Develop Reference

How to avoid loop in Flash files in android

After mentioning God, I must tell u a little story about my problem.
I need to make a simple (teaching) mobile game for the my son so I've tried Unity and seen it complicated and without a good library reference (unlike Arduino), tried Flash professional (why old ver? it was enough) and seen complicated too. Finally I backed to my young years and tried SWiSH MAX 4 ( I know it's weak but was enough for my purpose). The results (SWF 10) were good in PC.
When I tried it in the my phone, some issues tried to crush me!!!!
1-there is just one real and strong flash player available (adobe player, which is a web plugin originally).
2-There is no setting to avoid loop in end of Flash files, in android flash player.
3-The android flash player doesn't do this simple script "stop();".
these issues avoids to run my Flash game correctly in Android. Could u help me?

Switch to AIR, which is just the Flash runtime with access to more cool stuff.
It can then be built as a normal android application. And since it's the real runtime, it will have no issues with basic actionscript.

LibGDX / Android: Playing sound effects makes the game stutter - Sound.play() takes 4 ms on a high-end device

Whenever I play a sound effect in my LibGDX game on an Android device, the game stutters. I have tried the game on three Samsung devices:
On Galaxy S7 Edge (2016, Android 8) and Galaxy Tab S 10.5 (2014, Android 6.0.1) the game is still playable, but not running smoothly whenever there are multiple sound effects being played (looping a sound effects are not a problem).
However on Galaxy S20 Ultra (2020, Android 10) the game is unplayable: Every call to Sound.play() takes 2...4 ms and causes "AUDIO_OUTPUT_FLAG_FAST denied by server; frameCount 0 -> 54276" error. This error does not appear with the other devices, but Sound.play() still takes 1...2 ms which of course is a considerable portion of a 16 ms frame.
So what I think is pretty clear is that the problem is in the Sound.play() method, not for example the number of concurrent sounds playing (which I have limited to 8 but have tried 4 as well), or that the Android device would be too slow to process the sounds (in which case a 6 year old GT should not outperform this year's high-end S20), or that the sound effect files would be too large (the one I'm using for testing was originally a 3.8 kB WAV). And yes, I am using AssetManager to load the sounds in advance.
I have now spent two long days doing research, found about 15-20 topics on different forums about what I believe is the same or related issue, and tried out all the suggested fixes without any success:
Changing audio format from WAV to OGG
Different sample rates: 44.1k, 48k, 96k on both formats (with 96k, there is no stutter and no error, but no audible sound either)
Adding silence of 1 or 2 seconds to the end of the sound effect (which itself is 41 ms long), with all the combinations of the above formats and sample rates.
Some say that looping a silent sound clip "in background" has solved the problem, but I anyway have another sound (car engine) looping constantly in the game and that seems to have no effect.
I have also seen suggestions to use Music class instead of Sound, but it's not suitable for collision sound effects with Box2D because pitch cannot be adjusted.
The only workaround that I found but have not tried yet is playing the sounds on a different thread. I have not tried it because I'm not familiar with multithreading and have not been able to find a comprehensive enough guide on how to do it (properly) in LibGDX. I also assume that this approach would be problematic for any sounds which may have to be paused, stopped or adjusted during playback by some actor from the main thread. Furthermore, according to https://github.com/libgdx/libgdx/wiki/Threading, "You should never perform multi-threaded operations on anything that is graphics or audio related".
Therefore, before I even start familiarizing my self on that topic (multithreading), I just wanted to ask once more: Is there really no other solution? It just doesn't feel right that a high-end Android device from this year cannot start the playback of a small WAV sound any faster than in 4 ms. There are lot of games in Play store with working sound effects and smooth gameplay, are they all really using multithreading?

I don't have a complete answer, but I'll share some ideas here.
My own anecdotal experience is that sound operations such as starting sound playback tend to be too time-consuming for a typical render thread on Android. I've tried a few different approaches (AudioTrack, SoundPool, etc.), and as best I can remember have gotten similar results in each case.
Putting the audio on a different thread seems like the most practical solution. I understand the hesitance if you're not familiar with multithreading, and I think you're right to be cautious, especially when using a third-party library. However, for simple tasks, Android supplies some fairly straightforward tools, like HandlerThread and Handler, that could perhaps be leveraged.
As for the LibGDX documentation saying not to perform multi-threaded operations on anything audio related, it's not clear to me whether that means don't do anything audio-related on a thread other than the render thread, or if it just means to keep all audio on a single thread, but that that thread doesn't have to be the render thread. If it's the latter, then putting audio on a separate thread might be an option.
I took a quick look at the LibGDX source code. I'd have to spend more time to better understand what's going on, but I see use of both AudioTrack and SoundPool, and I'm pretty sure I've run into this issue with both.
But, I also see some signs of asynchronous sound functionality. There are some classes with 'asynchronous' in the name that use a dedicated handler thread. I don't know if this functionality is documented (I couldn't find the documentation immediately) or otherwise supported, but it does seem to be present in the source code. The comments say there are some limitations, but it's not immediately clear to me what they are.
As for communication between the render thread and an audio thread, it would add some complexity, but you should be able to do it fairly straightforwardly using handlers or other similar tools. In fact, that's what the LibGDX code I looked at does - it creates a HandlerThread and uses a Handler (naturally) to post to it. It can still be difficult, especially when using a third-party library where you don't control where all audio operations occur. For example, LibGDX may always set up the audio objects on a specific thread (e.g. the render thread), which means if you use another thread, you'll be using the objects on a thread other than that on which they were created. I doubt that would be an issue, but it depends on the technology. (For example, the documentation for ExoPlayer says that instances should only be used from a single thread.)
In my own code I'm doing all audio myself, so I control it and can put everything on the same thread. That might be difficult or impossible with LibGDX, but the presence of the 'asynchronous' audio classes may be a hint that playing audio on a different thread is safe to do. (And maybe you can make use of those classes, assuming they're a supported part of the API.)

In case someone else has this issue. In your AndroidLauncher, override this.
#Override
public AndroidAudio createAudio(Context context, AndroidApplicationConfiguration config) {
return new AsynchronousAndroidAudio(context, config);
}
You MUST make sure you don't have any SoundId actions (eg. some_sound.Stop(sound_id)). As those will not work with AsynchronousAndroidAudio and will crash the game. So check that before you publish your game.

AVC HW encoder with MediaCodec Surface reliability?

I'm working on a Android app that uses MediaCodec to encode H.264 video using the Surface method. I am targeting Android 5.0 and I've followed all the examples and samples from bigflake.com (I started working on this project two years ago, so I kind of went through all the gotchas and other issues).
All is working nice and well on Nexus 6 (which uses the Qualcomm hardware encoder for doing this), and I'm able to record flawlessly in real-time 1440p video with AAC audio, in a multitude of outputs (from MP4 local files, upto http streaming).
But when I try to use the app on a Sony Android TV (running Android 5.1) which uses a Mediatek chipset, all hell breaks loose even from the encoding level. To be more specific:
It's basically impossible to make the hardware encoder work properly (that is, "OMX.MTK.VIDEO.ENCODER.AVC"). With the most basic setup (which succeeds at MediaCodec's level), I will almsot never get output buffers out of it, only weird, spammy, logcat error messages stating that the driver has encountered errors each time a frame should be encoded, like this:
01-20 05:04:30.575 1096-10598/? E/venc_omx_lib: VENC_DrvInit failed(-1)!
01-20 05:04:30.575 1096-10598/? E/MtkOmxVenc: [ERROR] cannot set param
01-20 05:04:30.575 1096-10598/? E/MtkOmxVenc: [ERROR] EncSettingH264Enc fail
Sometimes, trying to configure it to encode at a 360 by 640 pixels resolution will succeed in making the encoder actually encode stuff, but the first problem I'll notice is that it will only create one keyframe, that is, the first video frame. After that, no more keyframes are ever, ever created, only P-frames. Ofcourse, the i-frame-interval was set to a decent value and is working with no issues on other devices. Needless to say, this makes it impossible to create seekable MP4 files, or any kind of streamable solution on top.
Most of the times, after releasing the encoder, logcat will start spamming endlessly with "Waiting for input frame to be released..." which basically requires a reboot of the device, since nothing will work from that point on anyway.
In the case where it doesn;t go havoc after a simple release(), no problem - the hardware encoder is making sure that it cannot be created a second time, and it falls back to the generic SOFTWARE avc google encoder. hich ofcourse is basically a mockup encoder which does little to nothing than spit out an error when trying to make it encode anything larger than 160p videos...
So, my question is: is there any hope of making this MediaCodec API actually work on such a device? My understanding was that there are some CTS tests performed by Google/manufacturers (in this case, Sony) that would allow a developer to actually think that an API is supported on a device which prouds itself as running Android 5.1. Am I missing something obvious here? Did anyone actually ever tried doing this (a simple MediaCodec video encoding test) and succeeded? It's really frustrating!
PS: it's worth mentioning that not even Sony provides yet a recording capability for this TV set, which many people are complaining anyway. So, my guess is that this sounds more like a Mediatek problem, but still, what exactly are the Android's CTS for in this case anyway?

Android SoundPool Class acts weird in my application

I have a song playing continuously in background using an Android MediaPlayer, by continuously I mean it loops forever.
I also have 25-30 short sounds that I play at discrete duration's using SoundPool Class, and they also have to play again and again with the main song.
The sounds are 0.5 second duration each and some of them are 0.7Mb in size, while the average size of a song would be approximately 0.4Mb.
I am able to do this entire thing smoothly on the device I made this app on, then I came to know that SoundPool has problems playing on Dual Core Phones. So I withdrew support for them.
Lately I tested the app on an older device running 2.3.3 and the new problem is that the sounds seem to play properly for first 4-5 cycles, i.e. till the main song plays 4-5 times, then at 6th time, there is a noticeable delay in the playing of sounds, I logged the values of SoundPool.play() and found out that delay is ~(1-2 sec), and this issue is only on lower end phones, why is this happening, I suppose that the problem is caused by the SoundPool class and is not at all an hardware issue since the device I tested it on had ample RAM i.e. 500Mb and a decent 600Mhz processor.
I really need to fix this as I expect my app to run on most devices, except dual core phone for time being.
Also I cannot use MediaPlayer to play my sounds as I do not want to increase CPU overhead and make my app lag more and also I do not know how many sounds I want to play before hand.
Any clue on how to fix this issue and reduce the lag, is most welcome.

Audio / Video playback is usually problematic since there are a lot of hardware / lowlevel software factors involved (there might be specialized decoding hardware on separate chips and/or embedded into the cpu and all of that in combination with software decoders, switching between bluetooth, headphonejack and the 2 speakers you have, a huge software stack from kernel to android system, etc). It is probably the most fragile subsystem of Android devices. A lot of devices have smaller quirks in that area and it isn't directly Mhz / RAM / Dualcore related. And unfortunately you have to live with some of them :(
Your best bet is to experiment with different ways to play / compress your audio. Things like restarting the playback after 5 cycles etc

Strange "stutter" in box2D on different android devices

I'm developing an engine and a game at the same time in C++ and I'm using box2D for the physics back end. I'm testing on different android devices and on 2 out of 3 devices, the game runs fine and so do the physics. However, on my galaxy tab 10.1 I'm sporadically getting a sort of "stutter". Here is a youtube video demonstrating:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSbd8vX9FC0
The first device the game is running on is an Xperia Play... the second device is a Galaxy Tab 10.1. Needless to say the Galaxy tab has much better hardware than the Xperia Play, yet Box2D is lagging at random intervals for random lengths of time. The code for both machines is exactly the same. Also, the rest of the engine/game is not actually lagging. The entire time, it's running at solid 60 fps. So this "stuttering" seems to be some kind of delay or glitch in actually reading values from box2D.
The sprites you see moving check to see if they have an attached physical body at render time and set their positional values based on the world position of the physical body. So it seems to be in this specific process that box2D is seemingly out of sync with the rest of the application. Quite odd. I realize it's a long shot but I figured I'd post it here anyway to see if anyone had ideas... since I'm totally stumped. Thanks for any input in advance!
Oh, P.S. I am using a fixed time step since that seems to be the most commonly suggested solution for things like this. I moved to a fixed time step while developing this on my desktop, I ran into a similar issue just more severe and the fixed step was the solution. Also like I said the game is running steady at 60 fps, which is controlled by a low latency timer so I doubt simple lag is the issue. Thanks again!

As I mentioned in the comments here, this came down to being a timer resolution issue. I was using a timer class which was supposed to access the highest resolution system timer, cross platform. Everything worked great, except when it came to Android, some versions worked and some versions it did not. The galaxy tab 10.1 was one such case.
I ended up re-writing my getSystemTime() method to use a new addition to C++11 called std::chrono::high_resolution_clock. This also worked great (everywhere but Android)... except it has yet to be implemented in any NDK for android. It is supposed to be implemented in version 5 of the crystax NDK R7, which at the time of this post is 80% complete.
I did some research into various methods of accessing the system time or something by which I could base a reliable timer on the NDK side, but what it comes down to is that these various methods are not supported on all platforms. I've went through the painful process of writing my own engine from scratch simply so that I could support every version of android, so betting on methods that are inconsistently implemented is nonsensical.
The only sensible solution for anyone facing this problem, in my opinion, is to simply abandon the idea of implementing such code on the NDK side. I'm going to do this on the Java end instead, since thus far in all my tests this has been sufficiently reliable across all devices that I've tested on. More on that here:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/189515/Androng-a-Pong-clone-for-Android#Gettinghigh-resolutiontimingfromAndroid7
Update
I have now implemented my proposed solution, to do timing on the java side and it has worked. I also discovered that handling any relatively large number, regardless of data type (a number such as the nano seconds from calling the monotonic clock) in the NDK side also results in serious lagging on some versions of android. As such I've optimized this as much as possible by passing around a pointer to the system time, to ensure we're not passing-by-copy.
One last thing too, my statement that calling the monotonic clock from the NDK side is unreliable is however, it would seem, false. From the Android docks on System.nanoTime(),
...and System.nanoTime(). This clock is guaranteed to be monotonic,
and is the recommended basis for the general purpose interval timing
of user interface events, performance measurements, and anything else
that does not need to measure elapsed time during device sleep.
So it would seem, if this can be trusted, that calling the clock is reliable, but as mentioned there are other issues that then arise, like handling allocating and dumping the massive number that results which alone nearly cut my framerate in half on the Galaxy Tab 10.1 with Android 3.2. Ultimate conclusion: supporting all android devices equally is either damn near or flat out impossible and using native code seems to make it worse.

I am very new to game development, and you seem a lot more experienced and it may be silly to ask, but are you using delta time to update your world? Altough you say you have a constant frame rate of 60 fps, maybe your frame counter calculates something wrong, and you should use delta time to skip some frames when the FPS is low, or your world seem to "stay behind". I am pretty sure that you are familiar with this, but I think a good example is here : DeltaTimeExample altough it is a C implementation. If you need I can paste some code from my Android Projects of how I use delta time, that I've developed following this book : Beginning Android Games.