) {
}
...
}
});
Now I want fill each page with some json RecyclerView data list.(get json from network).
each page has independent data list.
For first time, I create a fragment for each page like this:
if (position == 0) {
final View view = LayoutInflater.from(getActivity().getBaseContext()).inflate(R.layout.fragment_tab0, null, false);
tabFragment.MyAdapter adapter = new tabFragment.MyAdapter(getActivity().getSupportFragmentManager());
adapter.addFragment(new tab0Fragment(), getResources().getString(R.string.tab0));
container.addView(view);
return view;
}
(so for 5 page, I have 5 fragment.
DEMO
But My application run slow (laggy) when I swipe pages.(with tap buttom is normal)
So I tried write an Adapter class directly for each page like this:
if (position == 0) {
final View view = LayoutInflater.from(getBaseContext()).inflate(R.layout.item_vp_list, null, false));
final RecyclerView recyclerView = (RecyclerView) view.findViewById(R.id.rv);
recyclerView.setHasFixedSize(true);
recyclerView.setLayoutManager(new LinearLayoutManager(getBaseContext(), LinearLayoutManager.VERTICAL, false));
recyclerView.setAdapter(new Tab0RecycleAdapter());
container.addView(view);
return view;
}
with top code,my application run fast again with swap pages!
Is it important to create fragment per each page?
why I must use fragment?(because some programmer recommended it in viewpager)
my method (second method without fragment) is true or false for a real application?
(I am noob and this is my first app)
Now I want fill each page with some json RecyclerView data list.(get json from network).
If you perform this network task on the UI thread, it will block and could cause laggy performance. This could be the reason your pages load slowly. You should perform network tasks on a separate thread.
So I tried write an Adapter class directly for each page like this
You only need one adapter per recycler view. If you want to support multiple views within the same adapter, override getItemViewType(). Example here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/26245463/7395923
Is it important to create fragment per each page?
Why I must use fragment? (because some programmer recommended it in view pager)
It is possible to use a view pager without fragments. Base on your previous question (linked at the top), it does seem overkill to load an entire fragment just to inflate a view. Here is a link to an example of a view pager without fragments: https://stackoverflow.com/a/18710626/7395923
I hope this helps.
I have a challenging problem and wanted to see if the community has some comments about its implementation.
I have a ViewPager and added 20 pages in it, and each page has a WebView. – This provides vertical page flipping between multiple websites
It should work as a ViewPager by default but when I pinch to zoom, each page will shrink and the ViewPager will scroll like a List View.
I didn’t want to use a different view like a List View as I want a smooth transition and the two modes use the same web contents so want to avoid any construction/deconstruction that might affect a smooth transition.
I was able to implement this scrolling ViewPager with VelocityViewPager.
What I want to do is add a scrollbar to navigate down the pages by holding and dragging a scroller, just like a PC’s behaviour – as opposed to a ListView which only shows the scrollbar but allows no interaction. I have made a custom view that looks like a scrollbar and performs a ViewPager’s fake drag as the scrollbar is moved. The problem is I can only scroll pages ViewPager is holding - so when the ViewPager keeps the whole 20 pages, it works well but If I keep 3 pages as default to make use of page recycling, it doesn’t scroll past 3. It seems as though it doesn’t create the next pages that it usually would when scrolling with your finger.
I’m not sure why ViewPager doesn’t create next pages while fake dragging. Is there anything I have to do other than beginFakeDrag(), endFakeDrag() and fakeDragBy()?
And, Is there any way I can implement this behaviour without keeping all 20 pages in ViewPager?
Have a look into this code, this may be useful to you:
public class MainActivity extends Activity {
#Override
public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
ViewPagerAdapter adapter = new ViewPagerAdapter(this, imageArra);
ViewPager myPager = (ViewPager) findViewById(R.id.myfivepanelpager);
myPager.setAdapter(adapter);
myPager.setCurrentItem(0);
}
private int imageArra[] = { R.drawable.gallery_photo_1, R.drawable.gallery_photo_2,
R.drawable.gallery_photo_3, R.drawable.gallery_photo_5,
R.drawable.gallery_photo_6, R.drawable.gallery_photo_7,
R.drawable.gallery_photo_8, R.drawable.ic_launcher };
}
and ViewPager class is:
public class ViewPagerAdapter extends PagerAdapter {
Activity activity;
int imageArray[];
public ViewPagerAdapter(Activity act, int[] imgArra) {
imageArray = imgArra;
activity = act;
}
public int getCount() {
return imageArray.length;
}
public Object instantiateItem(View collection, int position) {
ImageView view = (ImageView) collection.findViewById(R.id.image);
/*
* view.setLayoutParams(new LayoutParams(LayoutParams.FILL_PARENT,
* LayoutParams.FILL_PARENT)); view.setScaleType(ScaleType.FIT_XY);
*/
view.setBackgroundResource(imageArray[position]);
((ViewPager) collection).addView(view, 0);
return view;
}
#Override
public void destroyItem(View arg0, int arg1, Object arg2) {
((ViewPager) arg0).removeView((View) arg2);
}
#Override
public boolean isViewFromObject(View arg0, Object arg1) {
return arg0 == ((View) arg1);
}
#Override
public Parcelable saveState() {
return null;
}
}
I have a very simple PagerAdapter that for some reason, removes the views at position 0 and
1 when it is scrolled to position 2.
Specifically, when I first run the app, there are 3 views. I scroll to position 2 and position 1's view will disappear. View 0 is still there. If I scroll to view 0 and back to view 2 and again back to view 0, View 0 suddenly disappears. I do the same again, and I can actually see view 0 being instantiated and immediately destroyed.
what is going on here?
Main Activity
public class MainActivity extends Activity {
public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
final MyPagerAdapter adapter = new MyPagerAdapter(this);
final ViewPager myPager = (ViewPager) findViewById(R.id.mypanelpager);
myPager.setAdapter(adapter);
myPager.setCurrentItem(1);
}
public class MyPagerAdapter extends PagerAdapter {
private Context ctx;
Calendar c = Calendar.getInstance();
int month = c.get(Calendar.MONTH);
int year = c.get(Calendar.YEAR);
ViewGroup collection;
public MyPagerAdapter (Context ctx){
this.ctx = ctx ;
}
#Override
public int getCount() {
return 3;
}
public Object instantiateItem(ViewGroup container, int position ){
this.collection = (ViewPager)container;
NewMonth monthObject = new NewMonth(ctx, month+position-1,2012);
View monthLayout = monthObject.newParentLayout;
collection.addView(monthLayout);
return monthLayout;
return addViewAt(position);
}
#Override
public void destroyItem(ViewGroup container, int position, Object object) {
collection.removeViewAt(position);
}
#Override
public Parcelable saveState() {
return null;
}
#Override
public boolean isViewFromObject(View view, Object arg1) {
return view==arg1;
}
}
You have to maintain all tabs in memory specifying the OffscreenPageLimit to N-1, in your case put this inside the onCreate method:
myPager.setOffscreenPageLimit(2);
Checkout populate() function from ViewPager source - it has clear checks then to remove currentIndex+1 and currentIndex-1 items. Removing is done based on view sizes and it seems to be entirely internal ViewPager logic. ViewPager source is located
<android sdk folder>\extras\android\support\v4\src\java\android\support\v4\view\ViewPager.java
.
You might debug ViewPager to know that is happening exactly, but I wouldn't suggest so until You faced some serious issue with ViewPager. What's why: if you dig into ViewPager code it might lead You to write some hackish code (even not intentionally) on it based on its internal structure and not on its public interface and documentation. So, the main idea of data encapsulation would be ruined which is definitely not good (sadly, sometimes we need to do so in Android due to lack of documentation / unclear naming / android internal issues etc., check Code Complete by Steve McConnell for more details on good encapsulation etc.).
Here the key is that position is different then index. If they give you a position there is no guarantee that your collections haven't removed other positions.
Example:
Let's say your at position 2. destroyItem might have been called for position 0 which means in your collections now position 2 is actually at index 1. So your indexes will quickly become out of sync from your positions. The same thing happens with listview children. I would recommend using a sparseArray instead.
private final SparseArray<View> views = new SparseArray<>();
public View instantiateItem(ViewGroup container, final int position) {
...
views.put(position, view);
...
}
public void destroyItem(ViewGroup container, int position, Object object) {
View view = views.get(position);
if (view != null) {
container.removeView(view);
views.remove(position);
}
}
I'm designing an app that allows users to flip between multiple pages in a ViewPager. I've been struggling trying to figure out how it is possible to remove a Fragment instance from a page when it is no longer visible on screen, cache it (to, say, a HashMap), and then restore it so that when the user flips back to that page, the views and everything else in it will be in the same state it was before removal. For example, my first page is a login screen that makes certain layout elements on that particular page visible/invisible on a successful login. When I flip forward enough pages then flip back to the first page, the layout is reset. This becomes more of a problem for another one of my pages which contains a huge, horizontal/vertical scrolling grid of data that I use a thread in the background to draw when it initializes. I use a progress dialog to notify the user of loading progress and that becomes really annoying everytime I have to load it.
So I did some research...
I browsed through the source code for FragmentStatePageAdapter and in the destroyItem() callback, the state of the Fragment instance being removed is saved to an ArrayList. When a new instance of the Fragment is being created in the instantiateItem() callback, if an instance of an item doesn't already exist (they keep track of this by using an ArrayList), a new Fragment instance is created and its saved state is initialized with the corresponding Fragment.SavedState data. Unfortunately, this data does not include the state that the Views were in although I noticed that for pages with a GridView/ListView, the state of the Views were somehow restored (if I scrolled to some random position, flipped a few pages and came back, it would not be reset).
According to the API:
The saved state can not contain dependencies on other fragments --
that is it can't use putFragment(Bundle, String, Fragment) to store a
fragment reference because that reference may not be valid when this
saved state is later used. Likewise the Fragment's target and result
code are not included in this state.
Being a noob to Android, I'm not quite sure I understand the last statement.
That being said, is there any way to cache View state? If not, I think I'll just go ahead and go with leaving all the fragment pages in memory.
I had the same problem problem and solved it by implementing these two functions
public void onSaveInstanceState (Bundle outState)
public void onActivityCreated (Bundle savedInstanceState)
on the fragments that I wanted to save. On the first function, you should save in the Bundle the date that you need to restore the views ( in my case I had a bunch of spinner so I used
an int array to save their positions). The second function, which is called when restoring your fragment, is where you implement the restoring process.
I hope this helps. I also made my adapter to inherit from FragmentStatePageAdapter but I am not sure that this is mandatory.
Listing of main.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:orientation="vertical" android:layout_width="fill_parent"
android:layout_height="fill_parent">
<TextView android:text="Page 1" android:id="#+id/textViewHeader"
android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:gravity="center" android:padding="10dip" android:textStyle="bold"></TextView>
<android.support.v4.view.ViewPager
android:layout_width="fill_parent" android:layout_height="fill_parent"
android:id="#+id/viewPager" />
</LinearLayout>
Setting up the ViewPager
ViewPager viewPager = (ViewPager) findViewById(R.id.viewPager);
MyPagerAdapter adapter = new MyPagerAdapter(this);
viewPager.setAdapter(adapter);
The PagerAdapter
#Override
public void destroyItem(View view, int arg1, Object object) {
((ViewPager) view).removeView((View)object);
}
#Override
public int getCount() {
return views.size();
}
#Override
public Object instantiateItem(View view, int position) {
View view = views.get(position);
((ViewPager) view).addView(view);
return view;
}
#Override
public boolean isViewFromObject(View view, Object object) {
return view == object;
}
look here for more details view pager example
Looking at the various documentation pieces, my best guess is that the views you are creating do not have an ID attached to them. Assuming that the fragment's saved state is created from Fragment.onSaveInstanceState, then the fragment will automatically save any view's state that has an id. You probably have a default id associated with your ListView/GridView if you created them from a layout file. You can also associate an id with the views by calling setId.
Also, for your custom filled fragment, you may also have to do something custom in onSaveInstanceState.
Here's an example of how I implemented caching in PagerAdapter. After filling the cache all future view requests are served from cache, only data is replaced.
public class TestPageAdapter extends PagerAdapter{
private int MAX_SIZE = 3;
private ArrayList<SoftReference<View>> pageCache = new ArrayList<SoftReference<View>>(3);
public TestPageAdapter(Context context){
// do some initialization
}
#Override
public int getCount() {
// number of pages
}
private void addToCache(View view){
if (pageCache.size() < MAX_SIZE){
pageCache.add(new SoftReference<View>(view));
} else {
for(int n = (pageCache.size()-1); n >= 0; n--) {
SoftReference<View> cachedView = pageCache.get(n);
if (cachedView.get() == null){
pageCache.set(n, new SoftReference<View>(view));
return;
}
}
}
}
private View fetchFromCache(){
for(int n = (pageCache.size()-1); n>= 0; n--) {
SoftReference<View> reference = pageCache.remove(n);
View view = reference.get();
if (view != null) {
return view;
}
}
return null;
}
#Override
public Object instantiateItem(View collection, int position) {
View view = fetchFromCache();
if (view == null) {
// not in cache, inflate manually
LayoutInflater inflater = (LayoutInflater) collection.getContext().getSystemService(Context.LAYOUT_INFLATER_SERVICE);
view = inflater.inflate(R.layout.page, null);
}
setData(view, position);
((ViewPager) collection).addView(view, 0);
return view;
}
private void setData(View view, int position){
// set page data (images, text ....)
}
public void setPrimaryItem(ViewGroup container, int position, Object object) {
currentItem = (View)object;
}
public View getCurrentItem() {
return currentItem;
}
#Override
public boolean isViewFromObject(View view, Object object) {
return view == ((View) object);
}
#Override
public void destroyItem(View collection, int arg1, Object view) {
((ViewPager) collection).removeView((View) view);
addToCache((View) view);
}
}
I also ran into this problem when I was using PagerSlidingTabStrip and using and instance of FragmentPagerAdapter, switching to FragmentStatePagerAdapter definitely worked.
Then I use onSaveInstanceState() to save sate