I would like to use SQLiteStatement in my ContentProvider instead of the rawQuery or one of the other standard methods. I think using SQLiteStatement would give a more natural, native, efficient and less error prone approach to doing queries.
The problem is that I don't see a way to generate and return a Cursor. I realize I can use "call" and return a Bundle, but that approach requires that I cache and return all selected rows at the same time - this could be huge.
I will start looking at Android source code - I presume that "query" ultimately uses SQLiteStatement and somehow generates a Cursor. However, if anyone has any pointers or knowledge of this, I would greatly appreciate your sharing.
I would like to use SQLiteStatement in my ContentProvider instead of the rawQuery or one of the other standard methods. I think using SQLiteStatement would give a more natural, native, efficient and less error prone approach to doing queries.
Quoting the documentation for SQLiteStatement:
The statement cannot return multiple rows or columns, but single value (1 x 1) result sets are supported.
I fail to see why you would bother with a ContentProvider for single row, single column results, but, hey, it's your app...
The problem is that I don't see a way to generate and return a Cursor
Create a MatrixCursor and fill in the single result.
Related
The Android SDK documentation for SQLite provides an update method which takes as its parameters four values - table, values, whereClause, whereArgs. The first three make complete sense. However, it is not clear to me that using whereArgs with a whereClause containing ?'s as opposed to sending out a fully prepared whereClause offers any benefits - either in terms of security (there is no suggestion that this somehow helps to sanitize the SQL) or speed. So what then are the benefifts of going down that route instead of simply passing a full where string and a null whereArgs?
The docs say:
String: You may include ?s in the where clause, which will be replaced by the values from whereArgs. The values will be bound as Strings.
This is slightly misleading. No "replacement" takes place actually. Instead the ?s are variables and the whereArgs are values that are bound to those variables, and this binding happens inside the sqlite SQL program.
Using variable binding avoids issues such as SQL injection without the need to sanitize inputs.
Similar mechanism would be beneficial for performance in case you were executing the same SQL program over and over again with different values for variables. You only need to compile the SQL once. Android SQLite mechanism for that is SQLiteStatement (see the bind...() methods in its SQLiteProgram superclass).
Security is definitely an issue. If you use string concatenation, you are vulnerable to SQL Injection. Using ? and whereArgs does indeed sanitize the input so you are safe.
There is also the case of prepared statements - you compile them only once and then bind different values for each arguments placeholder. This will give you a benefit in terms of performance. You can't get that with your approach.
i'm trying to find a good way to sort the search results according to relevance after performing a search with a SearchView in Android. For me relevance means the number of matches in two SQLite text columns
I'm using a CursorLoader and there the sort order can be given to the constructor at the end
CursorLoader tLoader = new CursorLoader(
getActivity(), ContentProviderM.ARTICLE_CONTENT_URI,
tProj, tSel, tSelArgs, SORT_ORDER);
(or set using the setSortOrder (String sortOrder) method)
But i need more flexibility than this because i'm looking to sort on the number of matches rather than just on one or two columns
The only solution i can see myself is to add another column in my SQLite table, do some processing, and supply that column as the sort column to the CursorLoader
Now for my question: What is the best way to supply the sort order information to the CursorLoader using SQLite syntax, avoiding having to add a new column? (And what could this SQLite code look like?) Also, i'd like to ask more in general: Is there a different solution to this problem that i've missed?
Grateful for any help! And with kind regards,
Tord
Depending on the content provider, if it just pass to the orderBy field, you can do anything.
SQLiteDatabase query
orderBy How to order the rows, formatted as an SQL ORDER BY clause
(excluding the ORDER BY itself). Passing null will use the default
sort order, which may be unordered.
you can do whatever you want, this is just the line after ORDER BY
P.S. It is totally depending on the Content Provider, it it choose to ignore the parameter, you can do nothing.
i found a "workaround" for this problem.
After investigating different ways to write sqlite code i ended up just adding a new table column just for sorting. This column simply stores an integer and is updated every time that the user performs a search, right before the CursorLoader is created
Advantages:
We can now do all of the relevance calculations in Java code
Drawbacks:
Relevance calculation is done as the search is done so if we have a large number of items it may take some time to process everything
I am currently studying SQLite and I have found that it uses various classes like ContentValues for insertion and updation... I was wondering whether I have to follow the given way or can I write a normal SQL query and use db.execSQL() method to execute them?
Will it bring any inconsistency to my database because with these all "extra" steps doesnt it stop the flow of the query and I feel it would be faster if we use a query directly.
You can do any SQL command you want with db.execSQL except select command or any other SQL command that return data (you use db.rawQuery() for this). The classes used are helper classes that make it easy for you to manipulate DBs (try inserting 100 rows with 20 columns each using ContentValues and db.execSQL and you will get the point). For small tables it will not differ much (and you will not cause inconsistecies), however, for large tables with inputs that depend on user interface or use calculations, it might be useful to have a class like ContentValues with its helper methods.
Yes you can definitely use this way like using
myDB.execSQL("INSERT INTO MyTable VALUES ('fffff', 'numb', 20)");
to insert values but only when you are using database for small queries.
Also there are some flaws using direct methods which gets removed using ContentValues
For example,try to insert a blob into the database using this method ,you will get a null bitmap while converting the retrieved data to bitmap.But when you insert using ContentValues,you will get the correct data i.e you will be able to convert that into Bitmap.
The task is to combine data from 2 different tables with similar columns, sorted by one column .
Seems like MergeCursor might help, but have no idea how to sort items.
The only solutions I see now is converting manually to ArrayAdapter, or do sneaky JOINs (not sure yet its possible)
Thanks.
MergeCursor does not offer sorting.
The only solutions I see now is converting manually to ArrayAdapter, or do sneaky JOINs (not sure yet its possible)
I have no idea what the latter is. If you want to stick with the Cursor interface, you can build yourself a MatrixCursor. Or, you can try to create your own CursorWrapper that maintains the sort order and rewrites all position-related calls.
We have about 7-8 tables in our Android application each having about 8 columns on an average. Both read and write operations are performed on the database and I am experimenting and trying to find ways to enhance the performance of the DataAccess layer. So, far I have tried the following:
Use positional arguments in where clauses (Reason: so that sqlite makes use of the same execution plan)
Enclose inserts and update with transactions(Reason: every db operation is enclosed within a transaction by default. Doing this will remove that overhead)
Indexing: I have not created any explicit index other than those created by default on the primary key and unique keys columns.(Reason: indexing will improve seek time)
I have mentioned my assumptions in paranthesis; please correct me if I am wrong.
Questions:
Can I add anything else to this list? I read somewhere that avoiding the use of db-journal can improve performance of updates? Is this a myth or fact? How can this be done, if recomended?
Are nested transactions allowed in SQLite3? How do they affect performance?
The thing is I have a function which runs an update in a loop, so, i have enclosed the loop within a transaction block. Sometimes this function is called from another loop inside some other function. The calling function also encloses the loop within a transaction block. How does such a nesting of transactions affect performance?
The where clauses on my queries use more than one columns to build the predicate. These columns might not necessarily by a primary key or unique columns. Should I create indices on these columns too? Is it a good idea to create multiple indices for such a table?
Pin down exactly which queries you need to optimize. Grab a copy of a typical database and use the REPL to time queries. Use this to benchmark any gains as you optimize.
Use ANALYZE to allow SQLite's query planner to work more efficiently.
For SELECTs and UPDATEs, indexes can things up, but only if the indexes you create can actually be used by the queries that you need speeding up. Use EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN on your queries to see which index would be used or if the query requires a full table scan. For large tables, a full table scan is bad and you probably want an index. Only one index will be used on any given query. If you have multiple predicates, then the index that will be used is the one that is expected to reduce the result set the most (based on ANALYZE). You can have indexes that contain multiple columns (to assist queries with multiple predicates). If you have indexes with multiple columns, they are usable only if the predicates fit the index from left to right with no gaps (but unused columns at the end are fine). If you use an ordering predicate (<, <=, > etc) then that needs to be in the last used column of the index. Using both WHERE predicates and ORDER BY both require an index and SQLite can only use one, so that can be a point where performance suffers. The more indexes you have, the slower your INSERTs will be, so you will have to work out the best trade-off for your situation.
If you have more complex queries that can't make use of any indexes that you might create, you can de-normalize your schema, structuring your data in such a way that the queries are simpler and can be answered using indexes.
If you are doing a large number of INSERTs, try dropping indexes and recreating them at the end. You will need to benchmark this.
SQLite does support nested transactions using savepoints, but I'm not sure that you'll gain anything there performance-wise.
You can gain lots of speed by compromising on data integrity. If you can recover from database corruption yourself, then this might work for you. You could perhaps only do this when you're doing intensive operations that you can recover from manually.
I'm not sure how much of this you can get to from an Android application. There is a more detailed guide for optimizing SQLite in general in the SQLite documentation.
Here's a bit of code to get EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN results into Android logcat from a running Android app. I'm starting with an SQLiteOpenHelper dbHelper and an SQLiteQueryBuilder qb.
String sql = qb.buildQuery(projection,selection,selectionArgs,groupBy,having,sortOrder,limit);
android.util.Log.d("EXPLAIN",sql + "; " + java.util.Arrays.toString(selectionArgs));
Cursor c = dbHelper.getReadableDatabase().rawQuery("EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN " + sql,selectionArgs);
if(c.moveToFirst()) {
do {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for(int i = 0; i < c.getColumnCount(); i++) {
sb.append(c.getColumnName(i)).append(":").append(c.getString(i)).append(", ");
}
android.util.Log.d("EXPLAIN",sb.toString());
} while(c.moveToNext());
}
c.close();
I dropped this into my ContentProvider.query() and now I can see exactly how all the queries are getting performed. (In my case it looks like the problem is too many queries rather than poor use of indexing; but maybe this will help someone else...)
I would add these :
Using of rawQuery() instead of building using ContentValues will fasten up in certain cases. off course it is a little tedious to write raw query.
If you have a lot of string / text type data, consider creating Virtual tables using full text search (FTS3), which can run faster query. you can search in google for the exact speed improvements.
A minor point to add to Robie's otherwise comprehensive answer: the VFS in SQLite (which is mostly concerned with locking) can be swapped out for alternatives. You may find one of the alternatives like unix-excl or unix-none to be faster but heed the warnings on the SQLite VFS page!
Normalization (of table structures) is also worth considering (if you haven't already) simply because it tends to provide the smallest representation of the data in the database; this is a trade-off, less I/O for more CPU, and one that is usually worthwhile in medium-scale enterprise databases (the sort I'm most familiar with), but I'm afraid I've no idea whether the trade-off works well on small-scale platforms like Android.