Develop Reference

Recommended design approach for web service downloading/importing within app

My app needs to initially download data from two different web services (JSON) and import them into it's local database (Realm). I have two activities that need to display data from these web services. The first one (HomeActivity) is the initial activity that the app loads. The second one (LineupActivity) is created when navigating to it from the HomeActivity.
Currently, I've created an Application class (extending Application) in order to handle the web service downloading and importing. In it's onCreate(), it calls two methods, which are AsyncTasks that download and import each web service.
The reason I've added this download/import process into the Application class is for 2 reasons:
I want all the app data to be downloaded as soon as possible, so
when navigating to the second activity it doesn't need to initiate
another download.
Both these activities have swipe to refresh. They call each respective method in the Application class to re-download/import the
web service data.
Have I approached this incorrectly? Should I move the web service download/import logic out of the Application class? Also, does the onCreate() of the Application class get called more than once? Meaning, I know that it only gets called only once in the application's lifecycle, but does the Android OS eventually kill an app and have it call the onCreate() in the Application class when starting it again? I want the app to download fresh data upon startup, but not every time the user brings the app into focus.

Have I approached this incorrectly?
"Incorrectly" is a very relative term in this context.
Metaphorically, its like the context is never null but that doesn't determine boolean incorrect is true or false.
Should I move the web service download/import logic out of the Application class?
I would say Yes, as the download logic would not be related to the O.S. and the app being alive in its memory. Your requirement does not seem complex. Service would be necessary if the downloads are huge chunks of data, and if its not necessary, don't do it.
Also, does the onCreate() of the Application class get called more than once? Meaning, I know that it only gets called only once in the application's lifecycle...Application class when starting it again?
No, it won't be called more than once without app being killed and restarted. And what your are saying is correct, but for your requirement, there are probably more efficient and lighter ways to do it rather than combining it with an Application class.
For the rest of the logic, you could implement Asynctasks as a separate class and implement interfaces which are the callbacks of the result of your task. This would help in Swipe-to-refresh functionality.
In terms of documentation reference, Application class
There is normally no need to subclass Application. In most situation,
static singletons can provide the same functionality in a more modular
way.
Your case seems exactly that.
One thing you need to decide is When, how often do you need to refresh/download the data. For only start-up of the app or once daily, you can store date/day in SharedPreferences and check the value in onResume() of your Activity.
You can also implement inheritance with a Base Activity with the necessary download check logic in it and extend your classes. A Splash Screen would always help to initiate the downloads.

I suppose you could approach this anyway you want, though I like to implement one of the three options mentioned here: https://dl.google.com/googleio/2010/android-developing-RESTful-android-apps.pdf.
The presentation itself can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHXn3Kg2IQE.
This does however not mention how you should sync on startup. But you could just set a SharedPreference in the application class and then use one of the patterns to sync in the background.

I'd recommend you instead of using Application to download your stuff to use a Service. If by any reason your app gets killed by the OS your dl's will never complete. Using a Service it will.
Also, you can use a Broadcast to your activity to signalize that the service has completed downloading and taking the necessary following steps.

first: I think it's bad to place the download at appliaction onCreate
as stated in documentation
Called when the application is starting, before any activity, service,
or receiver objects (excluding content providers) have been created.
Implementations should be as quick as possible (for example using lazy
initialization of state) since the time spent in this function
directly impacts the performance of starting the first activity,
service, or receiver in a process. If you override this method, be
sure to call super.onCreate().
pay attention to this part
Implementations should be as quick as possible (for example using lazy initialization of state) since the time spent in this function directly impacts the performance of starting the first activity
so any delay in download or import may cause the first activity to be delayed.
and the behavior is not clear, a black screen maybe?
Second suggestions for download/import:
1- use an AsyncTask in the first activity, where you display a small progress bar indicating the download/import process or even block the whole UI until completed (based on your business)
2- add a splash screen while downloading the data
regarding fresh data, you can store a timestamp, last_updated
and before starting the download/import process, check that value, if less than your accepted value (say 1 hour) don't start the download/import.
finally, regarding onCreate() call, i think it's not called everytime, only when app is re-created, like 1st run after reboot, or after being killed or forced close.

Can I use an Application subclass as a global variable container?

I found and read a lot of articles talking about global variables in Android, some of them suggests using an subclass of Application + declare it in the manifest file as a glbal variable container.
But some articles mentioned that This class could also be killed when system memory gets low, is this correct?
So, is it 100% reliable to use an Application subclass as a global variable container? And could somebody give me a link to some documents explaining the life cycle of an application in Android (not activity)?
EDIT:
Thanks for the answers, I think I need to explain a bit more of my question.
The situation is, I just want to share a global String variable, Activity A modifies it, and activity B reads it.
When B is currently visible and user receives a call,
If A and B are killed but Application keep untouched (is this what Google calls an empty process?), I'm OK with it.
If A, B, and Application class are all killed and when user come back my app gets a clean start, I'm OK with it.
Which I'm not OK with it is, everything was killed including the Application class, when user come back my app doesn't start fresh, I mean, it starts from Activity B, will this happen? then should I start A manually or let Application class to do the initiation? none of these ideas looks good to me...

The answer is both "YES" and "NO" - the Application class can be used as a "global variable container" in that all activities and classes can rely on it.
However, you cannot rely on the Application class (or any other class) to persist indefinitely. In other words, if the user answers their phone, your application could be destroyed and then re-created when the user completes the call and returns to your app. So, you definitely cannot rely on it to persist data, but you can rely on it to provide global access to data when you app is active.
This is the Android documentation:
http://developer.android.com/training/basics/activity-lifecycle/index.html
This is a really good post on it - read the SECOND highest voted response, in addition to the "accepted" response:
Using the Android Application class to persist data
It explains pretty clearly how your app can be killed/destroyed whether you expect it or not.
EDIT:
To clarify, if you have a variable (call it "myVar") in the Application class and a user sets it in Activity A, then proceeds to Activity B, Activity B will be able to read the change.
If Android "destroys" the application class, which can occur anytime the user is not in your app (and in rare instances even if they are...), the app will be reconstructed so that the Activity Stack is still valid but "myVar" is not set, unless you persist the data.
In other words, Android will recreate the Application class and Activity B, but there is no guarantee that it will recreate Activity A until the user does something to destroy Activity B. Also, it will certainly not "replay" the user actions in Activity A in order to recreate the app state, and in your case that means "myVar" is not reliable.
If you read the references provided, you will see that this is the case (and also I have tested it).
EDIT 2:
To persist data, consider SQLite (which is pretty complicated and there are many references) or SharedPreferences:
How to use SharedPreferences in Android to store, fetch and edit values

This class could also be killed when system memory gets low, is this correct?
Yes.
So, is it 100% reliable to use an Application subclass as a global
variable container?
If you want to use it to pass values it is not reliable.
why?
EDIT:
Which I'm not OK with it is, everything was killed including the
Application class, when user come back my app doesn't start fresh, I
mean, it starts from Activity B, will this happen?
yes. It is possible that you set a value in your application from activity A and then when you are in Activity B user leaves your app and after a while android kills your process. then user comes back wants to look at your app. android again recreates application and activity B but not Activity A and instead of fill the application variable with what has passed Activity A to it, it recreates it from default initialization. So simply you missed what has passed or set by Activity A.
Don’t Store Data in the Application Object

Subclassing application, Launching nested activities, and detect when last one has exit

I'd like someone to help me with this question regarding an application lifecycle.
My App starts an activity StoryActivity, that can launch other instances of itself, so when the user presses the BACK button, returns to the previous StoryActivity.
I maintain a cross-activity cache in a static hashmap that I'd like to flush on the activity's OnDestroy, but only if this is the last of my spawned activities, i mean, only if the user has destroyed all the stacked (linked) stories and this is the only one left. Kind of an application shutdown.
Do I need to subclass Application, or what's the best practice for my intentions?
I'd like to avoid tracking myself the activity nesting if possible, relying on the android standard lifecycle as much as possible.
Thanks in advance.

Is there a way to create a controlling instance that controls several activities of my app?

I work on a project that has several developers.
We work on one rather large app.
Every developer has several activities that can be seen as sub-apps of the whole main-app.
I do realize, that this may not be the best design, but it exists and we have to handle it somehow.
Now the main issue is, that we need a master, that is always active and checks I/Os etc and that can give out status changes to every sub-app/activity. Something like "we just lost internet connection" etc.
Right now, that master is a singleton, that is first instantiated by the launcher activity and that every activity/sub-app can register to by passing the appropriate interfaces depending on what updates the activity would like to receive.
This is working, however it doesn’t feel right, because the singleton needs context to access system resources to determine system stati like internet or gps. Should the singleton be killed by OS, than a simple "getInstance" wouldn’t do much good, because the singleton would somehow need to acquire a context. I've read about extending the Application class and creating a static member context there, but this variable had to be volatile AND its possible that it returns null if the entire app is in some restart-after-crash/kill state. It doesn’t feel safe.
In addition, there should also be a possibility that the master somehow opens a user-dialog to display warnings etc to the user. Those warnings should look the same across the entire app and no dev should have to worry about when or why it suddenly pops up. Right now, those messages appear as custom toasts that overlay everything. Of course they require context and if the app is about to close there could be a problem.
All in all, that’s the mess we are in and I’m looking for a solution.
So how do I create a safe master object or activity (or even service ?!) that can pass info to different activities and post warnings etc (and Maybe even has the ability to close activities or at least order them to close themselves without the need to register a can_close interface).
It should be that safe, that if after a crash android only restarts the activity that was active it somehow manages to also be restarted or at least have/give the same info as before.
Every idea is welcome but total overhauls of the app are just not possible (lack of time and manpower)

Here are a few ideas:
Create a Service component for all the monitoring you need to do.
If I understand correctly, this service will be required only if
some of the activities are running. So you can make it a bound
service. Let all activities bind to this service when they start
and unbind when they close. The service will be started when the
first activity binds.
Create a base class for all your activities. You can write all the common code here. e.g. the code to bind to and exchange messages
with the master service. This class can also contain utility methods
for notifying user etc. So all activities will use the same method
for notification.
For user notifications, you could either use Status Bar Notification or create a Fragment which can capture, aggregate
and display the notifications. You can have a common menu item
implemented in the base Activity class to show/hide this Fragment.
If you use Status Bar Notification, make sure you use one aggregated
notification for your app. Otherwise, the different activities might
create a clutter in the status bar.

I guess that one solution would be to create a service that serve as the master.
You will have to make it run independently of the different activities (but don't forget to manage own to shut it down neatly if the app is no longer used, you don't want to kill your clients battery).
A service can't act on the interface though, so you will probably need to broadcast messages to the activities to order them to open a dialog.
A final thought : Toasts are ok but popup that block the interface are very bad, especially on a mobile device.

Android Application class being called twice

In my Android application, I overload the Application class, and I updated the tag in my manifest. This application also creates an Android Service.
I have put some logs in the onCreate of my Application class, and I see it being called twice.
The first time is when my application gets launched (this is expected) and then, it's usually right after the Service is being created.
the log also shows that a second instance of the Application is being created.
(I print the "this" value and they are different).
I thought the Application would be created as a singleton.
Is that happening because I create a Service?

Yes, if you used android:process then you have it running in a separate process, so when the service starts a new process is started for it and thus a new Application object for that process needs to be created.
But there is a more fundamental problem - it is just not right for an Application object to start one of its services. It is important that you don't confuse Application with how you may think of an "application" in another OS. The Application object does not drive the app. It is just a global of state for the app in that process. In fact, the Application object is completely superfluous -- you never need one to write an Android application. Generally I actually recommend that people don't use it. It is more likely to cause trouble than anything else.
Another way to put this: what really defines an application is its collection of activity, service, receiver, and provider tags. Those are what are "launched." All an Application is, is something that is created as part of initializing an application's process. It has no lifecycle of its own, it is just there to serve the other real components in the app.
So just ignore Application when designing your app; it will reduce confusion. (In its place, I prefer to use global singletons for such state.)
Also as a general rule, I recommend not using android:process. There are certainly some uses for it, but the vast majority of the time it is not needed and just makes an application use more RAM, less efficient, and harder to write (since you can't take advantage of globals in a single process). It should be obvious to you if you reach a place where there is actually a good reason to use android:process.

A Service should not really be thought of as an Activity, and you're bound to have problems later on if you think this way. Services and Activities can belong to the same application, if you defined them that way in your AndroidManifest.xml, but they behave differently and have different lifecycles. If you want your Service in a different process, then you set android:process="string" in the <service> section to give it a name different from your application name. You won't have access to global variables when it's in a separate process, and you should communicate to your service through Intents. If your service is more complex, you might want to look at making it remotely callable through AIDL. If you want a singleton activity, then set that Activity's launchMode to either singleInstance or singleTask. singleInstance means it will be the first and only instance of this Activity in it's task stack and no new instances will be created for any new Intents. Since it's the only instance of this Activity, it will always be at the top of the task stack, and always in a position to handle new Intents directed at this Activity. If the Activity is declared as singleTask it will also be a singleton but may have other Activities in the same task stack, and may even have Activities at the top of the task stack above it. This is an important distinction to note. Remember this: singleton Activities that are NOT at the top of the task stack cannot handle new Intents, and the Intent will be dropped. If you want your Activity to always be able to handle all new Intents destined for it, then you most likely want to use singleInstance

The problem is that a Service is a component too, with its own lifecycle, just it hasn't got an user interface.
You should check the developer application fundamentals for the alternatives.

I just had this issue and after reading all this, nothing helped. Here is what helped me.
Add the attribute MainLauncher = true to your MainActivity.cs class.