Develop Reference

How to parameterise all strings in android application

I am building an application and I am thinking of how to "parametrise" all the strings in the application (is it even possible) in order to allow me to change them easily without "redeploying" it again ...
meaning it will be somewhere in a file with strings (something like you have PO files in PHP when using templates and different languages) where I can manage it ..
it might be useful when I would like to use different languages :)
I am kinda struggling on this one, so I was thinking if you can give me a clue or show me where to "go" to study how this should be implemented ..
Thanks

If you want different langage in your app, create as many strings.xml files as you need. However, when you add new strings file, you have to redeploy.
To avoid that, you should call a specific API in backend which send you all the texts according to the langage of the device. For that you must manage back and front.

So if I understand your question correcly go to res - >value folder -> strings.xml - > open it and you will see something like this:
<string name="app_name">this is your app name</string>
And now every time that you want text to be "this is your app name" all you need to do is to add this line:
android:text="#string/app_name"
And when you will change the actual string in strings.xml it will also change in every place he is being used (android:text="#string/app_name")

Android has a built-in mechanism for localising assets (Strings included)
https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/resources/localization#creating-alternatives

What you are trying to do is known as 'Localisation', this can be helpful if you want to give users different language support and similar kind of stuff.
In android, this is done by putting all the strings in the Strings.xml file located in the res folder.
If you're using android studio, just press Alt + Enter on any hardcoded string and then select 'Extract string resource' from the popup, give the name of the string and Voila! you're done.
It is also a part of good coding practice, in fact you've might have noticed 'Lint warnings' in your layout files if you type any hardcoded string, and it asks you to add this string in the strings.xml file
You can create a separate String file for each language that you wanna include.

Option 1
Using the Default Built-In Mechanism
You already have answers about this or you can read the official documentation about it.
Essentially, you maintain an xml file called strings.xml which is a key-value of Strings. Each file (one per language) will be located in a values folder. E.g.: for french, you'd want values-fr/strings.xml. Each file will include all the translated strings. If a value is not found in French, then the english file will be searched instead as a fallback. If the key is not there, the app will crash (if I am not mistaken).
Pros
Included with the system
Supports many languages
Packed at compile time, always available.
Cons
Resources are "read-only" once they are compiled; you cannot change a string and save the change this way.
Option 2
Roll your own Thing.
If you need to be able to dynamically alter these strings, you'll need a few key pieces:
A way to obtain/download said strings.
A default in case step 1 fails (what if the user cannot download them?) You need defaults.
To ensure every widget that needs to display text, calls your own creation of a class that can manage said dynamic strings (i'll elaborate down below)
You need to know what to do if a String is somehow magically missing; because this is dynamic, there has to be a fallback in case the string is not found (see 2)
This has to be relatively fast (you don't want expensive lookups when constructing strings and UI elements).
Pros
You can model this the way it works best for you
You will be able to load strings as you see fit and even change them at runtime.
Cons
You have to build all this.
It's error prone, and most likely slower than the native solution.
You must ensure you don't miss strings and that you have dafults.
You must modify normal widgets (say TextView) to understand how to fetch the strings (or you must always provide them), and this is not going to be automatic, you'll either have to delegate or subclass into a YourCustomTextViewThatUnderstandsYourStringThing extends TextView (name... is just a draft ;) )
You must ensure you don't leak memory by keeping strings in memory you don't care anymore.
If you want to "persist" these downloaded languages (and you should), you have to write/use your own persisting mechanism (either by writing the files or by using some database, shared preferences is not the place for these).
You need to cache them (see above) and manage the validity of the strings (what if they become old, can they become old? when should you re-fetch them?)
etc.
As you can see it's not trivial and each app has its own world of problems to solve, but that's roughly what it means.
As for "code"... the simplest way I can think of (or rather, the bare basics) are:
Find a way to "store" the strings: e.g.:
Map<String, String> oneLanguage
So in this Map, you store the KEY (to find the value) and the VALUE:
oneLanguage.put("app_name", "My Super App")
Keep all the strings in one place in memory:
Map<String, Map<String, String>> allLanguages
so then you do:
allLanguages.put("English", oneLanguage);
Now you can add other languages:
anotherLanguage.put("app_name", "Mi Super App"); //my Spanish is top-notch
allLanguages.put("Spanish", anotherLanguage);
Now you have a place where to store (in memory) all your keys/values for each language.
When you want to retrieve Spanish, you'd have a method like:
String getString(#NonNull String locale, #NonNull String key) {
return allLanguages.get(locale).get(key);
}
And then you'd need to (either manually or via subclassing or whatever approach you find more convenient) to set these strings like:
// I mean, don't hardcode the locale... but you get the idea.
appNameTextView.setText(yourLanguageManager.getString("Spanish", "app_name"));
What approach you take for this last step, is entirely up to you.
As usual, all the above is pseudo-code, and not a complete solution to this approach. Things you want to do: ask the device what locale is using, keep track of which locale is in use (so you don't have to pass it every time), fetch these locales from your server (not pictured) :), persist these to disk, as well as save in shared preferences, the "locale" key that the user has selected, add methods to your yourLanguageManager so it can have things like:
boolean updateLocale(String locale, Map<String, String newStrings)
boolean deleteLocale(String locale)
Map<String, String> getLocale(String locale)
etc.. you get the idea.
All in all, it's just a simple data structure that can contain keys and values.
Good luck!

what R.java file actually does and how

I have been working on a simple android tutorial and while browsing through the project folders I found this R.java file in gen folder...
When I opened it seemed to me as a mess...
first R itself is a class.
it had multiple Inner classes defined within eg drawable,id,layout,etc.
and that inner classes had lots of variables declared as below which were assigned with hex values
public static final int addr=0x7f080003;
...
...
and much more
R is auto generated and acts as some pointer for other files
Questions for R.java
what it is basically for
how it works
why
values are in hex
what role did it performs while the actual application is running

"Acts as some pointer to other files" is actually absolutely correct, now the question is which files it points to how it is done.
What does it contain?
R file contains IDs for all the resources in the res folder of your project and also some additional IDs that you define on your own (in the layouts, for example). The IDs are needed for the Android resource management system to retrieve the files from the APK. Each ID is basically a number which corresponds to some resource in the resource management system.
The file itself is needed so you can access or reference the resource from code by giving the ID of the resource to the resource manager. Say, if you want to set the view in the activity, you call
setContentView(R.layout.main);
main in the R file contains the number which is understood by the Android resource management system as the layout file which is called main.
Why is it better than just plain file names?
It's harder to make a mistake with the generated fields. If you write the field name incorrectly, your program won't compile and you will know that there's an error immediately. If you write an incorrect string, however, the application won't fail until it is launched.
If you want to read more on this topic, you should check the Android documentation, especially the Accessing Resources part.

This holds your resource ids. So when you do something like
TextView tv = (TextView) findViewById(R.id.mytextview);
it looks up your id here for that View, layout, etc... This way the app has an easy way to look up your ids while you can use easy to remember names. Anytime you create a resource it automatically creates an id for it and stores it here. That's why you never want to try and edit this file yourself.

One way to think about how valuable R.java is, imagine a world without it. Its amazing how android brings the xml and java world together to help avoid coding the UI manually completely. With legacy java building UI using the java language was a pain. Invaluable.
With Android you can not only build your UI using only xml, but also see it while you build it. Invaluable.
Every element in the xml can be referenced in the java code WITHOUT writing a single line of code to parse the xml :). Just R.id.nameOfElement. Invaluable.
Rapid development is beautifully done in android. Imagine if iPhone would have 5000 screens to fit that one piece of code, they would crumble on their XCode. Google has done a wonderful job with just R.java. Invaluable.

Android String File equivalent in iPhone(Monotouch)

In android we have files by name String. Developers define the string values that they used for naming objects in this file. This is a very useful way. Because avoid of hard coding string values(you can change them from a single file, less time to change), also useful to creating multi language application and etc. (for more info just google this).
But the question is this: whether iPhone(Monotouch) have a mechanism like this to define strings on them or developers have to define themselves mechanism for this?

In XCode, you'll find File/New File, then on the left, pick "Resource", and you'll find "Strings File".
From code, you'll be referencing the keys in your strings file with NSLocalizedString:
NSLog("%#", NSLocalizedString(#"YOUR-STRING-KEY-OR-DEFAULT-VALUE", #"Comment about what this is"));
For details on what that second param is for, What is the second parameter of NSLocalizedString()?

Put your strings in a single file. Make them global constants. Access them throughout the app. When you change these, the change will be reflected everywhere.
It's not a big deal to have persistent string references throughout your app. It can be done in any decent programming language and platform I suppose.

Layout files naming conventions?

What are some layout file naming conventions people have come up with.
I haven't found anything online, but thought about using the following convention.
What does everyone think?
- activity_*
- dialog_*
- list_item_*
That's all I have worked with so far.
Also, what about the naming of the activity against its layout? For example:
-> res
-> layout
-> activity_about_us.xml
-> src
-> activity
-> AboutUs.java

Strangely enough, trying to google this question brings only this page as meaningful result...
For the past half year I am using naming convention similar to yours but with shorter prefixes. For example:
For activity that shows "About us" screen:
Class name: ActAboutUs. Prefixing class is kind of overkill but it clearly distinguishes activity classes from the others. Initially I used separate directory for all the activities (similar to your approach) but after some time I realized that for bigger apps may be it is better to group in directories by feature than by superclass (i.e. Activity). It is easier for me to work in single directory for example /src/settings/ when I work on Settings. That way all java files that I need are in a single dir so i don't have to wander around:
/src/settings/ActSettingsGlobal.java
/src/settings/ActSettingsNet.java
/src/settings/Settings.java
/src/settings/SettingsDBAdapter.java
/src/settings/etc...
This approach also helps to split the work among different developers, i.e. each one is working in his own dir on separate feature so no stepping on each other's feet :-).
Some people preffer suffixes but I found them less useful. Prefixes help to group things alphabetically like in the example above: Act* prefix is sorted first so all activities are conveniently at the top.
I am even considering of using Act_ as a prefix which is more readable although it is in conflict with java naming conventions...
Layout filename: act_about_us.xml. In res/layout/ we don't have the "luxury" of subdirs which is quite unfortunate so the only way to group things is using appropriate prefix like act_, dlg_, etc...
String IDs: <string name="act_about_us_dlg_help1_title" ...
string.xml is the place where we have most problems with duplicate names. It is very easy to create duplicates if naming convention like activity_element_item is not used. It adds a lot of additional typing but it saves you from a lot of confusion later on.
For global (application wide) strings we use prefix "global_", for example global_btn_ok, global_msg_no_inet_conn. Usually we make one person responsible for all global_ strings so if someone needs new string or change he needs to sync with him in order to avoid creating a mess.
(now I am realizing that activity__element__item (two underscores) is more clear and readable than activity_element_item)
All in all I still can't get rid of the feeling that there is something wrong with my approach because I can't believe that google devs created such an inconvenient framework when it comes to working with files, IDs, names, etc...

i think following naming convention should be follow
for activity
if our activity name is
DisplayListActivity
then our layoutname should be
display_list_activity.xml
for list items we can include category in list item layout name
country_list_item.xml
and for dialogboxes their action can be included
delete_country_dialog.xml

When looking for a group of layouts, which is how I tend to work on them, I find it effective to always prepend the class name and follow up with any sub-layouts. For Instance:
Class Name: AboutActivity.java
Layout Name: about_activity.xml
Sub-layout Name: about_activity_menu.xml
Sub Sub-layout Name: about_activity_menu_item.xml
Your activity will always be at the top of each grouping and hunting for non-activities becomes less of a chore. Anyone know why sub-folders aren't a thing yet? I expect for efficiency and simplicity on the back-end, but I imagine it wouldn't hurt too much.

This is a good read https://jeroenmols.com/blog/2016/03/07/resourcenaming/
Basically, you follow WHAT WHERE DESCRIPTION SIZE
For example, layout file
activity_main: content view of the MainActivity
fragment_articledetail: view for the ArticleDetailFragment
strings
articledetail_title: title of ArticleDetailFragment
feedback_explanation: feedback explanation in FeedbackFragment
drawable
- all_infoicon_large: large version of generic info icon
- all_infoicon_24dp: 24dp version of generic info icon

The first part of a layout file name should always be the type of the corresponding class.
For example if we have a class MainActivity (type is Activity in this case), the corresponding layout file should be called activity_main.xml
That means that lets say we have a dialog called WarningDialog, the corresponding layout file should be called dialog_warning.xml, same goes for fragments etc.
This might seem familiar because thats also how the activity/layout files are named when creating a new project in Android Studio (MainActivity -> activity_main.xml).

For me, naming should fix two important requirements:
it should give you a hint about files' content and type (for example activity_login/login_activity or movie_list_item/list_item_movie)
it should visually group related items together to minimize jumping back and forth
For the second requirement, most people define "related" as type related which gives you something like this:
activity_login
activity_movie_list
activity_user_list
activity_settings
fragment_movie_list
fragment_user_list
item_movie
item_user
etc.
I prefer to do grouping by feature since you'll almost never work on all activities or all fragments, but instead, you'll work on movies feature or setting feature.
so, my prefered way is this:
login_activity
movie_list_activity
movie_list_fragment
movie_list_item
user_list_activity
user_list_fragment
user_list_item
settings_activity
Source files are following xml naming but in CamelCase, so there will be
LoginActivity
MovieListActivity
MovieFragment
etc.

Should keys be placed on a xml to be accessed with R.string.key?

I usually place my keys on an xml and access them with R.string.key_name but someone make me notice that I could have inline strings in the code.
I feel that I might use that key in different places and if I change its name I would just rename in the xml but perhaps that doesn't make too much sense with keys.
What do you think?

Your question conflates two different questions:
Does it make sense to have a single definition of your key?
Does it make sense for this single definition to be within an XML file?
The answer to point 1 is clearly "yes". Duplicating strings used as keys (which need to be the same everywhere for your code to function correctly) is a recipe for pain and heartache.
But what benefit does putting the key in an XML file give you? You're just adding "noise" to your code, and ensuring that whoever reads it has to find, understand and look in at least one additional file.
public static final is the way to go.

Inline literal strings will be a massive pain to change if they get scattered through the code. Localizing them in one place with either the strings.xml or a defining a public final static variable will probably save you a headache later.