Develop Reference

How to texture a rectangle with multiple textures in OpenGL

I'm trying to make a 2d map (for a game, think tiled world map) in OpenGL ES 2.0 for an android game. Basically, there are a few tile types that have different textures, and the map is randomly generated from these types, so from game-to-game the map changes but for the duration of a single game it stays the same.
My first thought was to generate a single large texture / image / bitmap (independent from OpenGL) beforehand basically stitching duplicate tile textures together to make the larger map, and then using this single texture for one large map rectangle. In theory I think this is simple and would work fine, but I'm worried that it won't scale well for larger maps and especially on mobile I'll run out of memory with such a large image map. Plus, there's a small set of tiles that are duplicated over and over so it seems like a tremendous waste to duplicate the pixel data in a big texture over and over.
My second thought was having many textures, one for each of the tile textures. But I'm not sure how this would work, texture-binding-wise, would I need the shaders to contain multiple texture references and within the shader have logic for using the right one?
Finally, I thought using a texture atlas could work, have one texture / image with all of the tile data in it, this would be relatively small. But I'm struggling to imagine how to get the maths to work out such that "tiles" or subsections of the map rectangle would use completely different texture coordinates.
Am I approaching this the wrong way? Should I be using a rectangle for each tile? At least this way I can pass the shaders both vertex and texture coordinates for each tile independently. This seems easier, but also seems wrong since the map really is just one rectangle that won't be changing.

My first thought was to generate a single large texture...
Actualy, something like this has already been used in id Software's id Tech since version 4. It's called MegaTexture. Basicaly, it's a big texture, which could also hold additional data.
My second thought was having many textures...
You don't need to hold all the textures in a shader. Do it like this:
Implement a loop with n iterations, where n is how much different types of textures are used.
Inside a loop, bind the current texture type.
Pass any data, like position/color/texture coords to shaders.
Draw all tiles that use the bounded texture. You could use GLES30.glDrawElementsInstanced or GLES30.glDrawArraysInstanced if you are targeting devices with GLES 3.x or an appropriate extension support. Otherwise, draw your tiles using GLES20.glDrawArrays or GLES20.glDrawElements.
Shaders won't be complicated with this approach.
Finally, I thought using a texture atlas could work...
You could use loop here too and compute the texture coordinates for each tile type on CPU, then just pass them to shaders.
Considering your map is not changing through a game session, MegaTexture approach looks good. However, it depends on how large your map is and how much memory is available. Also, note that max texture size is limited. Max size differs from device to device but should be (AFAIK) equal or greater than screen size and at least 64 texels(16 for cube-mapped textures). You can get the maximum texture size on any device using glGet(GL_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE ).

Android, Open GL ES, crop and scale texture

I have some troubles with video processing. I'm using Surface with Texture to process video with MediaCodec and MediaMuxer (decode, crop, encode with lower quality).
And on middle-step, which is cropping, I've got problems. Basically, what I want to do is to take lesser dimension of video, then, based on this side, define offsets for bigger side and crop it out. Then result should be properly scaled into 640x640 square. I searched for pretty big amount of time, but all information that I have found points that Open GL should scale image itself. Yes, I should admit that it's doing some scale, but result is looking very ugly it seems to be "compressed" verticaly quite hardly.
So, now the question itself. Can somebody provide to me some explanation or maybe even snipet of code that perfrom desired functions in Open GL ES?
I already tried to adjust Viewport thought.
GLES20.glViewport(0, 0, 640, 640)
UPDATE
Idea that Isogen74 have proposed more less worked for me. It's still stretched quite significantly, but it's better then nothing.
Here you can find updated code: OpenGL setup

Cropping - change your texture coordinates that you loading from when loading the texture; e.g. if you you want to crop the top and bottom 10% off the image load from (0.0, 0.1) to (1.0, 0.9).
Scaling - the answer depends how big your downscale to 640*640 is. OpenGL filtering isn't designed to handle large downscaling ratios directly - it's not an image processing library - but assuming relatively small scaling ratios just ensure you have turned on GL_LINEAR texture filtering rather than GL_NEAREST.
If you have a large downscale you may need to mipmap the texture first and GL_LINEAR_MIPMAP_NEAREST or GL_LINEAR_MIPMAP_LINEAR as your minification filter, but just be aware that this isn't going to give you something as good as, for example a proper scaling algorithm you might get in image processing software (e.g. bicubic, or something like that).

Skybox OpenGL ES2.0

I am implementing a Skybox in my OpenGL application.
Is it more common to use a single texture like this one and use UV mapping to pull out the six sides.
Or is it more common to just use one texture for each of the six sides using something like this site provides.
The advantage to me in using one texture is that you save overhead by not using unnecessary texture units. HOWEVER, the sacrifice here is obviously image resolution. If you use a single 2048x2048 texture as show each side of the skybox only has 512x512 pixels to work with. Where one texture for each side quadruples the available pixels....
Any insight?

Is it more common to use a single texture like this one and use UV
mapping to pull out the six sides
Using a single texture is recommended, since it would reduce the amount of state switches and thus yields in most cases a better performance. Combinding multiple texture in one big texture is called 'Texture atlas' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texture_atlas and is used in a lot of applications, to reduce the number of separate textures.
If you use a single 2048x2048 texture as show each side of the skybox
only has 512x512 pixels to work with. Where one texture for each side
quadruples the available pixels....
This is not really and argument, because you could combine six 2048x2048 textures in one big texture.
My personal recommendations for enviroment maps (skyboxes are enviroment maps,too), is to use cube maps https://www.opengl.org/wiki/Cubemap_Texture . With cubemaps you're combining both advantages (only one texture bind + easy texture coordinates) and cubemaps have more usages, for example simple reflections.

scaling images in libgdx only once

In my android game, I am using images of fixed resolution lets say 256x256. Now for different device screens, I am rendering them by calculating their width and height as appropriate for that device.
Assume that on galaxy note2 I calculated width=128 and height=128... similarly for different devices, width and height will vary.
This is how I created texture..
....
imageTexture = new Texture(...);
....
in render()..
....
spriteBatch.draw(imageTexture,x,y,width,height);
....
So, every time when I call draw() method, does libgdx/opengl scale image from 256x256 to 128x128, which I think, yes!
Is there any way to tell opengl/libgdx to calculate all scaling only once ?
I have no idea how images were rendered? loaded into memory? scaled etc ?
How does Sprite in libgdx work? I tried understanding the code of Sprite and looks to me like they are also getting image width and height and then scale it every time, even though they have setScale() method.

First rule of optimizing: get some numbers. Premature optimization is the root of many problems. That said, there are still some good rules of thumb to know.
The texture data will be uploaded by libgdx/OpenGL to the GPU when you invoke new Texture. When you actually draw the texture with spriteBatch.draw instructions are uploaded to the GPU by OpenGL that tell the hardware to use your existing texture and to fit it to the bounds. The draw call just uploads coordinates (the corners of the box that defines the Sprite) and a pointer to the texture. The actual texture data is not uploaded.
So, in practice your image is "scaled" on every frame. However, this is not that bad, as this is exactly what GPUs are designed to do very, very well. You only really need to worry about uploading so many textures that the GPU has trouble keeping track of them all, you do not need to worry much about scaling the textures beforehand.
The costs of scaling and transforming the four corners of the sprite are relatively trivial next to the costs of sending the data to the GPU and the cost of refreshing the screen, so they probably are not worth worrying about too much. The "batch" in SpriteBatch is all about "batching up" (or gathering together) a lot of coordinates to send up to the GPU at once, as roughly, each call out to the GPU can be expensive. So, its always good to do as much work within a single batch's begin/end as you can.
Again, though, modern machines are stupidly fast, and you should be able to do whatever is easiest to get your app running first. Then once you have something working correctly, you can figure out which parts are actually slow and fix those. The parts that are "inefficient" but are not actually measurably impacting your application can be left alone.

Can OpenGL ES render textures of non base 2 dimensions?

This is just a quick question before I dive deeper into converting my current rendering system to openGL. I heard that textures needed to be in base 2 sizes in order to be stored for rendering. Is this true?
My application is very tight on memory, but most of the bitmaps are not powers of two. Does storing non-base 2 textures consume more memory?

It's true depending on the OpenGL ES version, OpenGL ES 1.0/1.1 have the power of two restriction. OpenGL ES 2.0 doesn't have the limitation, but it restrict the wrap modes for non power of two textures.
Creating bigger textures to match POT dimensions does waste texture memory.

Suresh, the power of 2 limitation was built into OpenGL back in the (very) early days of computer graphics (before affordable hardware acceleration), and it was done for performance reasons. Low-level rendering code gets a decent performance boost when it can be hard-coded for power-of-two textures. Even in modern GPU's, POT textures are faster than NPOT textures, but the speed difference is much smaller than it used to be (though it may still be noticeable on many ES devices).
GuyNoir, what you should do is build a texture atlas. I just solved this problem myself this past weekend for my own Android game. I created a class called TextureAtlas, and its constructor calls glTexImage2D() to create a large texture of any size I choose (passing null for the pixel values). Then I can call add(id, bitmap), which calls glTexSubImage2D(), repeatedly to pack in the smaller images. The TextureAtlas class tracks the used and free space within the larger texture and the rectangles each bitmap is stored in. Then the rendering code can call get(id) to get the rectangle for an image within the atlas (which it can then convert to texture coordinates).
Side note #1: Choosing the best way to pack in various texture sizes is NOT a trivial task. I chose to start with simple logic in the TextureAtlas class (think typewriter + carriage return + line feed) and make sure I load the images in the best order to take advantage of that logic. In my case, that was to start with the smallest square-ish images and work my way up to the medium square-ish images. Then I load any short+wide images, force a CR+LF, and then load any tall+skinny images. I load the largest square-ish images last.
Side note #2: If you need multiple texture atlases, try to group images inside each that will be rendered together to minimize the number of times you need to switch textures (which can kill performance). For example, in my Android game I put all the static game board elements into one atlas and all the frames of various animation effects in a second atlas. That way I can bind atlas #1 and draw everything on the game board, then I can bind atlas #2 and draw all the special effects on top of it. Two texture selects per frame is very efficient.
Side note #3: If you need repeating/mirroring textures, they need to go into their own textures, and you need to scale them (not add black pixels to fill in the edges).

No, it must be a 2base. However, you can get around this by adding black bars to the top and/or bottom of your image, then using the texture coordinates array to restrict where the texture will be mapped from your image. For example, lets say you have a 13 x 16 pixel texture. You can add 3 pixels of black to the right side then do the following:
static const GLfloat texCoords[] = {
0.0, 0.0,
0.0, 13.0/16.0,
1.0, 0.0,
1.0, 13.0/16.0
};
Now, you have a 2base image file, but a non-2base texture. Just make sure you use linear scaling :)

This is a bit late but Non-power of 2 textures are supported under OpenGL ES 1/2 through extensions.
The main one is GL_OES_texture_npot. There is also GL_IMG_texture_npot and GL_APPLE_texture_2D_limited_npot for iOS devices
Check for these extensions by calling glGetString(GL_EXTENSIONS) and searching for the extension you need.
I would also advise keeping your textures to sizes that are multiples of 4 as some hardware stretches textures if not.