Develop Reference

odata4j requests metadata too many times

I use the odata4j library to access a WCF Data Service.
This is how I call a Service Method from my Android code:
OQueryRequest<OEntity> l = consumer.getEntities("GetDataList")
.custom("dataId", String.format("'%s'", actualData.ID))
.orderBy("Name").skip(0).top(200);
I checked it with WireShark, and I see that every method call is preceded with 2 calls of metadata information request:
Why? Are they essential? The metadata information is quite heavy, it shouldn't request is every time (not to mention 2 times).
What should I do to prevent odata4j from requesting metadata information so many times?

I found in the source code where the 'extra' request happens (in odata4j/odata4j-core/src/main/java/org/odata4j/consumer/AbstractODataConsumer.java ):
#Override
public EdmEntitySet findEdmEntitySet(String entitySetName) {
EdmEntitySet rt = super.findEdmEntitySet(entitySetName);
if (rt == null && delegate != EdmDataServices.EMPTY) {
refreshDelegate();
rt = super.findEdmEntitySet(entitySetName);
}
return rt;
}
It seems that if the entity set can't be found, the consumer creates an extra roundtrip to the server to get the metadata again (by calling refreshDelegate()):
private void refreshDelegate() {
ODataClientRequest request = ODataClientRequest.get(AbstractODataConsumer.this.getServiceRootUri() + "$metadata");
try {
delegate = AbstractODataConsumer.this.getClient().getMetadata(request);
} catch (ODataProducerException e) {
// to support services that do not expose metadata information
delegate = EdmDataServices.EMPTY;
}
}
I don't quite understand why: maybe it assumes that the server has changed and a new version of the metadata is available so it tries again.
If it fails then it tries to find a function with the given name.
Personally I don't consider this very effective unless the server side is so volatile that it changes between calls.
So, if you have no changing metadata on the server, it is safe to remove the check for the entitySet and let it return as a null:
#Override
public EdmEntitySet findEdmEntitySet(String entitySetName) {
EdmEntitySet rt = super.findEdmEntitySet(entitySetName);
//if (rt == null && delegate != EdmDataServices.EMPTY) {
// refreshDelegate();
// rt = super.findEdmEntitySet(entitySetName);
//}
return rt; //if it is null, then the search for a function will commence
}

How should GATT_CMD_STARTED (status=134) be interpreted?

I'm working on an android app where I need to communicate with a bluetooth LE device and in the middle of the communication I receive a callback:
onCharacteristicWrite()
...which is expected. But the status of the operation is 134 instead of 0 (=success).
This GATT status constant is not defined in the official API but here is a translation in one of many unofficial lists:
public static final int GATT_CMD_STARTED = 134;
See: https://code.google.com/r/naranjomanuel-opensource-broadcom-ble/source/browse/framework/java/src/com/broadcom/bt/service/gatt/GattConstants.java?r=983950f9b35407446bf082633d70c7655c206d22
The consequence, that I can see, in my app is that I do not get an expected callback to:
onCharacteristicChanged()
Does anybody know what GATT_CMD_STARTED means? Is it an error?

The description of the following function taken from the bludroid sources hint that something is not working correctly in your GATT server.
Commands seem to "queue up" there, as there must be pending requests or value confirmations as hinted in the comment before the if(...) clause.
It might be worth checking what exactly is going on before you do the writeCharacteristic(...) as it seems to not finish correctly or create hiccups in your server.
/*******************************************************************************
**
** Function attp_cl_send_cmd
**
** Description Send a ATT command or enqueue it.
**
** Returns GATT_SUCCESS if command sent
** GATT_CONGESTED if command sent but channel congested
** GATT_CMD_STARTED if command queue up in GATT
** GATT_ERROR if command sending failure
**
*******************************************************************************/
tGATT_STATUS attp_cl_send_cmd(tGATT_TCB *p_tcb, UINT16 clcb_idx, UINT8 cmd_code, BT_HDR *p_cmd)
{
tGATT_STATUS att_ret = GATT_SUCCESS;
if (p_tcb != NULL)
{
cmd_code &= ~GATT_AUTH_SIGN_MASK;
/* no pending request or value confirmation */
if (p_tcb->pending_cl_req == p_tcb->next_slot_inq ||
cmd_code == GATT_HANDLE_VALUE_CONF)
{
att_ret = attp_send_msg_to_l2cap(p_tcb, p_cmd);
if (att_ret == GATT_CONGESTED || att_ret == GATT_SUCCESS)
{
/* do not enq cmd if handle value confirmation or set request */
if (cmd_code != GATT_HANDLE_VALUE_CONF && cmd_code != GATT_CMD_WRITE)
{
gatt_start_rsp_timer (clcb_idx);
gatt_cmd_enq(p_tcb, clcb_idx, FALSE, cmd_code, NULL);
}
}
else
att_ret = GATT_INTERNAL_ERROR;
}
else
{
att_ret = GATT_CMD_STARTED;
gatt_cmd_enq(p_tcb, clcb_idx, TRUE, cmd_code, p_cmd);
}
}
else
att_ret = GATT_ERROR;
return att_ret;
}
Starts at line 469 in android sources.
The native GATT error and statuscodes can be found here.

Google Plus Single Sign On Server Flow - Google_AuthException Error fetching OAuth2 access token, message: 'invalid_grant'

UPDATE 27th January 2013
I have now resolved this, Please check the accepted answer.
I am having trouble to get my refresh token and my access token when using the server side flow between my Android Application and my PHP server.
So I have managed to get my One Time Code by using the below:
AsyncTask<Void, Void, String> task = new AsyncTask<Void, Void, String>() {
#Override
protected String doInBackground(Void... params) {
Bundle appActivities = new Bundle();
appActivities.putString(GoogleAuthUtil.KEY_REQUEST_VISIBLE_ACTIVITIES,
"http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity");
String scopes = "oauth2:server:client_id:" + SERVER_CLIENT_ID +
":api_scope:" + SCOPE_STRING;
try {
code = GoogleAuthUtil.getToken(
OneTimeCodeActivity.this, // Context context
mPlusClient.getAccountName(), // String accountName
scopes, // String scope
appActivities // Bundle bundle
);
} catch (IOException transientEx) {
// network or server error, the call is expected to succeed if you try again later.
// Don't attempt to call again immediately - the request is likely to
// fail, you'll hit quotas or back-off.
System.out.println(transientEx.printStactTrace());
return "Error";
} catch (UserRecoverableAuthException e) {
// Recover
code = null;
System.out.println(e.printStackTrace());
OneTimeCodeActivity.this.startActivityForResult(e.getIntent(), REQUEST_AUTHORIZATION);
} catch (GoogleAuthException authEx) {
// Failure. The call is not expected to ever succeed so it should not be
// retried.
System.out.println(authEx.printStackTrace());
return "Error";
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(authEx.printStackTrace());
}
}
Which will then store the token in the variable "code" and I call up the async task as
task.execute();
The code above will always bring up a popup message and throw UserRecoverableAuthException Need Permission that requires the user to grant offline access, which means the above will need to be called twice to retrieve the code and store it in "code"
I am now trying to send this across to my server which is implemented in PHP.
I have used the quick start https://developers.google.com/+/quickstart/php and managed to get that working.
In here, there is a sample signin.php
In here and according to the documentation this already implements a One Time Authorisation Server Side Flow.
So now my problem is sending this One Time Code to the server.
I used the photohunt Android Auth example for this located here.
https://github.com/googleplus/gplus-photohunt-client-android/blob/master/src/com/google/plus/samples/photohunt/auth/AuthUtil.java
I used the "authorization" method of the code and called up signin.php/connect through a post method shown below
$app->post('/connect', function (Request $request) use ($app, $client) {
$token = $app['session']->get('token');
if (empty($token)) {
// Ensure that this is no request forgery going on, and that the user
// sending us this connect request is the user that was supposed to.
if ($request->get('state') != ($app['session']->get('state'))) {
return new Response('Invalid state parameter', 401);
}
// Normally the state would be a one-time use token, however in our
// simple case, we want a user to be able to connect and disconnect
// without reloading the page. Thus, for demonstration, we don't
// implement this best practice.
//$app['session']->set('state', '');
$code = $request->getContent();
// Exchange the OAuth 2.0 authorization code for user credentials.
$client->authenticate($code);
$token = json_decode($client->getAccessToken());
// You can read the Google user ID in the ID token.
// "sub" represents the ID token subscriber which in our case
// is the user ID. This sample does not use the user ID.
$attributes = $client->verifyIdToken($token->id_token, CLIENT_ID)
->getAttributes();
$gplus_id = $attributes["payload"]["sub"];
// Store the token in the session for later use.
$app['session']->set('token', json_encode($token));
$response = 'Successfully connected with token: ' . print_r($token, true);
}
return new Response($response, 200);
});
Now when I send the code using the above implementation, I get an 500 messages that says the below
Google_AuthException Error fetching OAuth2 access token, message: 'invalid_grant'
in ../vendor/google/google-api-php-client/src/auth/Google_OAuth2.php line 115
at Google_OAuth2->authenticate(array('scope' => 'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login'), '{ "token":"xxxxxxxx"}') in ../vendor/google/google-api-php-client/src/Google_Client.php line 131
at Google_Client->authenticate('{ "token":"xxxxxxx"}') in ../signin.php line 99
at {closure}(object(Request))
at call_user_func_array(object(Closure), array(object(Request))) in ../vendor/symfony/http-kernel/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/HttpKernel.php line 117
at HttpKernel->handleRaw(object(Request), '1') in ../vendor/symfony/http-kernel/Symfony/Component/HttpKernel/HttpKernel.php line 61
at HttpKernel->handle(object(Request), '1', true) in ../vendor/silex/silex/src/Silex/Application.php line 504
at Application->handle(object(Request)) in ../vendor/silex/silex/src/Silex/Application.php line 481
at Application->run() in ../signin.php line 139
Funny enough I have had to worked once where I did receive a 200, but I cannot recreate it.
So I know I have definitely got the implementation wrong, but I have no clue on how to send it and get my refresh token. I can't find anywhere on the web that explains this. Is someone able to help me please.
UPDATE 16 Jan 2014
Using https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v1/tokeninfo?access_token= I can see that the token being produced from getToken is valid and is indeed valid for 1 hour.
I can confirm the json formation is correct by changing the way I am inputting into the Post request and if I don't do it properly I get a total failure.
Now I am going deeper into the php and look at this section Google_OAuth2.php line 115 where it is breaking it is throwing a Google_AuthException. The code is below and this is provided in the quick starter pack
/**
* #param $service
* #param string|null $code
* #throws Google_AuthException
* #return string
*/
public function authenticate($service, $code = null) {
if (!$code && isset($_GET['code'])) {
$code = $_GET['code'];
}
if ($code) {
// We got here from the redirect from a successful authorization grant, fetch the access token
$request = Google_Client::$io->makeRequest(new Google_HttpRequest(self::OAUTH2_TOKEN_URI, 'POST', array(), array(
'code' => $code,
'grant_type' => 'authorization_code',
'redirect_uri' => $this->redirectUri,
'client_id' => $this->clientId,
'client_secret' => $this->clientSecret
)));
if ($request->getResponseHttpCode() == 200) {
$this->setAccessToken($request->getResponseBody());
$this->token['created'] = time();
return $this->getAccessToken();
} else {
$response = $request->getResponseBody();
$decodedResponse = json_decode($response, true);
if ($decodedResponse != null && $decodedResponse['error']) {
$response = $decodedResponse['error'];
}
throw new Google_AuthException("Error fetching OAuth2 access token, message: '$response'", $request->getResponseHttpCode());
}
}
$authUrl = $this->createAuthUrl($service['scope']);
header('Location: ' . $authUrl);
return true;
}
I edit the code above to make sure the code, the client id and secret were correct and they were. So that is where I am now, I don't think it is scope issues as well as I hard coded it in the client setup and still does not work. Not too sure.
UPDATE 23rd January
OK, I think it is a time issue. I used https://developers.google.com/+/photohunt/android and base my design on the BaseActivity in the Photohunt using the AuthUtil, and I get invalid grant on my server. How do I move the time back on my server in code. I read somewhere I can do time() - 10 somewhere but not sure where...

It sounds like you may be sending the same authorization code multiple times. On Android GoogleAuthUtil.getToken() caches any tokens that it retrieves including authorization codes.
If you ask for a second code without invalidating the previous code, GoogleAuthUtil will return the same code. When you try to exchange a code on your server which has already been exchanged you get the invalid_grant error. My advice would be to invalidate the token immediately after you retrieve it (even if you fail to exchange the code, you are better off getting a new one than retrying with the old one).
code = GoogleAuthUtil.getToken(
OneTimeCodeActivity.this, // Context context
mPlusClient.getAccountName(), // String accountName
scopes, // String scope
appActivities // Bundle bundle
);
GoogleAuthUtil.invalidateToken(
OneTimeCodeActivity.this,
code
);
invalid_grant can be returned for other reasons, but my guess is that caching is causing your problem since you said it worked the first time.

This issue is now resolved. This was due to the implementation on the One Time Code exchange with the server
As specified in the my issue above, I used the photohunt example to do the exchange with my server. The Android code can be found on the below link
https://github.com/googleplus/gplus-photohunt-client-android/blob/master/src/com/google/plus/samples/photohunt/auth/AuthUtil.java
One line 44 it reads this
byte[] postBody = String.format(ACCESS_TOKEN_JSON, sAccessToken).getBytes();
This will only work if on the server side you handle the JSON. I did not.
When calling up $client->authenticate($code); in php, $code had a JSON string and therefore when calling https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/token the authorization code was wrong.
So it was easy as I was not sending the code in the right format.
I found this out when digging and testing https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/token and created a manual cURL to test the token.
As provided in the Google+ API it was stated that all examples included a One Time Code exchange, but I think the code across all platform are not consistent and one has to double check themselve to make sure everything flows correctly, which was my mistake.

Android's SSLServerSocket causes increasing native memory in the App, OOM

Background
I am developing an Android App which provides a simple HTTP/HTTPS server. If the HTTPS serving is configured then on every connection an increasing native memory usage is observed which eventually leads to an app crash (oom), while using the HTTP configuration keeps the native memory usage relative constant. The app's Java VM keeps relative constant in both configurations.
The app serves an HTML page which contains a javascript with periodic polling (one json poll every second), so calling the app page using the HTTPS configuration and keeping the page open for several hours will lead to the mentioned out-of-memory because of increasing native memory usage. I have tested many SSLServerSocket and SSLContext configurations found on internet with no luck.
I observe the same problem on various Android devices and various Android versions beginning with 2.2 up to 4.3.
The code for handling client requests is the same for both configurations HTTP/HTTPS. The only difference between the two configurations is the setup of the server socket. While in the case of HTTP server socket one single line similar to this "ServerSocket serversocket = new ServerSocket(myport);" does the job, in the case of HTTPS server setup the usual steps for setting up the SSLContext are taken -- i.e. setting up the keymanager and initializing the SSLContext. For now, I use the default TrustManager.
Need For Your Advice
Does somebody know about any memory leak problems in Android's default TLS Provider using OpenSSL? Is there something special I should consider to avoid the leak in the native memory? Any hint is highly appreciated.
Update: I have also tried both TLS providers: OpenSSL and JSSE by explicitly giving the provider name in SSLContext.getInstance( "TLS", providerName ). But that did not change anything.
Here is a code block which demonstrates the problem. Just create a sample app put it into the bottom of the main activity's onCreate and build & run the app. Make sure that your Wifi is on and call the HTML page by following address:
https://android device IP:9090
Then watch the adb logs, after a while you will see the native memory beginning to increase.
new Thread(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
final int PORT = 9090;
SSLContext sslContext = SSLContext.getInstance( "TLS" ); // JSSE and OpenSSL providers behave the same way
KeyManagerFactory kmf = KeyManagerFactory.getInstance( KeyManagerFactory.getDefaultAlgorithm() );
KeyStore ks = KeyStore.getInstance( KeyStore.getDefaultType() );
char[] password = KEYSTORE_PW.toCharArray();
// we assume the keystore is in the app assets
InputStream sslKeyStore = getApplicationContext().getResources().openRawResource( R.raw.keystore );
ks.load( sslKeyStore, null );
sslKeyStore.close();
kmf.init( ks, password );
sslContext.init( kmf.getKeyManagers(), null, new SecureRandom() );
ServerSocketFactory ssf = sslContext.getServerSocketFactory();
sslContext.getServerSessionContext().setSessionTimeout(5);
try {
SSLServerSocket serversocket = ( SSLServerSocket )ssf.createServerSocket(PORT);
// alternatively, the plain server socket can be created here
//ServerSocket serversocket = new ServerSocket(9090);
serversocket.setReceiveBufferSize( 8192 );
int num = 0;
long lastnatmem = 0, natmemtotalincrease = 0;
while (true) {
try {
Socket soc = (Socket) serversocket.accept();
Log.i(TAG, "client connected (" + num++ + ")");
soc.setSoTimeout(2000);
try {
SSLSession session = ((SSLSocket)soc).getSession();
boolean valid = session.isValid();
Log.d(TAG, "session valid: " + valid);
OutputStream os = null;
InputStream is = null;
try {
os = soc.getOutputStream();
// just read the complete request from client
is = soc.getInputStream();
int c = 0;
String itext = "";
while ( (c = is.read() ) > 0 ) {
itext += (char)c;
if (itext.contains("\r\n\r\n")) // end of request detection
break;
}
//Log.e(TAG, " req: " + itext);
} catch (SocketTimeoutException e) {
// this can occasionally happen (handshake timeout)
Log.d(TAG, "socket timeout: " + e.getMessage());
if (os != null)
os.close();
if (is != null)
is.close();
soc.close();
continue;
}
long natmem = Debug.getNativeHeapSize();
long diff = 0;
if (lastnatmem != 0) {
diff = natmem - lastnatmem;
natmemtotalincrease += diff;
}
lastnatmem = natmem;
Log.i(TAG, " answer the request, native memory in use: " + natmem / 1024 + ", diff: " + diff / 1024 + ", total increase: " + natmemtotalincrease / 1024);
String html = "<!DOCTYPE html><html><head>";
html += "<script type='text/javascript'>";
html += "function poll() { request(); window.setTimeout(poll, 1000);}\n";
html += "function request() { var xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); xmlHttp.open( \"GET\", \"/\", false ); xmlHttp.send( null ); return xmlHttp.responseText; }";
html += "</script>";
html += "</head><body onload=\"poll()\"><p>Refresh the site to see the inreasing native memory when using HTTPS: " + natmem + " </p></body></html> ";
byte[] buffer = html.getBytes("UTF-8");
PrintWriter pw = new PrintWriter( os );
pw.print("HTTP/1.0 200 OK \r\n");
pw.print("Content-Type: text/html\r\n");
pw.print("Content-Length: " + buffer.length + "\r\n");
pw.print("\r\n");
pw.flush();
os.write(buffer);
os.flush();
os.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
soc.close();
}
catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
} catch (SocketException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}).start();
-- EDIT --
I have uploaded a sample app project called SSLTest for eClipse which demonstrates the problem:
http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=59536
-- UPDATE --
Good news: today the reported Android issue above was identified and proper submissions were made to fix the memory leak. For more details see the link above.

I imagine this would be a substantial time investment, but I see that Valgrind has been ported to Android. You could try getting that up and running. Of course, if you find there's an internal memory leak, there isn't a lot you can do about it except attempt to get the bug fixed in future Android releases.
As a workaround, you could make your application multi-process and put the https service in a separate process. That way you could restart it periodically, avoiding OOM. You might also have to have a third process just accepting port 443 connections and passing them on to the https worker - in order to avoid tiny outages when the https worker is restarted.
This also sounds like a substantial time investment :) But it would presumably successfully avoid the problem.
--- EDIT: More detail ---
Yes, if you have a main application with its own UI, a worker process for handling SSL and a worker process for accepting the SSL requests (which as you say probably can't be 443), then on top of your normal Activity classes, you would have two Service classes, and the manifest would place them in separate processes.
Handling SSL process: Rather than waiting for an OOM to crash the service, the service could monitor its own Debug.getNativeHeapSize(), and explicitly restart the service when it increased too much. Either that, or restart automatically after every 100 requests or so.
Handling listening socket process: This service would just listen on the TCP port you choose and pass on the raw data to the SSL process. This bit needs some thought, but the most obvious solution is to just have the SSL process listen on a different local port X (or switch between a selection of different ports), and the listening socket process would forward data to port X. The reason for having the listening socket process is to gracefully handle the possibility that X is down - as it might be whenever you restart it.
If your requirements allow for there being occasional mini-outages I would just do the handling SSL process, and skip the listening socket process, it's a relatively simple solution then - not that different to what you'd do normally. It's the listening socket process that adds complexity to the solution...

Does it help to explicitly close the input stream? In the sample code the input stream seems to only be closed in the case of a SocketTimeoutException exception.
--EDIT--
You could rename run() to run2() and move the while loop into run() and remove it from run2() and see if that makes a difference? This couldn't be a solution but would tell you if any of the long-lived objects free up the memory when their references are dropped.

There is one detail I would recommend changing in your implementation.
Make a list of all your resource variables, for example Sockets, Streams, Writers, etc. Be sure to have the declaration outside your try statement and be sure to do cleanup / closing in the finally statement. I normally do something like this to be 100% sure:
InputStream in = null;
OutputStream out = null;
try {
//assign a proper value to in and out, and use them as needed.
} catch(IOException e) {
//normal error handling
} finally {
try {
in.close();
} catch(IOException e) {}
try {
out.close();
} catch(IOException e) {}
}
It looks a little bit confusing, but imagine you use your in Stream inside the try block and you get some Exception, then your Streams never get closed and that is a potential reason for memory leaks.
I cannot guarantee that this is the reason, but it should be a good startup point.
About managing your service. I had a lot of bad experiences with Android services because I was running them in the same thread as the GUI. Under some circumstances, Android will see some code that is executing for too long and kill your main process in order to protect from crashes. The solution I found was to follow the suggestion from this tutorial (look at point 4):
http://www.vogella.com/articles/AndroidServices/article.html
After this, my service just worked as expected and didn't interfere with my GUI Process.
Regards

Smack getPrivacyList method throws classCastException

I am using Smack in an Android app for XMPP based communication. I am trying to create a privacy list using PrivacyManager. I have created a PrivacyList successfully, but when I try to access that list it returns ClassCastException. Here is the code:
PrivacyListManager privacyManager;
privacyManager = PrivacyListManager.getInstanceFor(connection);
PrivacyList privacyList = privacyManager.getPrivacyList("msg_block_list");
Investigating a bit more, I have found that the exception occurs in getRequest method in PrivacyListManager.java class on following line:
Privacy privacyAnswer =
(Privacy) response.nextResult(SmackConfiguration.getPacketReplyTimeout());
Here is the getRequest method:
private Privacy getRequest(Privacy requestPrivacy) throws XMPPException {
// The request is a get iq type
requestPrivacy.setType(Privacy.Type.GET);
requestPrivacy.setFrom(this.getUser());
// Filter packets looking for an answer from the server.
PacketFilter responseFilter = new PacketIDFilter(requestPrivacy.getPacketID());
PacketCollector response = connection.createPacketCollector(responseFilter);
// Send create & join packet.
connection.sendPacket(requestPrivacy);
// Wait up to a certain number of seconds for a reply.
Privacy privacyAnswer =
(Privacy) response.nextResult(SmackConfiguration.getPacketReplyTimeout());
// Stop queuing results
response.cancel();
// Interprete the result and answer the privacy only if it is valid
if (privacyAnswer == null) {
throw new XMPPException("No response from server.");
}
else if (privacyAnswer.getError() != null) {
throw new XMPPException(privacyAnswer.getError());
}
return privacyAnswer;
}
I have followed this tutorial for implementing PrivacyList. Anyone can help?

PacketCollector's method getResult() returns Packet object, but it could be any inherited from Packet class object, either Message or Presence or IQ (in IQ case you can use (privacy) cast, because Privacy is IQ's child class). In your case it seems like you get object which is present in another hierarchy, than Privacy class.

I have found the problem. The XML file smack.providers was missing. I created the file with following contents and it worked.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- Providers file for default Smack extensions -->
<smackProviders>
<!-- Privacy -->
<iqProvider>
<elementName>query</elementName>
<namespace>jabber:iq:privacy</namespace>
<className>org.jivesoftware.smack.provider.PrivacyProvider</className>
</iqProvider>
</smackProviders>