I am making an app which is pretty much like this:
Register a customer;
Add different types of math calculations to this customer;
Now this customer has a list full of specific calculations.
Everything is working pretty good so far. But the thing is, how could I make a sqlite function in my db class that would list ONLY the calcs of a specific customer? e.g. when I select one specific customer, I don't want to see the calcs of other customers, only of this specific one.
I have 2 tables:
Customer (_id, name, email)
Calculations (_id, customer_id, date, value1, value2, result)
is there anyway I could like add a new column to Customer which would be like "calcs_made" and then it would call ALL "Calculations" table's columns?
I thought of searching the "customer_id" that the user is looking for and showing only the lines with that matching information, but it doesn't sound like a good practice.
The "Calculations" table is the first and only one so far, but there will be many others with different types of calcs as I update the app, therefore it would have to be really flexible.
Try using a sql selection to get what you need. It may look like this
select * from Calculations where customer_id=id;
The id is the specific customer id you choose.
Related
I have in my app a database with two tables : country and rights. Long story short, the db tells me whether a right (there is 10 rights in total) is legal or not in a specific country.
Now, I want the user to be able to search in my db by criterias. I have a layout with checkbox. If the user check a box, it mean he want to see every country in where the right is legal. For exemple, if he check the box "criteria1" and "criteria6", the user want the list of every country where criteria1 and criteria6 are legal, but we don't care wether the other rights are legal or not.
I asigned values to the checkboxs (1 if legal, 0 if illegal, just like in my db) and passes all of them to the activity who display the result of the search.
My problem is, I can't figure out how to search in my database. I need to only get the country where where the selected criters are equal to 1, but I don't know how to formulate my sql request (since I never know which criterias are going to be checked or not). My request need to only be about the criterias who has the value 1.
I had the idea of sending all my values to a function (witch returns a cursor) where I excecute a select statement if the value is equal to one, but I don't know how I could join all the result of my selects in a cursor. I also thought about using "CASE WHEN..." but it doesn't seem to work.
Does anyone have a clue on how I could deal with my search ?
If you need precisions on my problem, please ask.
This guy here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGRV2qY9ZiU&list=PL200JxfhYIgCrrpH4rCz-uNfBTb5sng1e) has the right idea.
The clip may be a bit slow but it does exactly what you want.
He creates a custom string based on if checkbox is checked and removes it from the string if unchecked.
To get what you want, you need to do a couple of things.
First, create a table with countries as rows, and rights as columns. Add 1 for right is present in country and 0 if not. Get this into an sqlite database (eg import via csv in DB browser for SQLite, free software; don't forget to create the android_metadata table in the sqlite database - search online for this). Import the database in the app (there is plenty of documentation for this online).
Second, change the text inputed in the if/else checkbox part of the script (he writes fruit names, you write for ex. "right1 = 1", or the exact query the checkbox should do on the column right1).
You also need to pay attention to the selection.add and selection.remove (know that selection is an array list which will store all your criteria for search by column).
Third, you need to change the content of his finalSelection (View view).
Delete all he has written and just create two strings:
String final1 = android.text.TextUtils.join(" or ", selection);
String final2 = "select country from table where " + final1;
The string final2 is your key for a cursor with a rawQuery. Just create a cursor in the database and pass the key to it. This can be done easily.
PS the method android.text.TextUtils.join() is amazing :)
You can place the operator of choice there.
If you need more than one operator (and, or etc), you can create different ArrayLists which you fill in the if/else checkbox is filled and join later in the finalSelection.
Oh, btw, if you have too many checkboxes, you will get a warning in the XML file (layout has more than 80 views is bad for performance).
In order to get around that, you need to get to know grid views a bit better. After reading a few tutorials on the basic use of GridViews, a good start for checkboxes inside them is here.
It may seem like a lot, but you need to learn to use holders to get information out of the getView of the modified BaseAdapter.
If you want to understand it better, follow the arrPath.
It is a String[] filled with all the paths of images found inside the cursor (string values from the dataColumnIndex, which contains paths of images).
Within the onClick() listener of the Button, from the arrPath he extracts only the rows of the cursor that were selected by checkbox click (thumbnailsselection[i] is a boolean - with a value TRUE/FALSE for each row in the cursor).
The selected paths are placed in the selectImages String, separated by OR.
I put my data in 3 tables(Links, Images and PDF)
each table has columns(university, faculty, grade, and description,...)
I want to retrieve description column in the 3 tables.
where university, faculty, and grade equal to certain values.
and sort them with creation date.
how can I perform that query in parse?
I'm not familiar with Android, but I'm pretty sure Parse does not support "Join" in the way a SQL database does. You could nest the queries, performing the next one in the previous one's completion block.
However, if you regularly want to get data from those 3 tables, I'd suggest you make it 1 table instead, with a column "Content" instead of Link/Img/PDF. Images and PDFs would probably be stored as PFFiles anyway, and you can put link as either its own string column or putting it in a file. You could also add a column "type" if you want to be able to query a specific type, or just keep track of which columns contains which data.
Then you could query the "Content" class, on the keys you want.
I think this link might help you
https://parse.com/docs/js/guide#relations and it is quite simple and nicely explained . You can't do it directly in the database, though.
i am really stuck at this point of my android app development.
What i need is a way to save a changing amount of int or string-values (in a sql database). Yet im not even sure if this is the right approach, but let me explain:
In the app i am currently working on, you are able to create certain "events". Users should be able to apply for such events.
I have an external database with 2 tables:
first one for users - every user has a unique ID
second one for events - every event has a unique ID
I need each event to know what users applied for it. And i need each user to know what events they applied for.
I was thinking to save the Event-IDs in the User-Table and vice versa.
I just dont know how to do that since the amount of applicants/ID's can change. Is there a way to save Arrays in the database which can easily be edited (e.g. +/- one ID) and read?
Is this even the right way? I am very happy for any advise!
Thanks in advance!
What you seem to want is a many-to-many relationship. A user can be part of many events, and an event can have many users. That requires an additional table though:
Table: User Columns: UserId, Name, ...
Table: Event Columns: EventId, Name, ...
Table: UserEvents Columns: UserId, EventId, ...
In the new table, UserEvents, you would store the UserId's and EventId's like this:
UserEvents
UserId EventId
1 1
2 1
1 2
This means that if you selected UserId 1, the query would return EventId 1 & 2. If you selected EventId 1 the query would return that UserId 1 & 2 would be attending.
This is the standard and recommended way to deal with many-to-many. It's very flexible and can easily be scaled.
You could either use a Compound key (Composite Key) for this table, or create a column specifically as a Primary Key. The code below can be used, and manipulated, to create both your table and Compound/Composite key (I'm guessing on data types).
CREATE TABLE UserEvents
(
[UserId] INT NOT NULL,
[EventId] INT NOT NULL
CONSTRAINT PK_UserEvents PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED ([UserId], [EventId])
)
I would add a third table (e.g. UserEvents) to store which events a user has applied for, along with other relevant attributes (e.g. ApplicationTime, ApplicationStatus). This association would have a foreign key relationship back to the related tables and resolve the many-to-many relationship between users and events.
What you have there is called a "many-to-many" relationship between to tables which can only be resolved by the introduction of a third table between your two tables that stores the associations.
This table would contain the User-ID and the Event-ID as foreign keys (and maybe additional information).
I have in my db 2 table with a many to many relationship.
TAB_ARTICLES: {_ID, TITLE, BODY, DATE}
TAB_TAG: {_ID, NAME, COLOR, DATE}
TAB_ART_TAG: {_ID, ARTICLE_ID, TAG_ID}
I need to populate a ListView, one row for article and in every row I need to have a TextView for every label linked to that article. Like the following image
I think 2 solutions.
a. I use a CursorAdapter with a cursor made only on TAB_ARTICLE and than in every row I do a query to join the other 2 tables looking for all tags related at this article. This solution require a lot of db accesses.
b. I realize a temporary table
TABLE_TEMP: {ARTICLE_TITLE, ARTICLE_BODY, ARTICLE_DATE, TAG1_NAME, TAG1_COLOR, TAG2_NAME, TAG2_COLOR, ...}
and I use a query on this table as cursor for custom adapter. This solution use more space and have a limitation on possible displayed tags due to table columns.
Are there other ways?
Well, actually, it's a multicriterion thing: time, space, updates, search, etc. So there's no single recipe. It's very probable, however, that multiple queries will bog down scrolling. Worse, on some devices only. A temporary table may or may not be OK depending on the overall size of your data. And you may want to keep this redundant table in sync with the main one, making simultaneous updates to both.
One of the simplest trade-offs could be adding a redundant TEXT/CLOB column with the tag data (XML, JSON, other markup/separated format) to TAB_ARTICLES and keeping it in sync with your detail data. By the way, you will really need the M:M schema only if your queries substantiate that. Otherwise, the single table would suffice.
Again, I'd list and evaluate all the criteria first and decide what dimensions really need to be scalable and simplify the rest.
this is more of a question of theory than anything else. I am writing an android app that uses a pre-packaged database. The purpose of the app is solely to search through this database and return values. Ill provide some abstract examples to illustrate my implementation and quandary. The user can search by: "Thing Name," and what I want returned to the user is values a, b, and c. I initially designed the database to have it all contained on a single sheet, and have column 1 be key_index, column 2 be name, column 3 be a, etc etc. When the user searches, the cursor will return the key_index, and then use that to pull values a b and c.
However, in my database "Thing alpha" can have a value a = 4 or a = 6. I do not want to repeat data in the database, i.e. have multiple rows with the same thing alpha, only separate "a" values. So what is the best way to organize the data given this situation? Do I keep all the "Thing Names" in a single sheet, and all the data separately. This is really a question of proper database design, which is definitely something foreign to me. Thanks for your help!
There's a thing called database normalization http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization. You usually want to avoid redundancy and dependency in the DB entities using a corresponding design with surrogate keys and foreign keys and so on. Your "thing aplpha" looks like you want to have a many-to-many table like e.g. one or many songs belong/s to the same or different genres. You may want to create dictionary tables to hold your id,name pairs and have foreign keys referencing these tables. In your case it will be mostly a read-only DB so you might want to consider creating indexes with high FILLFACTOR percentage don't think sqlite allows it to do though. There're many ways to design the database. Everything depends on the purpose of DB. You can start with a design of your hardware like raids/file systems/db block sizes to match the F-System's block sizes in order to keep the I/O optimal and where to put your tablespaces/filegroups/indexes to balance the i/o load. The whole DB design theory/task is really a deep subject which is not to be underestimated nor is a matter of few sentences in the answer of stackoverflow. :)
without understanding your data better here is my guess at what you are looking for.
table: product
- _id
- name
table: attribute
- product_id
- a