I have been working on a project for both native iOS and Android apps. Now that my parent projects are done, I need to run clones for them. These clones will use more or less the same code but with different languages, resources and possibly XIB files as well. I have been using GIT for code management and I google the best way to handle this and the suggested technique was with Forking which was no good because it started creating issues with different Package IDs in the projects.
Now, you know the problem that I am facing. I am looking for expert opinion to handle this scenario.
Don't know how about Android, but for iOS you can use targets and then set which files should be used by selected target. Each target may have its own Info.plist file, different graphic assets and more.
Start with duplicating an existing target:
You will notice Info-copy.plist file, which is a setting file for the new target.
Then use a proper scheme to run your new target:
If it's not there, go to "Manage schemes" and press "Autocreate schemes now"
Related
I'm trying to write a barebones Vulkan app on Android. I'm finding that most of Google's example apps rely on vulkan_wrapper.h and vulkan_wrapper.cpp. Google's Vulkan documentation also says to use them.
I would love to use them but they are part of the example projects' code, not the SDK, and the header says that they are generated. So how is a developer supposed to generate them for their project? I have copied them from a sample app for the time being but am curious what the best practice is for generating them and keeping them up-to-date.
I'm not sure how they're generated, but you could just copy them into your project. There shouldn't be much need to regenerate them, since they only contain the core and WSI extension entrypoints normally provided by libvulkan.so; even if you regenerate it, it won't contain other extensions that might have been added to vulkan.h.
The only reason to use these is if you want to avoid linking against libvulkan.so directly, which only matters if you want your app to load and run on devices that don't have it (Marshmallow and older).
Not sure How they get generated but you can do something like that if you want it to. Vulkan layers come with the scripts and the xml file, you can modify the script to your requirements. We are already doing that in our projects. The script can be found here.
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-LoaderAndValidationLayers/tree/master/scripts
I have a piece software that should delivered to many customers.
Each build should get a customized set of assets (icons , splash screen etc. ) and a bunch of config files, but also a different app id (eg. com.myself.myapp.customer1 ; com.myself.myapp.customer2 etc... )
Also I need builds for different OSes like Android, iOS , PlayBook.
The way I handled this up to now was:
I created a new Application.mxml for each customer, which opened the right locations and passed the files to the MainController.
This leaves it to me to pick the right assets, certificates and iOS-provisioning files to be packaged each time I need to compile, and I had to repeat this steps for each customer, which is very error-prone and , especially in case of iOS, extremely time-consuming.
So I need to get into automated building quickly...
I already downloaded and installed gradle/gradleFX, but I don't find the documentation very friendly to beginners in this subject.
Now the questions:
How do I have to convert the (Flash Builder- ) given project structure to conform the gradle conventions? Are there FB-plugins or tools I could use?
Can I use gradleFX to build for debug sessions as well? FB 4.7 has a lot of issues with that I really like to circumvent.
Can an ipa be "signed" and packaged with assets after it's principle compilation, so I don't have to wait 15 mins for each compile?
Many thanks
How do I have to convert the (Flash Builder- ) given project structure
to conform the gradle conventions? Are there FB-plugins or tools I
could use?
There is nothing to convert. Unless your project structure is extremely exotic, you should be able to configure GradleFx to work with it.
Note that by default GradleFx uses some Maven-style conventions: for instance, the default source folder will be src/main/actionscript. If you want to configure a typical FlashBuilder project you'll have to explicitly declare the source folder:
srcDirs = ['src']
As for FB plugins: there are none. But you can use an "external build tool" instead of FB's built-in configuration. IntelliJ IDEA has Gradle support, but nothing specifically for GradleFx. GradleFx itself has a flashbuilder plugin, but its purpose is to generate an FB-compatible project from a build script - I don't think that's what you're looking for.
Can I use gradleFX to build for debug sessions as well? FB 4.7 has a
lot of issues with that I really like to circumvent.
You can build a debug-enabled version of your application simply by setting the debug flag to true (as described in Adobe's mxmlc docs). GradleFx does not expose all compiler options in its API (there's just too many of them), however you can use the additionalCompilerOptions to define whatever additional compiler flags you require:
additionalCompilerOptions = ['-debug=true']
I don't know how you should tell FlashBuilder to hook up to the compiled swf for its debug session though :( Perhaps through the "external build tool" configuration.
Can an ipa be "signed" and packaged with assets after it's principle
compilation, so I don't have to wait 15 mins for each compile?
I know too little of mobile support to give you a meaningful answer here, but I can tell you that a major upgrade in this area is in the works right now and will be released soon. Perhaps you should ask this question on http://support.gradlefx.org/; #Slevinbe is very helpful and quick to answer.
I don't find the documentation very friendly to beginners in this
subject
If the docs don't work for you, perhaps the example projects might be more helpful. That said, you could help us make the docs better for beginners by telling us how we could improve them. Just start a discussion on support.gradlefx.org
Multiple outputs
One more thing: your main issue seems to be that you need to create multiple outputs from a single code base. This is one thing that GradleFx doesn't provide out-of-the-box (yet). However, there's a fairly unobtrusive workaround that I've described on my blog. If you find the basic concepts difficult to grasp, then I suggest you don't start with this part, but rather concentrate on getting a single project building first.
I have an Android app that's downloaded primarily from Android Market (now, Google Play). We made a few tweaks to the source and also submitted to the Amazon App Store to see what sort of traction it gets. I'm now looking for a sustainable way to develop from a common code base and yet build so that I can submit to either/both.
Amazon's store has some restrictions about available APIs, and hence I'd like to conditionally remove/modify features from that version. Since Java doesn't support traditional conditional compilation, and conditionally including files in Eclipse doesn't seem trivial (is it even possible?), I wanted to ask what others are doing to solve this.
Admittedly, I'm no Eclipse/Java expert so feel free to school me.
What I'm looking for in a solution:
Building/debugging using Eclipse.
Static code files, with environment/settings toggles to control what to build.
No duplicate code or conditional logic in code to pick code flow at runtime
Is this something you've solved for Android apps specifically, or for other Java/Eclipse based projects? Suggestions for where to begin?
It's quite easy to do in the newest versions of ADT (version 17), though I do find it makes compilation a bit longer:
Create a new Android project (proj-A)
Go to Project->Properties, select Android, and check "Is Library"
Move all your common code to proj-A, import all the necessary libraries
Create a new Android project for Google Play (proj-B)
Go to Project->Properties, select Android, and add Proj-A to the Library
Repeat #4&5 for the Amazon version
If you have some variables that should be set differently for each sub project (i.e. boolean GOOGLE_PLAY_VERSION to enable Google Play specific functions), you have to create another project to contain these values since you can't have projects that reference one-another in a circular fashion. You can solve this by adding the following steps:
Pull all of your sub-project specific variables into one or more Classes that just serves as container(s) for these variables
Create a "dummy" Java project (dummy)
Config proj-A to add a new Source link to the bin directory of dummy
Add the config Classes in each sub-project with project-specific changes
Profits!
Note that the variables in dummy should not be set as final, otherwise it will override sub-project's setting.
This may seem like quite a bit of up-front work, but has worked quite well for me as far as version control goes.
Edit:
Now with Google's move to Android Studio & Gradle, it may be better to move to that if you are starting a new project if you want to support multiple APKs, see Android dev site's Building Your Project with Gradle#Work with build variants. It definitely doesn't hurt to evaluate that option before deciding.
Unfortunately, it's sort of a convention in Android to change flow at runtime based on what would be in C/C++-land conditional compilation.
Our app has to maintain different behavior for different API levels, so we've created some application-level constants that are initialized statically based on API-level information available to us, and used throughout the code. This is the way that Google does things in their examples (for example, see the ActionBarCompat compatibility library, and in particular the factory method used here).
You could create an interface CustomBuild, and implement it in AmazonBuild and GooglePlayBuild, then use a static getBuild() method to switch functionality as necessary:
if(getBuild().shouldEnableFeatureX()){
doStuff();
} else {
doDifferentStuff();
}
Then all you've got to worry about switching between builds is a line or two of code in the factory along with maintaining which things you want enabled in which versions. Or you could include a different version of a static class CustomBuild for each build.
I'm going to second the suggestion of others above re: switching to something like Maven for building; it should make your life much easier once you have it set up.
I'm also going to say you should make the core of the app a library as suggested above, and have two different modules (one for amazon, one for play store) that depend on the library but each only contain the one custom factory file (or just a static class for each type of build that contains the same "should I do this thing?" methods... once you have the infrastructure it's just a matter of preference).
I haven't actually tried this yet, but it's something I've thought about.
How about using Eclipse's ability to link to files from a directory outside your workspace?
Start with one Eclipse project: for the sake of argument, say it's the Google Play version.
Now build a second project, beginning with asking Eclipse to link (not copy) the source files from your first project.
To develop the second project, add classes that subclass ones from the original project to realize your modifications. For resources, you can use some combination of includes, attribute overrides, and selectors.
Where it's not possible to subclass or extend, then obviously you'll have to just copy the original source file and hack on it. If you're really OCD about it, you can probably just maintain a patch set rather than a whole redundant set of files.
What do you think, will it work?
You may create manually two projects in Eclipse pointing to the same source folders but with different inclusion/exclusion filters and different target directories.
Then two Ant targets using properties to switch excluded files from javac fileset are enough to generate corresponding jar files.
The aim is to get a clean application for each target, without any code from the other one.
With features listed as pluggable behaviors in a property file or XML configuration, your runtime will adapt itself with the addition of menu entries.
I recently downloaded the source code for Android. There are many folders starting from the root level and I was wondering if there is any resource on the web containing just an overview of the contents of different folders and where common libraries/framework classes reside.
Thanks.
The Android project is made by a bunch of smaller projects, all of them downloaded when you clone the Android repo (with repo init ...). I don't know if there's such a resource explaining what each project is and I wouldn't expect there is one.
Android framework classes are in their majority under frameworks/base/ directory, while apps like Settings, Browser and others can be found under packages/apps/. A really good way to navigate the sources is to use find + grep if you're under Linux. Another approach that goes SO independent is using Eclipse to navigate the sources. For this last approach, you can find the details here: http://blog.michael-forster.de/2008/12/view-android-source-code-in-eclipse.html
Note that classes in the framework that are not visible for application developers are not that well documented, so if you're planning on customizing Android be prepared to read a lot of code.
Sounds like you're after the javadocs?
I would like an Android build system procedure, command line or Eclipse, to generate several .apk files from a single source codebase. Some common reasons for this - having specific versions for markets with different requirements or a free and paid version.
This question IS NOT ABOUT:
Packaging shared code into Android libraries or into external Java jars
Producing a debug vs. signed release .apk
Google says "you probably need to create separate Android projects for each APK you intend to publish so that you can appropriately develop them separately. You can do this by simply duplicating your existing project and give it a new name." Then they kindly suggest using libraries, which I understand. Then, they mention in passing exactly what I do want: "a build system that can output different resources based on the build configuration"
I know that to accomplish conditional compilation in JAVA one can key off a 'public static final' variable. There is an example of tweaking such a value in build.xml. Any more complete example of an Android Ant build configuration for this or a link to an OSS project doing that now, please? BTW, build.xml is auto-generated, but I have seen people hacking it, so how does that work?
With the package name declared in Manifest.xml as package="com.example.appname", if one needs to emit multiple .apks that vary that name, is one stuck with a separate project for each?
I'm generating 2 different APK's (demo and production) from one single source tree with 3 small modifications:
1) I have public static final DEMO=true; //false; in my Application class and depending on that value I used to switch code between demo/production features
2) There are 2 main activities, like:
package mypackage;
public class MyProduction extends Activity
{
//blah-blah
}
package mypackage.demo;
public class MyDemoActivity extends mypackage.MyProductionActivity
{
//blah-blah
}
3) And in the end 2 separate AndroidManifest.xml files which points to different launcher activities depending on demo/production switch
I'm switching between 2 APK's manually, but see nothing difficult in writing small ANT task to switch between them automatically
One way to do it would be to maintain two separate AndroidManifest.xml, one for each configuration. You can switch back and forth between the two either manually (copying) or automatically (build script).
[edit] This person here has a system to do this kind of thing: http://blog.elsdoerfer.name/2010/04/29/android-build-multiple-versions-of-a-project/
The answer to this screams Gradle, as explained on this website. It's officially built into Android Studio and is encouraged.
It's amazing; I've built 3 separate apps using the same source code, with customized text and graphics, with no special coding whatsoever. Just some directory and Gradle setup is required, and other posts of mine can be found with answers to both.
It seems to explain all the basics really well. For the answer to your specific question, look for the section Product Flavors under Build Variants, where it describes specifying different flavors.
As the website explains, part of the purpose behind this design was to make it more dynamic and more easily allow multiple APKs to be created with essentially the same code, which sounds exactly like what you're doing.
I probably didn't explain it the best, but that website does a pretty good job.
Despite your insistence that this is not about packaging shared code into Android libraries, it sort of is. You've stated that markets may have different requirements or having a free and a paid version. In each of these examples, your two final output APKs have different behavior and/or resources. You can put the vast majority of your code in a shared Android library, and then maintain the differences in your actual projects.
For example, I've worked on apps where they need to be released both to the Android Market and the Amazon AppStore. The Amazon AppStore requires that if you link to a market page for the app, it must be Amazon's (as opposed to the Android Market page). You can store a URL in a resource in the library and use that in your code, but then override that resource in the Amazon project to point to the appropriate Amazon URL.
If you structure it right, you can do similar things in code because your starting point is your Application object which you can subclass and do different things with.
That said, if you want to add an Ant step that changes the package name in the manifest, it is just XML. It shouldn't be hard to modify as a precompilation step.
This article has a good walk-through with examples of how to amend config files at build time; see in particular the Customizing the build and Using a Java configuration file sections. Note that some of the information about build.xml and ant is a little bit out-of-date now.
Here's our situation: we have a single codebase from which we release for several clients. Each of them has various requirements regarding titles, backgrounds and other resources in the application (let alone package names).
Build is handled by a Ruby script that modifies AndroidManifest, copies/replaces certain resources from client-specific folders and then moves on to Android's standart build routine. After the build is done, script resets changed files back to their original, 'default' state.
Well... Maybe it's not optimal and definitely not Android-specific, but that's how we do it.
I had the same problem but packing all in one project with flags is no solution for me. I wrote an example how to do that with Maven:
How to create multiple Android apk files from one codebase organized by a Maven multi module project.
My team build 2 different build using single code base + additional code.
As android build is based on ant script, I use ant script to do this work.
I used xmltask to manipulate manifest xml file and many ant task ( regexp , copy..) to edit source code.
I prepared template project template ( including build.xml , default.properties, local.properties) and copied new source code into those project templates. when copy completed, run build.xml parallel to shorten build time. when build finished, I get multiple apk files.
It's easily to achieve your goal by using Android Studio build variants which use graddle as the build system.
Check here for more detailed information.
I think that the best way remain to use libray for common sources and two different Android project for demo and production package. This because in Java it is very simple to make a reverse engeneering from apk to sources. If you use the same sources for demo and production, someone could hacking your apk downloading the demo package, extracting the java sources and unlock the sources changing the variable to use it as production version.
With library you can preserve part of sources in the production package, in this way there is no way to use demo package as production package.