Develop Reference

Fragment implementation - Using google's document as an example

I am reading google developer's article on Fragment implementation. I am stuck at one point in the session "Creating event callbacks to the activity".
It says that when Fragment A, which contains a list of articles' title, wants to communicate with Article Fragment, which shows the content of the article, Fragment A should implement an interface OnArticleSelectedListener. A listener is set in the activity hosting the two fragments, and the listener will send information to Article Fragment.
My problem is that, why don't we simply implement an interface in Article Fragment listening to Fragment A's selection? I know there must be a reason, but I just don't get it.
My Attempt:
Is it because we cannot find a reference to Article Fragment in Fragment A? We could only find the reference of Article Fragment from the hosting activity.
Many Thx.

Fragments can not communicate with each other. Activity is not only a Host but also acts as a middle man between two or more fragments.
(taken from developer.android.com)
Although a Fragment is implemented as an object that's independent from an Activity and can be used inside multiple activities, a given instance of a fragment is directly tied to the activity that contains it.
In some cases, you might need a fragment to share events with the activity. A good way to do that is to define a callback interface inside the fragment and require that the host activity implement it. When the activity receives a callback through the interface, it can share the information with other fragments in the layout as necessary.

What is the difference creating event callback or the activity itself within a fragment?

Lets say I will be using several fragments(Action1Fragment, Action2Fragment etc.) within an activity(ActionActivity). I want to access some elements of activity object, or call some methods of ActionActivity. It is generally offered to create a event callback . What if I keep a reference to ActionActivity within Action1Fragment instead of keeping a reference to CallBackInterface which is actually implemented by ActionActivity since I will be using these fragments only within a particular activity.
I am kinda confused by the idea that Activity might be dead while reference of interface might still be alive(it sounds ridiculous when I read it again but it is OK if I managed to explain myself).

The Android Developer tutorials recommend that you use a callback interface on your fragments. The activity that hosts the fragment must implement the callback interface. The fragment does getActivity() and casts it to the callback interface, and then makes the callback.
This is the recommended way to promote a more modular design. It would not matter if your fragments will only ever work inside one activity. But if you want to make more generic fragments that could be used by different activities, then the above design pattern starts to become useful. (For example: a telephones fragment inside an person fragment and a company fragment.)
Suppose you do it the other way: the fragment does getActivity() and casts it to PersonActivity. The fragment then has access to all the public methods of PersonActivity. But this design pattern becomes much more ugly when you need the other activity to also use the fragment. The fragment would then have to be changed to first try and cast to PersonActivity, and if that throws, try the CompanyActivity.
The recommended design pattern basically gives you a way to make an activity compatible with the fragment instead of vice versa. The fragment only knows about the callback interface and not about any of the activities itself. The activities do know about the fragment because they implement the callback interface but they already knew about it because they constructed and initialized an instance of it.
Does that make sense?

Avoid fragment recreation with hashmap

I have one Activity which handles 5 fragments. Every time the activity replaces each fragment onCreate and onCreateView are being called. In order to avoid this i created a HashMap where i store each fragment. Before the activity replaces a fragment it checks the hashmap if this fragment already exists. If it exists it replaces the old fragment with the instance from the map. In other case it instatiates the fragment and after that it replaces the old own.
Despite i avoid the instation of the fragment when i find it on hashmap, the onCreate and onCreateView are being called. How can i avoid this? Is there any other way to achieve my goal?

First of all there is no use for a HashMap to save the references of your Fragments. You can set a tag to a Fragment at the point you add/replace it. Have a look at the FragmentTransaction.add(int, Fragment, String) and FragmenTransaction.replace(int, Fragment, String) methods. If you provide a unique String for the tag you can retrieve the Fragment with the FragmentManager.findFragmentByTag(String) method. A container for Fragment references is redundant.
To the point:
If you use the replace/add method to show a Fragment the onCreate() and onCreateView() is called. To avoid the onCreate() call you can just attach and detach your Fragments. This way only onCreateView() will be invoked. But it's not possible to prevent the onCreateView() call.
Maybe update your question with some details what you want to achieve, because it sounds you are completely on the wrong track.

Your goal is not very cleared.
When you deal with fragment, keep in mind that your control over their life cycle is limited, you only extend (system controlled) object. You can read on the life cycle of the fragment here: Creating a Fragment.
Assuming your goal is to switch between 5 active fragments, I can think of two options:
option 1: design your fragment so they can be recreated quickly, maintain the data in some other place, and provide it to the fragment, which only do the work of display the data.
option 2: The android support library has two fragment adapters, FragmentPagerAdapter, and FragmentStatePagerAdapter. The first is an adapter which keep the fragments in memory.

How can i avoid this? Is there any other way to achieve my goal?
If you really want to avoid your activity instance to be recreated again and again just use android:launchMode="singleTop".
Example:
<activity
android:name=".YourActivity"
android:label="SomeLabel"
android:launchMode="singleTop">
</activity>
From developer docs,
If an instance of the activity already exists at the top of the target
task, the system routes the intent to that instance through a call to
its onNewIntent() method, rather than creating a new instance of the
activity.
Source: http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/manifest/activity-element.html

Android Lifecycle management of Fragments within ViewPager and FragmentPagerAdapter

I have been struggling to find out what the correct management of Fragments within a FragmentActivity with a ViewPager is. Before I go into details, a quick summary of the issue that I am facing is the following:
I have a FragmentActivity with a ViewPager. The ViewPager uses a custom, yet very simple FragmentPagerAdapter. Each Fragment within the ViewPager comprises of an ExpandableListView. I also have an action bar button called "Refresh". For now, let's assume that the ViewPager has only one Fragment. The activity is created, and the Fragment's ExpandableListView is populated (so far so good). When the Refresh button is clicked, the handling method within the FragmentActivity iterates over the list of Fragments that are assigned to the FragmentPagerAdapter and calls refresh() on each Fragment to populate its ListView. However, when the orientation of the device changes (e.g. from portrait to landscape), the Activity is recreated and so are the fragments. Clicking the Refresh button now will iterate over non-initialised Fragments.
I know that I am being quite vague, especially without sample code, but please bear with me. I have traced the problem and method calls as follows from the start of the application/activity:
FragmentActivity.onCreate()
FragmentActivity.setContentView()
FragmentActivity.createPagerFragments() <-- this creates an ArrayList of Fragments and assignes them to a new FragmentPagerAdapter which is in turn assigned to the ViewPager.
Fragment.onAttach()
Fragment.onCreate() <-- nothing special here, just calling the super method.
Fragment.onCreateView() <-- nothing special here either, just inflating the layout
Fragment.onActivityCreated() <-- nothing here either.
<< All good, orientation changes here >>
FragmentActivity.onCreate()
Fragment.onAttach()
Fragment.onCreate()
FragmentActivity.setContentView()
FragmentActivity.createPagerFragments()
Fragment.onCreateView()
Fragment.onActivityCreated()
<< Refresh button clicked >>
FragmentActivity.refresh() <-- iterates over the newly created Fragments from #13 (not these by Android!).
<< Crash: NullPointerException for mExpandableListView in Fragment. >>
So the problem, as I see it, is as follows:
When Android re-creates the FragmentActivity and its Views after a change of screen orientation (calls #9-15 above), it creates new Fragment objects with their state restored to what the original ones were. However, these ones appear to be completely managed by the FragmentManager, and not by the FragmentPagerAdapter. In contrast, when the FragmentPagerAdapter is re-created along with the Fragments in the activity's onCreate method (see call #13) the Fragments that get assigned to the adapter never have their Fragment.onCreate() or Fragment.onCreateView() methods called at all. So when the refresh() method is called (see #17) the method iterates over these Fragments that have not been initialised. Therefore, when they try to populate the ExpandableListView, the view's instance variable is NULL. This is to be expected as the instance variable is only assigned in the Fragment.onCreateView() method that never gets called on these Fragments.
So my question is: how does one properly make re-use of the re-recreated (by Android) Fragments after the screen orientation has changed in order to avoid creating new ones that don't get initialised? I need to have a valid reference to them, in order to call their refresh() method that populates them on-demand. Ideally, they should also be assigned to the FragmentPagerAdapter as well.
I hope I have been clear in describing the issue, and the reason that I have not provided sample code is because the problem (as can be seen) is not from the code itself but from a rather incorrect (seemigly) re-creation of Fragments rather than re-use. But if needed, I can give you sample code, I just through this way would be clearer.
Thank you!

It's lot to read, but after reading just introduction and the question and having experience with FragmentStatePagerAdapter, which is similar to FragmentPagerAdapter I can tell you that:
After rotation your adapter will AUTOMAGICALLY attach old fragments. So it seems that although activity creating adapter is being recreated, FragmentManager, which is global and it's instance preserve activity's recreation will detect that new FragmentStatePagerAdapter is combined with the same ViewPager and is asking for the same Fragments and will simply fetch them from Fragment's BackStack.
You as designer of Fragments can notice this behavior by continues invocation of Fragment.onAttach() and Fragment.onDetach(). When onAttach() occurs it's either creation of your Fragment or reusing it after rotation. You should be able to distinguish that Fragment was rotated with use of callback onRestoreRnstanceState().
You will see in your logs many onCreate() and other states logs simultaneously, because FragmentStatePagerAdapter always fetches/creates min 3 Fragments (except if you set that they are only 2 or 1), so also after screen rotation 3 fragments will be reattached from backstack.
I hope that it helped.

I believe that this question, about retrieving the current fragment from a ViewPager, will help you. As already pointed out, fragments are managed by the Fragment(State)PagerAdapter and NOT Activity's or Fragment's lifecycle.
The first time the activity is created, fragments are returned by the getItem method. This method is called only once per fragment, even if the activity gets recreated.
Subsequent times, the fragments are returned by the instantiateItem method. Most probably, this is the place, where you need to get hold of your fragments and call their refresh methods.

How about adding this to Activity Tag in your manifest:
android:configChanges="orientation"
or this for API 13 or higher
android:configChanges="orientation|screenSize"
so it won't recreate your fragments when it changes orientation..

Saving ListData Objects with onSavedInstanceState

I have an app that has one main Activity that swaps out numerous Fragment's. Well it doesn't matter what Fragment you are on, after low memory kills the Activity and you try to return to the app, it boots you back to the "start" Fragment that the Activity first calls. (Note: Almost all of these are actually ListFragment's)
So here are my questions:
Should I be using onSaveInstanceState() in EACH Fragment? And if so, am I saving the Data in the Fragment OR the Fragment itself? Or do you use onSaveInstanceState() only once in the Main Activity. (If this is even the course to take)
Note: I have setRetainInstance(true) but I don't think I am handling that correctly, if that is the solution. These are all put as the last line of onActivityCreated().

The answer depends a lot on how you are managing fragments.
I'll assume you are not using the Fragment backstack, and that you have called setRetainInstance(true) on EACH fragment.
You need to use a tag when you attach the fragments.
In Activity#onSaveInstanceState() you need to remember which fragments are visible.
In Activity#onCreate you need to find the existing Fragments by tag for each fragment, then create new instances of any Fragments you can't find. Now you can use the information from the saved instance state to make the appropriate Fragments visible (show or add or replace as necessary depending on how your code manages the fragments.)
Edit in response to questions/comments:
activty.getFragmentManager().findFragmentByTag(tag); finds an existing fragment
in a Fragment transaction: add(fragment, tag), replace(id, fragment, tag), etc. lets you specify the tag. You can also put it in a layout file using the attribute
class=".myFrag$tag"
The actual fragment object including its contents still exist when you use setRetainInstance.
Note: If you don't want to use tags, you may also use the fragment manager's putFragment/getFragment methods to put the fragment into the instance state bundle.
Finally you can simply let the fragment save itself by calling FragmentManager's saveFragmentInstanceState but I've had trouble using this correctly.