WakefulBroadcastReceiver intent not starting only in some cases (strange) - android

I have a very strange bug happening in my app. I am building an Alarm APP and I am using SQLite to store alarm data and broadcast receivers to manage the alarm manager calls.
The code of onReceive strangely does not behave in the same way in some cases. I try to start an Activity when the receiver receives a broadcast, nearly 90% of cases everything goes well and I manage to start the Activity, but in some cases strangely enough the receiver executes the instruction "startActivity(i)" but nothing happens.
It is really hard to reproduce the BUG and during my debugging I have learned what I have mentioned, but more than this is really difficult for me to understand how a call to startActivity() in most cases works and in some cases does not work. I have searched through the Stack community but no one seamed to have this kind of problem, everybody just had problems in starting the activity because they had not set the flag or because they had not registered the receiver in the manifest. Below I am posting the code.
public class AlarmReceiver extends WakefulBroadcastReceiver {
// The app's AlarmManager, which provides access to the system alarm services.
private AlarmManager alarmMgr;
// The pending intent that is triggered when the alarm fires.
private PendingIntent alarmIntent;
#Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
Utils.logToFile("Received Alarm ,I am in onReceive(), ALARM ID: "+intent.getExtras().getInt(Constants.ALARM_ID));
Intent intent = new Intent(context, StopAlarm.class);
Bundle b = new Bundle();
b.putInt(Constants.ALARM_ID, intent.getExtras().getInt(Constants.ALARM_ID));
if(intent.getExtras().containsKey(Constants.SNOOZE_ALARM)){
b.putString(Constants.SNOOZE_ALARM, intent.getExtras().getString(Constants.SNOOZE_ALARM));
}
i.putExtras(b);
//this flag is needed to start an Activity from a BroadcastReceiver
intent.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK);
context.startActivity(intent);
//this method reads from the DB and sets the next alarm
//I tried commenting this method so that no DB action is
//performed and still the bug happened
setAlarm(context.getApplicationContext());
//this method just logs data into a file that I have created to keep track of events
//since not always the device is connected with LogCat
Utils.logToFile("Received Alarm, Intent(context, StopAlarm.class);");
}
Do I need to set any other flag and how is it possible that startActivity(intent) behaves incorrectly in some cases?
EDIT
<activity
android:label="#string/app_name"
android:name="package.activity.StopAlarm"
android:windowSoftInputMode="stateAlwaysHidden"
android:screenOrientation="sensorPortrait">
</activity>
<receiver android:name="package.receivers.AlarmReceiver" />

I have finally solved the issue by creating an IntentService and by starting the activity from the IntentService and setting two flags to the Intent. After doing this I placed the code which reads from DB in the activity that is started from the IntentService. I have tested nearly 60 times the behaviour and in all the tests the app behaved correctly. I am posting the code below.
public class MyAlarmReceiver extends WakefulBroadcastReceiver {
// The app's AlarmManager, which provides access to the system alarm services.
private static AlarmManager alarmMgr;
// The pending intent that is triggered when the alarm fires.
private static PendingIntent alarmIntent;
#Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
Intent i = new Intent(context, AlarmIntentService.class);
Bundle b = new Bundle();
b.putInt(Constants.ALARM_ID, intent.getExtras().getInt(Constants.ALARM_ID));
if(intent.getExtras().containsKey(Constants.SNOOZE_ALARM)){
b.putString(Constants.SNOOZE_ALARM, intent.getExtras().getString(Constants.SNOOZE_ALARM));
}
i.putExtras(b);
i.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK);
startWakefulService(context, i);
}
This is the IntentService I needed to implement
public class AlarmIntentService extends IntentService {
public AlarmIntentService() {
super("AlarmIntentService");
}
#Override
protected void onHandleIntent(Intent intent) {
Intent i = new Intent(this, StopAlarm.class);
Bundle b = new Bundle();
b.putInt(Constants.ALARM_ID, intent.getExtras().getInt(Constants.ALARM_ID));
if(intent.getExtras().containsKey(Constants.SNOOZE_ALARM)){
b.putString(Constants.SNOOZE_ALARM, intent.getExtras().getString(Constants.SNOOZE_ALARM));
}
i.putExtras(b);
//THESE ARE THE FLAGS NEEDED TO START THE ACTIVITY AND TO PREVENT THE BUG
//(CLEAR_TASK is crucial for the bug and new task is needed to start activity from outside of an activity)
i.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK|Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_CLEAR_TASK);
startActivity(i);
MyAlarmReceiver.completeWakefulIntent(intent);
}
}
This is the activity started by the IntentService. Here I set the next alarm.
public class StopAlarm extends Activity {
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.stop_alarm);
//this method reads from the DB and sets the next alarm
MyAlarmReceiver.setAlarm(getApplicationContext());
...

I had a similar issue. From my experience the problem is,that startActivity(i) is asynchronous. So in this case the program will simultaneously call activities onCreate(),onStart(), etc. but also call QlokAlarmReceiver.completeWakefulIntent(intent) (without waiting for the activity to be closed), which will release the wakeLock. Because of that the device can go to sleep during executing the activities onCreate() or onStart().
Rubin, I know, that my answer is a contradiction of your solution, but my logs clearly indicated such order of events:
- startActivity called
- onCreate of the activity called
- completeWakefulIntent(intent); called in between logs from onStart of the activity
My workaround this is to start a wakelock with a timeout of eg 20 seconds just before calling startActivity and then start another wakeLock in the activities onCreate, which will be released in the onDestroy method.
I'm not sure if my solution goes along with best practises, but I haven't found a better solution so far.

Related

WakefulBroadcastReceiver onReceive called twice

I need to periodically read data from Google Fit via the Fitness API for a watch face development.
I'm using AlarmManager every POLL_INTERVAL_MS interval to broadcast an Intent to a WakefulBroadcastReceiver which starts an IntentService executing the data read task.
This is the code I'm using.
In the manifest file
<receiver android:name=".FitDataAlarmReceiver"></receiver>
In watch face engine onCreate
FitDataAlarmReceiver mFitDataAlarmReceiver = new FitDataAlarmReceiver();
mFitDataAlarmReceiver.setAlarm(MyApp.this);
In FitDataAlarmReceiver class
public class FitDataAlarmReceiver extends WakefulBroadcastReceiver {
private AlarmManager alarmMgr;
private PendingIntent alarmIntent;
private static final long FIT_DATA_POLL_INTERVAL_MS = TimeUnit.SECONDS.toMillis(60);
public void setAlarm(Context context) {
alarmMgr = (AlarmManager)context.getSystemService(Context.ALARM_SERVICE);
Intent intent = new Intent(context, FitDataAlarmReceiver.class);
alarmIntent = PendingIntent.getBroadcast(context, 123456, intent, 0);
alarmMgr.setRepeating(AlarmManager.ELAPSED_REALTIME_WAKEUP, POLL_INTERVAL_MS, POLL_INTERVAL_MS, alarmIntent);
}
public void cancelAlarm(Context context) {
if (alarmMgr!= null) {
alarmMgr.cancel(alarmIntent);
}
}
#Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
Intent service = new Intent(context, FitDataManagerService.class);
startWakefulService(context, service);
}
}
In my IntentService I then obtain a new wake lock, start the data read stuff and then release it together with the receiver one (by calling completeWakefulIntent method).
cancelAlarm method is of course called in the watch face onDestroy.
mFitDataAlarmReceiver.cancelAlarm(MyApp.this);
It works. But, what's happening is that the onReceive in the FitDataAlarmReceiver class is triggered twice very quickly without even respecting the first POLL_INTERVAL_MS parameter of the setRepeating method call.
It takes a couple of - literally - false alarms before the receiver starts receiving correctly timed invocations. I don't know why.
SetAlarm is called only once in the onCreate method of the watch face engine.
However the onCreate method of the watch face engine itself is also (inexplicably) being called two times(!).
I've filtered out the second onCreate call by using a simple semaphore, and it is now called only once.
Nevertheless, onReceive is still called twice.
Only if I use the debugger and place a breakpoint in the onReceive, it is called just once.
These are my questions:
Why is the onCreate method in the watch face Engine class called two times?
And, even if I manage to filter out one call, why is the receiver onReceive being called twice?

how to stop a service/thread when the application exits or from a different activity

now i have a server class that i run on a thread from an activity(i.e servActivity).now when i am not interacting with my app in anyway possible (like i have removed it from recent apps etc) the thread should stop which currently is not stopping. So i researched and i found that i should use a bound service. now a bound service i will have to bind it to servActivity and when servActivity is destroyed i have to unbind and stop service but i dont want to do that. i want to stop service when i am not interacting with the app. i also found that maybe i have to extend application class but cannot find the solution to achieve this?Is it advisable to extend the application class?
i want to be able to create a service running on independent thread from a particular activity(ie servActivity) and then be able to interact with the service from any activity and service should be active (even if the activity in which i started the service i.e-servActivity is destroyed by going to previous activity etc) through button or whatever until i am not interacting with the app(i have a notification controller which also needs to be closed to stop the interaction)
i have a client class on one device whose object i create again and again if i have to make request but i want to make only one object for server class because it has a while(true) loop so it keeps running so i want to be able to interact with the server from all activities and stop it when i am not interacting with the application
i also found a way in which i can make an abstract class which extends activity and extend that derived class to all the other activities in my app.But how to i bind the service to all the other activities in the class so that i can interact with the service from all the other activities?And how would i know that if all activities and notification controller have been stopped and there is no interaction with user?something like this how to know our app has gone to background in android
If there is there any other method please suggest
Please help
thanks in advance
You can create a BroadcastReceiver in your Service Class to interact/start/close your Service from any Activity or even from any App.
Your Activities can broadcast custom Action Strings which can be picked up by any BroadcastReceivers (even ones set up in Services) and thereby invoking their onReceive() methods allow communication.
1) I suggest you don't bind your Service to any Activity and instead use Intent to initiate it in your Activity like this....
//In your Activity
Intent i = new Intent(this, /*MyServiceClassName.class*/);
startService(i);
Or else your Service may still be active until you unbind it.
2) Create a BroadcastReceiver in your Service Class to listen for certain Action Strings broadcasted by your Activities....
//In your Service
private final BroadcastReceiver receiver = new BroadcastReceiver() {
#Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
String action = intent.getAction();
if(action.equals(/*"Action String to stop Service"*/)){
stopSelf();
}else if(action.equals(/*"Action string to interact with Service"*/)){
//Do what you want
};
3) Now set what Action Strings the Broadcast Receiver will listen for and also register it in your Service onCreate() method....
//In your Service onCreate() method
IntentFilter filter = new IntentFilter();
filter.addAction(/*"Action String to stop Service"*/);
filter.addAction(/*"Action String to do something"*/);
registerReceiver(receiver, filter);
4) And also unregister your receiver when Service onDestroy() is invoked as housekeeping....
//Service onDestroy()
#Override
public void onDestroy(){
super.onDestroy();
unregisterReceiver(receiver);
}
5) Finally broadcasting Action Strings from your Activities through Intent....
//From any Activity
Intent intent = new Intent(/*"your custom Action String that should match
up with whats set up with the BroadcastReceiver in Service"*/);
sendBroadcast(intent);
6) So once the broadcast is sent your receiver should pick it up then its onReceive() method will be invoked. Therefore you now have a medium for your Activities and Service to communicate through and also the Service will persist even after you close your app until you stop it explicitly with....
//From any Activity
Intent i = new Intent(this, /*MyServiceClassName.class*/);
stopService(i);
7) Stop service when app is stopped....
//In all your activities
#Override
protected void onDestroy() {
Intent i = new Intent(this, /*MyServiceClassName.class*/);
stopService(i);
super.onDestroy();
}
8) First you'd need to put a killcode intent action String in your Service as demonstrated in points 2 and 3 then put this code in your app's Activity onPause() methods....
#Override
protected void onPause() {
PendingIntent pintent = PendingIntent.getBroadcast( this, 0, new Intent(/*"Action String to stop Service"*/), 0 );
AlarmManager manager = (AlarmManager)(this.getSystemService( Context.ALARM_SERVICE ));
// set alarm to fire 10mins (1000*60*10) from now (SystemClock.elapsedRealtime())
manager.set( AlarmManager.ELAPSED_REALTIME_WAKEUP, SystemClock.elapsedRealtime() + 1000*60*10, pintent );
super.onPause();
}
And this in your app's Activity onResume() methods....
#Override
protected void onResume() {
PendingIntent pintent = PendingIntent.getBroadcast( this, 0, new Intent(/*"Action String to stop Service"*/), 0 );
AlarmManager manager = (AlarmManager)(this.getSystemService( Context.ALARM_SERVICE ));
manager.cancel(pintent);
super.onResume();
}

How can I tell if my activity was started by a broadcast receiver?

I have an alarm clock application I am making. I have one activity where the user sets the time for the alarm. This registers a broadcast receiver class I have made to receive a broadcast at the time of the alarm, using AlarmManager. I then start a new activity in the receivers onReceive(). When this second activity starts, the alarm clock sound is played in onStart(). How can I tell if my activity has been started by a receiver or if the user is just multitasking with the application? I don't want my sound to play when the user silences the alarm, presses the home button, and then renters the app (while still on the sound playing activity).
Just send an extra via the intent you use in your onReceive() method:
Intent intent = new Intent(this, NextActivity.class);
intent.putExtras("playSound", true);
in your "sound playing" activity, you have to play the sound in onCreate():
boolean playSound = getIntent().getBooleanExtra("playSound", false);
This will return false if the intent-extra "playSound" does not exist or is set to false, true if it is set to true.
onCreate() is only called once (when the activity starts), while onStart() gets called everytime a user reenters your activity (i.e. through recent apps). You can see this in the lifecycle:
(diagram source)
Where Paused is called when something draws over you activity (e.g. low battery dialog), Stopped is called if you "exit" your app (e.g. through the home-button).
Start an activity or a service, etc., based on a received broadcast then you need a standalone broadcast receiver and you put that in your android manifest file. If you want your activity itself to respond to broadcasts then you create an instance of a broadcast receiver in your activity and register it there.
public class BRActivity extends Activity {
private BroadcastReceiver broadcastReceiver = new BroadcastReceiver(){
#Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
..................
..................
}
};
public void onResume() {
super.onResume();
IntentFilter filter = new IntentFilter();
filter.addAction(BROADCAST_ACTION);
this.registerReceiver(this.broadcastReceiver , filter);
}
public void onPause() {
super.onPause();
this.unregisterReceiver(this.broadcastReceiver );
}
}
So, this way the receiver is instantiated when the class is created (could also do in onCreate). Then in the onResume/onPause I handle registering and unregistering the receiver. Then in the reciever's onReceive method I do whatever is necessary to make the activity react the way I want to when it receives the broadcast.
You can do as below:
For each alarm user sets, you put an boolean flag in sharedpreference to true. E.g. you have three alarms then in sharedpreference you will have 3 flags.
Now suppose a alarm broadcast is received for alarm1 and activity2 is started.
Now in activity2 first thing you check is whether the flag for alarm1 which you set in sharedpreference is true or false, if true play sound.
When user silences the alarm or press home button then you can mark this flag to false, so next time if user starts activity from background, flag in sharedpreference will be false and sound will not be played.
Same thing you can achieve using sqlite db, by setting flags in sqlite db table instead of sharedpreference.
For the intent used to launch the sound playing activity use the FLAG_ACTIVITY_EXCLUDE_FROM_RECENTS flag. So if the user moves out of the activity, it cannot be resumed.
Intent intent = new Intent(context, SoundActivity.class);
intent.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_EXCLUDE_FROM_RECENTS);
or in manifest
<activity
android:name="SoundActivity"
android:excludeFromRecents="true" >
</activity>
There are couple of solutions:
(1) one approach is to use a Singleton Class which can be shared across activity.
In this approach set a boolean flag of Singleton class in BroadcastReceiver and then check that flag in the activity (which is fired from your BroadcastReceiver) where you play sound. Please reset the flag if it is set. This solution assumes that the Broadcast receiver is part of your Android App package.
(2)
Alternatively, you can also use Intet.putExtra ("Key", Value) method when you start an activity from BroadcastReceiver. You can check this key in the Activity you started from BroadcastReceiver to know who started this activity.
So this will take care of detecting where you come from.
If you are simply trying to set single (one-shot ) alarm then creating another activity for playing the sound is OK. If you set repeat alarm ( alarm plays at a multiple interval), I am not sure how your application will behave.
I prefer to play the sound in the Broadcast receiver itself (registered as remote receiver in manifest) for a specified duration for a given alarm ( like 30 sec of sound or you can ask user to configure it).
So this way you can use the same BroadcastReceiver for playing sound for single-shot & multi-repeat alarm.
I will use the same PendingIntent for setting both Single-shot and multi-repeat alarm.
You can simply set flag or any value in Intent that will determine what's your purpose in that class ..
For Ex: For playing sound set a Boolean value to TRUE in Intent and send same over that class using bundle ..
Else
Set that Boolean value to FALSE if starting alarm class from some other class.
This is the code to find if app is started via broadcast receiver.
public class AlarmReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver
{
#Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent)
{
String AlarmTriggerString = (String)intent.getSerializableExtra("AlarmTrigger");
Intent i = new Intent();
i.setClassName("com.prasath.viki.bot","com.prasath.viki.bot.MainActivity");
intent.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_REORDER_TO_FRONT|Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK);
i.putExtra("FromBroacastReceiver",true);
i.putExtra("AlarmTrigger",AlarmTriggerString);
context.startActivity(i);
}
}
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState)
{
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
boolean FromReceiver = (boolean)getIntent().getSerializableExtra("FromBroacastReceiver");
String AlarmTriggerString = (String) getIntent().getSerializableExtra("AlarmTrigger");
if(AlarmTriggerString != null && FromReceiver != null && FromReceiver == true)
{
// do something
}
}

Starting a Service from a BroadcastReceiver

The parts of this application in question are an IntentService (DatabaseService) and an AppWidgetProvider (LotWidget). In LotWidget, when a button is pressed, a PendingIntent is fired which sends a broadcast to itself, and is received in onReceive(). All of this works fine so far. In onReceive, I read the action from the Intent as well as the various extras, and either start this IntentService, or start the main Activity. Starting the activity works fine, but for some reason I can't understand, the DatabaseService isn't being started. I know code leading up to the DatabaseService intent is being sent by testing with Log.
Here is the onReceive code:
#Override
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
super.onReceive(context, intent);
if(intent.getAction().equals(RETURN_DATA_WIDGET) && initialize(context)){
updateWidget(context);
}
else if(intent.getAction().equals(INTERNAL_INC)){
Log.d("WIDG", "Incrememnt");
Intent incr = new Intent(context, DatabaseService.class);
incr.setAction(INCREMENT);
incr.putExtra("incval", intent.getIntExtra("incval", 999));
context.startService(intent);
}
else if(intent.getAction().equals(INTERNAL_UP)){
Log.d("WIDG", "UPDATE");
Intent upd = new Intent(context, DatabaseService.class);
upd.setAction(UPDATE_COUNT);
context.startService(intent);
}
else if(intent.getAction().equals(OPEN_APP)){
Intent open = new Intent(context, TheLotActivity.class);
open.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK);
context.startActivity(open);
}
}
Using the same intents to start the DatabaseService from the main Activity works fine. My manifest defines the DatabaseService as a Service like so:
<service android:name="com.bsprague.thelot.DatabaseService" >
</service>
I know the Service isn't being started because a Log at the very beginning of onHandleIntent isn't being displayed, though it displays fine when this Intent is sent from the main Activity. Is there something in Android that I'm missing that makes it so you can't start a Service from a BroadcastReceiver?
You are setting an action on the Intent, and your <intent-filter> does not have that action. You might consider replacing the setAction() calls with putExtra() calls instead.
Never mind -- as you pointed out in a comment, since you are specifying the component, all other routing elements (e.g., action) are ignored. Your error from your updated comment suggests that your Intent is picking up the wrong component, LotWidget instead of DatabaseService.

How do you start an Activity with AlarmManager in Android?

I've poured through a dozen tutorials and forum answers about this problem, but still haven't been able to get some working code together. I'll try to keep the question straightforward:
How do you use AlarmManager (in the Android API) to start an Activity at a given time? Any solution to this problem will do.
My latest attempt to achieve this is below.
(Imports omitted. I expect MyActivity to start 3 seconds after the program is opened, which it doesn't. There are no error messages to speak of.)
public class AndroidTest2Activity extends Activity {
/** Called when the activity is first created. */
#Override
public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
Context context = this;//.getApplicationContext();
AlarmManager manager = (AlarmManager) getSystemService(Context.ALARM_SERVICE); // CORRECT
Intent intent = new Intent(context, myReceiver.class); // CORRECT
PendingIntent pending = PendingIntent.getBroadcast( context, 0, intent, 0 ); // CORRECT
manager.set( AlarmManager.RTC, System.currentTimeMillis() + 3000, pending ); // CORRECT
setContentView(R.layout.main);
}
}
public class myReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver {
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
Intent i=new Intent(context, myActivity.class);
i.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK);
context.startActivity(i);
}
}
public class myActivity extends Activity {
#Override
public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
Log.d("", "Elusive success");
setContentView(R.layout.main);
}
}
Any advice would be appreciated.
Please note: I've got myReceiver in the manifest already
In case someone else stumbles upon this - here's some working code (Tested on 2.3.3 emulator):
public final void setAlarm(int seconds) {
// create the pending intent
Intent intent = new Intent(MainActivity.this, AlarmReceiver.class);
// intent.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK);
pendingIntent = PendingIntent.getBroadcast(MainActivity.this, 0,
intent, 0);
// get the alarm manager, and scedule an alarm that calls the receiver
((AlarmManager) getSystemService(ALARM_SERVICE)).set(
AlarmManager.RTC, System.currentTimeMillis() + seconds
* 1000, pendingIntent);
Toast.makeText(MainActivity.this, "Timer set to " + seconds + " seconds.",
Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show();
}
public static class AlarmReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver {
public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
Log.d("-", "Receiver3");
}
}
AndroidManifest.xml:
<receiver android:name="com.example.test.MainActivity$AlarmReceiver" >
</receiver>
Issues with BenLambell's code :
EITHER:
Move the receiver to it's own .java file or
make the inner class static - so it can be accessed from outside
Receiver is not declared correctly in the manifest:
if it's an inner class in MainActivity use:
<receiver android:name="package.name.MainActivity$AlarmReceiver" ></receiver>
if it's in a separate file:
<receiver android:name="package.name.AlarmReceiver" ></receiver>
If your intention is to display a dialog in the receiver's onReceive (like me): that's not allowed - only activities can start dialogs. This can be achieved with a dialog activity.
You can directly call an activity with the AlarmManager:
Intent intent = new Intent(MainActivity.this, TriggeredActivity.class);
PendingIntent pendingIntent = PendingIntent.getActivity(MainActivity.this, 0, intent, PendingIntent.FLAG_ONE_SHOT);
((AlarmManager) getSystemService(ALARM_SERVICE)).set(AlarmManager.RTC_WAKEUP, System.currentTimeMillis() + seconds * 1000, pendingIntent);
How do you use AlarmManager (in the Android API) to start an Activity at a given time?
Supply a PendingIntent to the set() call that identifies the activity to start up. Or, do what you're doing, which should work just fine.
This sample project is a bit elaborate, because it's 19 tutorials deep into one of my books, but if you look at classes like EditPreferences, OnBootReceiver, and OnAlarmReceiver, you will see the same basic recipe that you're using above. In this case, I could have just used a getActivity() PendingIntent, but the tutorial after this one gives the user a choice of launching an activity or displaying a Notification, so a BroadcastReceiver makes more sense.
Look for warnings in addition to errors in LogCat. Most likely, your receiver or activity is not in your manifest.
Note that popping up an activity out of the middle of nowhere is generally not a good idea. Quoting myself from the book in question:
Displaying the lunchtime alarm via a full-screen activity certainly works,
and if the user is looking at the screen, it will get their attention. However,
it is also rather disruptive if they happen to be using the phone right that
instant. For example, if they are typing a text message while driving, your
alarm activity popping up out of nowhere might distract them enough to
cause an accident. So, in the interest of public safety, we should give the user an option to
have a more subtle way to remind them to have lunch.
add this in your android mainifest file and it will hopefully work
<activity android:name=".MyReceiver" />
<receiver android:name=".MyReceiver"> </receiver>
In my experience you can achieve this without broadcast receiver, just use PendingIntent.getActivity() instead of getbroadcast()
private void setReminder(){
AlarmManager alarmManager = (AlarmManager) getSystemService(Context.ALARM_SERVICE);
Calendar startTime = Calendar.getInstance();
startTime.add(Calendar.MINUTE, 1);
Intent intent = new Intent(ReminderActivity.this, ReminderActivity.class);
intent.setFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK);
PendingIntent pendingIntent = PendingIntent.getActivity(ReminderActivity.this, 1, intent, PendingIntent.FLAG_UPDATE_CURRENT);
alarmManager.set(AlarmManager.RTC, startTime.getTimeInMillis(), pendingIntent);
}
I've tested this code on android O but I'm not sure about other android versions please inform me if this doesn't work on any other android version.
Main Problem : if you close completely you're app and expect to start you're activity after 3 seconds, you wrong. because when you close you're app , you're app cant receive broadcast, for solve this problem use services instead of broadcasts.
Point: when you're service would ran ,you cant start your activity if your app wouldn't in foreground.
Solution: I think when your service started you can again set Alarmmanager to start your activity with PendingIntent for just now.
Remember :
When you create your intent for pass it to pendingIntent add the FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK to it.
For this PendingIntent use PendingIntent.getActivity() method and for the first PendingIntent use PendingIntent.getService() method.
I hope this help you.
I had this problem too long ago to know which answer is correct, but thank you to everyone for their responses. I'm self-answering so the question isn't still open.
According to Java convention class name begin with Capital letter.So change your
"myReceiver" to "MyReceiver" and "myActivity" to "MyActivity".
Then add your receiver in the manifest file like the below.
<application
------------
<receiver android:name="MyReceiver"></receiver>
---------------------
</application>
you are not sending any broadcast for the receiver to receiver and further more it lokks like u want a splash screen or something like that for that purpose u can start a new thread wait for some sec then start ur activity in that and for that time period u can do what ever u want on the UI thread ...

Categories

Resources