I have an android app that uses GCM for push notifications. Lets say I need this for ambulance drivers when new calls are received. Right now there is a delay between when the server sends out the push notification and when the android device receives it, sometimes more than a minute. I've read on Stack Overflow about sending the heartbeat out, set delay_while_idle to true/false( yes I've seen both) etc...
What I need to know is if this is just how it is with GCM or if there is a way to make push notification times much more reliable. I've had suggestions of sockets, test messages etc... Because this is potentially for medical services I can't afford to have delays longer than what is absolutely necessary.
I've read that GCM notification delivery isn't guaranteed so is there a direction someone can point me to maybe do this on my own so that I can make something is guaranteed???
GCM push notifications are not reliable.
Have a look at "Pushy": https://pushy.me/
They state the following on their website:
The most reliable push notification gateway, perfect for real-time
applications.
Google Cloud Messaging simply doesn't cut it for time-sensitive,
real-time apps, due to its instability and push notification
throttling.
Pushy works by maintaining a dedicated background socket connection
using the MQTT protocol, an extremely light-weight pub/sub protocol
that consumes very little network bandwidth and battery, which makes
it perfect for mobile.
You can use it for free with up to 100 devices, so you could just give it a try to see, if it fits your needs. I didn't try it.
Related
I am trying to use GCM service, Every thing is OK except of the long delay that GCM push notification or deliver payload... some times it take to my App 5 minutes receive notification or payload.
I need Immediate delivering...
I know about the roles of GCM, that wait until the other device got online, but in my case I hold two devices and they are online, but I got Delayed notifications!
How does WhatsApp(as example of app that uses GCM) overcome this problem.. and send Immediately?
[ i.e (message of the type: typing, online - last seen) cannot be delayed...]
the GCM Delayed Push is known problem : this issue
my question is: How other app that use GCM overcome this issue
The big players
Lets focus on WhatsApp from a scale point of view. Their scale is global and one of the largest in terms of the market share. For players like these it becomes necessary to provide a consistent and smooth user experience no matter what the circumstances are. This means that the "small fish developers" like us are left with pre-defined rules by the big fish companies. Sometimes, it is the implementation that is challenging enough that a lot of the small time developers have to do with whatever is available.
I would like to take WhatsApp's Push Notification as an example to illustrate the above.
First of all, we must stop associating Push notification with Google's services(i.e, Google Play Services) exclusively. Would a device without Google Play services won't receive Push notifications? No, of course it can -- try focusing on the core mechanism of a push notification
How do Push Notifications work - Sockets!
Contrary to a protocol like HTTP which assumes a client-server architecture and is a uni-directional protocol(server can't initiate communication by itself), a plain socket enables communication bi-directionally.
You want to implement your own File transfer protocol over socket? You can!
You want to implement your own Chatting protocol over socket? You can!
You want to implement your own Push notifications protocol over socket? You can!
A socket is the canvas of communication over a network. You can pretty much do anything. Personally we have developed a custom request-response protocol in our organization.
Multiple implementations
Don't stick with default GCM/FCM notification messages protocol or implementation. You can deploy a mechanism to maintain a persistent socket connection with the device and can listen to whatever the server wants to push.
WhatsApp uses both GCM/FCM as well as their proprietary XMPP server implementation for Push notifications
WhatsApp(and several other Apps) rely upon GCM/FCM(as option 1 - the default) as it is present as a system App on lot of devices and therefore holds a special status where it is very less likely to be killed unlike a normal App.
For devices that do not have play services, your custom socket connection is relied upon. It may be that FCM is preferred over socket when the former is available but those are upto you to manage.
From WhatsApp's latest build(2.19.203):
Notice that the relevant permission for FCM is present.
Suspected socket implementation: https://android.stackexchange.com/questions/43970/how-is-whatsapp-able-to-receive-messages-when-not-in-use
XMPP based Push Notifications
From, https://www.quora.com/Does-WhatsApp-use-GCM-to-exchange-messages
No, whatsapp doesn't use GCM[NOT entirely true]. It uses a modified version of XMPP
called FunXMPP instead. It changes the XML keywords in message frames
to save bandwidth as it's users aka mostly mobile network users,
doesn't have a good internet connection. The replacements can be found
here: mgp25/Chat-API (I am not the author though)
They have even asked for whitelisting of any port(custom) in use by them.
So, WhatsApp does it. Facebook does it. Google does it. A lot of these companies do this. You can do it as well(to an extent) using Ejjaberd, Openfire or some other technology and having a proper client side implementation for the same.
Chinese ROMs
Some chinese ROMs have taken it even further and radically changed the way the memory and processes are managed in Android. As an example, in Oppo if the Application doesn't have Auto Start turned on, it will not let you do anything once your App is killed. No hopes of any experience whatsoever except hoping that the user will open the App again. In these cases, these OEMs have whitelisted WhatsApp, Facebook, Google and other players selectively. So, who suffers?
Us. Period.
When sending your notification you could set the priority-parameter to "high".
From the docs:
By default, messages are sent with normal priority. Normal priority optimizes the client app's battery consumption, and should be used unless immediate delivery is required. For messages with normal priority, the app may receive the message with unspecified delay.
When a message is sent with high priority, it is sent immediately, and the app can wake a sleeping device and open a network connection to your server.
I know this answer comes late, nevertheless if you are still facing this issue (or anyone else) please tell me if it helps.
I have implemented a home monitoring and control system with some motion detectors and temperature sensors, that is connected to a mini PC as a server. On this PC I have a .NET ASMX web service that has some methods, return the detectors situation and environment temperature.
In order to achieve the devices situation I am trying to build an Android application that can connect to the web service via Wifi and shows the temperatures.
when the temperature exceeds critical range or motion detectors detect motion, this application must show a related notification.
The problem here is: every time I need the system situation, I query the web service. but this way I have to query the web service every one second to know that whether the temperature exceeded critical range or not, and whether the detectors detected motion or not.
The question: is there any better solution to achieve this? or is there any way that a web service can inform the clients when an event occurs?
note that I am using KSOAP2 library in my android app.
Thanks in advance
You need to consider using a Push notification pattern instead of polling the server to check for new data.
There are a few options here. The easiest and most standard would be to look into Google's push notification system, called Google Cloud Messaging (GCM) Note that this is only available to devices which have Google Services (so if you're using a Kindle Fire for example, you can't use it)
Or you could consider a more bespoke version of push notifications based on MQTT protocol. You'll need to setup your own MQTT server, and have android code and server code which talks to the MQTT server.
Any time the data changes, you would send a push notification to the subscribing clients so they would not have to be checking for data all the time.
Push services, i.e. http://developer.android.com/google/gcm/index.html
But there is a certain limit of pushes, I guess each second call would kill that limit. Maybe just send requests each 5 seconds, or 10 seconds? Temperature in the room doesn't change even at that rate :)
I have already implemented a push notification system for the android. My system works as following: From my server I communicate through the Http protocol with the google servers. Then the google servers are sending the notification to the mobiles. So, I was wondering if there are any alternatives ways to implement this functionality. However, I want something which will be reliable.
P.S. I would like to hear opinions from people that they implement something similar.
Not sure why you're looking for something else, if you've already got it working through the Google servers, but a good system to send push notifications easily is Urban Airship.
I was working with some Chinese tablets that could not receive android push notifs (very annoying). I had to implement a Comet like system on android.
Basically, on the android device, I created a service which essentially polled a URL. But since polling is very battery intensive, I used a push technique called long-polling. I had the Android http client set a very long timeout. I then on the server side had the server hold the connection open also for a very long time. What would end up happening is that as soon as a message had to be passed, the connection would finish, and the android device would get the message immediately. This is just an additional method of "push" technology.
The only other option not discussed here is a persistant TCP/IP connection. This can be very dicey because Android could kill the service at will, and it can be somewhat battery intensive as well.
From my experience, GCM is the best method out there, and I wish there was something as good as it available for iOS Devices!
I am having issues with C2DM. Sometimes works perfectly, sometimes my messages simply do not get pushed. Is there reliable way to enforce this connection? To pull messages. I read somewhere that what google do is keep low bandwidth TCP connection to their server at all time. So I assume that
when switching between network types TCP connection falls down and Android tries to reestablish connection to C2DM servers. So that might fail on WiFi with restricted network. Is that wrong assumption?
I have noticed with WhatsApp that on WiFi sometimes I do not get messages. When I switch to 3G I usually get them at the moment of the switch. What tips from your experience with C2DM would you offer?
C2DM is not suitable for critical parts of your application, since Google currently does not offer an SLA or paid tiers that will guarantee you reliable service and throughput.
I've considered several alternatives myself: XMPP via asmack, Parse, Deacon, Urban Airship, and MQTT.
After some reading and experimenting I decided to go with MQTT. It is a very lightweight telemetry protocol invented at IBM that fits quite nicely in the Android push notifications scenario. I recommend you give it a try, here's a nice blog post to guide you: Using MQTT in Android mobile applications.
Hope this helps.
C2DM does not guarantee that your message will be delivered, and your application should not assume that in order to work correctly. Therefore, your C2DM message should never contain the data itself but, rather, a notification that there is data available. In other words, the loss of a C2DM message should never cause your application to lose data; it should, at most, cause it to take longer to notice that a certain piece of data is available on your server.
A typical app should connect to its server once in a while (a long while) to retrieve messages, even when using C2DM, to cover the case where C2DM messages might not be delivered.
Depending on network configuration, the device might not be able to receive C2DM messages; restrictive firewalls or other strange WiFi configs might do that.
With C2DM reliability is not a guarantee. So best to have a ACK
message or some way in which you (the sender) the realize the message was received successfully.
Also make it a point to override onRegister class properly because the device Reg ID keep on shuffling.
Lastly, if you are planning to send updates regularly, I'd prefer polling to C2DM just because of the amount of requirements to get it functioning while reliability and ultimate control is still not assured.
I've been struggling with the same problem myself. The behaviour you describe is accurate. I'm developing an app that uses c2dm mainly with Wifi connection, and I had to implement an AsyncTask to periodically (minute and a half) call WifiManager.reassociate() (turning wifi off and on again triggers the arrival of all pending notifications, that's what inspired this solution) so I can keep the notification arrival as accurate as possible. Not so sure about the correctness of this practice, though.
Have you tested it every 15 minute connection? I created a schedule task to send the message. I use NotifyMyAndroid to push it. C2DM sometime pushes the message about 10 mninutes after not instantly. But, sometimes you get it in around a second.
The best way you can do this is by testing. I have a mechanism in my app that when I enable debugging I receive a HTTP request from the client saying that they received the message.
I find that this number is about 80%. Fortunately that's enough for the scope of my application.
Wifi shouldn't interfere in the C2DM ability of receive messages. At least while the phone is active.
What happens is that android turns the wifi OFF after the phone is in standby for a while. The messages won't be available at that period of time, simply because there's no internet connection available. Right after the user wakes the phone up, they should receive the messages.
After a long time research pretty much "all the internet" for an answer, I've found it. As I posted before, I was struggling with the problem myself and found out it was not a C2DM problem, or even a implementation problem. It was simply a router or firewall misconfiguration. Android uses a persistent TCP connection with a heartbeat keep-alive mecanism to ensures that the connection stays up. Google uses the state of the connection to determine if your device is idle or not. But if your router has a protection policy that checks for "unused" connections and terminates them, that won't work. Android notifications should be delivered (close to) instantly. I've tested this in my school network and home network, with two diferrent behaviour.
To resume: be sure to check your network configurations.
Some APNs work better than others with C2DM. Google "gtalk apn", for example, to find forums about the impact of the APN on C2DM.
I recently learned about the ability of iPhone apps to receive nearly instantaneous notifications to apps notifications to apps.
This is provided in the form of push notifications, a bespoke protocol which keeps an always on data connection to the iPhone and messages binary packets to the app, which pops up alerts incredibly quickly, between 0.5 - 5 seconds from server app send to phone app response time. This is sent as data - rather than SMS - in very very small packets charged as part of the data plan not as incoming messages.
I would like to know if, using Android, there is either a similar facility, or whether it's possible to implement something close to this using Android APIs. To clarify, I define similar as:
Not an SMS message, but some data driven solution
As real time as is possible
Is scalable, i.e., as the server part of a mobile app, I could notify thousands of app instances in seconds
I appreciate the app could be pull based, HTTP request/response style, but ideally I don't want to be polling that heavily just to check for notification; besides which it's like drip draining the data plan.
Firebase Cloud Messaging FCM FAQ is the new version of GCM. It inherits GCM’s core infrastructure to deliver messages reliably on Android, iOS and Chrome. However they'll continue to support GCM because lot of developers are using GCM SDKs today to handle notifications, and client app upgrade takes time.
As of June 26, 2012, Google Cloud Messaging is the preferred way of sending messages to applications running on devices.
Previously (and now deprecated), the service was called Cloud To Device Messaging.
XMPP is a good solution. I have used it for a push enabled, realtime, Android application. XMPP is powerful, highly extensible and easy to integrate and use.
There are loads of free XMPP servers (though out of courtesy you shouldn't abuse them) and there are open source servers you can run on one of your own boxes. OpenFire is an excellent choice.
The library you want isn't Smack as noted above, it's aSmack. But note, this is a build environment - you will have to build the library.
This is a calculation I did on battery life impact of an XMPP solution:
The Android client must maintain a persistent TCP connection by waking up periodically
to send a heartbeat to the XMPP server.
This clearly imposes a cost in terms of power usage. An estimate of this cost is
provided below:
Using a 1400mAh battery (as supplied in the Nexus One and HTC Desire)
An idle device, connected to an 3G network, uses approximately 5mA
The wake-up, heartbeat, sleep cycle occurs every 5 minutes, takes three seconds
to complete and uses 300mA
The cost in battery usage per hour is therefore:
36 seconds 300mA = 3mAh sending heartbeat
3600 seconds 5mA = 5mAh at idle
4:95 + 3 = 7:95mAh combined
A 1400mAh battery lasts approximately 11.6 days at idle and 7.3 days when
running the application, which represents an approximate 37% reduction in
battery life.
However, a reduction in battery life of 37% represents the absolute worst case
in practice given that devices are rarely completely idle.
I recently started playing with MQTT http://mqtt.org for Android as a way of doing what you're asking for (i.e. not SMS but data driven, almost immediate message delivery, scalable, not polling, etc.)
I have a blog post with background information on this in case it's helpful http://dalelane.co.uk/blog/?p=938
(Note: MQTT is an IBM technology, and I should point out that I work for IBM.)
Have a look at the Xtify platform. Looks like this is what they are doing,
Google is depreciating C2DM, but in its place their introducing GCM (Google Cloud Messaging) I dont think theirs any quota and its free! It does require Android 2.2+ though! http://developer.android.com/guide/google/gcm/index.html
If you can depend on the Google libraries being there for you target market, then you may want to piggy back on GTalk functionality (registering a resource on the existing username - the intercepting it the messages as they come in with a BroadcastReceiver).
If not, and I expect you can't, then you're into bundling your own versions of XMPP. This is a pain, but may be made easier if XMPP is bundled separately as a standalone library.
You may also consider PubSubHubub, but I have no idea the network usage of it. I believe it is built atop of XMPP.
I have been looking into this and PubSubHubBub recommended by jamesh is not an option. PubSubHubBub is intended for server to server communications
"I'm behind a NAT. Can I subscribe to a Hub? The hub can't connect to me."
/Anonymous
No, PSHB is a server-to-server
protocol. If you're behind NAT, you're
not really a server. While we've
kicked around ideas for optional PSHB
extensions to do hanging gets ("long
polling") and/or messagebox polling
for such clients, it's not in the core
spec. The core spec is
server-to-server only.
/Brad Fitzpatrick, San Francisco, CA
Source: http://moderator.appspot.com/#15/e=43e1a&t=426ac&f=b0c2d (direct link not possible)
I've come to the conclusion that the simplest method is to use Comet HTTP push. This is both a simple and well understood solution but it can also be re-used for web applications.
There is a new open-source effort to develop a Java library for push notifications on Android, using the Meteor comet server as a backend. You can check it out at the Deacon Project Blog. We need developers, so please spread the word!
Google recently(18May2016) announced that Firebase is now it's unified platform for mobile developers including near real time push notifications.It is also multi-platform :
The company now offers all Firebase users free and unlimited
notifications with support for iOS, Android and the Web.
source
I cannot find where I read it at, but I believe gmail utilizes an open TCP connection to do the e-mail push.
As GTalk is gone from the SDK, it might be a good idea to make a 'standard' push messaging system. That way, only one service has to run, only one extra tcp connection needs to be open. Applications should talk to this service using Intents and should first request permission to send and receive notification from the service. The service should then notify the user a new application wants to send and receive messages. The user will then grant or deny permission, so he stays in control. The application will then register an action + category to the service, so the service knows how to deliver the pushed message.
Would the a good idea or not?
Why dont you go with the XMPP implementation. right now there are so many public servers available including gtalk, jabber, citadel etc. For Android there is one SDK is also available named as SMACK. This we cant say a push notification but using the XMPP you can keep a connection open between client and server which will allow a two way communication. Means Android client and server both can communicate to each other. At present this will fulfill the need of Push in android. I have implemented a sample code and it really works great
I have recently developed http://pushdroid.org its a single application that should be installed on the phone just like google has implemented it in 2.2 this works from 1.5 and is broadcasting via intent.
The problem with GCM is that there is a lot of configuration involved in the process:
You have to add a lot of boilerplate to you Android app
You need to configure an external server to comunicate with the GCM server
You will have to write tests
If you like simple things (like me) you should try UrbanAirship. It is (IMHO) the easiest way to use GCM in your app without doing a lot of configuration. It also gives you a pretty GUI to test that your GCM messages are being delivered correctly.
You can find the docs and getting started guide here
You can find a sample application here
Note: I am not afiliated with UrbanAirship in any way
https://github.com/Guti/Google-Cloud-Messaging--Titanium-/blob/master/src/com/google/android/gcm/GCMRegistrar.java
Its reaily good and working solution for push.
Please try it
They have their listeners which has to be used by you by using their library classes in your code. You need not to bother about pushing. You have to send the message to server server will push the message to the device. They use OAuth. Regarding Protocols, there are two methods using CCS and XMPP. CCS just uses XMPP as an authenticated transport layer, so you can use most XMPP libraries to manage the connection. To send notifications to device you can write code in android app to send as well as your server code. the message sending will be done only by your code. Rest will be taken care by Google Server in GCM case. You can check detail at this link
http://developer.android.com/google/gcm/server.html
Also, for security issues
google cloud messaging security https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/android-gcm/M-EevBitbhQ
In case your app is not running then also devices can recieve notification because you have to write code for broadcast listeners. In background it will be listening to server and whenever any message packet will be there it will recieve the message as notification. Android has service you need to not to bother about it. You have only to use those resources using the library class that makes your work easier and let them write if your app is not running then also it recieve notification. Obviously, there would be some listener whick make the app to recieve.Check "Recieve the message" section in this link
http://developer.android.com/google/gcm/client.html
It will acccept request from users also. For GCM it will do. Please check "Send a message"
http://developer.android.com/google/gcm/client.html