So here's the scenario: we have an old app on the Play Store that was published before there were any tablets (it runs on tablets using the phone interface.) We want to release an update to that app (because it has >150K users) instead of a new app but because the design for the phone UI won't be ready in time for our deadline we want to release an update that targets only tablets for now while the existing users continue to use the old phone-only app. Later, when the design and implementation of the phone UI is complete, we want to release another update that adds support for phones.
Ideally what should happen is if a user is using the old app on a phone, they will not get the first upgrade notification but a user running it on a tablet will get the update notification (and a new user installing it for the first time will get the the old apk if, for example, they're running a Gingerbread phone while a user using, say, a Nexus 7 will get the new apk.) Eventually, all users will get the update notification to the second release no matter what Android version/device type they are running.
If we do this, what will the experience be for the current users that are using the old version on phones? Will they be prompted to upgrade to an app version they cannot run or will they get no update notification at all? Later, when we release the second upgrade that does support phones will they then get the update notification?
To make your app look great on tablets, just add specialized layout types, just like
layout-large or layout-sw600dp. Then copy your existing layout-xml files from your layout folder to these and modify them as required.
I suggest reading Supporting Different Screen Sizes.
This way, you add tablet-optimization without throwing away phone compatibility.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by having an update only available to a certain device. Tablets and phones work quite differently and the Google Play market is capable of differentiating what will run on the user's current device and what won't.
Like the previous answer you WILL be required to construct different layouts specifically for tablets.
However if you only want an update to tablets to take place on tablets - You need to get as much information about the screen size, density, device version and maybe even the current users android OS version to really help you narrow down whether the current device is a tablet or large screen device or not.
For example:
Get screen dimensions in pixels
shows you how to get screen dimensions.
How can I check the system version of Android? Gives you more information about the current android version.
getting the screen density programmatically in android?
will allow you to find out the screen density of the current screen.
Using all of the above, or some similar combination, you can determine if the user is running your app on the tablet, if they are, provide them with an update, if not, the app continues with its regular layouts as normal.
I'm not quite sure if this is the answer you were looking for, but I hope it helps.
Take care
Related
In Google play (app market), if an application is not compatible to your device (for some reason, say small screen size, etc). Then it is not even shown in the list.
Now, as an app developer I never want to unintentionally add a limitation in my app that forbids it from a range of devices.
So, while developing how can I make sure that the application will be able to run on atleast the type of devices that I intend.
Also, right now I'm developing an app & testing it in on my phone with version 2.3.5. And every now & then Google changes some method names & flags.
For newer android releases, I CAN test it on emulator, but testing it on phone/tabs/etc. is a different thing.
Please suggest.
how can I make sure that the application will be able to run on atleast the type of devices that I intend.
In manifest file you can mention, which type of device you want to run your app. And for testing you can create emulators for different devices to test your app. Try to make app UI such that it runs on all devices.
Google changes some method names & flags
Whenever Android changes any thing it will always be upward compatible means if you have made app for 2.2 it will run on 2.2 and above (screen size or resolution is other thing)
Regarding UI see my answer here
Layout for 720*1280 devices
By default apps will be available to as wide a range of users as possible.
There are certain limitations you can define in your manifest file, such as not being available on small screen sizes, but they are at your discretion.
The only limitation Google imposes on you is that any user who has a lower Android version than your minimum SDK version cannot see your app. To get around this, you can either design the app for lower SDK versions (I believe building for 2.2 and up gives you access to about 95% of the user base) or maintain multiple versions of the APK.
Read this. It will really help. Next Eclipse will help you a lot, firstly you can define what you wish to support (screen sizes and hardware requirements or even if they're not necessary but may be used) in the manifest. You can run a version check and implement APIs dependent on which version of Android you're running on. That's personally what I do, I check the API level and if it's greater than or equal to the API I wish to run I run it, otherwise I attempt to find compatible code (often using the compatibility library) or alternatively drop support for that feature, for example JellyBean notifications there's not really any work around for expanded notifications but I can use the NotifcationCompat builder.
Developed a application of size 40MB. I need to test it for all screen support but the android emulator really a bad choice(I feel... ). It gives Insufficient memory error almost every time). How developer test their application?
One more Question
I have designed app for four different layout(normal,small,large and xlarge). Will every device(In future) satisfy these layout params?
And i faced a real problem that i tested my app in Sony xperia minpro(Small screen 240*320 2.4inch) and in Samsung galaxy 5(smallscreen 240*320, 2.8inch) but the layout is overlapping in samsung device. This can be a serious problem , actually we cant check our app in every device.. that is impossible too.
TIA
40MB is way too big for an Android application. Many users will have problems installing the app on their devices. You should consider moving some resources out of the application and downloading them either on demand or on first app run.
The list of layout types (normal, small, large, xlarge) is definitely not final, for there quite possibly will be even larger screens (xxlarge) or tiny ones (xsmall?).
Developed a application of size 40MB. I need to test it for all screen
support but the android emulator really a bad choice(I feel... ). It
gives Insufficient memory error almost every time). How developer test
their application?
You can configure the emulator with any amount of memory you wish, including an emulated SD card so memory shouldn't be a problem. However, 40MB is quite big so you may be hitting the package size limit.
One more Question I have designed app for four different
layout(normal,small,large and xlarge). Will every device(In future)
satisfy these layout params?
You're asking us to predict the future - there's no way we can know what Google are planning if they haven't already announced it though I would suggest that there will never be a commitment to keep screen sizes or resolutions static - technology constantly evolves and specs that are OK for today, will not be OK for tomorrow.
I have seen dictionaries weighing in at 40Mb, best practise is to download the database as a separate file. Some graphically intensive games approach that size. If you want to emulate many Android devices make sure your PC is up to snuff and you have the latest SDK.
How developer test their application?
You do not have so many choices: you have to use as many (and different) physical devices as you can, from different vendors and technical specifications (screen, etc), to try to detect as many specific bugs as possible.
This is difficult, as you are often limiten to a few physical devices.
To give you examples, I recently struggled with the Camera, for a bug happening with Motorola Defy only. I am currently struggling with the Camera, but only for Samsung Galaxy this time.
When you find a specific bug, try to fix it "the general way": instead of detecting the vendor/version of the device to write specific code for it, try to enhance your code in a way it will work for all tested phones. So far, I never had to write anything specific to a given device. The bugs I encountered were always tied to a permissivities or particular cases that could be handled by making the common code more complete or resiliant. Let's say by "making as less assumptions as possible" knowing that we tend to make assumptions without meaning it.
On top of testing on as many physical devices as possible, create emulators. You can parameter them to have different screen layouts, different embedded hardware, memory, etc. And on top of the default emulator that comes with the Android distribution, you also have emulators provided by the devices vendors and that reproduce the specificity of these devices. For example, Samsung released a Galaxy Tab emulator. Sony Ericsson released a EDK Cellphone emulator. You can get them thru the regular android distribution update workflow.
Will every device(In future) satisfy these layout params (normal,small,large and xlarge)?
Yes, as Android distributions are backward compatible. Any of these layout will still be supported in the future, but may become 'deprecated' (so not recommended, but still working), and new layout types will certainly be created.
This could be a dumb question, but I have submitted a few apps where I provided high resolution icons with specified values like:
512x512, 32-bit PNG; Max size of 1024KB.
both ways, by making a white background and transparent background.
My problem is:
1. why is it showing as a smaller icon in the Android market app, and
2. (this is lower priority; just out of curiosity) generally how long does it take to reflect your changes in the marketplace? I think it should be real time but it doesn't seem to be.
The high resolution app is used on the http://market.android.com website as the banner icon (to the left of the feature graphic).
It depends on the changes. New app versions appear very quickly on the market (matter of minutes). Changes in graphics can take up to several hours. the Android Market App cache can also influence what you see, so to be sure I would suggest to clear the Android Market App cache from time to time.
If I want a certain application to be available for certain devices only or for tablets only, is there any way to make limitations by device (like I can limit the min/max Android OS version)?
I say it is impossible. Do you agree?
I understand that you are trying to limit the devices that can see the application in the Market but, like you, I do not think that is possible. You can, however, limit it within the app using details from and Build class. Build.PRODUCT looks like it would fit your needs - if the phone that has the app installed in not in a pre-set list of "products", tell the user that they have the wrong version and exit.
A similar idea for tablets is to check the screen size - if they are under a certain threshold, then display that same message.
It is possible, starting in june this year. Please take a look at this Google I/O session:
http://youtu.be/GxU8N21wfrM
I'm spending considerable time in making my UI to work with keyboard input only. But in the end I'm not sure whether I can rely on the assumption that Android devices all have touch screens.
Is there a way to determine if an Android device has a touch screen?
You should research the existing devices and read the Android Compatibility Definition Document (CDD) and decide for yourself.
I have spent some considerable time trying to figure out this problem for myself. The posters above are correct that Android already powers some non-touch devices and will power Google TV in the near future, but as it currently stands, the CDD specifically requires that ALL Android devices MUST have a touchscreen.
Basically, the Android Compatibility program was created to hedge against the sort of fragmentation issues you're worrying about now. It lists a bunch of requirements, and if a device does not meet those requirements, it does not get access to Android Market. These requirements include a touchscreen, wireless communication, bluetooth, a camera, and much more.
If you research those tablets and netbooks, you will find that not a single one carries the Android Market. Augen recently tried to pull a fast one with their new GENTOUCH 78 tablet, but had to rescind their claims that the tablet would carry Android Market after being shot down by the Android Compatibility Team.
So, if you are only distributing your app through Android Market, you have nothing to worry about until Google changes the CDD. But if you'd like to offer your app on other app stores or as a direct download, then you'll have to worry about your key mode navigation issues.
If it's any consolation, I have found that many, many apps have the exact same problem; they are impossible to use without a touchscreen. Many of them also have serious issues with focus and the soft keyboard. Sometimes the keyboard stays up when it should be hidden. Sometimes you can't get the keyboard to pop up no matter how many times you click on an EditText. IMO, the Android framework does not handle these things all that well.
Given all that, it will certainly be interesting to see how Google TV fits into all this. Will they update the CDD to be compatible with their set-top boxes? Will they use a different SDK and CDD for Google TV implementations? Will they ignore the Compatibility Program altogether when it comes to Google TV? Your guess is as good as mine.
Update:
It seems that someone at Google has finally come forward and admitted that Android is not ready to run on a tablet:
http://phandroid.com/2010/09/10/shocker-google-says-android-not-meant-for-tablets-in-its-current-state/
To me, this says that Google was not prepared for the accelerated adoption of the Android OS and has not adequately roadmapped the future of the platform. Supporting screens larger than 480x800 is barely possible, and Samsung was only able to do it by working closely with Google on the Galaxy Tab. So I'm not so sure we need to worry about non-touchscreen devices in the near future. They'll be here eventually, I'm sure, but when they do arrive we may see a separate app market just for those, or some altered filtering scheme on the existing market, a new CDD, who knows.
To me, this says that Google is still playing it by ear, and we'll just have to do the same.
All the phones so far have touch screens, but there is no promise that they must.
However there are lots of netbooks, notebooks, and soon to be TVs that have no touch screen.
However these devices have mice. From what I've seen, the mouse input gets pumped through the touch system so MouseDown is ACTION_DOWN, etc... (Don't know about right click though)
Are you targetting just the phones? Android is appearing on many devices including TV's I've no idea if new libs will be released to isolate parts of the devices from each other, but if you want a broader audience I'd suggest keeping the keyboard input available if you are
Google TV (GTV) is the most popular Android notouch device (as of the time this answer is composed). However, there are several devices that will call for notouch renderings if you have "notouch" resources (e.g. a directory like res/layout-notouch/ )
To accommodate notouch devices, made sure that focus will cause a visual selection indicator, and (for GTV) that keystroke listeners are in place for the directional-pad center button. Using default widgets and themes will often accomplish much of this automatically. If you make your own buttons, you need background 9-patches for focused and focused+pressed.
Running on a GTV is a good test environment to make sure that notouch works well, and GTV has an emulator now, though it runs only on Linux/x86.