I would like to use ProGuard to obfuscate my Android app. This works fine. But my gui classes, which extends acitvity, view and sherlockactivity are not obfuscated. Here is the proguard.cfg
-injars bin/classes
-injars libs
-outjars bin/classes-processed.jar
-libraryjars C:/Users/android-sdks/platforms/android-17/android.jar
-dontpreverify
-dontoptimize
-repackageclasses ''
-allowaccessmodification
-optimizationpasses 5
-optimizations !code/simplification/arithmetic,!field/*,!class/merging/*
-keepattributes *Annotation*
-dontwarn sun.misc.Unsafe
-dontwarn com.actionbarsherlock.**
-dontwarn com.google.common.**
-keep class android.support.v4.app.** { *; }
-keep interface android.support.v4.app.** { *; }
-keep class com.actionbarsherlock.** { *; }
-keep interface com.actionbarsherlock.** { *; }
-keep public class * extends android.app.Activity
-keep public class * extends android.app.Application
-keep public class * extends android.app.Service
-keep public class * extends android.content.BroadcastReceiver
-keep public class * extends android.content.ContentProvider
-keep public class * extends android.view.View
-keep public class * extends android.view.ViewGroup
-keep public class * extends android.support.v4.app.Fragment
-keepclassmembers class * extends android.app.Activity {
public void *(android.view.View);
}
-keepclassmembers class android.support.v4.app.Fragment {
*** getActivity();
public *** onCreate();
public *** onCreateOptionsMenu(...);
}
-keepclassmembers class * extends com.actionbarsherlock.ActionBarSherlock {
public <init>(...);
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
}
-keep public class * extends android.view.View {
public <init>(android.content.Context);
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
public void set*(...);
}
-keepclassmembers class * implements android.os.Parcelable {
static android.os.Parcelable$Creator CREATOR;
}
-keepclassmembers class **.R$* {
public static <fields>;
}
-keepclassmembers class com.brainyoo.brainyoo2android.ui.html.BYJavaScriptInterface {
public *;
}
First, I thought activities can´t be obfuscated because of the reflection call
myactivity.class
I've tried to add:
- keep public class mypackege.myactivity.class
But it does not solve the problem. Any ideas how to obfuscate the gui elements?
Thanks
Christine
But my gui classes, which extends acitvit, view and sherlockactivtiy are not obfusecated.
That is because your ProGuard configuration file says to not obfuscate them. Moreover, this is important, as if they are obfuscated, your app will not run, because:
Android will not find your renamed activities
Android will not find your activity lifecycle methods
Android will not find your widgets (for use with reflection in interpreting layout resources)
etc.
I´ve tried to added: -keep public class mypackege.myactivity.class But it does not solve the problem.
That is because you are telling ProGuard to not obfuscate that class.
Any ideas how to obfusecate the gui elements?
You don't, if you wish to have a working app when you are done.
Related
java.lang.NullPointerException: Attempt to invoke virtual method ‘boolean java.lang.String.equals(java.lang.Object)’ on a null object reference
After debugging I have come to the conclusion that this is because that a value is not being passed from one activity to the other using putextra. This error only happens after enabling proguard. I am not aware of any keep rules to prevent this.
Currently my proguard file looks like this:
-keep public class * implements com.bumptech.glide.module.GlideModule
-keep class * extends com.bumptech.glide.module.AppGlideModule {
<init>(...);
-keep public enum com.bumptech.glide.load.ImageHeaderParser$** {
**[] $VALUES;
public *;
}
-keep class com.bumptech.glide.load.data.ParcelFileDescriptorRewinder$InternalRewinder {
*** rewind();
}
-keep public class pl.droidsonroids.gif.GifIOException{<init>(int, java.lang.String);}
-dontwarn com.squareup.okhttp.**
-keep class com.squareup.okhttp.* { *;}
-dontwarn okio.
-dontshrink
-dontoptimize
# unknown stuff
-android
-allowaccessmodification
-dontpreverify
-keepattributes *Annotation*
-keep public class * extends android.app.Activity
-keep public class * extends android.app.Application
-keep public class * extends android.app.Service
-keep public class * extends android.content.BroadcastReceiver
-keep public class * extends android.content.ContentProvider
-keep public class * extends android.view.View {
public <init>(android.content.Context);
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
public void set*(...);
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
}
-keepclassmembers class * extends android.content.Context {
public void *(android.view.View);
public void *(android.view.MenuItem);
}
-keepclassmembers class * implements android.os.Parcelable {
static ** CREATOR;
}
-keepclassmembers class **.R$* {
public static <fields>;
}
-keepclassmembers class * {
#android.webkit.JavascriptInterface <methods>;
}
I don't understand proguard much. I have added rules as required by third party libraries. Other than that I use firebase and some classes with getter and setter methods. Activity has all its members as private. It is my understanding that there is a null pointer exception occurring due to inability to pass values between intents using putextra after enabling proguard and so the value of variable of the second activity remains null.
How to solve this and better write proguard rules?
First of all, you should give more details.
For example, you have a folder named model and inside you have a response model class.
Your FileTree
-model
--Response.java
If you do not specify this in proguard, the release app will not be able to use it as a reference, because proguard will change keys on memory. so you should remove your models from proguard. And finally, the app cannot wrong reference key on memory, after then you will get a null pointer error.
-keep class com.name.app.model.** { *; }
Thus, the model folder will not interfere with its classes within
I am developing a android application. I obfuscates the code of the project using progaurd. I want to obfuscate the folder structure as well. anyway to do that ?
Thanks for your help
ProGuard contains various directives, for your ProGuard rules file, that can obfuscate package names, such as -flattenpackagehierarchy and -repackageclasses. Just make sure that anything referenced from AndroidManifest.xml or otherwise accessed via reflection is kept intact.
It is conceivable that the commercial, Android-tuned DexGuard tool can even let you repackage stuff in the manifest (by modifying the manifest entries as part of the obfuscation process), but I do not know if it does or not.
copy and paste this code in proguard.cfg:
-dontusemixedcaseclassnames
-dontskipnonpubliclibraryclasses
-verbose
-dontoptimize
-dontpreverify
-keepattributes *Annotation*
-keep public class * extends android.app.Activity
-keep public class * extends android.app.Application
-keep public class * extends android.app.Service
-keep public class * extends android.content.BroadcastReceiver
-keep public class * extends android.content.ContentProvider
-keep public class * extends android.app.backup.BackupAgent
-keep public class * extends android.preference.Preference
-keep public class * extends android.support.v4.app.Fragment
-keep public class * extends android.support.v7.app.ActionBarActivity
-keep public class * extends android.app.Fragment
-keep public class com.android.vending.licensing.ILicensingService
-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
native <methods>;
}
-keep public class * extends android.view.View {
public <init>(android.content.Context);
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
public void set*(...);
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
}
-keepclassmembers class * extends android.app.Activity {
public void *(android.view.View);
}
-keepclassmembers enum * {
public static **[] values();
public static ** valueOf(java.lang.String);
}
-keep class * implements android.os.Parcelable {
public static final android.os.Parcelable$Creator *;
}
-keepclassmembers class **.R$* {
public static <fields>;
}
-dontwarn android.support.**
When my android app proguard, My app try to connect to https server, the connection be refused.I don't know why.So i package an apk without proguard and do the same test, the app run normally and connected the https server successfully. This is my proguard config:
-optimizationpasses 5` `
-dontusemixedcaseclassnames ` `
-dontskipnonpubliclibraryclasses` `
-dontpreverifyenter` `
-verbose` `
-optimizations !code/simplification/arithmetic,!field/*,!class/merging/*` `
-ignorewarnings` `
-libraryjars libs/android-support-v4.jar` `
-libraryjars libs/universal-image-loader-1.9.3.jar` `
-libraryjars libs/libqblueota v0.96.jar` `
-libraryjars libs/zxing.jar` `
-keep class com.zxing.** {*; }` `
-keep class android.support.** {*;}` `
-keep class org.apache.** {*;}` `
-keep class com.nostra13.universalimageloader.** {*;}` `
-keep class com.google.zxing.** {*;}` `
-keep class android.** {*; }` `
-keep class com.sengled.cloud.service.** {*;}` `
-keep public class * extends android.app.Activity` `
-keep public class * extends android.app.Application` `
-keep public class * extends android.app.Service` `
-keep public class * extends android.content.BroadcastReceiver` `
-keep public class * extends android.content.ContentProvider
-keep public class * extends android.app.backup.BackupAgentHelper
-keep public class * extends android.preference.Preference
-keep public class com.android.vending.licensing.ILicensingService
-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {native <methods>;}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
}
-keepclassmembers class * extends android.app.Activity {
public void *(android.view.View);
}
-keepclassmembers enum * {
public static **[] values();
public static ** valueOf(java.lang.String);
}
-keep class * implements android.os.Parcelable {
public static final android.os.Parcelable$Creator *;
}
Proguard returned with error code 1. See console
[2013-04-04 16:25:20 - ] Note: there were 157 duplicate class definitions.
[2013-04-04 16:25:20 - ] Error: Method must be overridden in [proguard.optimize.peephole.ClassMerger] if ever called
I have tried every possible solution found on SO. There were around 2000 duplicates which now came down to 157. I have some external jars in my project too. This is my proguard.cfg file:
-dontwarn android.support.**
-keep public class * extends android.app.Activity
-keep public class * extends android.app.Application
-keep public class * extends android.app.Service
-keep public class * extends android.content.BroadcastReceiver
-keep public class * extends android.content.ContentProvider
-keep public class * extends android.view.View {
public <init>(android.content.Context);
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
public void set*(...);
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
}
-keepclassmembers class * extends android.content.Context {
public void *(android.view.View);
public void *(android.view.MenuItem);
}
-keepclassmembers class * implements android.os.Parcelable {
static android.os.Parcelable$Creator CREATOR;
}
-keepclassmembers class **.R$* {
public static <fields>;
}
-keep class com.flurry.** { *; }
-dontwarn com.flurry.**
-keep class org.apache.** { *; }
-dontwarn org.apache.**
-dump proguard/class_files.txt
-printseeds proguard/seeds.txt
-printusage proguard/unused.txt
-printmapping proguard/mapping.txt
This application is for Android 4.0
Can you kindly let me know whats causing this and how do I go about in fixing it.
Merging my project's proguard config with one from ${sdk.dir}/tools/proguard/proguard-android.txt did the trick.
This error mostly happens with 3rd party build systems (e.g. Maven), which don't know about default proguard config.
UPD: ...because of the following content of default config:
# Optimization is turned off by default. Dex does not like code run
# through the ProGuard optimize and preverify steps (and performs some
# of these optimizations on its own).
-dontoptimize
I am trying to enable ProGuard when compiling my Android application.
Below is the ProGuard configuration.
The problem I have is that I get a lot of warnings about duplicate definition (pretty much for all classes, in my app or the basic java classes) and what's worse is that when I make changes in my code, those do not get reflected when I run on the device.
I am compiling (and developing) using IntelliJ IDEA 11.1.5 (and just enable ProGuard in the project structure, I did not set it to use the system proguard configuration).
I saw that other question, but it does not help at all, I don't think my problem is limited to 3rd party libraries, I imagine it's more about setting the right input/output... ?
-injars bin/classes
-outjars bin/classes-processed.jar
-libraryjars /home/matthieu/android/platforms/android-17/android.jar
-dontpreverify
-repackageclasses ''
-allowaccessmodification
-optimizations !code/simplification/arithmetic
-keepattributes *Annotation*,SourceFile,LineNumberTable,*Annotation*
-renamesourcefileattribute SourceFile
-dontwarn java.awt.**,javax.security.**,java.beans.**,com.sun.**
-keep public class my.package.MainMenuActivity
-keep public class * extends android.app.Activity
-keep public class * extends android.app.Application
-keep public class * extends android.app.Service
-keep public class * extends android.content.BroadcastReceiver
-keep public class * extends android.content.ContentProvider
-keep public class * extends android.view.View {
public <init>(android.content.Context);
public <init>(android.content.Context,android.util.AttributeSet);
public <init>(android.content.Context,android.util.AttributeSet,int);
public void set*(...);
}
-keep public class * extends android.view.ViewGroup
-keep public class * extends android.support.v4.app.Fragment
-keep class android.support.v4.app.** { *; }
-keep interface android.support.v4.app.** { *; }
-keep class com.actionbarsherlock.** { *; }
-keep interface com.actionbarsherlock.** { *; }
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context,android.util.AttributeSet);
}
-keepclasseswithmembers class * {
public <init>(android.content.Context,android.util.AttributeSet,int);
}
-keepclassmembers class * extends android.os.Parcelable {
static android.os.Parcelable$Creator CREATOR;
}
-keepclassmembers class **.R$* {
public static <fields>;
}
#ACRA specifics
# keep this class so that logging will show 'ACRA' and not a obfuscated name like 'a'.
# Note: if you are removing log messages elsewhere in this file then this isn't necessary
-keep class org.acra.ACRA {
*;
}
# keep this around for some enums that ACRA needs
-keep class org.acra.ReportingInteractionMode {
*;
}
-keepnames class org.acra.sender.HttpSender$** {
*;
}
-keepnames class org.acra.ReportField {
*;
}
# keep this otherwise it is removed by ProGuard
-keep public class org.acra.ErrorReporter
{
public void addCustomData(java.lang.String,java.lang.String);
public void putCustomData(java.lang.String,java.lang.String);
public void removeCustomData(java.lang.String);
}
# keep this otherwise it is removed by ProGuard
-keep public class org.acra.ErrorReporter
{
public void handleSilentException(java.lang.Throwable);
}
-keepclassmembers enum * {
public static **[] values();
public static ** valueOf(java.lang.String);
}
Assuming you are building with Ant inside IntelliJ IDEA, you mustn't add -injars, -outjars, or -libraryjars options; the Ant script already does that for you. This explains the warnings about duplicates.
Note that it's better to remove the generic part of the configuration in your proguard-project.txt and rely on the configuration of the Android SDK. The latter is partly generated by aapt (tuned for your project) and partly maintained inside the SDK.