I am using the drag and drop feature to add a Linear layout in my activity.
when i check the activity_main.xml there is the component created but no "android:id"
I cannot manually add the id , because there is no id for this layout in R.java . how to solve it?
If you add android:id="#+id/YOUR_ID" to your XML, your IDE (I'm assuming eclipse) will recompile R.java, and you should be able to use R.id.YOUR_ID in your activity.
You needn't use R.id for setting id programmatically. You can use any positive number for id:
myNewLayout.setId(newLayoutIndex);
According to View documentation
The identifier does not have to be unique in this view's hierarchy.
The identifier should be a positive number.
Related
This question is quite basic. Let me go with an example.
I have two activities
activity_a.xml
ActivityA.java
activity_b.xml
ActivityB.java
Both the XML files contain only a TextView to display a simple text. As usual, the TextViews are going to be referenced in the corresponding .java files using their View id
My question is, if it is right to reference the TextView in both the XML files with same id? (like using the below code with exactly same id for activity_a.xml and activity_b.xml)
<LinearLayout
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="wrap_content">
<TextView
android:id="#+id/textview"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="wrap_content" />
</LinearLayout>
I was practising this procedure without any problems. When trying to reach the corresponding xml code for the TextView using Ctrl + Click (on Windows), I am provided with two options (to display the TextView's xml code from activity_a.xml or from activity_b.xml).
Also, what is the recommended way to name a View in Android? This will be helpful, when your Android project contains multiple layout files.
Yes , if you have same name of view or view group in different layout then it tells from which layout file it belongs to, ask for select required layout file.
so for that you have to follow proper naming conventions to avoid this type of confusion
https://github.com/ribot/android-guidelines/blob/master/project_and_code_guidelines.md
or you can give name like
activity_home_tvUserName if username textview from home activity
and
activity_profile_tvUserName if username textview from profile activity.
if it is right to reference the TextView in both the XML files with same id?
It is totally fine, the compiler will only look at the ID under a single view hierarchy.
e.g.: findViewById(R.id.textview) inside ActivityA.java will only search for textview ID inside activity_a.xml (assuming you have setContentView(R.layout.activity_a); beforehand.
what is the recommended way to name a View in Android?
In my opinion, you just need to be consistent in naming your view throughout the app. The main goal is to avoid misinterpretation and confusion.
Hope it helps!
They are in different activities, so you should have no problem using the same id. you could event declare them both as #+id/textview. However, why not just use the same XML file for both activities? No reason you can't.
You can also create an ids.xml file under the values folder and declare all your ids under it, so you don't have to declare them in your layouts, but this is not a very common approach.
if it is right to reference the TextView in both the XML files with same id?
My answer is Yes, It is right.
Whenever we set the setContentView(R.layout.activity_a), then it'll search for the given id within the above activity. Local attribute having the same id will take the more preference over the other attributes with the same id.
But having unique id's is Best practice.
I've been writing some Android apps but I don't really understand when to use app: and when to use android:. When styles are not being applied the way they're supposed to, I use trial and error and sometimes find that using app: instead of android: solves the issue but I don't understand why. It'd be great if someone could point me in the right direction. Thanks!
You can use the app namespace to have app compatibility with older API versions.
For example
app:srcCompat="#drawable/customborder" has the same effects with
android:background="#drawable/customborder"
The difference is that the first will work correctly with older API's and the second will not display what you would like.
You are talking about custom namespace.In android we can create custom views in additional to already available views.
As per in Google developer docs..
To add a built-in View to your user interface, you specify it in an XML element and control its appearance and behavior with element attributes. Well-written custom views can also be added and styled via XML. To enable this behavior in your custom view, you must:
Define custom attributes for your view in a resource element
Specify values for the attributes in your XML layout
Retrieve attribute values at runtime
Apply the retrieved attribute values to your view
Once you define the custom attributes, you can use them in layout XML files just like built-in attributes. The only difference is that your custom attributes belong to a different namespace. Instead of belonging to the http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android namespace, they belong to http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/[your package name]
So for if you use default views you can use android namespace and if you want to set and use attributes for custom view you can define your own name.
Refer this
If you take a look at the beginning of the your layout xml files (in which you used app:) you will (probably) find lines like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<SOME_LAYOUT xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
in this case app: namespace will be used for custom attributes, specified by you inside attrs.xml file or by someone else in one of used libraries.
Sometime the property with android only available in new Android version like
In this case, you should use app:... to make it work with older version.
moreover you will find two variants
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/[packagename]"
the difference between xmlns lines is res-auto take care of resolving our package as sometime we will add .debug or .test in our package and we already provided the packageid of the app Ex:
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/com.test.io.debug"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/com.test.io.test"
I've seen that all the layout ids are identified by #+id/viewid, but it seems the #+my_group_name/viewid works as well. Is it normal to use this naming convention, or the id must be in the "id" class ? I've checked the forum and found prefix based naming conventions but nothing like this.
In examples: I have a dialog layout called dlgeffect. In this layout:
<CheckedTextView
android:id="#+dlgeffect/text"
android:layout_width="0dip" ... >
I now the id's are reused, but during layout modifications if the ids are unique for the whole project the compiler gives error this way (and not runtime error)
Thanks,
Gzp
EDIT: and of course from java it is referenced as R.dlgeffect.text
I really dont know if you can do this, but always stick to standards, if you want it for reuse porpuse or setting property for more than element at once you can use same id for different element
I am not getting what Author wants to explain , so please explain this , "Use #+ on the first occurrence of a given android:id in a layout (XML) file. It might be in the definition of the view or it might be in a reference - which ever is first. In the example above, the EditText view is defined before the Button. So the #+ is used on the android:id attribute in EditText. However, if the Button was defined first, the #+ would be used on the relative layout positioning in the Button" ,
..
Read more: http://www.intertech.com/Blog/Post/Android-Layout-and-ID-Attribute.aspx#ixzz2MHHdt1wv
#+ means, that if this id doesn't exists yet, it will be created, otherwise already created id will be used. If you look at R.java - ids is some numeric constants.
If you write just # - you should be sure, that id already created.
Take a look here. It explains a lot, take a look at the ID section.
The at-symbol (#) at the beginning of the string indicates that the
XML parser should parse and expand the rest of the ID string and
identify it as an ID resource. The plus-symbol (+) means that this is
a new resource name that must be created and added to our resources
(in the R.java file). There are a number of other ID resources that
are offered by the Android framework. When referencing an Android
resource ID, you do not need the plus-symbol, but must add the android
package namespace, like so:
android:id="#android:id/empty"
There are always a few attribute values that Android doesn't explicitly define how to change and set dynamically for views. In my case, I'm trying to set the ListView's vertical scroll bar drawable. There's no method in the ListView class that lets you set this. I can only define this in the XML using android:scrollbarThumbVertical="#drawable/new_scroll_bar". Is there ANY workaround that would let me change attributes not otherwise defined dynamically?
It seems impossible, since the document doesn't refer to a corresponding method to set that XML attribute.
In the docs it says it corresponds to the global resource attribute:
android.R.attr.scrollbarThumbHorizontal
You can set this equal to a drawable programatically.
Ref: http://developer.android.com/reference/android/view/View.html#attr_android:scrollbarThumbVertical
Let me know if that is what you were trying to get to.