Develop Reference

Getting data from server regularly even when the app is closed

I want to get data from the server and store it in a cache regularly, even when the app is closed. I am not sure what is the correct way to do it. I have listed down the possible ways I can think of. Please let me know the correct or the best way to do it. Really appreciate any help.
Create an Activity and set a repeated alarm to call a service. The service should connect to the server and download the data in cache.
From a fragment, check the last time the cache was updated and then if the data is out-dated, connect to server in a background thread and update the cache.

You can Directly Use IntentService for Frequently Updating Data
IntentService is a subclass of android.app.Service class. A stated intent service allows to handle long running tasks without effecting the application UI thread. This is not bound to any activity so, it is not getting effected for any change in activity lifecycle. Once IntentService is started, it handles each Intent using a worker thread and stops itself when it runs out of work.
IntentService would be an best solution, If you have an work queue to process. For example, if your application using analytics you will likely to send event name and related parameter to your tracking server for each user generated event. Although each event means a tiny piece of data, creating networking request on each click will result an overhead to your application
For implementation : Updating Data from Server Using Intent Serive

Do take a look at Android Sync Adapter Framework.
https://developer.android.com/training/sync-adapters/index.html
Hope this helps.

Android app advice, multiple intent services?

My app has a UI and a connection is made to a bluetooth device which is periodically sending barcode scan data to my app. I then want to cache this data in a sqlite db and have another process push this data up to a web server.
I have managed to get the UI and bluetooth scan process separated by using an Intent Service for the scanner component... The thread in the intent service connects to the bluetooth device and loops endlessly pulling in new scan data as it comes... communicating with the UI via broadcast messages as it needs to.
So now I need to handle storing the data in a sqlite db and pushing it up to the Internet.
I'm thinking I can insert a db row directly in the intent service loop I already have working for the bluetooth data... would I do that by firing of an async task or something like that?
Then, would I have a completely different intent service running and looping endlessly checking for new records to be processed and pushed up to my web server via an http post?
I guess the main reason I'm thinking of using intent services is that they seem to keep running even if I lock my phone and put it in my pocket... has worked so far for the bluetooth barcode scanner... can scan away happily with my phone locked and in my pocket.
I also need to handle the reality that internet won't always be available... hence the sqlite db... kind of like a safe buffer to store data until it can eventually be pushed up to the Web server.
Am I going down the right path? I'm really new to Android development and even after much research I'm still unsure about my approach.

You can store data or communicate from IntentService onHandleIntent() directly. You don't need to run it in separate thread, unless you want reading bluetooth to continue ASAP.
Handling everything in an infinite loop smells. Also keeping service alive depends on few factors. If IntentService dies, it won't be restored because by default IntentService.onStartCommand implicitly returns START_NOT_STICKY, or START_REDELIVER_INTENT if you call setIntentRedelivery(true) on this service. Check Service javadoc for more info.
If you can scan bluetooth periodically then I would consider kind of scheduler. For that you would probably need to implement Service, not IntentService and handle background thread yourself. Alternatively, you could use a Timer. These are more hints, not ready solution. Since you asked about direction, I assume you will investigate solutions yourself.
Depending on handled data you could separate DB operations and network to separate services. Think about them as modules which are decoupled. You will benefit maintaing this code in the future and in case one service goes down due to any reason, the rest will keep working. It depends on data size because it's not a good practise to push heavy data between service/activities(data is serialised and deserialised every time it is sent).
If DB is just a buffer/queue then maybe use it directly after reading bluetooth data. In other words queue data for sending. Create second service for HTTP communications. Don't push entire data to second service, just inform it about(knock the door :)) and let HTTP service access DB by itself. I would wrap DB in ContentProvider and access it from services.
There are probably different techniques out there too, but that's what I thought about it in the first place.

How to structure an application properly on background processes

I have an application that uses a webservice to get information and save the changes made ​​by the user.
currently I have one service that runs while the application is open, and it has public methods for each operation. the trouble is that service is growing considerably and I'm thinking refactor, but the question is what is the best way?
I can think of the following options:
Deferred services the current service and that all are initialized at boot time application
Create small services and that these are initialized by local broadcast
although I have doubts about performance. Can give me some clue or example about which method is better, do not really care that changes are instantly synchronized, these are stored locally and can be synchronized when possible. Data sent are not many, so the synchronization is relatively fast
Synchronization processes are something like
Check if there is new data (I have several types of data, these are the ones that are growing)
Synchronize user preferences

Most likely there's no point of having Service running all the time. Instead, I'd go for IntentService. If possible, I'd also condifer using push notification (like GCM) so the server could let my app know that there's new data to fetch (or maybe even send it to me if you'd fit in the GCM payload limit).

Android: Singleton which is used between Activity and Service

im wondering if it would be a bad idea to create a Singleton that is used between some Android Activities and a Android Service. As far as I know the static fields, in my case the Singleton, is available as long as the whole Process is alive.
My plan is to use a singleton instead of Parcelable to share data between my activities and a Background service. So my Activity1 will add some data by calling MySingleton.getInstance().addData(foo); then I would sent an Intent to inform my Service that new Data has been added to the singleton. Next my BackgroundService would handle the intent and call MySingleton.getInstance().getLatestData(); then it would process the data (takes some time). The result of the service would next be "post" back by using the singleton and fire a broadcast intent, which are handled by the Activity1 (if alive) and the Activity1 will retrieve the result from the singleton.
Do you guys think thats a bad idea?
EDIT:
What I want to implement is an peace of software that downloads data from a web server parse it and return the result. So my Activity would create DownloadJob Object. The DownloadJob-Object would be put into the DownloadScheduler (Singleton) which queues and manage all DownloadJobs. The DownloadScheduler would allow to run 5 DownloadJobs at the same time and use a queue to store the waiting. The effective Download would be done by the DownloadService (IntentService), which gets informed over an Intent that the a new DownloadJob should now be executed (downloaded) right now. The DowanlodService would retrieve the next job from the DownloadSchedulers queue (PriorityBlockingQueue) and return the Result by setting DownloadJob.setResult(...) and fires up an broadcast intent, that the Result is ready, which will be received by the DownloadScheduler which would remve the job from the queue and inform the Activity that the download is complete etc.
So in my scenario I would use the singleton to access the DownloadJobs from the DownloadService instead of making a DownloadJob Parcelable and pass it with the Intent. So i would avoid the problem, that I have two DownloadJobs in memory (one on the "Activity Site" and one on "Service site").
Any suggestions how to solve this better?
Is it true that static instances, like DownloadScheduler(Singleton), would be used by freed by the android system on low memory? So would subclassing the Application and hold there the reference (non static) avoid this problem?

If you are using the singleton just as shared memory between a background service which I assume is performing operations on a different thread, you may run into synchronization issues and or read inconsistent data.
If the data in the singleton is not synchronized, you have to be careful because you are relying on your "protocol" to be sure that nobody is reading while your background thread is writing (which may lead to errors).
On the other hand, if it is synchronized, you are risking to face anr error because the activity which reads the data may be blocked waiting the service to finish to write the data in the singleton.
As the other said, you also have to keep in mind that your singleton may be freed if the os needs resources, and that your data may not be there anymore.
I'd rather use an event bus such as otto or eventbus
EDIT:
Using a singleton as the entry point of background (intent) service is the approach suggested in 2010 Virgil Dobjanschi talk about building rest client applications for android.
The suggested approach is having a singleton that performs as controller of ongoing requests. Please consider also that request to intent service are already queued by the os, so you can throw several intents that will be processed sequentially by the intent service.
Some time ago I also tried take that as a starting point for a library, which still remains unfinished. YOu can find the sources here
What I would certainly not do is to store your data in the singleton. The approach I would prefer is to store the data in some persistent storage (such as sql / preferences / file / content provider) and let the client know of the change through a broadcast message (or, if you are using a content provider, through an observer).
Finally, to some extent this is the approach followed by the robospice library, which looks quite mature and ships a lot of interesting features such as caching.

A better idea is to subclass Application and put any long living objects in there. By subclassing Application you can properly handle startup and shutdown of the application something you can't easily do with a singleton. Also by using an Application Activites and Services can share access to the models within your program without resorting to parcelables. And you can avoid all of the problems Singletons bring to your program.
You also don't have to resort to storing everything in a database which requires lots of boiler plate code just to shove a bunch of data in there. It doesn't do anything for sharing behavior between parts of your application and doesn't do anything to facilitate communication and centralization of activities. If you really need to persist state between shutdowns great use it, but if not you can save yourself a lot of work.
You could also look into using something like Roboguice which makes injecting shared models into your Activities and services.
You might find this helpful:
what's design pattern principle in the Android development?

Using a singleton like this is not necessarily a bad idea, but you will lose it's state if Android decides to stop your process. You may want to consider storing your state instead in a SQLite database or a persistent queue (take a look at tape for a good example).

Proper use of Android Services with RESTful API

I'm currently learning to develop for Android and I'm having a somewhat hard time figuring out when and how to use services. I have already seen the numerous questions asked about very similar things, but I can't quite find the exact answer to my questions.
I have an app which talks to a restful api. I fetch several lists which I would like to cache in memory and only update if the user hits a refresh button, or certain activities are created. If a list is refreshed, sometimes several activities need to be notified, so that they update their content (if they are on screen at the time). I store the data I retrieve in value objects.
On a non-android app I would usually create a sort of dataproxy class in a singleton pattern. I could ask the dataproxy to update its data via http request, and then it would send some kind of system-wide notification as soon as the data is changed, so the interested views can all be updated. I hope this makes sense.
My question is now: How do I do this the android way? Do I bind and unbind to a dataproxy service, which I can actively ask to fetch certain data? Should I do my non-persistent caching in this service or somewhere else? Do I need AIDL, or can I just use normal objects for moving data between a service and an activity? Although I find the android dev guide pretty well written and useful, I haven't found much information on services best practice.
Thank you in advance!

How do I do this the android way?
You assume that there is a single "android way".
Do I bind and unbind to a dataproxy service, which I can actively ask to fetch certain data?
You can either bind, or send commands via startService().
Should I do my non-persistent caching in this service or somewhere else?
If you're sure that you only want it to be in RAM, I'd lean towards static data members. Make the service be the "do-er", not the store.
That being said, I'd treat this more as a synchronization pattern, with the real store being a database or directory, with a cache in RAM. Users will find this less frustrating -- under your current plan, if they are in your app, then take a phone call for a while, they'll have to have you download all the data again.
Do I need AIDL, or can I just use normal objects for moving data between a service and an activity?
If they are all in the same process, normal objects is fine via binding, or use Intent extras for the command pattern.
Now, back to:
How do I do this the android way?
Option #1: Wrap your store in a ContentProvider and use ContentObserver for changes.
Option #2: Have your service send a broadcast to your package when the data changes, so the foreground activity can find out about the change via a BroadcastReceiver registered via registerReceiver(). Other activities simply grab a fresh look at the data in onResume() -- the only one that immediately needs to know of the data change is the one the user is interacting with, if any.
Option #3: Use the binding pattern with the service, and have the foreground activity register a listener with the service. The service calls the listener when data is updated. Once again, ather activities simply grab a fresh look at the data in onResume()
Option #4: Cook up your own listener system as part of your static data members, being very very careful to avoid memory leaks (e.g., static reference to an activity or service that is destroyed, preventing its garbage collection).
There are probably other options, but this should get you started.

The Google IO session mentioned by Andrew Halloran:
http://www.google.com/events/io/2010/sessions/developing-RESTful-android-apps.html

Check out the Google I/O session videos. I implemented REST api calls the easy BUT wrong way. It wasn't until watching this Google I/O video that I understood where I went wrong. It's not as simple as putting together an AsyncTask with a HttpUrlConnection get/put call.