What is the proper context in which AlarmManagers should be declared and initialized so that they persist indefinitely (or until a system reboot or until a Task Killer wipes it out, realistically) and avoid garbage collection- But also allow for changes to the alarm across the scope of the entire application.
The whole reason I am using an AlarmManager is to remedy the need to have a service running at all times. However to accomplish this feat, where is the AlarmManager created? I would imagine it cannot be created in a service that is then turned off/destroyed because the alarm object would go away with it, eventually, and the alarms would stop firing- would it not?
I liked the idea of the AlarmManager example from a different question post, where a MyAlarm class is created as an extension of the BroadcastReceiver for the alarm's onReceive and the AlarmManager is intialized in this class' constructor. But how does this implementation work if a MyAlarm instance is required across multiple contexts. Such as, from event handlers across multiple Activity objects. From the event handlers of multiple Widgets. From within a worker service. All of which may have to disable or enable the alarm. My guess is, create a local instance everywhere you need to deal with the alarm and because the pendingIntent is the same for all instances, you will in effect be working with a virtual "singleton".
This is only conceptual at this point because I have no idea how I would test "garbage collection" of an Alarm Manager which could occur 8, 12, ? hours later when my alarm just randomly stops firing. My goal is, if the phone isn't rebooted, and my Task isn't manually killed by the user, to keep the alarm firing indefinitely. Thanks
In android the OS automatically closes services it thinks aren't being used... lots of apps and particularly widgets struggle with this. I don't know if there is a definitive way to make sure the service doesn't close itself. You can persist it longer by having it occasionally do something so the system doesn't think it's a useless task.
And yes, you'd use the same pending intent for all those, so you can just run one service with multiple handlers linked to it, that's part of the benefit of the way the OS is set up. You can update all widgets with your signature at the start of your single service, that service can also receive all the handlers from your widgets.
However to accomplish this feat, where is the AlarmManager created?
The AlarmManager is a system service. It is "created" by the operating system.
I would imagine it cannot be created in a service that is then turned off/destroyed because the alarm object would go away with it, eventually, and the alarms would stop firing- would it not?
The AlarmManager is a system service. The "alarm" are held by the operating system.
My guess is, create a local instance everywhere you need to deal with the alarm and because the pendingIntent is the same for all instances, you will in effect be working with a virtual "singleton".
Correct.
Related
I'm developing a little Android app, that needs to run a background process, used to start a remote connection periodically (for example, to check if there is new data on the server). This process obviously needs to work also if the application activity is not running at the moment.
As I can see in documentation, there are two types of approach to develop a scheduled background process in Android, working also when the application is closed.
Services
Alarms
The first one is not so good for my requirementes, because it can be killed by OS in case of low memory, so it is useless for me. startForeground() is not so good because I want the process is silent.
Alarm is ok, because it can't be killed by the OS, so it can work indefinitely. But... If I schedule an Intent with the AlarmManager, how can I preserve a reference to the Intent, surviving at application restart?
For example, if I want to cancel, or reschedule the Alarm, I need the reference to the initial Intent to cancel it thorugh the "AlarmManager.cancel(Intent i)" method. But if the application was restarted by the user, how can I obtain a reference to the initial Intent that was used to start the alarm?
Is there another way to stop an alarm if the launching application was restarted?
about alarms, you can cancel using the intent characteristics, so you don't need a reference to the original intent. In any case, the alarms mechanism still need you to run something on a service.
In any case, you missed another possible solution: SyncAdapter. Its purpose is to sync with servers, but you can do whatever you wish in the code, and it's unlikely the OS will kill it, as opposed to the other solutions you've mentioned.
Sadly even now it lacks on documentation and samples, but I think it can fulfill your needs. Here's what I've found
yes, note that cancel is looking for a PendingIntent, not an Intent per se.
so
PendingIntent pendingIntent = PendingIntent.getBroadcast(this, R.string.some_string, new Intent(this, InitialIntent.class), 0);
AlarmManager alarmManager = (AlarmManager) getSystemService(ALARM_SERVICE);
alarmManager.cancel(pendingIntent);
gets you where you want to be.
note that I'm not getString'ing that string, that's becasue I want a unique Id/request code for this intent that I'm not going to screw up copypasting; I reference the same number when creating the alarm in InititalIntent.
This question was just answered, here:
How can I get the context of other activity?
Just cancel the intent you scheduled
Your best bet would be to make use to push notification (via GCM), whenever something new is available on the server. I am working on similar application where data can be pushed from one side (producers) and needs to be pushed to the consumer apps.
You need to look at BroadcastReceiver and GCM specific communication model. Hope this helps
I am making an app that needs to execute a function each hour even the app is closed.
First of all, I thought to create a service, but during my tests, I realise that android sometimes kills my service. So I was looking for another solution and I found AlarmManager. I have implemented it and it seems to work but I have the doubt if it will happen the same the service or it will run forever? (Until reboot of the mobile...)
Another question, it is necessary to create a new thread to execute the process in alarm manager or it runs directly in other thread?
I have implemented it and it seems to work but I have the doubt if it will happen the same the service or it will run forever? (Until reboot of the mobile...)
It will run until:
the device is rebooted, as you noted, or
the user uninstalls your app, or
you cancel the events yourself, or
the user goes into Settings, finds your app in the list of installed apps, taps on that entry, and clicks the Force Stop button
It's possible that alarms will need to be scheduled again after your app is upgraded (I forget...).
it is necessary to create a new thread to execute the process in alarm manager or it runs directly in other thread??
Unless the work you are going to do will take only a couple of milliseconds, you will want a background thread for it. That leads to two possible patterns:
If you are not using a _WAKEUP-style alarm, use a getService() PendingIntent to send control to an IntentService every hour
If you are using a _WAKEUP-style alarm, you will need to use a getBroadcast() PendingIntent, and have it either invoke your subclass of my WakefulIntentService, or you will need to manage a WakeLock yourself to keep the device awake while you do your bit of work
No, Android won't kill scheduled alarms and they got executed as planned unless app is replaced or device is rebooted. Use broadcast receivers for these events to reschedule Alarms. There's no way to prevent Force Stop as it kills all of your app components and threads totally.
That depends on what Alarm Manager do. If it sends a broadcast, the receiver limit is 10 second.
If it starts an Activity, Service or Intent Service, there is no limit. For Activity and Services you must finish or stop it and for Intent Services until the process is finished. Be aware that you can't have another thread inside Intent Service and you'r limited to code inside the OnHandleIntent.
Also you must consider device state. If it's sleep and you are using Wake Up flag receivers won't need a wake lock, but others do. It won't take long for device to go back to sleep.
Don't waste system resources with a service because Alarm Manager do what you want.
I'm new to Android so I want to make sure that the following solution is the correct one.
The problem:
I want to sync the device's local database with a database on my server, via a webservice, every 10 minutes. I already have a web service call that I can make that returns the new/updated records. What I'm wondering is what is the best way to schedule this task. I want the databases to sync even when the application is not running.
My solution (is this the correct route to go?):
I will have one BroadcastReceiver that listens for android.intent.action.BOOT_COMPLETED, in it's onReceive I will create an AlarmManager that sends a message to MyReceiver (via a PendingIntent) every 10 minutes. Also, in my application's startup I will do the same (create an alarm to send messages to the MyReceiver via a PendingIntent) - Since both alarms are sending messages to MyReceiver and their corresponding PendingIntents are initialized with PendingIntent.FLAG_UPDATE_CURRENT will the new alarm override the old one? (this is what I want to do, in case for some reason the alarm gets cancelled after device boot it should be restarted when the application starts).
In MyReceiver's onReceive() I will create a MyIntentService (this instance will make the webservice call and update the local database).
Is this a good solution? Any suggestions?
Thanks
Solution is fine...Actually all the AlarmManager instances get cleared when device turned off and rebooted.
The simple way is that...
First create AlarmManager when application started.
Second in onReceive of BOOT_COMPLETED BroadcastReceiver.
Its enough, PendingIntent.FLAG_UPDATE_CURRENT will make sure of having only one activated alarm at a time.
In this way, alarm registered when your application started. There will be no issue if its already registered via BOOT_COMPLETED. Activated alarm will deactivated when you turn off your device, but BroadcastReceiver to BOOT_COMPLETED will take care of registration new alarm at next boot.
If you decide that this answers your question, please mark it as "accepted". This will raise both your and my reputation score.
Also you need to review your interval to use network, it might be very resource consuming for device and user. One policy might be to have longer period of interval and check for update when user starts your app (this might not be user friendly but can save many system resources and battery power as well). Try to find some better policy according to your needs.
Using FLAG_UPDATE_CURRENT in that manner will override the existing PendingIntent if one exists. I'm not positive but I believe that as soon as you get into onReceive, the PendingIntent is consumed so it's no longer there to be overridden. In either case, it sounds like this is the functionality you are looking for and yes it's a good way to solve this kind of problem. My only other suggestion would be if the 10 minute interval timing is not absolutely critical then use one of the INTERVAL_ schedules (INTERVAL_FIFTEEN_MINUTES for example) in your AlarmManager to help conserve battery life; basically it lets allows all apps that run on intervals to "batch" their work together and wake the device up less frequently.
I'm developing an app designed to transform an android phone into a remote device running without user action. At the time the app is made by an Activity that sets AlarmManager to execute a service (class inside project) every X minutes.
All this works OK, but occasionally after 5-6 DAYS continuosly running the application crashes (currently I don't know why, because i can't get the phone now). It isn't a connection problem (I know) and the phone is still running (plugged into AC). The only thing that i can suppose is that the application is down.
I don't think that this is due to a bug, because the prew debugging doesn't give me any errors.
So I must suppose that android has killed the activity (system needs more memory?) and as the image explain there is no way to back it up.
But I have a doubt: in my application the activity doesn't matter, because all the work is done by the service. The service itself is called by an Alarm Manager and in the time between two calls the service is terminated by StopSelf().
In my case the system may kill my alarm manager service schedule?
What can I do to have the service start up by Alarm Manager forever?
(ATTENTION: currently there is yet a WAKE LOCK but this consider only the execution of the service! I hope that you have understand that the service is called each x minutes by alarm manager and than terminated...i want to perform this operations for an indefinite time)
[I haven't posted the source code because is too long]
Lork,
After wrestling with a similar issues myself, I may have some pointers for you. I assume that you are using your Android device as a sort of remote ‘embedded controller’, which performs its functions with minimum user interaction. I believe that you are 95% there and just need to make some slight architectural changes. As you have not provided code, I’ll just explain in abstract terms rather than give code examples.
CommonsWare is correct that you need to use AlarmManager, but I suspect you already knew that.
A couple of background comments first, just to make sure that everything is understandable.
Alarms created by AlarmManager exist at the system level, that is they can exist beyond the lifecycle of the activity and application that created them. If you set an alarm but don’t want it to go off if your app changes state (for example after it has been destroyed), then you can cancel it using alarmManager.cancel(pendingIntent) – just create the intents and alarm manager with the same parameters and Android will match the alarm).
Similarly, BroadcastReceivers are registered at the system level (at least if they are declared in manifest.xml) and can exist beyond the lifecycle of the activity and application that created them. Again if you want to ensure that a BroadcastReceiver does not fire in response to an event occurring after your app has changed state (for example after it has been destroyed), you need to explicitly unregister in it code. If it was registered programmatically then use context.unregisterReceiver(broadcastReceiver); if it was registered statically in the Manifest its not so easy – you will have to retrieve the receiver using PackageManager and ComponentName (see: Android - how to unregister a receiver created in the manifest? ) - and remember that you will need to re-enable the receiver if you need it again.
You say you have already set up your alarm. Make sure you specify ELAPSED_REALTIME_WAKEUP or RTC_WAKUP for the alarm Type to ensure that it runs even when the phone is in ‘sleep’ mode.
You also say you have already created the associated BroadcastReceiver to handle to alarm event. The BroadcastReceiver should do a minimum of work, so you should handle any processing in a separate thread or by launching a Service. You opted to launch a Service and terminate it using stopSelf() when it has finished, so that it doesn’t use up system resources. So far so good.
This is fine when the app is running, however as you require something that runs reliably for an indefinite period, you need to ensure that you manage the 'exception' situations where it has paused, the device is ‘sleeping’, the app has crashed/terminated, or the device has rebooted (and any other exception scenarios you may think of). Here are the issues I have identified that you need to address:
First: WakeLock is only guaranteed for the duration of the onReceive() method of the BroadcastReceiver. After it has terminated, the device could go back to ‘sleep’ even if your Service has not started or even completed, so you need to create a WakeLock, pass it to the Service and release it before you stop the Service. (Note: for your application, you require a PARTIAL_WAKE_LOCK). Be very careful using WakeLocks – make sure you only hold a WakeLock for the minimum required time and ensure you release it, as it’s use can lead to excessive battery drain). See http://www.netmite.com/android/mydroid/development/pdk/docs/power_management.html for an example of using WakeLocks.
Second: If you reset your alarm in code (rather than defining an automatically repeating one), do this in the OnReceive() method of the BroadcastReceiver or as the first thing in the Service you have launched – this will ensure that the alarm repeats, irrespective of the state of the application or device.
Third: Make sure that any Contexts you use are going to be non-null values. You can dynamically fetch the context in the Service using getApplicationContext(). Otherwise this can be achieved by EXPLICITLY passing the Context from your application to the alarm and make sure it is passed all the way through the BroadcastReceiver, and associated threads and Services. If you have statically stored Context in your application so you can retrieve it anywhere, then this will return a null value if the application has terminated. If you use the Context (for example to retrieve a resource, access a database etc), and it is null, it will cause a null pointer exception and the Service or BroadcastReceiver will crash. I believe this is the most likely reason for your Broadcast receivers not to be working when your app has terminated.
Fourth: You may wish to make references to ResourceIDs (e.g. R.drawable.icon) in your Service or BroadcastReceiver fully qualified (. R.drawable.icon) or generated from the passed Context. I haven’t yet found this to be necessary, but I suspect it may be prudent.
Fifth: Implement a separate BroadcastReceiver to handle a device reboot scenario (ON_BOOT_COMPLETE event). You could get this receiver to re-launch the app if appropriate or it could launch a service to check that your app is supposed to be active, set up any required parameters and set up the relevant alarms, then terminate it using stopSelf(), or just set the alarm again and let that receiver handle it all. Remember to ensure the service has a WakeLock for its duration and to release the WakeLock when it is complete. If you don’t just relaunch the app, or a Service (declared as part of your application) then you should also statically store the correct Context as a class attribute in your BroadcastReceiver, if you need it, so that it is available to access resources.
A couple of other things you may wish to consider:
As your set up is remote, I would seriously consider storing any persistent data in SQLite database tables. This will ensure that data is recoverable between application terminations and device reboots, without having to regenerate it.
If your application communicates with a server service, consider using push notifications for server initiated communication, rather than have the app periodically poll. Push Notifications can also be used to ‘wake up and launch services and apps’, so could be used as part of a remote mechanism to query the status of the device and your application. This approach is also more power efficient and timely.
Post information to LogCat at key points in your code for debugging. If the application terminates, then adb stops tracking the source code running for the receiver and service, but LogCat continues to function, so can be used to check the path through the code and variable values.
Other people may have better ways to address these issues or some other pointers (I would certainly be very happy to see other input), but I hope these ideas are helpful and good luck!
The point behind using AlarmManager with a service is to start up a service that will run briefly, then the service goes away (e.g., an IntentService). If you are going to try to have an everlasting service, you do not need AlarmManager, and your service will be shut down by Android after some period of time.
If you rewrite your app to not need an everlasting service, but rather use AlarmManager as it was intended, you should have better survivability.
I believe that what Lork wants to achieve is similar to something I am also wrestling with.
He wants the alarm manager to trigger a broadcast receiver that will handle the alarm, even when the application it is part of, has been terminated (for example by the Android OS).
For example: The application sets an alarm, with a type of ELAPSED_REALTIME_WAKEUP or RTC_WAKUP and has a Broadcast Receiver to handle it when it fires, via an Intent which references the application context and the Broadcast receiver class. The receiver is declared as a in the application manifest.
Under normal circumstances, when the application is running or paused, when the alarm goes off, the Broadcast Receiver is triggered, waking up the device and resuming the application as necessary, and the alarm in handled.
However, if the application has been killed (for example by the OS), then the alarm will still go off (as it is still registered) but the Broadcast Receiver will not be triggered and LogCat shows a null pointer exception, (I assume because the reference to the application is no longer in memory). This will occur, even if the Context has been passed.
Am I (and I assume Lork) missing an easy strategy here? Or is it not possible? Can a broadcast receiver exist on its own and trigger the app if necessary?
One, imperfect strategy I have been toying with, is to move all the app data access into a Content Provider, and have a separate low profile app which just implements the broadcast receiver – triggering a service to do the work and accessing the application data it requires via the Content Provider. This would still be subject to being terminated by the OS, but would be less likely.
I see all the examples of AlarmManager being set by an Activity.
My question is this:
If my application sets a recurring AlarmManager, does that persist even after the application that started is is closed and removed from memory?
If not, how do I start an AlarmManager at a lower level that is started by Android at boot up and if it ever fails or dies or throws an exception is restarted without the user having to do anything?
Lastly, if the action I wish for the BroadcastReceiver to undertake has no visual components, do I still have to create a separate Activity for it? In my case I want there to be a background uploader that wakes up and looks into a folder and if it sees files in that folder, sends them off to the server. I don't need any feedback to the user.
So, my ideal would be to have a magical, OS based AlarmManager that calls an IntentService which just handles the uploading, but I'm unclear on how to get such an AlarmManager running in the first place.
TIA
Yes, AFAIK the alarms "survive" and keeps getting triggered, even after the activity that registered them ends. But they don't survive a phone reboot.
If I understands your problem correctly, I think you can achieve what your looking for by creating a project with a broadcast receiver that listens for android.intent.action.BOOT_COMPLETED intents and then (re-)register a repeating alarm, which in turns starts a (Intent)Service to do the uploading.
You don't need an activity, but you probably would want one anyway, to let the user temporarily disable the upload mechanism by checking off a checkbox, or something. It would probably also be nice to let the user choose the frequency of your alarm, i.e. how often the service should be started and look for new files to upload. This would also be a good place to register your alarm for the first time.
I agree with Nicolai that you'd have 2 broadcast receivers in your application :
one that re-register the alarm on boot
one that starts your service when triggered by the alarm
You could still have an activity but it shouldn't be started by the alarm receiver (hence the service) : instead, maybe launch a notification as you start your service, with the user having the possibility to launch the activity from the expanded message of the notification.
maybe also think about setInexactRepeating (instead of setRepeating) for your alarm, as well as using a worker thread to handle the long uploads (in case the user wants to use your activity in the main thread at the same time).