I want to know how to detect when an external app runs one of this methods. I'm working with some classmates in a project where we want to examinate the response time of other applications. The idea is to measure the time between the run of each method to get an aproximation of the response time when opening the app.
Is this possible to achieve?
Android apps are sandboxed and only expose content that they intend to expose. The methods you name are part of components that cannot be accessed directly from the "outside" world. In other ways, if an app wanted you to know when those methods are being called, they will expose that information (i.e. sending a Broadcast or maybe storing the information in a ContentProvider). You can try and see if you can get some information out of the logcat, but I cannot assure how accurate and consistent it will be.
This is imprecise, but I would monitor logcat activity. Depending on the device/VM/AVD logcat is super active during transitions (such as back-grounding and foregrounding) and idle when an app is awaiting user input.
EDIT:
Other than that, if you can do your analysis off the device, perhaps look into using DDMS?
Related
Play store has numerous apps those creates fake call logs.But, sometimes it's important to detect is that call log real or fake to save yourself being a fool. Can anybody tell me how can we detect same?
If these apps are writing to the actual android call log, I don't think there is much you can do against that.
However, you might want to try the below solution, which can maintain your own call list based on the device behaviour.
In Android you can listen for incoming and outgoing calls, using a BroadcastReceiver. Here is a good tutorial for it:
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/548416/Detecting-incoming-and-outgoing-phone-calls-on-And
If you implement it correctly, you will only receive events from calls being executed for real. So you can save them in your app's call log.
An application background service updates sqlite database. Therefore my activities are becoming outdated. Activity intents also contain outdated params so onCreate, onResume will crash the application. An easiest solution is to restart whole application. I don't want to add IFs to all onCreate, onResume methods in all activities to handle one special case.
I noticed that ACRA has following code executed after an exception has been handled.
android.os.Process.killProcess(android.os.Process.myPid());
System.exit(10);
However many people discourage use of System.exit(0). Is System.exit(0) really that dangerous for an Android application data integrity? Of course my code will close the database before existing.
Update:
I known how to use finish(), content providers, send broadcasts, read many answers here on SO, etc. However each of these approaches requires additional thousands lines of code. I implemented solution with System.exit(0) in ten minutes. The restart is so fast that it is indistinguishable from ordinary startActivity action. The db update/restart is done after longer user inactivity so the app is already suspended by the system. My app doesn't require real time syncing. During tests the application behaves correctly. This is quick and dirty solution.
Therefore I asked the question about possible side effects of System.exit(0). Not how I can do the design differently. I know that current design is not perfect.
System.exit(0) is an artifact from Java runtime, it isn't meant for Android. So in any cases using it would be worst solution.
Why don't you use Activity.finish() gracefully?
If you terminate the process you are living in, you'll loose most of the caching and restart time (~resume in the eyes of the user) for it next time will be higher.
Read more in Activity Lifecycle documentation on Android Developers.
Killing the process will not clean up any registered resources from outside the process. BroadcastReceivers, for example. This is a leak and the device will tell you as much.
You really shouldn't be updating the database schema from a background service. Do it when your activities resume.
If you are just updating your data, resuming an activity should validate the data specified by the Intent and tell the user if, for example, Item X is no longer there.
No tool is that dangerous if used carefully and for a specific, well thought off purpose.
However, In your case I do not believe System.exit() is the right way to go. If your application depends on data from a database, create a background service (or a few, depending on what you need) that will inform your application of changes and update the data. It is, in my opinion the right way to handle changes.
As for scenarios when you want to use System.exit() I personally sometimes use it when I can't recover from a critical error and no graceful degradation is possible. In those cases it is better to force all resources associated with your application to cease rather than just leave loose ends tangling around. To clarify, you should always use error handling before doing anything radical. Proper error handling is often the way to go.
But this is a very delicate topic and you are likely to receive quite a few diverging answers.
Therefore my activities are becoming outdated.
Use a ContentProvider and ContentObserver (or the Loader framework), or use a message bus (LocalBroadcastManager, Otto, etc.) to update the activities in situ.
Activity intents also contain outdated params so onCreate, onResume will crash the application
Copy the relevant "params" to data members of the activities. Update those data members as needed (e.g., from the handlers from the message bus-raised events). Hold onto that data as part of your instance state for configuration change (e.g., onSaveInstanceState()). Use this data from onCreate(), onResume(), etc.
An easiest solution is to restart whole application
It is not easiest, if you value your users, as your users will not appreciate your app spontaneously evaporating while they are using it. Do you think that Gmail crashes their own app every time an email comes in?
Next, you will propose writing a Web app that uses some exploit to crash the browser, because you cannot figure out how to update a Web page.
I noticed that ACRA has following code executed after an exception has been handled.
A top-level exception handler is about the only sensible place to have this sort of code, and even there, the objective is for this code to never run (i.e., do not have an unhandled exception).
There's an existing answer HERE that might give you some help as to why people say it's bad to use System.Exit().
It seems that there is a large amount of information about saving Activity state, but I have been unable to locate much on finding Application state.
I am looking for some design ideas to solve a problem I have run into. I am developing a game that has a fairly large data model (1-2 MBytes). This model exists outside of any Activity, in fact there are numerous activities that all interact with it. These activities are transient, coming and going all the time.
I currently keep a pointer to the data model in my application and all of the activities access the data model through it. I need to save that data model in the event that my application is being killed, but it is far too slow to save it every time an activity hits onPause, which happens very frequently as activities come and go.
What I need is a way to determine that my application (and along with it my data model) are being destroyed. I have searched extensively for this method or callback and have come up empty.
I would appreciate any suggestions.
I have been unable to locate much on finding Application state.
That's because there is no "Application state" in Android, any more than there is in a Web app.
but it is far too slow to save it every time an activity hits onPause
While your entire data model may be "1-2 MBytes", but the amount of data that changes is going to be a small subset of that, for any given change. Use a background thread and only modify the data that has changed.
which happens very frequently as activities come and go
It sounds like perhaps you have too many activities.
What I need is a way to determine that my application (and along with it my data model) are being destroyed
That is not possible. You will never find out that you are being destroyed. Android can and will terminate your process without warning, either at user request (e.g., Force Close, task killer) or for OS reasons (e.g., need the RAM to handle an incoming phone call).
You are welcome to use onUserLeaveHint(), which is called in a number of cases when you entire app loses the foreground, but I certainly would not count on that for something as important as persisting a data model.
I have a multi-Threaded android application. One of the things my application does is saves various data to a database on a server via webservices. I was trying to figure out why things were not saving to the server correctly, and saw in one of my log files, that the application objects onCreate() method and constructor were called in the middle of one of the requests going up to the server. These request are in the background and are sent via an intentservice.
I have my application set to catch unhandled exceptions and log them, and I did not see anthing in there. The application onCreate() and constructor was called, the application was kicked back to the main/first screen, the user then had to re-login, and it seems that the database was wiped(which is something else I am wondering about).
So, my main questions are: Why did the application object onCreate() and Constructor get called(why did the application get killed), why did the database get wiped when the above happened because if I do a force stop from inside of settings, applications, it never kills my db.
two words: low memory
I have the same problem. No solution for now. Try to take advantage of the onLowMemory() method, maybe the OS will spare your app.
My application object gets restarted randomly (not any time) when I am coming back from an external application (ex. camera or gallery) for onActivityResult().
Hope that helps someone.
If the application is not a service, but a 'normal' application that calles your intentservice, it is subject to the normal application lifecycle: this means it will get killed when in the background.
Look for the explaining image on this site: http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/fundamentals/activities.html
Take note of the red "Process is killed" part on the left, an the subsequent "onCreate()" afterwards.
I've actually seen very similar behaviour that was caused by a NumberFormater trying to parse a null String. After the call to parse(), the application simply reset itself back to the splash screen with no errors at all. Wasn't fun to track down, pretty much stepped through half the code base trying to find out what was happening - the debugger disconnected and the app restarted when stepping past the parse call.
I'm building an Android application that's based around an enhanced WebView (based on PhoneGap). I've enhanced the WebView so that from JavaScript running inside you can invoke the native contact picker to choose a phone number (which may be supplied by Facebook for example).
The problem I have is that the native contact picker runs in an activity in another process and the Android docs say that while another activity is open my activity may get destroyed due to memory constraints. I haven't actually seen this happen in my application but if it did then I'm guessing my WebView's state would be destroyed and the code that was waiting for the picked contact would be terminated.
It seems a bit crazy that the activity requesting a contact could be destroyed while the contact picker is open. Does anyone know if that does indeed happen? Is there a way to persist the state of the WebView if it does?
Thanks,
-Shaun
Does anyone know if that does indeed
happen?
You're looking at the problem too simply.
You have a WebView. You open the contacts application. While the user is in the contacts application, a phone call comes in. While on the phone call (using a Bluetooth headset), a text message comes in, so the user opens that up from its Notification. While still on the phone call and texting away, a text comes in with a link, so she taps it and brings up the Browser application.
By this time, your activity is surely destroyed, except on maybe some of the most recent phones that have a fair bit of RAM.
Now, is that common? No. However, this also has nothing to do with the contacts application -- if the user presses HOME, at some point in the future, your activity may be destroyed to free up RAM as well.
Is there a way to persist the state of
the WebView if it does?
That depends on what you consider "the state of the WebView" to be. This really is PhoneGap's job, if you are making a PhoneGap-based app. So, you might consider asking them.
There is no way to persist the DOM. There are trivial ways to persist the URL (see onSaveInstanceState()). And there may be stuff in between that you consider part of "the state of the WebView" that may or may not be possible to save.
The long and detailed answer is a bit complicated, but essentially it comes down to a few points:
If the Android OS has to go cleaning up Activities or Services, it knows how to prioritise which ones should go first. It does this based on whether they're currently in the foreground (last to go), in the middle of executing code, waiting for a result, or simply sitting inactive in the background (first to go). You can be reasonably certain that if your WebView Activity launched the contact picker using the startActivityForResult, it won't be killed
There's a whole system for saving data if an activity is killed, such as the onPause method (which are triggered as soon as your activity leaves the foreground), the onSaveInstanceState method which is called when your activity is about to die. Read up on those to get more information, and the configurationChanged method when the screen orientation changes. If you haven't at least skim read the Activity Lifecycle document on the developers page, you must do that.
Lastly, I'm sure this question has been addressed many times, but with slightly varying wording or situations. Have a look around, see what else you can find.