I am working on a fitness app that is to supports two BLE sensors (heart rate, stride). I ended up with two bounded services (one for each sensor) called and bounded by my main activity. This is running on Nexus 7 II, with KitKat. I have spent days trying to get the app to stable state. The Gatt connections, and notifications work perfectly right after a clean reboot. The problem I am having is getting things back to a working state after one or both of the devices get disconnected and needs to be reconnected. Since similar issues have been reported by others, I have developed and tested various scenarios which included keeping the service and the connections going when the activity is restarted, closing the connections and the server and then starting fresh, closing only and not disconnecting, waiting before reconnecting, etc. Currently, with one sensor, I can get the app to reconnect most of the time. With two sensors, the connections do not get re-established most of the time. It is such a shame that android BLE API is so fragile considering that there are many new BLE devices every week. I am wondering if anyone else has had much luck with multiple BLE sensors and if they would share their approach to get it working.
This isn't a very question-y question but your comment indicates knowing what 0x85 means would help. The Android BLE API was taken from Samsung's second BLE API, but not all of the constants Samsung had defined made it over.
0x85 = 133 (which you also see in the logs) is GATT_ERROR. Basically this means that something went wrong, it could be the peripheral went out of range of the device, or the Bluetooth chip just messed up. I've found calling connect() on the BluetoothGatt in onConnectionStateChange is a decent solution since that will wait for things to get sorted out and connect when it can.
0x8D = 141 GATT_ALREADY_OPEN This one is pretty self-explanatory.
The other thing to watch out for is making sure anything happening to Bluetooth happens sequentially. Multiple threads sending commands to a BluetoothGatt before the result of the previous action happens tends to not be a good thing.
Related
We've been working on a custom BLE peripheral gadget and writing an Android app to interface with it. We've discovered a failure mode that we can not seem to figure out.
The peripheral device has a number of characteristics, some of them marked as PROPERTY_INDICATE.
Normally the app works great. In particular, when we issue a gatt.disconnect() eventually followed by a gatt.close(), the device senses the disconnect and returns to advertising mode.
There is a mode the peripheral may enter though where it broadcasts changes to 2 characteristics with PROPERTY_INDICATE every second. When the peripheral is in that mode and we disconnect, the device never receives the disconnect. Somehow the android device (either a Samsung Tab2 or a Samsung S9) stays connected. We know it is connected, because until we power the handheld down, the device won't sense the disconnect. BUT, if you query BluetoothManager.getConnectedDevices() it shows 0.
We've done a number of iterations to try and triangulate on the cause:
Reduce the characteristic count -> NO CHANGE
Reduce the update rate to every 2 seconds -> SUCCESS
Change one of the characteristics to use NOTIFY -> SUCCESS
Interleave the changes so that we change both, but 0.5 seconds out of phase with each other, so they're not the exact same time -> NO CHANGE
Can anyone suggest what might be the issue? Or how to get closer to what's going on?
A quick fix for us would be the 3rd change. For this scenario NOTIFY vs INDICATE isn't that important. But it worries me to make that kind of change without understanding why.
We have an iOS variant of the app that doesn't have any of these issues. The iOS connection works fine (meaning it disconnects correctly) with the two indications happening every second.
After porting the app to use SweetBlue (a commercial offering that I was pretty impressed with actually), this behavior persisted. We will be modifying our peripheral to use PROPERTY_INDICATION sparingly, preferring PROPERTY_NOTIFY for any cases where the extra acknowledgment provided by INDICATE isn't critical.
At the end of the day my take away answer (until someone shows up with a better one) is:
Android and PROPERTY_INDICATE don't mix/scale well. Developer Beware.
I am working on my Bachelor Thesis and I have to implement an application using Google Nearby Connection API. The goal is to develop a disaster assistance app.
I tested Google Nearby Connection for the past two day and I have some problems, quesitons.
I have 6 devices, 4 Motorola G (2nd Generation), 1 Nexus 5X and 1 OnePlus 5T. They all are up to date. I also use the latest version of Google Nearby
'com.google.android.gms:play-services-nearby:15.0.1'
Here are my questions:
The Motorola devices ask for a pairing code to connect one to another, but even when the pairing is accepted they do not connect.
Some device connect flawlessely (OnePlus and Nexus) but the Motorola have problems connecting, the often throw this error : STATUS_BLUETOOTH_ERROR
Is it possible to create a mesh application that will forward message form device to device? With the testing I made I am starting to wonder if that's really feasable.
During my testing I often discover and advertise in the same time. Is there a better way to do so that might avoid problems?
I used the documentation of google and some other ressources I found online.
Here is the code I had at the end: Gist Link
Thank's a lot for the help guys!
Disaster assistance apps have actually been talked about a lot on our team, as a really interesting use-case. I work on Nearby, the team that built (and maintains) Nearby Connections. It's definitely feasible, once you know the limitations.
I believe that Motorola bug has been fixed on our internal builds, so look out for it in the coming months. The update will be pushed out to all devices (you don't need to update your app) in 1.5~2 months. Wish we could push it faster, but it is what it is. They should be connecting if the pairing dialog is accepted, though. If that's not working, I unfortunately don't have a work-around.
We've found that toggling Bluetooth is the best way to get around STATUS_BLUETOOTH_ERROR, as the radio can get into a bad state (especially on Android versions older than N... which is... a lot of Android versions...). We do our best to toggle semi-often, by toggling the radio after apps stop using Nearby Connections, but sometimes that's not enough. In extreme cases, the phone may have to be rebooted. This error can also go away on it's own, and can also be somewhat alleviated by stopping discovery before connecting.
Yup, meshes are definitely possible. For an always connected mesh, you'll want to use P2P_CLUSTER. Try to keep 3~4 simultaneous connections per device (and have some kind of logic to avoid forming islands). Once the devices are connected, you'll need to build a protocol to send messages, flooding the network for broadcasts or hoping between nodes for directed messages. Other ways to solve this problem that I've seen are using advertise / discovery to transmit short pieces of information asynchronously, or setting up a timer (eg: Once an hour, everyone scans and tries to connect to exchange data, and then quickly disconnects), or forming a 'snake-like' connection where everyone connects to at-most 2 devices and forms a long string of connections.
Advertising is usually lightweight, but discovery can be hard on the radio. We turn it off internally while you connect, but we turn it back on for the duration of the connection. This can lead to flaky connections. If you're able, try to limit discovery to short bursts.
PS: You can check my post history to get some more in depth information about Nearby Connections.
PPS: In the future, break up your stack overflow questions into smaller, more pointed questions. It's more helpful for people searching in the future.
My goal is to get the Android device to reconnect to a BLE device that it has previously connected to without user intervention in the same way it does for a classic BT paired device does (even works through power cycles).
One of the ideas of BTLE devices is that one saves service, bonding, and enabling states such that a reconnect is VERY fast and consumes very little power on the peripheral.
What I have done seems to work but it works poorly.
The first step is to connect or pair and connect to a new device setting the 'autoconnect' parameter to 'true'.
When the device disconnects, do not call gatt.close(). Everywhere I look I see that one should call gatt.close(). But if I do call gatt.close() the Android central app never reconnects. I have tested this many times.
If I have not called gatt.close() and have not power cycled the Android, the auto-connection usually happens. Sometimes it can take a long time, especially after version 5.0. It is, however, unreliable and it may be unreliable due to a very low-duty scan cycle and the device quitting advertising before a scan cycle actually detects the advertisement. I am not sure because there is no way to detect the scanning operation like there is advertisements! It is also possible the scanning stops after a certain amount of time but there is no documentation on that.
So what I think I need to do is to somehow set the background scan rate used by the Android to a higher duty cycle (only possible in 5.0 and up) when auto-connect has been set but I do not know how to do this. I do not want to start my own scan but somehow set the background scanning rate used by Android for the reconnect. Does anyone know how to do this? Does anyone really know how autoconnect and gatt.close() are to work?
Maybe the auto-connect was NOT meant to re-connect as I indicated above?
Well after many trials and tribulations this is how I best get the Android to auto connect with the only user action being to first select the device (if using the settings menu then first pairing).
You have to trap the paired event in a BroadcastReceiver and do a BluetoothDevice.connectGatt() setting the autoconnect to true. Then when the device disconnects, invoke a gatt.connect().
Update: While the above approach works in general, it is sometimes agonizingly slow probably because the pending connection uses extremely conservative scan rates. The other downside is that for each device you want to auto-reconnect to you have to keep a BluetoothGatt object performing a pending connection. In the embedded world this is insane. Instead what one does is continuously scan and connect to a desired device by inspecting its advertisement. One saves only the minimal amount of data about the device (the services, its paired state and keys, etc.). When an advertisement is captured you see if it is one of your known devices and connect to if it is.
I tried the equivalent on Android. Scan all the time (low power rate) and connect to advertisements of interest, and maintain a class representing a known device. There are some annoying details in this approach (like turning off scanning while connecting and restarting after connected) but it basically works without the overhead of maintaining connections. BUT there is one exception I do not understand. One pre-paired device's advertisements are never seen by the scanner. However, if I invoke a pending connection to this device, I re-connect. I do not understand this at all. On my embedded platforms it works as it should.
If anyone else has tried this approach for auto-reconnecting, please share your experiences!
I have discovered the reason the pre-paired device is not seen by Android. Android only reports scan results IF the device responds to a scan request. Once paired, this device only emits advertisements and ignores scan requests, so the Android system does not pass up its advertisements in the ScanCallback. Thus in order to work using the scan approach, I have to use the pending connect approach for those specific devices. It just seems like you can't win!
============= UPDATE 2020
Many years have passed and I have a lot more experience with the background scan approach. If one keeps the supported platforms 5 and up, one can use only the newest scanner APIs and use filters, eliminating the need to decode the raw advertisements yourself. I have also found that connection and re-connection is snappier if you DONT turn off scanning while connecting. I know it goes against all documentation, but it works and on some platforms allowed connections to happen that otherwise did not. Also, to date, I have found only one (health) device that needs pending connects. Disclaimer: All I have ever worked with is health devices.
This is how I was able to do it for my application.
I first stored the address of the device in a SharedPreference then in gattClientCallback funtion of my BluetoothLeService
else if (newState == BluetoothProfile.STATE_DISCONNECTED) {
intentAction = ACTION_DISCONNECTED;
DeviceActivity.runOnUI(() -> {
sharedPreferences = PreferenceManager.getDefaultSharedPreferences(getApplicationContext());
String name_dev_1 = sharedPreferences.getString("Dev_1", null) ;
connectToDevice(name_dev_1);
disconnectGattServer();
});
}
}
What this does is if your device is disconnected it will keep on trying to connect to it until a connection is established.
I am creating an app that communicates through Bluetooth Low Energy with a device, mostly to have the phone display the data from the device. I need to implement functionality where if the device and phone are moved into range, they will automatically identify as a pair and will connect without user interaction. I have been looking into Bonding to accomplish this.
I am currently trying to take the currently connected device and create a bond with it when the user clicks a ListItem. I call BluetoothDevice.createBond() on a reference to the connected BluetoothDevice variable. The Android Developer site says that for BluetoothDevice.createBond(), false will be returned if there is an error, and that I should register for ACTION_BOND_STATE_CHANGED to be informed when Bonding has started and is completed.
I have a few problems with createBond(), which is where my questions lie:
Most of the time createBond() returns false, indicating that it has failed to start bonding. What are some possible reasons for this? (My phone runs Android 4.4.2, API19 which is where createBond() is introduced - so it isn't that.)
Sometimes, bonding apparently succeeds because the code inside the ACTION_BOND_STATE_CHANGED receiver will be called. I may misunderstand what is involved in maintaining and using a bond, but the BLE device does not automatically connect to the phone when it is in range, so I am probably missing some code. After establishing a bond, what else do I need to do?
In the event that createBond() is no good for whatever reason (e.g. I have to make the app work for API18 when createBond() is introduced in API19), what alternatives are there?
Examples would be incredibly helpful. Finding information about bonding with BLE has been frustrating. Self-teaching this stuff has been difficult, especially with no tutorials lying around. On top of that, some people say it's impossible due to being "Just Works" when others say it's certainly possible. BLE is still a big cloud of confusion for me, so for now, some clarity with createBond() would be much appreciated.
I am currently developing an application that will use Bluetooth Low Energy (testing on the Nexus 4). After getting started with the official BLE APIs in Android 4.3, I have noticed that after I connect a device for the first time I am rarely able to successfully connect to / communicate with that device or any other device again.
Following the guide here, I can successfully connect to a device, scan services and characteristics, and read/write/receive notifications without any issues. However, after disconnecting and re-connecting, I am often unable to either scan services/characteristics or unable to complete a read/write. I can't find anything in the logs to indicate why this is happening.
Once this happens I have to uninstall the application, disable Bluetooth, and restart the phone before it will start working again.
Whenever a device is disconnected I make sure to call close() on the BluetoothGatt object and set it to null. Any insights?
EDIT:
Log dumps: For these logs I rooted my phone and upped the trace levels of related items in /etc/bluetooth/bt_stack.conf
Successful connection - First attempt after rebooting the phone and installing the app. I am able to connect, discover all services/characteristics, and read/write.
Failed Attempt 1 - This is the next attempt after disconnecting from the successful connection above. It seems I was able to discover characteristics, but the first attempt to read returned a null value and disconnected soon thereafter.
Failed Attempt 2 - An example where I am not even able to discover services/characteristics.
EDIT 2:
The device to which I am trying to connect is based on TI's CC2541 chip. I obtained a TI SensorTag (also based on the CC2541) to play around with and discovered that TI released an android app for the SensorTag yesterday. However, this app has the same problem. I tested this on two other Nexus 4s with the same result: Connection to the SensorTag is successful the first or second time, but (according to the logs) fails to discover services thereafter, causing all sorts of crashes. I'm starting to wonder if it's an issue with this specific chip?
Important implementation hints
(Perhaps some of those hints aren't necessary anymore due to Android OS updates.)
Some devices like Nexus 4 with Android 4.3 take 45+ seconds to connect using an existing gatt instance. Work around: Always close gatt instances on disconnect and create a fresh instance of gatt on each connect.
Don't forget to call android.bluetooth.BluetoothGatt#close()
Start a new thread inside onLeScan(..) and then connect. Reason: BluetoothDevice#connectGatt(Context context, boolean autoConnect, BluetoothGattCallback callback) always fails, if called inside LeScanCallback() {...}.onLeScan(BluetoothDevice device, int rssi, byte[] scanRecord) in the same thread on Samsung Galaxy S3 with Android 4.3 (at least for build JSS15J.I9300XXUGMK6)
Most devices filter advertising
Better not use android.bluetooth.BluetoothAdapter#startLeScan(UUID[] serviceUuids, LeScanCallback callback) with the parameter to filter for certain service UUIDs because this is broken completely in Samsung Galaxy S3 with Android 4.3 and doesn't work for 128bit UUIDs in general.
Gatt always can process one command at a time. If several commands get called short after another, the first one gets cancelled due to the synchronous nature of the gatt implementation.
I often see even on modern devices with Android 5, that Wifi interferes withs bluetooth and vice versa. As a last resort, turn off wifi to stabilize bluetooth.
Tutorial for beginners
A pretty OK entry point for newcomers could be this video tutorial: Developing Bluetooth Smart Applications for Android http://youtu.be/x1y4tEHDwk0
The issue and work around described below is probably fixed now by OS updates
Work around: I could "stabilize" my app doing that...
I provide the user a setting "Restart Bluetooth". If that setting is enabled, I restart Bluetooth at some points that indicate the begin of BLE stack becoming unstable. E.g. if startScan returns false. A good point may also be if serviceDiscovery failes. I just turn Bluetooth off and on.
I provide another setting "Turn off WiFi". If that setting is enabled, my app turns off Wifi when the app is running (and turns it back on afterwards)
This work around is based on follwoing experiences...
Restarting Bluetooth helps to fix problems with BLE in most cases
If you turn off Wifi, the BLE stack gets much more stable. However, it also works fine on most devices with wifi turned on.
If you turn off Wifi, restarting Bluetooth fully recovers the BLE stack without the need to reboot the device in most cases.
Turning WIFI OFF:
I can confirm too, that turning WIFI OFF makes Bluetooth 4.0 more stable especially on Google Nexus (I have a Nexus 7).
The problem
is that the application I am developing needs both WIFI and continous Bluetooth LE scanning. So turning WIFI OFF was no option for me.
Moreover I have realised is that continous Bluetooth LE scanning can actually kill WIFI connection and make the WIFI adapter unable to re-connect to any WIFI network until BLE scan is ON. (I'm not sure about mobile networks and mobile internet).
This definitely happened on the following devices:
Nexus 7
Motorola Moto G
However BLE scanning with WIFI on seemed pretty stable on:
Samsung S4
HTC One
My workaround
I scan BLE for a short period of time 3-4 seconds then I turn scan OFF for 3-4 seconds. Then ON again.
Obviously I always turn BLE scan OFF when I'm connecting to a BLE device.
When I disconnect from a device I restart BLE (turn adapter OFF and then ON) to reset the stack before starting scan again.
I also reset BLE when discovering services or characteristics fails.
When I get advertisement data from a device that the app should connect to (lets say 500 times without being able to connect - thats about 5-10 seconds of advertising) I reset BLE again.
Make sure your Nexus is paired to the device. I can't verify whether or not the communication works properly, but you will be able to connect more than once without a reboot. It seems the first connect is not requiring pairing but all subsequent attempts do.
I will update this answer in a couple of days when I test service discovery and gatt read and write requests without a reboot.
EDIT:
It turns out I was testing on a development firmware version (our sensor) that was causing issues if not paired. Our latest production firmware build works fine on the 2540s and 2541s.
EDIT:
I did notice that on the Nexus 7 2013, connections are more stable when WiFi is turned off. I'd like to know if this helps anyone else.
EDIT:
I seem to have had it backwards with pairing. Everything works fine when not paired. After pairing, I am experiencing the exact same symptoms as the OP. It's just not known yet if this is related to our firmware or the Android BLE API. Be careful if testing this because once paired, you may not be able to unpair due to a bug explained in 3b of this post.
In some models there is a defect:
https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=180440
On the other hand in my case the problem was, that my connection was not properly closed in onDestroy method. After correct closing, problem for me is not existing, not matter that wifi is turned on or off.
btGatt.disconnect();
btGatt.close();
I was facing a similar issue. My fix was
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= 23) {
mBluetoothGatt = device.connectGatt(this, false, mGattCallback, BluetoothDevice.TRANSPORT_LE);
} else {
mBluetoothGatt = device.connectGatt(this, false, mGattCallback);
}
& calling close after disconnect.