I have a Fragment (I'll call it pagerFragment) that is added to the backstack and is visible. It holds a viewPager with a FragmentPagerAdapter. The FragmentPagerAdapter holds (let's say) two fragments: A and B.
First adding of the fragments works great.
Fragment A has a button that once clicked, adds a fragment (C) to the backstack.
The problem is this: if I add that fragment (C), and then click back, the pagerAdapter is empty, and I cannot see any fragments inside.
If I use a hack, and destroy the children fragments (A and B) in the pagerFragments onDestroyView(), this solves the problem, although I don't wan't to use this hack.
Any ideas what the issue could be?
I had the same problem. The solution for me was simple:
in onCreateView I had:
// Create the adapter that will return a fragment for each of the three
// primary sections of the app.
mSectionsPagerAdapter = new SectionsPagerAdapter(getActivity()
.getSupportFragmentManager());
where SectionPageAdapter is something like this:
class SectionsPagerAdapter extends FragmentPagerAdapter {
...
}
after changing getSupportFragmentManager to
mSectionsPagerAdapter = new SectionsPagerAdapter(getChildFragmentManager());
it started working!
It sounds like you are using nested fragments since your ViewPager is inside a PagerFragment. Have you passed getChildFragmentManager() to the constructor of your FragmentPagerAdapter? If not you should.
I don't think you need a FragmentStatePagerAdapter, but I would give that a shot since it handles saving and restoring Fragment state. The fact that your onDestroyView() hack works makes me think that you may want a FragmentStatePagerAdapter.
It could also have something to do with the way the FragmentPagerAdapter adds Fragments. The FragmentPagerAdapter doesn't add Fragments to the backstack. Imagine if you had a 10+ pages added in your ViewPager and the user swiped through them. The user would need to hit back 11 times just to back out of the app.
It may also be related to this post: Nested Fragments and The Back Stack.
Also I'm not sure what you are adding the Fragment C to. Are you adding it to the same container as the ViewPager?
Well at least you have a few options to investigate. In these situations I like to debug down into the Android SDK source code and see what's causing the behaviour. I recommend grabbing the AOSP source and adding frameworks/support and frameworks/base as your SDK sources. That's the only true way to understand what is happening and avoid making random changes until things work.
Use getChildFragmentManager() instead of getSupportFragmentManager().
It will work fine.
I just faced the problem in our project as well. The root cause is the way the the FragmentPagerAdapter works:
The FragmentPagerAdapter just detaches a Fragment he does not currently need from its View but does not remove it from its FragmentManager. When he wants to display the Fragment again he looks if the FragmentManager still contains the Fragment using a tag that is created from the view id of the ViewPager and the id returned by the adapters getItemId(position) call. If he finds a Fragment he just schedules an attach of the Fragment to its View within the updating transaction of the FragmentManager. Only if he does not find a Fragment this way he creates a new one using the adapters getItem(position) call!
The problem with a Fragment containing a ViewPager with a FragmentPagerAdapter is, that the contents of the FragmentManager is never cleaned up when the containing Fragment is put to the back stack. If the containing Fragment comes back from the back stack it creates a new View but the FragmentManager still contains the fragments that were attached to the old view and the attach of an existing fragment does not work anymore.
The easiest way to get rid of this problem is to avoid nested fragments. :)
The second easiest way is as already mentioned in other posts to use the ChildFragmentManager for the FragmentPagerAdapter as this one gets properly updated during the life cycle of the container fragment.
As there are projects (as my current one) where both options are not possible, I have published here a solution that works with an arbitrary FragmentManager by using the hashCode of the sub fragments as the item id of the fragment at that position. It comes at the price of storing all fragments for all positions within the adapter.
public class MyPagerAdapter extends FragmentPagerAdapter {
private static int COUNT = ...;
private final FragmentManager fragmentManager;
private Fragment[] subFragments = new Fragment[COUNT];
private FragmentTransaction cleanupTransaction;
public MyPagerAdapter(FragmentManager fragmentManager) {
super(fragmentManager);
this.fragmentManager = fragmentManager;
}
#Override
public Fragment getItem(int position) {
return getSubFragmentAtPosition(position);
}
#Override
public int getCount() {
return COUNT;
}
#Override
public long getItemId(int position) {
return getSubFragmentAtPosition(position).hashCode();
}
//The next three methods are needed to remove fragments no longer used from the fragment manager
#Override
public void startUpdate(ViewGroup container) {
super.startUpdate(container);
cleanupTransaction = fragmentManager.beginTransaction();
}
#Override
public void destroyItem(ViewGroup container, int position, Object object) {
super.destroyItem(container, position, object);
cleanupTransaction.remove((Fragment) object);
}
#Override
public void finishUpdate(ViewGroup container) {
super.finishUpdate(container);
cleanupTransaction.commit();
}
private Fragment getSubFragmentAtPosition(int position){
if (subFragments[position] == null){
subFragments[position] = ...;
}
return subFragments[position];
}
}
I had same problem, just set adapter twice at once and that's all.
Example code :
private fun displayImg(photo1:String, photo2:String){
val pager:ViewPager = v?.findViewById(R.id.ProductImgPager)!!
val arr = ArrayList<String>()
arr.add(photo1)
arr.add(photo2)
pager.adapter = AdapterImageView(fm, arr ,arr.size)
pager.adapter = AdapterImageView(fm, arr ,arr.size)
}
Related
Problem:
I am currently running into a problem where my app is trying to load too many fragments when it opens for the first time.
I have BottomNavigationView with ViewPager that loads 4 fragments - each one of the Fragment contains TabLayout with ViewPager to load at least 2 more fragments.
As you can imagine, that is a lot of UI rendering (10+ fragments) - especially when some of these fragments contain heavy components such as calendar, bar graphs, etc.
Currently proposed solution:
Control the UI loading when the fragment is required - so until the user goes to that fragment for the first time, there is no reason to load it.
It seems like it's definitely possible as many apps, including the Play Store, are doing it. Please see the example here
In the video example above - the UI component(s) are being loaded AFTER the navigation to the tab is completed. It even has an embedded loading symbol.
1) I am trying to figure out how to do exactly that - at what point would I know that this fragment UI need to be created vs it already is created?
2) Also, what is the fragment lifecycle callback where I would start the UI create process? onResume() means UI is visible to the user so loading the UI there will be laggy and delayed.
Hope this is clear enough.
EDIT:
I'm already using the FragmentStatePagerAdapter as ViewPager adapter. I noticed that the super(fm) method in the constructor is deprecated now:
ViewPagerAdapter(FragmentManager fm) {
super(fm); // this is deprecated
}
So I changed that to:
ViewPagerAdapter(FragmentManager fm) {
super(fm, BEHAVIOR_RESUME_ONLY_CURRENT_FRAGMENT);
}
BEHAVIOR_RESUME_ONLY_CURRENT_FRAGMENT: Indicates that only the current fragment will be in the Lifecycle.State.RESUMED state. All other Fragments are capped at Lifecycle.State.STARTED.
This seems useful as the onResume() of the Fragment will only be called when the Fragment is visible to the user. Can I use this indication somehow to load the UI then?
The reason your app loads multiple Fragments at the startup is most probably, you're initializing them all at once. Instead, you can initialize them when you need them. Then use show\ hide to attach\ detach from window without re-inflating whole layout.
Simple explanation: You'll create your Fragment once user clicks on BottomNavigationView's item. On clicked item, you'll check if Fragment is not created and not added, then create it and add. If it's already created then use show() method to show already available Fragment and use hide() to hide all other fragments of BottomNavigationView.
As per your case show()/hide is better than add()/replace because as you said you don't want to re-inflate the Fragment when you want show them
public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity{
FragmentOne frg1;
FragmentTwo frg2;
#Override
public boolean onNavigationItemSelected(MenuItem item){
switch(item.getId()){
case R.id.fragment_one:
if (frg2 != null && frg2.isAdded(){
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().hide(frg2).commit();
}
if(frg1 != null && !frg1.isAdded){
frg1 = new FragmenOne();
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().add(R.id.container, frg1).commit();
}else if (frg1 != null && frg1.isAdded) {
fragmentManager.beginTransaction().show(frg1).commit();
}
return true;
case R.id.fragment_two:
// Reverse of what you did for FragmentOne
return true;
}
}
}
And for your ViewPager as you can see from the example you're referring to; PlayStore is using setOffscreenPageLimit. This will let you choose how many Views should be kept alive, otherwise will be destroyed and created from start passing through all lifecycle events of the Fragment (in case view is Fragment). In PlayStore app's case that's probably 4-5 that why it started loading again when you re-selected "editor's choice" tab. If you do the following only selected and neighboring (one in the right) Fragments will be alive other Fragments outside screen will be destroyed.
public class FragmentOne extends Fragment{
ViewPager viewPager;
#Override
public void onCreateView(){
viewPager = .... // Initialize
viewpAger.setOffscreenPageLimit(1); // This will keep only 2 Fragments "alive"
}
}
Answer to both questions
If you use show/hide you won't need to know when to inflate your view. It will be handled automatically and won't be laggy since it's just attaching/detaching views not inflating.
It depends upon how you initialize your fragment in your activity. May be you are initializing all your fragment in onCreate method of your activity instead of that you can initialize it when BottomNavigation item is selected like below :
Fragment one,two,three,four;
#Override
public boolean onNavigationItemSelected(MenuItem item){
Fragment fragment;
switch(item.getId()){
case R.id.menu_one:{
if(one==null)
one = Fragment()
fragment = one;
break;
}
case R.id.menu_two:{
if(two==null)
two = Fragment()
fragment = two;
break;
}
}
getFragmentManager().beginTransaction().replace(fragment).commit();
}
To decide how many page is load in you view pager at one time you can use :
setOffscreenPageLimit.
viewPager.setOffscreenPageLimit(number)
To get the resume and pause functionality on fragments you can take an example from this link.
Please try this.
i was worked with the same kind of the Application, There were multiple tabs and also Tabs have multiple inner tabs.
i was used the concept of ViewPager method, In which there is one method of onPageSelected() for that method we were getting the page position.
By the Use of this position we are checking the current Fragment and called their custom method that we created inside that fragment like onPageSelected() defined inside that fragment.
With this custom method onPageSelected() inside the Fragment we checked that weather the list are available or not if list have data then we are not making the call of Api otherwise we are calling the Api and loading that list.
I think you have same kind of requirement to follow if your Tabs have inner Tab or viewpager you can follow same concept inside of that so if your current fragment of viewpager method onpageSelected called at that time your viewpager fragment initialized.
you have to call just initialization like data binding or view initialization need to be called in onCreate() method and other list attachment and api call to be managed by the custom method onPageSelected that will be called based on ViewPager onPageSelected.
let me Know if you need any help for same.
You can try to have Fragments with FrameLayouts only in ViewPager. The actual Fragments could be added to FrameLayout in onResume() (after checking if this Fragment isn't already attached). It should work if BEHAVIOR_RESUME_ONLY_CURRENT_FRAGMENT works as expected.
I would recommend you use BottomNavigationView.setOnNavigationItemSelectedListener to toggle between the fragment UI whenever it is needed.
navigationView.setOnNavigationItemSelectedListener(item -> {
switch(item.getItemId()) {
case R.id.item1:
// you can replace the code findFragmentById() with findFragmentByTag("dashboard");
// if you only have one framelayout to hold the fragment
fragment = getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentById(R.id.fragment_container);
if (fragment == null) {
fragment = new ExampleFragment();
// if the fragment is identified by tag, add another
// argument to this method:
// replace(R.id.fragment_container, fragment, "dashboard")
getSupportFragmentManager().begintransaction()
.replace(R.id.fragment_container, fragment)
.commit();
}
break;
}
}
The idea is simple, when the user swipes or selects a different tab, the fragment that was visible is replaced by the new fragment.
Just load fragments one by one. Create the main fragment layout with many placeholders and stubs and then just load them in the order you like.
Use FragmentTransaction.replace() from the main fragment after it loads.
Have you tried the setUserVisibleHint() method of a fragment
override fun setUserVisibleHint(isVisibleToUser: Boolean) {
super.setUserVisibleHint(isVisibleToUser)
if(isVisibleToUser){
// Do you stuff here
}
}
This will only get called when a fragment is visible to the user
How about you maintain just one ViewPager? Sounds crazy? In that case, you just change the dataset of PagerAdapter when you switch between the bottom tabs. Let's see how you can accomplish this,
As you mentioned, you have 4 fragments, which are assigned to each individual tabs of the bottom navigation view. Each performs some redundant work i.e. holding a viewPager with tab layout and setting the same kind of adapters. So, if we can combine these 4 redundant tasks into one then we will be able to get rid of 4 fragments. And as there will be just one viewPager with one single adapter then we will be able to reduce the fragment loading count from ~10 to 2 if we set offScreenPageLimit to 1. Let's see some example,
activity.xml should look like
<LinearLayout>
<TabLayout />
<ViewPager />
<BottomNavigationView />
</LinearLayout>
It's optional but I would recommend to create a base PagerFragment abstract class with abstract method getTabTitle()
public abstract class PagerFragment extends Fragment {
public abstract String getTabTitle();
}
Now it's time to make our PagerAdapter class
public class SectionsPagerAdapter extends FragmentStatePagerAdapter {
public Map<Integer, List<PagerFragment>> map = ...; // If you are concerned about memory then I could recommend to store DataObject instead of PagerFragment and instantiate fragment on demand using that data.
public int currentTabId = R.id.first_bottom_tab_id;
private List<PagerFragment> getCurrentFragments() {
return map.get(currentTabId);
}
public void setCurrentTabId(int tabId) {
this.currentTabId = tabId;
}
public SectionsPagerAdapter(FragmentManager manager) {
super(manager);
}
#Override
public Fragment getItem(int position) {
return getCurrentFragments().get(position);
}
#Override
public int getCount() {
return getCurrentFragments().size();
}
#Override
public int getItemPosition(#NonNull Object object) {
return POSITION_NONE;
}
#Override
public CharSequence getPageTitle(int position) {
return getCurrentFragments().get(position).getTabTitle();
}
}
And finally, in Activity
SectionsPagerAdapter pagerAdapter = new SectionsPagerAdapter(getSupportFragmentManager());
viewPager.setAdapter(pagerAdapter);
viewPager.setOffscreenPageLimit(1);
viewPagerTab.setViewPager(viewPager);
bottomNavigationView.setOnNavigationItemSelectedListener(menuItem -> {
pagerAdapter.setCurrentTabId(menuItem.getItemId())
pagerAdapter.notifyDataSetChanged();
viewPagerTab.setViewPager(viewPager);
}
This is the basic idea. You can mix some of your own ideas with it to make a wonderful result. Let me know if it is useful?
UPDATE
Answer to your questions,
I think with my solution you can achieve exactly the same behavior of the video as I already did it in a project. In my solution, if you set offset page limit to 1 then only adjacent fragment's is created in advance. So, fragment creation will be handled by adapter and viewpager you don't need to worry about it.
In my above solution, you should create UI in onCreateView().
I have a ViewPager using a FragmentPagerAdapter for displaying three tabs, each represented by its ow fragment. One of these fragments contains a list, that should be updated on switching / swiping to that tab. But I don't find any way to make it happen. I tried using the onResume method, but the fragments seem not to be paused and resumed on tab change. I also tried using ViewPager.OnPageChangeListener in my MainActivity:
#Override
public void onPageSelected(int position)
{
FragmentRefreshInterface currentFragment = (FragmentRefreshInterface) mSectionsPagerAdapter.getItem(position);
currentFragment.onRefreshed();
}
And in the fragment I use the following:
#Override
public void onRefreshed()
{
List<Record> records = mRecordingService.getRecords();
mRecordAdapter.clear();
mRecordAdapter.add(record);
}
But using this code I can't access my RecordingService class that is used to provide the database functions (because mRecordingService seems to be null). I initialize it in the fragment like this:
#Override
public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState)
{
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
mRecordingService = new RecordingService(getContext());
}
Using the onPageChangeListener is the correct way to do it. I believe the reason why your code is not working, is because you are calling getItem on your pager adapter: getItem() actually returns a new instance of the fragment. In order to get the current instance, you use instantiateItem() (which returns a reference to the fragment actually being used).
Change your code to look something like this:
#Override
public void onPageSelected(int position)
{
FragmentRefreshInterface currentFragment = (FragmentRefreshInterface) mSectionsPagerAdapter.instantiateItem(viewPager,position);
currentFragment.onRefreshed();
}
And it should work.
I suggest that the code you have in onRefreshed() go in onResume() instead. Fragment doesn't have an onRefreshed() method. You must be implementing another interface that declares this method.
Since you are storing data in a database, you should be use a CursorAdapter or subclass such as SimpleCursorAdapter. If you do this correctly, the ListView will automatically update when you add a record to the database. Then the service can add records without needing to access the service from the fragment.
In your MainActivity:
private FirstFragment firstFragment;
private WantedFragment wantedFragment;
private ThirdFragment thirdfragment;
In getItem
switch(postition){
//return first, wanted, third fragments depending on position
}
onPageSelected:
if(position == 1) // position of the wanted fragment
wantedfragment.onRefreshed()
Okay i'll try and make this as clear as possible. I have a Fragment called CheckerManager which contains a ViewPager. This ViewPager will allow the user to swipe between 3 Fragments all of which are an instance of another Fragment called CheckerFragment. I'm using a FragmentPagerAdapter to handle paging. Here's how it looks
private class PagerAdapter extends FragmentPagerAdapter {
CharSequence mTabTitles[];
public PagerAdapter(FragmentManager fm, CharSequence tabTitles[]) {
super(fm);
mTabTitles = tabTitles;
}
#Override
public Fragment getItem(int position) {
switch(position) {
case 0:
return CheckerFragment.newInstance(MainFragment.DRAW_TITLE_LOTTO);
case 1:
return CheckerFragment.newInstance(MainFragment.DRAW_TITLE_DAILY);
case 2:
return CheckerFragment.newInstance(MainFragment.DRAW_TITLE_EURO);
default:
return null;
}
}
#Override
public CharSequence getPageTitle(int position) {
return mTabTitles[position];
}
#Override
public int getCount() {
return 3;
}
}
I know that the ViewPager will always create the Fragment either side of the current Fragment. So say my 3 CheckerFragments are called A, B and C and the current Fragment is A. B has already been created. But my problem is that even though I am still looking at Fragment A, Fragment B is the 'active' Fragment. Every input I make is actually corresponding to Fragment B and not A. The active Fragment is always the one which has been created last by the ViewPager.
I've looked at quite a few things to see if anyone has had the same problem but i'm finding it difficult to even describe what's wrong. I think it's something to with the fact that all of the ViewPagers fragments are of the same type ie - CheckerFragment. I have a working implementation of a ViewPager inside a fragment elsewhere in the application and the only difference I can tell is that each page is a different type of Fragment.
Any help would be appreciated!
*EDIT
PagerAdapter adapter = new PagerAdapter(getChildFragmentManager(), tabTitles);
ViewPager viewPager = (ViewPager)view.findViewById(R.id.viewPagerChecker);
viewPager.setAdapter(adapter);
I feel pretty stupid but I found out what the issue was. In my CheckerFragment I would call getArguments() to retrieve a String extra and I would use this to determine how to layout the fragment. Problem was I made this extra a static member of CheckerFragment. So every time a new Fragment was created it was using the most recent extra.
Moral of the story - Don't make your fragments extra a static member if you plan on making multiple instances of that fragment.
Currently, with a FragmentActivity, I toggle among 2 type of Fragments using the following code.
private void toggle() {
Fragment oldFragment = getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentById(R.id.content);
Fragment fragment = null;
if (oldFragment instanceof ColorFragment) {
fragment = new ViewPagerFragment();
} else {
fragment = new ColorFragment(android.R.color.black);
}
getSupportFragmentManager().beginTransaction().replace(R.id.content, fragment).commitAllowingStateLoss();
}
2 Fragments are being toggle.
ColorFragment - A simple fragment which fill up its background with solid black color.
ViewPagerFragment - A fragment contains ViewPager. User can swipe between a purple color fragment, and a blue color fragment.
The code which responsible for swiping purple and blue color fragments are as below.
private static class MyFragmentPagerAdapter extends FragmentPagerAdapter {
public MyFragmentPagerAdapter(FragmentManager fm) {
super(fm);
}
#Override
public int getCount() {
return 2;
}
#Override
public Fragment getItem(int position) {
switch (position) {
case 0:
return new ColorFragment(android.R.color.holo_purple);
default:
return new ColorFragment(android.R.color.holo_blue_bright);
}
}
}
However, I encounter the weird behavior during toggling.
Black color fragment was shown.
Toggling.
View pager, which can swipe between purple and blue fragments shown.
Toggling.
Black color fragment was shown.
Toggling.
Nothing shown, as MyFragmentPagerAdapter's getItem is not being triggered.
I think my situation is similar to FragmentPagerAdapter getItem is not called
However, I prefer not to use FragmentStatePagerAdapter, because of the cost of potentially more overhead when switching between pages.
Any workaround to overcome this problem?
I include a complete workable source code to demonstrate this problem : https://www.dropbox.com/s/jok9tz5ktvfcteo/viewpagerbug.zip
Any workaround to overcome this problem?
I've downloaded your code and the problem appears because you don't handle those Fragments right. Most precisely you use nested Fragments in the ViewPager based Fragment and for that ViewPager you create the adapter like this:
MyFragmentPagerAdapter myFragmentPagerAdapter = new MyFragmentPagerAdapter(this.getFragmentManager());
Instead, you should be using getChildFragmentManager() to bind the nested fragments:
MyFragmentPagerAdapter myFragmentPagerAdapter = new MyFragmentPagerAdapter(this.getChildFragmentManager());
Also, you shouldn't pass data through a constructor to a Fragment as that data will not survive a configuration change and bad things will start to appear. Use a Bundle instead.
Global working tested solution.
getSupportFragmentManager() keeps the null reference some times and View pager does not create new fragment instance.Since it finds reference to same fragment. So to over come this use getChildFragmentManager() solves problem in simple way.
Don't
new PagerAdapter(getSupportFragmentManager(), fragments);
Do
new PagerAdapter(getChildFragmentManager() , fragments);
Simple use FragmentStatePagerAdapter instead of FragmentPagerAdapter
or
you can use new MyFragmentPagerAdapter(this.getChildFragmentManager())
Hope it will help you :)
In my case I was correctly calling
MyFragmentPagerAdapter myFragmentPagerAdapter = new MyFragmentPagerAdapter(this.getChildFragmentManager());
but then in the nested fragment I was trying to replace the container fragment with another one by using:
getFragmentManager()
You need to go to the activity and call
getActivity().getSupportFragmentManager();
In my cases it worked after add this to my FragmentPagerAdapter:
#Override
public int getItemPosition(Object object) {
return POSITION_NONE;
}
and I also used getChildFragmentManager() like Luksprog said
I am not able to reuse fragment in FragmentPagerAdapter.. Using destroyItem() method, It is deleting the fragment but still does not called getItem() again..There are just 2-3 Images so I am using FragmentPagerAdapter Instead of FragmentStatePagerAdapter..
public class ExamplePagerAdapter extends FragmentPagerAdapter {
ArrayList < String > urls;
int size = 0;
public ExamplePagerAdapter(FragmentManager fm, ArrayList < String > res) {
super(fm);
urls = res;
size = urls.size();
}
#Override
public int getCount() {
if (urls == null) {
return 0;
} else {
return size;
}
}
#Override
public void destroyItem(ViewGroup container, int position, Object object) {
FragmentManager manager = ((Fragment) object).getFragmentManager();
FragmentTransaction trans = manager.beginTransaction();
trans.remove((Fragment) object);
trans.commit();
}
#Override
public Fragment getItem(int position) {
Fragment fragment = new FloorPlanFragment();
Bundle b = new Bundle();
b.putInt("p", position);
b.putString("image", urls.get(position));
Log.i("image", "" + urls.get(position));
fragment.setArguments(b);
return fragment;
}
}
And In FragmentActivity,
pager.setAdapter(new ExamplePagerAdapter(getSupportFragmentManager(), res2));
KISS Answer:
Simple use FragmentStatePagerAdapter instead of FragmentPagerAdapter.
I got the answer.. Firstly I thought to delete this question as I am doing a very silly mistake but this answer will help someone who is facing the same problem that Instead of FragmentPagerAdapter, use FragmentStatePagerAdapter.
As #BlackHatSamurai mentioned in the comment:
The reason this works is because FragmentStatePagerAdapter destroys
as Fragments that aren't being used. FragmentPagerAdapter does not.
Using a FragmentStatePagerAdapter didn't fully fix my problem which was a similar issue where onCreateView was not being called for child fragments in the view pager. I am actually nesting my FragmentPagerAdapter inside of another Fragment therefore the FragmentManager was shared throughout all of them and thus retaining instances of the old fragments. The fix was to instead feed an instance of the getChildFragmentManager to the constructor of the FragmentPagerAdapter in my host fragment. Something like...
FragmentPagerAdapter adapter = new FragmentPagerAdapter(getChildFragmentManager());
The getChildFragmentManager() method is accessible via a fragment and this worked for me because it returns a private FragmentManager for that fragment specifically for situations in which nesting fragments is needed.
Keep in mind however to use getChildFragmentManager() your minimum API version must be atleast 17 (4.2), so this may throw a wrench in your gears. Of course, if you are using fragments from the support library v4 you should be okay.
Override long getItemId (int position)
FragmentPagerAdapter caches the fragments it creates using getItem. I was facing the same issue- even after calling notifyDataSetChanged() getItem was not being called.
This is actually a feature and not a bug. You need to override getItemId so that you can correctly reuse your fragments. Since you are removing fragments, your positions are changing. As mentioned in the docs:
long getItemId (int position)
Return a unique identifier for the item at the given position.
The default implementation returns the given position. Subclasses should override this method if the positions of items can change.
Just provide a unique id to each fragment and you're done.
Using a FragementStatePagerAdapter or returning POSITION_NONE in int getItemPosition (Object object) is wrong. You will not get any caching.
I did what #kanika and #Jraco11 had posted but I still had the problem.
So, after a lot of changes, I found one that worked for me and was added to my FragmentPagerAdapter the next code:
#Override
public int getItemPosition(Object object) {
return POSITION_NONE;
}
According to what I read, getItemPosition is used to notify the ViewPager whether or not to refresh an item, and to avoid updates if the items at the visible positions haven't changed.
method getItem() is used only to create new items. Once they created, this method will not be called. If you need to get item that is currently in use by adapter, use this method:
pagerAdapter.instantiateItem(viewPager, TAB_POS)
There are two different scenarios :
1.) You have same layout for every pager :
In that case, it will be better if you'll extend your custom adapter
by PagerAdapter and return a single layout.
2.) You have different layout for every pager :
In that case, it will be better if you'll extend your custom adapter
by FragmentStatePagerAdapter and return different fragmets for every pager.
I found that setting a listener on the tab-layout stopped this from being called, probably because they only have space for one listener on tabLayout.setOnTabSelectedListener instead of an array of listeners.