I have a scenario where i have to do following task:
1. populate a list-view.
2. perform database operation which is very time consuming task.
3. database processing/operation time is sometime unpredictable.
I have used listView using holder pattern, now it is working faster than earlier but still taking significant time. What else i can do to improve the performance.
I have an idea but i am afraid whether it will be good to implement or not. Idea is to put the database operation in AsyncTask and update my listview there only.
But i am afraid of doing so is because my listview is totally dependent on database result. So i can display something on Listview only when i am done with DB operation
Please suggest is using Async task will be good approach and please suggest any other idea.
Using the Holder approach is good. Use that in your adapters always. Make sure you are reusing the convert views as well.
Using an AsyncTask is the best option. But you don't have to wait for the entire operation to complete. Read up on how AsyncTask works. Use the publishProgress() method in your doInBackground() of the AsyncTask to give batches of data to your list.
For example, if you have to process 100 rows, process 10, then do a publishProgress() which will update the list with those 10 rows. When you process the next batch, update the list with publishProgress() again.
Related
I am using Async task to populate auto-complete suggestions from server.
Problem:
when user types and removes the text in edittext so many times.
lets say he typed: cofee > cof > coffee >coffee late .... etc for so many times.
for each text changed after 3 keyword(threshold) i am initializing an asynctask and ask for result.
so in current scenario i have so many threads running in background. so some of my latest async threads are waiting for there chance.
Whole this make my app very slow.
What can I do to tackle this problem?
If it is possible to load entire data from server at beginning...then you can avoid calling asynctask repeatedly and fetching the data from server. This will improve performance of you app. If data displayed in Listview is String, following link show how to filter it:
http://www.androidhive.info/2012/09/android-adding-search-functionality-to-listview/
And if custom object is used in ListView adapter, try:
Filtering ListView with custom (object) adapter
Hopefully this helps.
You should cancel the current task before issuing a new one. Use AsyncTask#cancel(true) for that and make sure that the execution of the task can be quickly stopped. This means correct handling of interruption and frequent checking whether the task was cancelled in the body of AsyncTask#doInBackground.
And you cannot execute again the AsyncTask you have cancelled. You have to create a new one. (Trying to execute it again leads to IllegalStateExceptions)
It worked for me by cancelling the task each time you change the text (if it is still running).
You need to define your request once outside the listener(private for the class), and then start your listener function by (if your request is not finished, then cancel it).
define your request out side the function
private YourSearchTaskClass YourTaskReq = new YourSearchTaskClass();
then start your addTextChangeListener/afterTextChanged by this
if (YourTaskReq.getStatus()!= AsyncTask.Status.FINISHED)
YourTaskAvReq.cancel(false);
YourTaskReq= new YourSearchTaskClass(keyword);
The endless adapter that I've used in my code, doesn't stop expecting data even if I am out of it. Thus the throbbing symbol, which is the loading symbol here, keeps on circling expecting some data.
How do I stop it? How do I make the endless adapter know that I'm out of data?
Also, I would like to tweak the adapter so that it can use multiple lists. Is it possible? By multiple lists, I mean list embedded inside another list. If yes, is there an example or any ideas as to how to do it?
How do I make the endless adapter know that I'm out of data?
Quoting the documentation:
Your EndlessAdapter subclass also needs to implement cacheInBackground(). This method will be called from a background thread, and it needs to download more data that will eventually be added to the ListAdapter you used in the constructor. While the demo application simply sleeps for 10 seconds, a real application might make a Web service call or otherwise load in more data.
This method returns a boolean, which needs to be true if there is more data yet to be fetched, false otherwise.
Since this method is called on a background thread, you do not need to fork your own thread. However, at the same time, do not try to update the UI directly.
If you expected to be able to retrieve data, but failed (e.g., network error), that is fine. However, you should then return false, indicating that you have no more data.
Also, I would like to tweak the adapter so that it can use multiple lists. Is it possible? By multiple lists, I mean list embedded inside another list.
No. Android does not support the notion of lists inside of lists. You are welcome to take a look at my MergeAdapter (if you really mean that you wish to concatenate multiple lists together) or Android's ExpandableListView (if your lists-in-lists is really some sort of shallow tree structure).
It is possible to use different data for your own Adapter this data can be of any type such as
ArrayList<HashMap/HashSet<?,List<?>>> it is your own business how you will use it within your getView(...) method. You can implement a poller service which will update your Adapter with data accordingly and setAdapter() after. If there's no data just idle...
hope this helps abit.
I'm having issues with multithreading in my application. I know there are many posts on Threads/AsyncTasks/etc, but none seem to address my specific problem.
Basically, I get a query string in my search Activity, then send it to my results Activity, where the string is used as a SQL query, the results are returned as an array of JSON objects, then I display these objects in a ListView (which is part of the results Activity). All of my SQL connection and retrieval is done in a separate class that I call at the start of the results Activity.
MySQLRetrieve data = new MySQLRetrieve();
ArrayList<Tile> tiles = data.getResults(nameValuePairs, isLocationSearch);
The above code is how I get the SQL response and convert into an ArrayList, which I then use the populate my ListView with. getResults() takes care of all of this.
I already have separate threads working to download images into the ListView, but what I can't get to work is getting the SQL query and result to run in it's own Thread. What I want to achieve is this:
User enters search query in search Activity.
Intent is sent to results Activity, and it starts immediately.
ProgressDialog (just the animated spinner thing, not a loading bar) displays while the SQL query is taking place.
ListView populates with objects from the JSON array, lazy loading images as they come.
I have steps 1,2, and 4 working well, but 3 is the problem. I've looked up AsyncTasks, which seem to be the answer, but I just can't get them to work. Does anyone have a solution to this problem? I need to do this, so when starting the results Activity, the UI changes immediately to the results Activity and doesn't have to wait until the SQL response is returned.
And yes, I've already read the painless-threading post.
Thank you.
I would recommend against creating that ArrayList<Tile> to reduce memory consumption (and code size) and instead directly bind the SQLite Cursor to the ListView using a CursorAdapter.
That alone might just increase the performance enough that you don't need to do any async loading.
If you still want async loading, check out the LoaderManager framework (available since Android 3.0/ API level 11, with Android support package down to 1.6/4) which will automagically do asynchronous loading of your Cursor -- either using the built-in CursorLoader (if you happen to have a ContentProvider), or the SimpleCursorLoader created by a fellow SO user (if you don't).
I'm relatively new to Android and have the following question. I have a local DB on the device from which I want to display the content in an ActivityList. Let's say there is a table "person" on the DB containing general information like "name, surname etc."
Every row in the table should be displayed as an item within the ActivityList.
I know that there exists a sort of Adapter with which I can directly fill the ActivityList with my table data, but is this the way to do it?
Isn't it better to load all the data at startup and then hold them for the entire session and pass the data from one activity to another(or make them static..) if necessary, instead of loading the data every time I change to another Activity?
If I would have a normal Java application I would load the Data at startup and then just work with the loaded objects (at least for reasonable data sets).
Doesn't it make sense for an Android App too?
I will up-rate every answer that makes sense to me.
Thanks!
Slash
I would have a look at the ContentProvider.
You can use it to query your database and then show the content in the ListView using a CursorAdapter.
You need to use an Adapter if you want to work with ListView. So, that is a must. And you can set the Adapter data from your Activity.
As for the "sense" question, it probably makes sense. But as always it depends on a few things:
Will this data be used through out the application? Then it absolutely makes sense to load it once and use it everywhere. How you do that is up to your needs, static access or passing the data, all should work.
And DB access is always expensive. And if you have lots of rows, the loading process from the database can be extremely slow. So, again, load it once and use it everywhere is a good plan.
But be careful about blocking the UI thread when you load this data. You should never access DB from your UI thread. Instead use a worker thread or AsyncTask.
I have a ListView which potentially contains thousands of rows, generated by a CursorAdapter. Only eight or so rows are visible at any one time. I've had reports that starting up this view can take many seconds, and can cause an ANR (force close).
I'm doing the DB query in a background thread. I've verified that newView and bindView in my adapter are only being called for the number of visible rows.
Once the list is displayed, actually scrolling up and down the list is very fast.
The delay is in the call to ListView.setListAdapter, which has to run on the UI thread. Why does this seem to depend on the total number of rows in the result set, rather than the (much smaller) number of rows which are actually being displayed? Is there any way I can optimize it?
This question was asked a couple of years ago in this thread. I'm hoping to get some fresh insight and more concrete examples of potential workarounds.
UPDATE
I have tried to work around this by using CommonsWare's EndlessAdapter. I limit the initial query to (say) 20 rows using a LIMIT clause in my DB query, and I increase this limit and resubmit the query every time I hit the bottom of the list.
(As an aside, I haven't found a way of appending just the new results to an existing Cursor, so I'm increasing the LIMIT value each time and then re-fetching the whole lot up to the new limit in a new Cursor.)
Strangely, this workaround doesn't seem to improve the time it takes to perform the initial setListAdapter call. When I run it on a data set containing only 20 rows, the call to setListAdapter is really quick. When I run it on a data set containing hundreds of rows, but limited to return just 20, it takes over a second.
UPDATE 2
By forcing the query to execute in the background thread with a simple getCount(), as suggested by CommonsWare, I've cured the initial blocking of the UI thread on starting the activity. The UI is still blocked, though, when returning to this activity from a child activity. The ListActivity by default seems to want to re-run the query on the UI thread.
I have worked around this by removing the adapter in onStop(), and recreating it in onStart(). Thus the query is always performed in the background regardless of the direction we're moving through the activity stack.
I'm doing the DB query in a background thread
If all you do in the background is call query() or rawQuery(), the query is not actually executed. It will be lazy-executed when you first try using the Cursor (e.g., getCount()). So, the right recipe for doing a query in the background is a rawQuery() followed by something like getCount() in the background thread, to ensure the query really is executed.
When I run it on a data set containing hundreds of rows, but limited to return just 20, it takes over a second.
Off the cuff, that would suggest that the speed issue is not the time required to read in the results, but rather in computing the results in the first place.