My requirement is as follows:
I have two modes of my application in first mode it will open normally but in second mode I have to re size all the screens to a fixed dimension. I am able to do so by writing code in each activity before calling setContentView() method, what I want to know is, Does there any optimal way of doing the same i.e writing the code at single place or anything else so that I can optimize the code.
I am looking for it because in second mode I will set some parameters, And my application then required to check the parameter in activities individually which in terms effect my performance, that's why I want something which runs at starting of my app and re size all the activities view.
any help would be greatly appreciated!!
Edit:
Can we specify the dimensions in the attrs.xml and dynamically set the specified theme?
Have you tried using Fragments? http://developer.android.com/guide/components/fragments.html
Related
I would like to know what the above mentioned attribute for an Activity in the AndroidManifest.xml does and why it (would be) needed?
I have already read the Android documentation about this topic and the explaination is not quite clear to me. Id like to know an example case WHY I would have to set this attribute.
As you may have known every time a parameter of the phone changes the system rebuilds the whole Activity in order to load the new resources. On of these parameters is the screen size, which can change on a phone, as the rotation of the phone changes it.
If you define android:configChanges in your manifest you can have full control over your application, which means that the system won't destroy your Activity, it only calls the onConfiguratinChanged method of it. This way you have to manage the resizeing of the screen.
I have used both approaches:
Let the activity be destroyed on rotation
Don't let the activity be destroyed on rotation
My approach almost everytime is to catch the rotation event and if needed call the setContentView and add some components again. If not, just let it rotate and the layouts are designed to adapt.
So far I only have seen advantages on letting it be destroyed on screens with very complex construction that are very dynamic, and whenever I rotate and not destroy show some flickering when re-building the screen.
The overhead of having to pass the state with onSaveInstance, onRestoreInstace is sometimes very error prone, and somehow time consuming.
Am I missing something?
UPDATE:
I'm not doing any kind of if "Orientation.XPTO == ..." on my code. This is the logic of each of the 2 approaches (the code is reused):
When destroying
onCreate -> DrawUI() setContentView and add views -> fill() add content
When not destroyed:
onCreate -> DrawUI() setContentView and add views -> fill() add content
onRotation -> DrawUI() setContentView and add views -> fill() add content
When calling setContentView after rotation it will pick the right layout for the device orientation (Check this answer by Google's Reto Meier https://stackoverflow.com/a/456918/327011 )
And the DrawUI and fill would have to have the logic for both the portrait and landscape layouts as the activity can be created on each of the two orientations to begin with.
Am I missing something?
Yes. You are assuming that your alternative is somehow less error prone.
By not going through the destroy-and-recreate cycle, you have to ensure that you are handling changing every resource for every possible configuration change.
Don't let the activity be destroyed on rotation
Unless you are using android:screenOrientation to force your activity into a single orientation (e.g., landscape), you cannot only handle rotation-related configuration changes. You need to handle all configuration changes. Otherwise, as soon as the user drops their device into a dock, removes it from a dock, changes language from Settings, attaches or detaches a keyboard, changes the global font scaling, etc., your app will break.
This, in turn, means that on every configuration change, you need to:
update your UI for your potentially new string resources
adjust or reload your layouts (and by "adjust" that includes changing any drawables, animations, menus, etc.)
anything else tied to your resources (e.g., array lists in your PreferenceFragment)
The problem is that you are going to forget something. For example, you will miss changing a string associated with an action bar item, so now most of your UI is in Spanish and that action bar item is in English. The sorts of things you are going to forget will be less obvious (how often do you test your Spanish translation?).
Your activity is destroyed to give you the opportunity to reconfigure yourself for the new orientation.
From the developer.android.com:
When the screen changes orientation, the system destroys and recreates
the foreground activity because the screen configuration has changed
and your activity might need to load alternative resources (such as
the layout).
For example, in landscape mode you may require a completely different layout, or may want to load in graphics that would not appear stretched. The best way of doing this is allowing the activity to be created again, which will allow the linking to the layout file to change to a more orientation-friendly layout.
See http://developer.android.com/training/basics/activity-lifecycle/recreating.html for more info and how to deal with the orientation change
If you want to disable the recreation you can add
android:configChanges="orientation"
to your Activity element in AndroidManifest.xml. This way your Activity will not be reloaded.
onSaveInstance and onRestoreInstace should only be used for passing through session information, for example the current text in a TextField, and nothing generic that can just be loaded in again after onCreate.
If you, restarting the Activity, requires recovering large sets of data, re-establishing a network connection, or perform other intensive operations then using the onSaveInstanceState() could potentially cause your noted symptoms:
A poor user experience (i.e. "show some flickering")
Require consumption of a lot of memory
onSaveInstanceState() callbacks are not designed to carry large objects.
To retain an object during a runtime configuration change:
Override the onRetainNonConfigurationInstance() method to return the object you would like to retain.
When your activity is created again, call getLastNonConfigurationInstance() to recover your object.
However:
While you can return any object, you should never pass an object that is tied to the Activity, such as a Drawable, an Adapter, a View or any other object that's associated with a Context. If you do, it will leak all the views and resources of the original activity instance. (Leaking resources means that your application maintains a hold on them and they cannot be garbage-collected, so lots of memory can be lost.)
Source
Unless you are able to pass the Object(s) smoothly I personally think it is more advantageous to handle the configuration change yourself, meaning not to destroy.
If you have a target API of 13 or higher: You must include screenSize in your configChanges. Starting with API 13 the screen size also changes on orientation change and you'll need to account for this. Prior to 13 your Activity would handle this itself.
android:configChanges="orientation|screenSize"
Some time it is useful when you are using different layouts for (Landscape / Portrait ). and using different type of views for example ListView in portrait and GridView in landscape.
I guess you are not considering the standard way of creating the android layouts. Please correct me If I'm wrong. Are you using two res folders with -port,-land separately to tell android system to choose in runtime to load the different assets and layout on the basis of orientation.
This example can give you a clue to manage layouts in different orientations.
Here is the android stanard document. Please check with "land" and "port".
Hope this will help you.
I was wondering why not use android:configChanges="keyboardHidden|orientation" in every (almost every ;)) activity?
Goods:
no need to worry about your activity been rotated
it's faster
Not so nice:
need to change your layouts if they are depending on screen size (e.g. layouts with two columns or so)
Bad:
no flexible way to have different layouts on different orientation
not so good when using fragments
But if we don't use different layouts, why not?
Quick Background
By default, when certain key configuration changes happen on Android (a common example is an orientation change), Android fully restarts the running Activity to help it adjust to such changes.
When you define android:configChanges="keyboardHidden|orientation" in your AndroidManifest, you are telling Android: "Please don't do the default reset when the keyboard is pulled out, or the phone is rotated; I want to handle this myself. Yes, I know what I'm doing"
Is this a good thing? We shall soon see...
No worries?
One of the pros you start with is that there is:
no need to worry about your activity been rotated
In many cases, people mistakenly believe that when they have an error that is being generated by an orientation change ("rotation"), they can simply fix it by putting in android:configChanges="keyboardHidden|orientation".
However, android:configChanges="keyboardHidden|orientation" is nothing more than a bandaid. In truth, there are many ways a configuration change can be triggered. For example, if the user selects a new language (i.e. the locale has changed), your activity will be restarted in the same way it does by an orientation change. If you want you can view a list of all the different types of config changes.
Edit: More importantly, though, as hackbod points out in the comments, your activity will also be restarted when your app is in the background and Android decides to free up some memory by killing it. When the user comes back to your app, Android will attempt to restart the activity in the same way it does if there was some other configuration change. If you can't handle that - the user will not be happy...
In other words, using android:configChanges="keyboardHidden|orientation" is not a solution for your "worries." The right way is to code your activities so that they are happy with any restart Android throws at them. This is a good practice that will help you down the road, so get used to it.
So when should I use it?
As you mentioned there is a distinct advantage. Overwriting the default configuration change for a rotation by handling it yourself will speed things up. However, this speed does come with a price of convenience.
To put it simply, if you use the same layout for both portrait and landscape you're in good shape by doing the overwrite. Instead of a full-blown reload of the activity, the views will simply shift around to fill the remaining space.
However, if for some reason you use a different layout when the device is in landscape, the fact that Android reloads your Activity is good because it will then load up the correct layout. [If you use the override on such an Activity, and want to do some magical re-layout at runtime... well, good luck - it's far from simple]
Quick Summary
By all means, if android:configChanges="keyboardHidden|orientation" is right for you, then use it. But PLEASE be sure to test what happens when something changes, because an orientation change is not the only way a full Activity restart can be triggered.
From my point of view: If the layout is the same in both landscape and portrait mode - you might aswell disable one of the two in your app.
The reason why I state this is that I as a user expect the app to provide me with some benefit, when I change orientation. If it doesn't matter how I hold my phone, then I don't need the choice.
Take for instance an app where you have a ListView, and upon clicking a ListItem you want to be shown a detailed view for that item. In landscape you would od this by dividing the screen in two, having the ListView on the left and the detailed view on the right. In Portrait you would have the list in one screen and then change the screen to the detailed view when a ListItem is selected. In that case orientation change makes sense as well as different layouts.
I don see why.... occasional restarts are ok in my opinion... configChanges handles most cases for me... well maybe in some types of applications this can be problem but it depends really on type of app and how you restore state when app restarts... When one of my app restarts user is logged back and last activity opens by my code and user jus loses some steps to go back where he was but not big deal.. In other some state is always persisted and some state is always restored on restart. When activity restarted it had to be that app have not been used or something... so no problem at all... In game for example this can be problem maybe or in some other type of app I don't know...
I say that when you do it this way applications just works fine under normal circumstances. And code is much more readable without ton of logic needed for saving and restoring where u just can make new bugs and have to maintain it all the time... sure if android gets out of power and kill you application window it lose the context and starts again, but this happen just in special situations and on newer devices I belive this is more and more rare...
So kill me, but I use this across applications quite successfully...
android:configChanges="locale|keyboard|keyboardHidden|orientation|screenLayout|uiMode|screenSize|smallestScreenSize"
But I understand that for some special kind of applications it may be not good way but most of apps can live with this just OK.
Yeah I think pausing will make it quicker than releasing the player. Still have the pause though.
Have now found a solution that won't pause the song.
State in the manifest that you will handle the config change for screen orientation and then use the onConfigurationChanged method to load the layout file. By doing this in logCat I can see onPause, onCreate & onResume aren't called, and therefore the song isn't paused.
update the manifest to handle the orientation.
android:configChanges="orientation|screenSize"
add this code
#Override
public void onConfigurationChanged(Configuration newConfig) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
super.onConfigurationChanged(newConfig);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
}
I have a request that background for my activity must be "transparent", ie. background of an activity should be camera's current view. What is the easiest way to implemet this?
I have all the activities already implemented, with all the logic already implemented. Ideally, solution wouldn't include a lot of modification of an existing code.
Normally this is done with SurfaceView. Use it via camera.setPreviewDisplay(surfaceView)
To use it in your app, the simplest way would be to use FrameLayout as a top layout of your Activity and then put SurfaceView any you current top layout inside it.
`FrameLayout`
`SurfaceView`
`yourExistingLayout`
Of course your existing layout must be transparent to see the underlying SurfaceView. Note also that this alpha blending takes a lot of processor power so it will eat battery.
I have code in an appwidget that I want to run when the phone's orientation changes on the home screen, ie like when the keyboard flips out. I have an image that I want to change in an imageview in my appwidget. I can't use different layouts linked to the orientation (ie "layout" and "layout-land") because I don't know the name of the image file until runtime, it is created at runtime. Is there anyway to trigger code to run only if the home screen is shown, my appwidget is active and the orientation just changed?
I could listen for a configuration_change broadcast but that will run everytime the phone switches to landscape or portrait and I only want it to happen when the homescreen is shown. I cannot think of any good way in android to do this. Thanks
Ryan
There isn't a good way of doing this for images generated at runtime.
One approach would be to build both versions of the image and have two ImageViews that are visible depending on the layout/layout-land being used. (So the RemoteViews would update both ImageViews, but only the correct one would be visible.)
Jeff, what is the reason for this limitation ? I would love to be able to use images generated at runtime, or construct the RemoteView on the runtime as well, rather than use the precompiled XML - this is so inflexible.
There is more info at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_thread/thread/0eb7c016be05e0b9/d31b312e2fa8530d
Basically update the widget from onConfigurationChanged() in an Activity and add android:configChanges="orientation" for that Activity in your manifest. Bad thing is, this doesn't cover all use cases.