I have a custom view with an added method named moveView which changes the location of the view by a X pixels in Y direction when invoked. Now I want to have 6 of these views spread all over the screen and be in constant movement.
What I have:
Handler (I need it for UI updates?)
ApplyMoveRunnable (implements Runnable. Constructor receives custom View, amount of pixels to move, and direction in which it will move)
6 Threads (one for each view)
6 MoveCalcRunnable (one for each thread. implements Runnable)
What I tried:
I tried creating my 6 views and then 6 Threads. Each of these threads' MoveCalcRunnable call the moveView() method within their respective views. This moveView() method calculates the amount of pixels the view will move and the direction in which it will move and sends this information to the ApplyMoveRunnable and then calls the handler.post(applyMoveRunnable).
Simply put, what happens is this:
Instantiate ApplyMoveRunnable applyMoveRunnable
Instantiate Handler handler.
Instantiate 6 MoveCalcRunnable's.
Create 6 threads, one for each view, each holding a MoveCalcRunnable.
Start all threads.
When I run this, at first I see my 6 views, but then one moves and nothing else happens.
Here's the run() method for each of my MoveCalcRunnable:
#Override
public void run() {
Log.e(tag, "Thread locking directionAmountRunnable.");
synchronized (applyMoveRunnable) {
Log.e(tag, "Moving view.");
myView.moveView();
}
}
Can anyone help me get this to work? Or suggest a better, simpler, and/or more efficient way of doing this?
Related
I am trying to do calculate view's x,y positions after completion of loading of activity. What I did is view.postDelayed(runnable, 2000) which is working fine. code reviewer is not happy with this and suggested to use OnGlobalLayoutListener to know about the completion of activity loading. Somehow I don't like OnGlobalLayoutListener because it is associated with entire view tree which is not required for my solution. I am trying to understand pros and cons of these approaches. Thanks!
If all you are trying to do is read the view's x and y coordinates, I recommend using view.post(Runnable) with no delay (unless there is a good reason to include a delay). This will add the Runnable to a message queue to in the UI thread. The Runnable will wait to execute until after your View is inflated and attached to the window. Since View position property values depend on the view's layout context, posting a Runnable will give you the timing that you are looking for.
As you mentioned in your question description, an OnGlobalLayoutListener will apply to the entire View's layout as the class name suggests. An OnGlobalLayoutListener should only be considered if you are concerned with the layout state or visibility of any or all views within the view tree. I.e. anything that causes the view tree to be re-laid out.
Code reviewer is not happy because you wait 2s and guess that the loading of the activity is finished by then. This may be the case with your emulator or device but on older and slower devices the activity may not have finished loading. To be 100% safe that the activity has finished loading you should use the listener to inform the 'listener' when loading is completed.
I think that the correct way of doing this is by adding an onPreDrawListener to the view. This is the listener that is called when the view is about to be drawn, and where you already have all the information about it's size (width and height) and position (X and Y).
Example:
final View v = new View(getContext());
v.getViewTreeObserver().addOnPreDrawListener(new ViewTreeObserver.OnPreDrawListener() {
#Override
public boolean onPreDraw() {
v.getViewTreeObserver().removeOnPreDrawListener(this);
float myX = v.getX();
float myY = v.getY();
return true;
}
});
Don't forget to make the method onPreDraw return true, I don't know why but Android Studio makes it return false when you create the listener.
Also don't forget to remove the listener from the view, otherwise it might be uselessly called again.
I been fighting an odd issue these last few days. I have a custom ExpandableListAdapter where each row contains an ImageView, among other things. I have a class that handles the asynchronous loading of images from the multitude of places they may reside (disk cache, app data, remote server, etc). In my adapter's getView method I delegate the responsibility of returning a View to the list Item itself (I have multiple row types for my group list). I request the image load as follows:
final ImageView thumb = holder.thumb;
holder.token = mFetcher.fetchThumb(mImage.id, new BitmapFetcher.Callback() {
#Override
public void onBitmap(final Bitmap b) {
thumb.post(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
thumb.setImageBitmap(b);
}
});
}
#Override
public void onFailure() {
}
});
Yeah, it's ugly, but I decided against some contract where you have the BitmapFetcher.Callback execute its methods on the UI thread by default.
Anyway, when I load the Activity that contains the ExpandableListView there will often be thumb images missing from different rows in the list. Reloading the Activity may cause some of the missing thumbs to show but others that were previously showing may not be anymore. The behavior is pretty random as far as I can tell. Scrolling the ListView such that the rows with missing images get recycled causes the new thumb images (when the recycled row gets displayed again) to load fine. Scrolling back to rows that previously contained missing images causes the missing images to appear. I can confirm that all the images are loading correctly from my BitmapFetcher (mFetcher) class. I should also mention that I load other images in other places. Every once in awhile they don't appear either.
After pulling most of my hair out, I discovered that changing:
thumb.post(new Runnable() {
to:
mExpListView.post(new Runnable() {
fixes the issue. I originally thought that the issue might be happening because I was using a final reference to a View, but the other locations in the app use non-final references to a view to post messages, and, as I mentioned, sometimes those did not work. I eventually changed everything to use an Activity's runOnUiThread() method (and my own getUiThreadRunner().execute method when inside Fragments) and that seems to fix the issue all around.
So my question remains, in what cases can View.post() to fail to deliver the runnable to the associated ViewRoot's message queue in the proper order? Or, perhaps the invalidate() is happening before the View is returned from getView and thus before it's placed in a ViewGroup that can be reached from the root View. Those are really the only cases I can think of that would prevent the image from showing up. I can guarantee that none of these calls are happening until at least onStart has finished executing. Further, it looks like it's fine to post to a View even if it hasn't been attached to a Window yet:
// Execute enqueued actions on every traversal in case a detached view enqueued an action
getRunQueue().executeActions(attachInfo.mHandler);
(in performTraversal). The only difference between the runOnUiThread and post seems to be that an Activity has a different Handler than the ViewRootImpl.
Activity:
final Handler mHandler = new Handler();
whereas in ViewRootImpl:
final ViewRootHandler handler = new ViewRootHandler();
But, this should not be a problem provided both Handlers were constructed in the same Thread (or using the same Looper). That leaves me wondering if it is, indeed, a problem to invalidate() a View that has not yet been added to the hierarchy. For this to be the case invalidate should either 1. not do anything if it's not visible, or 2. only be valid for the next performTraversal() that happens.
View.invalidate() checks a nice private method that's not documented called skipInvalidate():
/**
* Do not invalidate views which are not visible and which are not running an animation. They
* will not get drawn and they should not set dirty flags as if they will be drawn
*/
private boolean skipInvalidate() {
return (mViewFlags & VISIBILITY_MASK) != VISIBLE && mCurrentAnimation == null &&
(!(mParent instanceof ViewGroup) ||
!((ViewGroup) mParent).isViewTransitioning(this));
}
It looks like number 1 is more accurate! However, I would think this only pertains to a View's VISIBILITY property. So, is it accurate to assume that a View is considered not VISIBLE if it cannot be reached from the ViewRoot? Or is the VISIBILITY property unaffected by the View's container? If the former is the case (which I suspect it is) it raises a concern. My use of Activity.runOnUiThread is not a solution to the problem. It only happens to work because the invalidate() calls are being sent to a different Handler and being executed later (after getView returns and after the row has been added and made visible on the screen). Has anybody else run into this issue? Is there a good solution?
Hey David I ran into a similar issue long time back. The basic requirement for view.post(Runnable r) is that the view should be attached to the window for Runnable to be executed. However, since you are loading images asynchronously in your first case, therefore there is a probability that imageView aren't attached to window when post request is made and hence, some images fail to load.
Quoting earlier version of docs on the same:
View.post() : Causes the Runnable to be added to the message queue. The runnable will be run on the user interface thread. This method can
be invoked from outside of the UI thread only when this View is
attached to a window.
Switching to you next question, what is the best solution to handle this situation ?
Can't comment on the best solution. However, I think both handler.post() and activity.runOnUIThread() are good to go. Since, they basically post runnable in main thread queue irrespective of anything and in general, the request to display list rows would be enqueued prior to our thumb.post(). So, they might work flawlessly for most cases. (Atleast I've never faced a problem with them !). However. if you find a better solution, do share it with me.
Try this : setBitmap() like this :
runOnUiThread(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
thumb.setImageBitmap(b);
}
});
On developing a painting canvas application in android, i need to track all the points and have to redraw it in another canvas. Now i am able to track all the points, but don't know how to synchronize the point drawing in case of draw and redraw ie the user should redraw the points at the same time gap as in the draw. How can i achieve this?
Not sure if this is the sort of answer you are looking for but I would record the events with a sort of timestamp, really a time difference to the next point. Something like:
class Point {
int x;
int y;
long deltaTime;
}
Its up to you how precise you want to be with the timing. Second to millisecond precision should be good enough. You could interpret deltaTime as either the time until this point should be drawn or the time until the next point should be drawn (I'm going to use the latter in my example).
A few reasons to use a deltaTime instead of a direct timestamp is that it lets you check for really long pauses and you are going to have to compute the delta time anyways in playback. Also using it as a long should give you enough room for really lengthy pauses and lets you use the Handler class which accepts a long integer for the number of milliseconds to wait before executing.
public class Redrawer implements Handler.callback {
LinkedList<Point> points; //List of point objects describing your drawing
Handler handler = new Handler(this); //Probably should place this in class initialization code
static final int MSG_DRAW_NEXT = 0;
public void begin(){
//Do any prep work here and then we can cheat and mimic a message call
//Without a delay specified it will be called ASAP but on another
//thread
handler.sendEmptyMessage(MSG_DRAW_NEXT);
}
public boolean handleMessage(Message msg){
//If you use the handler for other things you will want to
//branch off depending on msg.what
Point p = points.remove(); //returns the first element, and removes it from the list
drawPoint(p);
if (!points.isEmpty())
handler.sendEmptyMessageDelayed(MSG_DRAW_NEXT, p.deltaTime);
public void drawPoint(Point p){
//Canvas drawing code here
//something like canvas.drawPixel(p.x, p.y, SOMECOLOR);
//too lazy to look up the details right now
//also since this is called on another thread you might want to use
//view.postInvalidate
}
This code is far from complete or bullet-proof. Namely you will need to possibly pause or restart the redrawing at a later time because the user switched activities or got a phone call, etc. I also didn't implement the details of where or how you get the canvas object (I figure you have that part down by now). Also you probably want to keep track of the previous point so you can make a rectangle to send to View.postInvalidate as redrawing a small portion of the screen is much faster than redrawing it all. Lastly I didn't implement any clean-up, the handler and points list will need to be destroyed as needed.
There are probably several different approaches to this, some probably better than this. If you're worried about long pauses between touch events simply add a check for the deltaTime if its greater than say 10 seconds, then just override it to 10 seconds. Ex. handler.sendEmptyMessage(MSG_DRAW_NEXT, Math.min(p.deltaTime, 100000)); I'd suggest using a constant instead of a hard coded number however.
Hope this helps
I'm trying to move a ball on canvas. a and b are similar to x,y coordinate positions. Any way from my code im trying to get different values dynamically. The a,b are global variables. But it seems that "invalidate()" or the refreshing of screen only happens afer end of the whole loop. Do you know why?. And if i have to build this on another thread please suggest me with some simple codes.
private void shootBall(){
while (a>b){
a = getPositionX();
b = getPositionY();
invalidate();
}
}
}
I think it's more correct to say that you can call invalidate() from within a loop, but that that invalidation will not be handled (the canvas won't be redrawn) until after your loop is complete. The problem is that you are calling invalidate on the same thread (the UI toolkit thread) as the one that would call your onDraw() method. So unless/until you hand control back to the toolkit, it cannot possibly do the rendering. So your invalidate() call does actually invalidate the view ... but the view won't be redrawn until after your loop completes and your function returns.
It is more correct to change the position in some function that is called via some timer (which is essentially what the animation classes do). In that function, you would change the values, invalidate() appropriately, and return. Then the toolkit re-renders the scene and your function will get future callbacks and update the position accordingly.
do it like this, and use postInvalidate() instead:
private void shootBall(){
new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
while (a>b){
a = getPositionX();
b = getPositionY();
postInvalidate();
}
}
}).start();
}
edit: but as mentioned before, don't assume that the invalidate redraws the screen, it marks it as to-be-redrawn and the UI thread will get around to it.
You can put invalidate() at the end of onDraw() like in this example: How can I use the animation framework inside the canvas?
However this works well on some devices while bottlenecks and slows down on other.
To use a thread and SurfaceView go through all of these tutorials: http://www.droidnova.com/playing-with-graphics-in-android-part-i,147.html
UI cant be modified form any new thread..you should use invalidate() in the same thread where your view
Just want to start out by saying this seems like a great site, hope you guys can help!
I'm trying to use the structure laid out in LunarLander to create a simple game in which the user can drag some bitmaps around on the screen (the actual game is more complex, but that's not important). I ripped out the irrelevant parts of LanderLander, and set up my own bitmap drawing, something like
BoardThread (an inner class of BoardView):
run()
{
while(mRun)
{
canvas = lockSurfaceHolder...
syncronized(mSurfaceHolder)
{
/* drawStuff using member position fields
in BoardView */
}
unlockSurfaceHolder
}
}
My drawStuff simply walks through some arrays and throws bitmaps onto the canvas. All that works fine. Then I wanted to start handling touch events so that when the user presses a bitmap, it is selected, when the user unpresses a bitmap, it is deselected, and if a bitmap is selected during a touch move event, the bitmap is dragged. I did this stuff by listening for touch events in the BoardView's parent, BoardActivity, and passing them down into the BoardView. Something like
In BoardView
handleTouchEvent(MotionEvent e)
{
synchronized(mSurfaceHolder)
{
/* Modify shared member fields in BoardView
so BoardThread can render the bitmaps */
}
}
This ALSO works fine. I can drag my tiles around the screen no problem.
However, every once in a while, when the app first starts up and I trigger my first touch event, the handleTouchEvent stops executing at the synchronized line (as viewed in DDMS). The drawing loop is active during this time (I can tell because a timer changes onscreen), and it usually takes several seconds or more before a bunch of touch events come through the pipeline and everything is fine again.
This doesn't seem like deadlock to me, since the draw loop is constantly going in and out of its syncronized block. Shouldn't this allow the event handling thread to grab a lock on mSurfaceHolder? What's going on here? Anyone have suggestions for improving how I've structured this?
Some other info. This "hang" only ever occurs on first touch event after activity start. This includes on orientation change after restoreState has been called. Also, I can remove EVERYTHING within the syncronized block in the event handler, and it will still get hung up at the syncronized call.
Thanks!
So Rob Green from rbgrn helped me get a little more info on this. I ended up using a concurrent queue to deliver touch events to my game thread, but I still had hanging issues when saveInstanceState got called, so I'm now calling Thread.sleep(16) at the bottom of every iteration of my game thread's while loop. Full discussion here.